The effect of sun exposure in determining nevus density in UK adolescent twins.

We report a study of 221 teenage twin pairs to examine the genetic and environmental determinants of nevi representing the most potent phenotypic risk factor for melanoma. Our published heritability analysis estimated that nevi are mainly genetically determined. In this paper we examine the role of sun exposure. We report a correlation between nevus density and sun exposure, particularly that acquired in hotter countries than in the UK (mean nevus density 41 per m2 in those in the highest quartile of exposure vs 24 per m2 in those with no exposure, p<0.0001). We were not able to demonstrate a protective effect for either sun protection cream or shirt wearing. By including phenotypic variables and reported sun exposure into the heritability analysis, we conclude that 66% of the total variance of nevus count is attributable to genetic effects: 7% associated to eye color, 6% to hair color, and 1% to reported skin type, which leaves 52% as to yet unidentified genetic factors. Of the 25% of variation attributable to environmental influences, one-third is estimated to be because of sun exposure on hot holidays.

No Evidence for BRAF as a melanoma/nevus susceptibility gene.

Somatic mutations of BRAF have been identified in both melanoma tumors and benign nevi. Germ line mutations in BRAF have not been identified as causal in families predisposed to melanoma. However, a recent study suggested that a BRAF haplotype was associated with risk of sporadic melanoma in men. Polymorphisms or other variants in the BRAF gene may therefore act as candidate low-penetrance genes for nevus/melanoma susceptibility. We hypothesized that promoter variants would be the most likely candidates for determinants of risk. Using denaturing high-pressure liquid chromatography and sequencing, we screened peripheral blood DNA from 184 familial melanoma cases for BRAF promoter variants. We identified a promoter insertion/deletion in linkage disequilibrium with the previously described BRAF polymorphism in intron 11 (rs1639679) reported to be associated with melanoma susceptibility in males. We therefore investigated the contribution of this BRAF polymorphism to melanoma susceptibility in 581 consecutively recruited incident cases, 258 incident cases in a study of late relapse, 673 female general practitioner controls, and the 184 familial cases. We found no statistically significant difference in either genotype or allele frequencies between cases and controls overall or between male and female cases for the BRAF polymorphism in the two incident case series. Our results therefore suggest that the BRAF polymorphism is not significantly associated with melanoma and the promoter insertion/deletion linked with the polymorphism is not a causal variant. In addition, we found that there was no association between the BRAF genotype and mean total number of banal or atypical nevi in either the cases or controls.

An assessment of the CDKN2A variant Ala148Thr as a nevus/melanoma susceptibility allele.

Melanocytic nevi are the most potent risk factors for melanoma yet identified. Variation in the nevus phenotype within a population is predominantly genetically determined. Genes that determine nevus expression may therefore act as low penetrance melanoma susceptibility genes. Rare germline mutations in CDKN2A predispose to melanoma and appear to be nevogenic, although the correlation between nevus phenotype and mutation status is poor. It is plausible that more common CDKN2A variants may influence both melanoma susceptibility and nevus susceptibility. Ala148Thr is a G to A missense polymorphism of CDKN2A, which is found in 4%-6% of the general population. We have investigated the role of Ala148Thr as a low penetrance melanoma or nevus susceptibility allele in two separate groups of individuals. The first was a sample of 488 adults recruited from 179 families of patients with the atypical nevus phenotype and/or a family history of melanoma, and the second was a population-based sample of 599 women. Similar prevalences of Ala148Thr (4.9% and 5.2%) were found in both samples but significant variation in the prevalence of the polymorphism was seen across geographic areas within England. There was no association between Ala148Thr status and nevus number or history of melanoma, and therefore the results did not support the hypothesis that the Ala148Thr variant is a low penetrance melanoma or nevus susceptibility allele. A significant protective role of Ala148Thr on the number of atypical nevi was observed in the family sample (mean of 1 atypical nevus in those with the allele and 3.5 nevi in those without, p = 0.02). After allowing for potential confounders this was not evident in the population-based sample.

An assessment of a variant of the DNA repair gene XRCC3 as a possible nevus or melanoma susceptibility genotype.

Inheritance of the T allele in exon 7 (position 18067) of the DNA repair gene XRCC3 has been reported to be associated with susceptibility to melanoma in a study from Oxford. We report a study in which an attempt was made to confirm this association in a similar population. The most potent risk factor for melanoma in the general population is a phenotype characterized by the presence of multiple melanocytic nevi: the atypical mole syndrome. Our hypothesis is that the atypical mole syndrome may be a marker of genetic susceptibility to melanoma. We have therefore investigated whether the XRCC3 polymorphism influences the nevus phenotype. The XRCC3 genotype was investigated using PCR in a general-practice-based sample of 565 women and 475 patients from a cohort enriched for the atypical mole syndrome, of whom 140 had had melanoma. Allele frequencies were the same in the healthy women, the melanoma cases from this study, and the melanoma cases reported in the Oxford study, but were different from those in the Oxford control group. We found no evidence therefore that the T allele of this XRCC3 polymorphism is indicative of susceptibility to melanoma. There was a marginal relationship with nevus phenotype, but this was no longer statistically significant in multivariate analysis. The previous association between XRCC3 and melanoma may be a result of the choice of control group and we emphasize the need for appropriate choice of controls.

