Long-term quality of life in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory hypoxaemia.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study was to assess the long term outcome and quality of life of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory hypoxemia. METHODS: A retrospective observational study with prospective health related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment was conducted in ARDS patients who had ECMO as a rescue therapy for reversible refractory hypoxemia from January 2009 until April 2011 in a tertiary Australian centre. Survival and long-term quality of life assessment, using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and the EuroQol health related quality of life questionnaire (EQ5D) were assessed and compared to international data from other research groups. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (mean age 36.3 years) with ARDS receiving ECMO for refractory hypoxemia were studied. Eighteen (86%) patients were retrieved from external intensive care units (ICUs) by a dedicated ECMO retrieval team. Eleven (55%) had H1N1 influenza A-associated pneumonitis. Eighteen (86%) patients survived to hospital discharge. Of the 18 survivors, ten (56%) were discharged to other hospitals and 8 (44%) were discharged directly home. Sequelae and health related quality of life were evaluated for 15 of the 18 (71%) long-term survivors (assessment at median 8 months). Mean SF-36 scores were significantly lower across all domains compared to age and sex matched Australian norms. Mean SF-36 scores were lower (minimum important difference at least 5 points) than previously described ARDS survivors in the domains of general health, mental health, vitality and social function. One patient had long-term disability as a result of ICU acquired weakness. Only 26% of survivors had returned to previous work levels at the time of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This ARDS cohort had a high survival rate (86%) after use of ECMO support for reversible refractory hypoxemia. Long term survivors had similar physical health but decreased mental health, general health, vitality and social function compared to other ARDS survivors and an unexpectedly poor return to work.

A randomised controlled trial of an open lung strategy with staircase recruitment, titrated PEEP and targeted low airway pressures in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Tidal volume and plateau pressure minimisation are the standard components of a protective lung ventilation strategy for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Open lung strategies, including higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment manoeuvres to date have not proven efficacious. This study examines the effectiveness and safety of a novel open lung strategy, which includes permissive hypercapnia, staircase recruitment manoeuvres (SRM) and low airway pressure with PEEP titration. METHOD: Twenty ARDS patients were randomised to treatment or ARDSnet control ventilation strategies. The treatment group received SRM with decremental PEEP titration and targeted plateau pressure < 30 cm H2O. Gas exchange and lung compliance were measured daily for 7 days and plasma cytokines in the first 24 hours and on days 1, 3, 5 and 7 (mean ± SE). Duration of ventilation, ICU stay and hospital stay (median and interquartile range) and hospital survival were determined. RESULTS: There were significant overall differences between groups when considering plasma IL-8 and TNF-α. For plasma IL-8, the control group was 41% higher than the treatment group over the seven-day period (ratio 1.41 (1.11 to 1.79), P = 0.01), while for TNF-α the control group was 20% higher over the seven-day period (ratio 1.20 (1.01 to 1.42) P = 0.05). PaO2/FIO2 (204 ± 9 versus 165 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.005) and static lung compliance (49.1 ± 2.9 versus 33.7 ± 2.7 mls/cm H2O, P < 0.001) were higher in the treatment group than the control group over seven days. There was no difference in duration of ventilation (180 (87 to 298) versus 341 (131 to 351) hrs, P = 0.13), duration of ICU stay (9.9 (5.6 to 14.8) versus 16.0 (8.1 to 19.3) days, P = 0.19) and duration of hospital stay (17.9 (13.7 to 34.5) versus 24.7 (20.5 to 39.8) days, P = 0.16) between the treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: This open lung strategy was associated with greater amelioration in some systemic cytokines, improved oxygenation and lung compliance over seven days. A larger trial powered to examine clinically-meaningful outcomes is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12607000465459.

A positive response to a recruitment maneuver with PEEP titration in patients with ARDS, regardless of transient oxygen desaturation during the maneuver.

