Redeployment to critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological study.

BACKGROUND: The redeployment of staff which involves moving staff from one clinical setting to another is a key feature of health care management. Rising demand associated with chronic disease and seasonal variation makes redeployment increasingly commonplace. During the COVID-19 pandemic preparation for the influx of patients included sourcing equipment and resources and the redeployment of staff to respiratory wards and critical care. AIM: The aim of this study was to explore the lived experience of redeployment to critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of those individuals who were moved to help and critical care core staff. STUDY DESIGN: A transcendental phenomenological study involving semi-structured interviews with staff redeployed and critical care core staff was conducted. Data were collected from staff in one critical care department of a large NHS Trust in England between the second and third pandemic wave (April-June 2021). RESULTS: Analysis of the data led to the identification of seven meaning units: intention, apprehension, expectations, familiarity, preparation, support, and own work. Intention related to the decisions made by managers regarding whom to redeploy and the reasons why people were chosen. Apprehension and expectations were closely linked and related to critical care skills and knowledge as well as anxiety about infection risk. Familiarity was a key element of people feeling comfortable and the confidence core staff had in colleagues who had come to help. Support and preparation helped but staff were anxious about their own work and concerned about the open-ended nature of redeployment. CONCLUSION: Familiarity and recency of critical care experience played a significant role in how useful redeployed staff were. Redeployed staff were concerned about assumptions being made and expectations of themselves as well as detachment from their usual support network. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Continued shortages of registered nurses globally combined with the need to create additional critical care capacity during emergencies such as infection outbreaks means that redeployment of staff will continue for some time. Identifying the impact of redeployment on staff will enable services to better prepare and support registered nurses who are redeployed to critical care.

Evaluation of a structured preceptorship programme.

Preceptorship is a period in which newly qualified staff nurses receive support from an experienced nurse to smooth their transition into the service. District nurses (DNs) from the authors' trust informally expressed the need for a better transition between the completion of district nursing education and entry into the workforce. Hence, a structured preceptorship programme was developed and delivered. This article describes this service initiative and its evaluation by preceptors (n=14) and preceptees (newly qualified DNs; n=13). Both groups valued having a structured preceptorship programme. Preceptees agreed that having a named preceptor was very important, and preceptors felt that the role which they played was rewarding. Both groups felt that the role of the DN was a specialist role and that the preceptorship programme helped to support newly qualified staff make the transition into qualified DNs, clinical team leaders and, ultimately, caseload holders. A large-scale study of DN practice is required to develop a national consensus on the structure and content of preceptorship programmes for district nursing.

The use of early warning scores to recognise and respond to patient deterioration in district nursing.

This discussion article focuses on the literature surrounding early warning scoring systems and their use in primary care, specifically within district nursing. Patient deterioration is a global concern, associated with high mortality rates and avoidable deaths. Early recognition and response by nursing and other health care staff has been attributed to early warning scoring systems (EWSS) and tools. However, the use of equivalent tools in the community appears to be lacking. This review concludes that there is no consensus over the use of EWSS in district nursing and culture of practice is varied, rather than standardised.