Frequent p16-independent inactivation of p14ARF in human melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The tumor suppressors p14(ARF) (ARF) and p16(INK4A) (p16) are encoded by overlapping reading frames at the CDKN2A/INK4A locus on chromosome 9p21. In human melanoma, the accumulated evidence has suggested that the predominant tumor suppressor at 9p21 is p16, not ARF. However, recent observations from melanoma-prone families and murine melanoma models suggest a p16-independent tumor suppressor role for ARF. We analyzed a group of melanoma metastases and cell lines to investigate directly whether somatic alterations to the ARF gene support its role as a p16-independent tumor suppressor in human melanoma, assuming that two alterations (genetic and/or epigenetic) would be required to inactivate a gene. METHODS: We examined the p16/ARF locus in 60 melanoma metastases from 58 patients and in 9 human melanoma cell lines using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect deletions, methylation-specific PCR to detect promoter methylation, direct sequencing to detect mutations affecting ARF and p16, and, in a subset of 20 tumors, immunohistochemistry to determine the effect of these alterations on p16 protein expression. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We observed two or more alterations to the ARF gene in 26/60 (43%) metastases. The p16 gene sustained two or more alterations in 13/60 (22%) metastases (P = .03). Inactivation of ARF in the presence of wild-type p16 was seen in 18/60 (30%) metastases. CONCLUSION: Genetic and epigenetic analyses of the human 9p21 locus indicate that modifications of ARF occur independently of p16 inactivation in human melanoma and suggest that ARF is more frequently inactivated than p16.

Clinical and genetic findings in an Ashkenazi Jewish population with colorectal neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the frequency of the carrier status of three ancestral colorectal neoplasm-associated mutations (APC:I1307K, BLM(Ash), and MSH2*1906G>C) found in the Jewish population among a case series with documented colorectal neoplasms. They further compared family and personal histories plus environmental exposures of the carriers and noncarriers of the I1307K mutation and examined clinical differences with regard to the colorectal neoplasms and the specific molecular genetic changes in these lesions. METHODS: Analyses were performed on tissue from stored paraffin-embedded blocks for the three germline mutations plus the KRAS mutation and APC loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and APC gene sequencing. RESULTS: Fifty-four of the 429 individuals (12.6%) were found to carry the APC:I1307K mutation, whereas 4 (0.9%) were found to be heterozygous for the BLM(Ash) mutation and 3 (0.7%) were carriers of the MSH21906G>C* mutation. Carriers of the I1307K mutation did not appear to differ from noncarriers with regard to the number of neoplasms, patient age at detection, or tumor location within the colon. There was no significant difference noted between I1307K carriers and noncarriers with regard to the percentage of patients with first-degree relatives with colorectal carcinoma. A significant risk for APC LOH was found in lesions from carriers who smoked cigarettes compared with nonsmokers. The I1307K mutation was found to be clearly associated with a somatic additional adenine insertion in the region of codons 1306-1309, but other mutations in the region of codons 1277-1348 were found to be no more prevalent in carriers than in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: In Jewish individuals previously diagnosed with a colorectal neoplasm, MSH2*1906G>C is uncommon but has been associated with carcinoma occurring at a young age. The BLM(Ash) mutation is uncommon and appears to be of little effect. The I1307K mutation is common among Jews who have had colorectal neoplasms, but overall it was found to have little effect clinically in the current study group. There may be a gene-environment interaction between the I1307K mutation and cigarette use.

No evidence that polymorphisms in CYP2C8, CYP2C9, UGT1A6, PPARdelta and PPARgamma act as modifiers of the protective effect of regular NSAID use on the risk of colorectal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: Regular continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use has been associated with a reduction in risk of colorectal cancer. Our objective was to investigate whether or not a number of the polymorphic genes involved in the metabolism of NSAIDs, including cytochrome P450 s (CYPs), act as modifiers of this protective effect. METHODS: As part of a multi-centre case-control study, 478 colorectal cancer patients and 733 controls (433 matched case-control pairs) answered questions on NSAID use. These individuals were then genotyped for common polymorphisms in P450 CYP2C8, P450 CYP2C9, UDP-glucuronosyl transferase (UGT)1A6 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor isoforms delta and gamma (PPARdelta and PPARgamma). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the reduction in risk of colorectal cancer with regular NSAID use (odds ratio (OR) = 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.56, 0.95)) but showed that none of the polymorphic genes studied appeared to modify the protective effect of regular NSAID use.