UNLABELLED: Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) can expand collapsed alveoli in ventilated patients. The optimal method for delivering RMs is unknown. PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and the respiratory and hemodynamic effects of a staircase recruitment maneuver (SRM) with decremental positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration and the consequences of desaturation during the SRM in patients with early acute lung injury (ALI). METHODS: In total, 20 consecutive patients with early ALI were enrolled and received an SRM. Patients were given 15 ± 3 cm H(2)O pressure-controlled ventilation. Positive end expiratory pressure was increased from baseline (range 10-18) to 20, 30, and 40 cm H(2)O every 2 minutes to achieve maximum alveolar pressure of 55 ± 3 cm H(2)O, then decreased at 3-minute intervals to 25, 22.5, 20, 17.5, and 15 cm H(2)O until a decrease of 1% to 2% oxygen saturation from maximum was detected. Positive end expiratory pressure was left at the level where the fall in oxygen saturation occurred. Standard respiratory and circulatory variables, arterial and central venous gases were measured before, during, and after the SRM. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in shunt fraction (36.3% ± 10% to 26.4% ± 14%, P < .001), oxygen saturation (93.4% ± 2% to 96.8% ± 3%, P = .007), partial pressure of oxygen, arterial (PaO(2))/fraction of inspired oxygen ([FIO(2)]; 150 ± 42 to 227 ± 100, P = .004), lung compliance (33.9 ± 9.1 to 40.1 ± 11.4 mL/cm H(2)O, P < .01), and chest x-ray (CXR) after the SRM. Briefly, 80% of the patients responded and the response was maintained at 1 hour. In total, 8 patients desaturated 6.1% ± 2.8% in SaO(2) during the SRM but 5 of those improved SaO(2) relative to baseline by the end of the SRM. CONCLUSIONS: In all, 80% of the patients with early ALI responded to the SRM with decremental PEEP titration. Desaturation during the SRM did not indicate a failed response 1 hour later.

Where to now with carbon monoxide poisoning?

The controversy regarding the role of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) in the treatment of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning has been re-ignited following the publication of a further randomized controlled trial by Weaver et al., the results of which appear to conflict with our findings. Comparative analysis suggests that the apparent outcome differences may be secondary to the design, analysis and interpretation of the results of the two studies. Following careful analysis of these two papers and further results from a study by Raphael et al on 385 CO-poisoned patients, we can still find no convincing evidence favouring HBO therapy. Pending further research to determine optimal oxygen therapy for CO-poisoning, current therapy should involve stratifying patients for risk of a poor outcome. This stratification may be aided by the evolving availability of biochemical markers of brain injury and the finding that patients with transient loss of consciousness and poor performance on neuropsychological tests of the supervisory attention system are at higher risk of neuropsychological sequelae. We propose that those patients most at risk be admitted and receive more prolonged normobaric oxygen therapy whilst those with more minor CO-poisoning should be provided with normobaric oxygen of no less than 6 h duration and certainly until sign and symptom free.

Hypoxaemic rescue therapies in acute respiratory distress syndrome: Why, when, what and which one?

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is an inflammatory condition of the lungs which can result in refractory and life-threatening hypoxaemic respiratory failure. The risk factors for the development of ARDS are many but include trauma, multiple blood transfusions, burns and major surgery, therefore this condition is not uncommon in the severely injured patient. When ARDS is severe, high-inspired oxygen concentrations are frequently required to minimise hypoxaemia. In these situations clinicians commonly utilise interventions termed 'hypoxaemic rescue therapies' in an attempt to improve oxygenation, as without these, conventional mechanical ventilation can be associated with high mortality. However, their lack of efficacy on mortality when used prophylactically in generalised ARDS cohorts has resulted in their use being confined to clinical trials and the subset of ARDS patients with refractory hypoxaemia. First line hypoxaemic rescue therapies include inhaled nitric oxide, prone positioning, alveolar recruitment manoeuvres and high frequency oscillatory ventilation, which have all been shown to be effective in improving oxygenation. In situations where these first line rescue therapies are inadequate extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation has emerged as a lifesaving second line rescue therapy. Rescue therapies in critically ill patients with traumatic injuries presents specific challenges and requires careful assessment of both the short and longer term benefits, therapeutic limitations, and specific adverse effects before their use.

Predictors of independent lung ventilation: an analysis of 170 single-lung transplantations.

OBJECTIVE: Single-lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can cause unique postoperative problems that might require independent lung ventilation. We evaluated preoperative and immediate postoperative factors to predict the need for independent lung ventilation. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 170 patients who received a single-lung transplant over a 15-year period, 20 (12%) of whom required independent lung ventilation. RESULTS: Patients requiring independent lung ventilation were similar in age, sex, ischemic time, and donor characteristics to those who required conventional ventilation. Patients receiving independent lung ventilation had a greater degree of preoperative airflow limitation, more hyperinflation, lower postoperative PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratios, more radiologic mediastinal shift, and more transplant lung infiltrate on the postoperative chest radiograph. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that independent lung ventilation was associated with increasing levels of recipient hyperinflation (percentage total lung capacity compared with predicted value; odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.07; P = .032) and reduced early postoperative PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (odds ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.99; P = .005). Length of ventilation and intensive care unit stay and mortality were higher in the independent lung ventilation group. Among patients who survived to hospital discharge, there were no differences in long-term mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: The need for independent lung ventilation in patients undergoing single-lung transplantation for obstructive lung disease is predicted by the combination of increased hyperinflation measured on recipients' preoperative lung function tests and a low PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio, indicating graft dysfunction in the immediate postoperative period.