The impact of rapid cycle simulation deliberate practice on nursing student's resuscitation self-efficacy: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Nursing students often report anxiety about the performance of resuscitation in a placement context. Rapid cycle deliberate practice which involves re-running the scenario after de-brief allowing for the correction of errors and improved practice has been widely used to develop skills in resuscitation. Few studies have examined the use of rapid cycle deliberate practice to improve resuscitation confidence and self-efficacy. OBJECTIVE: to assess if rapid cycle deliberate practice leads to improvements in resuscitation self-efficacy in pre-registration nursing students. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental pre and post-test design measuring self-efficacy using the Basic Resuscitation Skills - Self Efficacy Scale. SETTING: University, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Students were invited to participate (n = 120) and 106 consented to take part in the study. Participants were in pre-determined practical groups with 56 in the experimental group and 50 in the control group. METHODS: A pre and post-test of nursing students' self-efficacy during a resuscitation simulation scenario. The scenario will relate to a patient admitted to the emergency room with chest pain who then goes into cardiac arrest. The control group undertake the simulation exercise and then received a de-brief whereas the experimental group participated in a rerun of the scenario following the de-brief (deliberate practice). Both groups completed the Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-efficacy scale pre and post the session. Data were analysed using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: Both groups showed improved self-efficacy as a result of the simulation session. The difference in the post-test mean scores between the control and the experimental group was marginal and not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: rapid cycle deliberate practice simulation does not lead to improved resuscitation self-efficacy amongst pre-registration nursing students when compared with a single session. ABSTRACT: Nursing students are often anxious about performing resuscitation in practice. Can rapid cycle deliberate practice improve resuscitation self-efficacy? Pre and post-test study (n=106) showed improved self-efficacy with no statistical difference between standard simulation and deliberate practice.

Identifying Sources of Moral Distress Amongst Critical Care Staff During the Covid-19 Pandemic Using a Naturalistic Inquiry.

Introduction: Moral distress can have a significant impact on the mental health and well-being of practitioners. Causes of moral distress in critical care have been identified as futile treatment, conflict between family members and staff, lack of resources, and dysfunctional teams. Objectives: This study explores the sources of moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and the meaning that staff attached to these events. The study aims to examine whether the sources of moral distress are similar, or different, to those that commonly occur in critical care departments. Methods: Naturalistic inquiry using semi-structured individual interviews with 17 participants drawn from nursing (n = 12), medicine (n = 3), and the allied health professions (n = 2). The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: The results suggested that while there were some similar sources of moral distress including caring for dying patients and not being able to provide the usual standard of care, the nature of the disease trajectory and frequency of death had a significant impact. In addition, the researchers found that providing care which was counter-intuitive, concerns about the risks to the staff and their families and the additional burdens associated with leading teams in times of uncertainty were identified as sources of moral distress. Conclusion: This study explored the potential sources of moral distress during the pandemic and the meaning that practitioners attached to their experiences. There were some similarities with the sources of moral distress in critical care which occur outside of a pandemic. However, the frequency and intensity of the experiences are likely to be different during a pandemic, with staff describing high volumes of deaths without family members present. In addition, new sources of moral distress related to uncertainty, counter-intuitive care and concerns about personal and family risk of infection were identified.

The impact of unsuccessful resuscitation and manikin death during simulation on nursing student's resuscitation self-efficacy: A quasi-experimental study.

BACKGROUND: There has been considerable debate about whether it is appropriate to let the manikin die during simulation teaching. Simulations are used in high-risk industries to recreate rare and potentially catastrophic events. In healthcare, there has been a reluctance to allow scenarios to progress to a catastrophe because of the potential impact on the individual if they were to then encounter the situation in real life. In healthcare, witnessed resuscitation has an overall success rate of around 23.9 %, therefore making every simulation situation successful results in an altered perception of reality. OBJECTIVE: The researchers aimed to examine whether the manikin's death during a simulation adversely affects the resuscitation self-efficacy of nursing students. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental design. SETTING: Univesity of Sunderland, United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Students were invited to participate (n = 120) and 106 consented to take part in the study. METHODS: A pre-and post-test of the nursing student's self-efficacy during a resuscitation scenario. The scenario related to a patient admitted to the emergency room with chest pain who then went into cardiac arrest. The experimental group's resuscitation was unsuccessful, and the control group's resuscitation was successful. Self-efficacy was measured using the validated Basic Resuscitation Skills Self-efficacy scale (BRS-SES). The data were analysed using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: Overall, both groups showed improved self-efficacy as a result of the simulation session and the death of the manikin in the experimental group did not result in a reduced level of self-efficacy related to resuscitation. CONCLUSION: The death of the manikin during the simulation involving resuscitation had no impact on student resuscitation self-efficacy.