Prevalence of 9p21 deletions in UK melanoma families.

Although the CDKN2A gene has been shown to be the major genetic determinant governing high-penetrance susceptibility to melanoma, there remains a significant proportion of melanoma pedigrees in which germline mutations of CDKN2A have not been identified. We have therefore studied the prevalence of germline 9p deletions encompassing the CDKN2 locus in melanoma pedigrees, using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Germline deletions were found in 3 of 93 UK pedigrees, with no previously identified CDKN2A mutations. A hemizygous deletion of CDKN2A exon 1beta previously reported by this group was confirmed in one family and identified in a second. Microsatellite analysis determined that these two families were ancestrally related. In the third family, a novel p16 hemizygous deletion involving CDKN2A exons 1alpha, 2, and 3 was detected. An additional 9p21 deletion reported previously in a USA melanoma-neural system tumor family was shown to involve CDKN2A exon 1beta, and not p16. The CDKN2A exon 1beta deletions provide further evidence that this tumor suppressor gene is important in melanoma-neural system tumor susceptibility, but do not exclude the possibility of a novel gene or regulatory element also being deleted in this region. Deletions at 9p21 are rare and explain only a small proportion of melanoma susceptibility. This study is the first to comprehensively exclude deletions in melanoma-prone families with no previously identified CDKN2A mutations.

Vegetable, fruit and meat consumption and potential risk modifying genes in relation to colorectal cancer.

Epidemiological evidence shows high red meat consumption to increase the risk of colorectal cancer, while the consumption of fruit and vegetables has been shown to be protective. Many genes have been identified that encode for enzymes involved in the metabolism of dietary carcinogens or anti-carcinogens. A study of 500 incident colorectal cancer cases and population controls, matched for age, sex and general practitioner, was conducted in the United Kingdom to investigate whether 6 such genes (CYP1A1, GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1, EPHX1 and NQO1) modify the relationship between diet and disease risk. Usual diet was estimated using a detailed questionnaire administered by interview. Fruit and vegetable consumption were both found to protect against colorectal cancer, while overall meat and red meat consumption were found to increase risk. There was some evidence of interaction between GSTT1 and vegetable consumption (p=0.006, not adjusted for multiple tests) but no evidence of interaction with GSTM1. The protective effect of vegetables was only seen in those with deficient or intermediate GSTT1 predicted phenotype [OR 0.3, 95% confidence interval (0.1, 0.6), and OR 0.6 (0.4, 0.96), OR 1.4 (0.3, 2.4) for those with fast phenotype], and a similar result was observed for cruciferous vegetables. There was also weak evidence of interaction between red meat intake and GSTT1 (p=0.06), GSTP1 (p=0.16, with p=0.02 after adjustment for potential confounders) and NQO1 predicted phenotype (p=0.01). Because of the multiple hypotheses tested in our study, these findings require independent confirmation.

A quality-of-life study in high-risk (thickness > = or 2 mm) cutaneous melanoma patients in a randomized trial of 1-cm versus 3-cm surgical excision margins.

A quality-of-life study was carried out to test the hypothesis that melanoma patients treated with a 3-cm margin of excision suffer greater impairment of their quality of life than those treated with a 1-cm margin. The secondary aim was to determine the predictors of a poor patient perception of their excision scar. A postal questionnaire study was carried out using Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD), Psychosocial Adjustment of Illness Scale-Self-Report (PAIS-SR), Medical Outcomes Survey-Short Form 36 (MOS-SF36), and the Cassileth Scar questionnaires. Data were collected from 426 of the 537 patients who were mailed the questionnaires (response rate 79%). Fourteen percent had clinically significant anxiety and 5% had significant depression. A poor attitude toward quality of health care was associated with youth. Patients treated with a 3-cm margin excision had significantly poorer mental and physical function 1 mo after surgery, which disappeared within 6 mo. The greater difficulties experienced by the 3-cm margin group were particularly in their domestic, sexual, and social roles. Women, younger patients, those with poor physical and mental function after surgery, and those treated by a 3-cm margin were more likely to report a poorer perception of their scar. The poorer scar perception of patients in the 3-cm group persisted throughout the study period. Use of a 3-cm margin of excision for melanoma is associated with significantly more morbidity than use of a 1-cm margin, but this effect disappears in 6 mo. Patients treated by 3-cm excision were more likely, however, to have a persistent poor view of their scar. Youth and being female were also predictors of poor perception of the scar.