An international reproducibility study validating quantitative determination of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 mRNA in breast cancer using MammaTyper®.

BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of the predictive markers human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/ERBB2), estrogen receptor (ER/ESR1), progesterone receptor (PgR/PGR), and marker of proliferation Ki67 (MKI67) is indispensable for therapeutic decision making in early breast cancer. In this multicenter prospective study, we addressed the issue of inter- and intrasite reproducibility using the recently developed reverse transcription-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based MammaTyper® test. METHODS: Ten international pathology institutions participated in this study and determined messenger RNA expression levels of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 in both centrally and locally extracted RNA from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer specimens with the MammaTyper® test. Samples were measured repeatedly on different days within the local laboratories, and reproducibility was assessed by means of variance component analysis, Fleiss' kappa statistics, and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Total variations in measurements of centrally and locally prepared RNA extracts were comparable; therefore, statistical analyses were performed on the complete dataset. Intersite reproducibility showed total SDs between 0.21 and 0.44 for the quantitative single-marker assessments, resulting in ICC values of 0.980-0.998, demonstrating excellent agreement of quantitative measurements. Also, the reproducibility of binary single-marker results (positive/negative), as well as the molecular subtype agreement, was almost perfect with kappa values ranging from 0.90 to 1.00. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of these data, the MammaTyper® has the potential to substantially improve the current standards of breast cancer diagnostics by providing a highly precise and reproducible quantitative assessment of the established breast cancer biomarkers and molecular subtypes in a decentralized workup.

HEROHE Challenge: Predicting HER2 Status in Breast Cancer from Hematoxylin-Eosin Whole-Slide Imaging.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide, and is responsible for more than half a million deaths each year. The appropriate therapy depends on the evaluation of the expression of various biomarkers, such as the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) transmembrane protein, through specialized techniques, such as immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. In this work, we present the HER2 on hematoxylin and eosin (HEROHE) challenge, a parallel event of the 16th European Congress on Digital Pathology, which aimed to predict the HER2 status in breast cancer based only on hematoxylin-eosin-stained tissue samples, thus avoiding specialized techniques. The challenge consisted of a large, annotated, whole-slide images dataset (509), specifically collected for the challenge. Models for predicting HER2 status were presented by 21 teams worldwide. The best-performing models are presented by detailing the network architectures and key parameters. Methods are compared and approaches, core methodologies, and software choices contrasted. Different evaluation metrics are discussed, as well as the performance of the presented models for each of these metrics. Potential differences in ranking that would result from different choices of evaluation metrics highlight the need for careful consideration at the time of their selection, as the results show that some metrics may misrepresent the true potential of a model to solve the problem for which it was developed. The HEROHE dataset remains publicly available to promote advances in the field of computational pathology.

An inhibitor of stress-activated MAP-kinases reduces invasion and MMP-2 expression of malignant melanoma cells.

A lot of parallels have been described between invasion of malignant tumor cells and leukocyte movement during inflammatory responses. Concerning these similarities, we investigated the function of cytokine-suppressive anti-inflammatory drugs (CSAIDs), which act via inhibition of stress-activated MAP-kinases, in regulation of expression of proteolytic enzymes and in vitro invasion of malignant melanoma cells. The p38MAPK inhibitor SB203580 reduced matrigel invasion of MeWo cells by 60%, while the MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 did not have any effect on invasion. Active p38MAPK was detected in MeWo cells by immunoblotting and confocal microscopy. Cells showed a constitutive expression of matrix-metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 as well as tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and TIMP-2 mRNAs. Expression of MMP-1 or urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) was not detected by Northern blot. Inhibition of p38MAPK by the specific inhibitor SB203580 resulted in downregulation of MMP-2 mRNA and protein levels as well as gelatinolytic activity, while expression levels of TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 mRNAs were not changed. The specific MEK-1 inhibitor PD98059 did not change expression of MMP-2 or TIMPs. Neither SB203580 nor PD98059 changed proliferation of cells. The results suggest that stress-activated protein kinases like p38MAPK are involved in regulation of expression of MMP-2 as well as in vitro invasion of malignant melanoma cells. Inhibitors of p38MAPK may be promising substances to interfere with a signaling cascade associated with invasion of malignant tumor cells.

Reliability of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry in breast core needle biopsies.

PURPOSE: Core needle biopsies (CNBs) are widely used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Recent publications reported up to 20% false-positive results on CNBs if immunohistochemistry (IHC) is compared with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). To clarify, if confirmation of IHC positivity by FISH is generally required, we analyzed the reliability of IHC positivity on CNBs versus surgical specimens in a multi-institutional study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five pathologic laboratories contributed to this study by performing IHC on 500 CNBs and the corresponding surgical specimens overall. If IHC revealed score 2+ or 3+, HER2 status was confirmed by FISH in a central laboratory. We compared evaluation according to US Food and Drug Administration-approved scoring criteria and recently published American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines. RESULTS: CNBs scored 3+ revealed five false-positive results if scoring followed the US Food and Drug Administration criteria (five of 40; 12.5%) and two false-positives in terms of the ASCO-CAP criteria (two of 33; 6.1%). IHC was false negative in one CNB only. By contrast, IHC on surgical specimens revealed five false-negative results, but only one false-positive result (one of 35; 2.9%) if scored following US Food and Drug Administration-approved criteria. With the aid of the ASCO-CAP criteria, false-positive IHC results were obtained in only one of the five participating institutions. CONCLUSION: IHC 3+ scores on CNBs proved to be reliable in four of the five participating institutions if scoring followed the ASCO-CAP criteria. Therefore, accurate determination of HER2 status in breast cancer is possible on CNB using the common strategy to screen all cases by IHC and retest only 2+ scores by FISH. Prerequisites are quality assurance and the application of the new ASCO-CAP criteria.