Longitudinal QTc stability and impact of baseline cardiac rhythm on discharge dose in dofetilide-treated patients.

INTRODUCTION: Dofetilide suppresses atrial fibrillation (AF) in a dose-dependent fashion. The protective effect of AF against QTc prolongation induced torsades de pointe and transient post-cardioversion QTc prolongation may result in dofetilide under-dosing during initiation. Thus, the optimal timing of cardioversion for AF patients undergoing dofetilide initiation to optimize discharge dose remains unknown as does the longitudinal stability of QTc . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of baseline rhythm on dofetilide dosing during initiation and assess the longitudinal stability of QTc-all (Bazzett, Fridericia, Framingham, and Hodges) over time. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent preplanned dofetilide loading at a tertiary care center between January 2016 and 2019 were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients (66 ± 10 years, 32% female, CHADS2 -Vasc 3 [2-4]) presented for dofetilide loading in either AF (59%) or sinus rhythm (SR) (41%). Neither presenting rhythm, nor spontaneous conversion to SR impacted discharge dose. The cumulative dofetilide dose before cardioversion moderately correlated (r = .36; p = .0001) with discharge dose. Postcardioversion QTc-all prolongation (p < .0001) prompted discharge dose reduction (890 ± 224 mcg vs. 552 ± 199 mcg; p < .0001) in 30% patients. QTc-all in SR prolonged significantly during loading (p < .0001). All patients displayed QTc-all reduction (p < .0001) from discharge to short-term (46 [34-65] days) that continued at long-term (360 [296-414] days) follow-ups. The extent of QTc-all reduction over time moderately correlated with discharge QTc-all (r = .54-0.65; p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Dofetilide initiation before cardioversion is equivalent to initiation during SR. Significant QTc reduction proportional to discharge QTc is seen over time in all dofetilide-treated patients. QTc returns to preloading baseline during follow-up in patients initiated in SR.

Impact of a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic on diagnosis-to-ablation time.

Background: Outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) improve as the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) shortens. Use of a protocol-based integrated care model through a dedicated atrial fibrillation clinic (AFC) may serve to standardize treatment pathways and decrease DAT. Objective: To evaluate the DAT and clinical characteristics of patients with AF referred from an AFC vs a conventional electrophysiology clinic (EC). Methods: Retrospective analysis was completed in consecutive patients undergoing index AF ablation at Riverside Methodist Hospital in 2019 with minimum 1 year follow-up. Patients were categorized based off their CA referral source (AFC vs EC) and where the initial visit following index diagnosis of AF occurred (AFC vs EC). Results: A total of 182 patients (mean age 65 years, 64% male) were reviewed. Patients referred from an AFC (21%) had a median DAT of 342 days (interquartile range [IQR], 125-855 days) compared to patients referred from EC (79%) with a median DAT of 813 days (IQR, 241-1444 days; P = .01). Patients with their index visit following AF diagnosis occurring in the AFC (9%) had significantly shorter median DAT (127 days [IQR, 95-188 days]) compared to EC (91%) (789 days [IQR, 253-1503 days]; P = .002). Patients with DAT <1 year had lower AF recurrence than patients with DAT >1 year (P = .04, hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.3418-1.000). Conclusion: DAT is a modifiable factor that may affect CA outcomes. Significant reductions in DAT were observed in patients evaluated through a dedicated AF clinic.

Anesthesia care for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter/defibrillator placement: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: The recently approved subcutaneous implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (S-ICD) uses a single extrathoracic subcutaneous lead to treat life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, such as ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation. This is different from conventional transvenous ICDs, which are typically implanted under sedation. Currently, there are no reports regarding the anesthetic management of patients undergoing S-ICD implantation. STUDY OBJECTIVES: This study describes the anesthetic management and outcomes in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation and defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing. METHODS: The study population consists of 73 patients who underwent S-ICD implantation. General anesthesia (n = 69, 95%) or conscious/deep sedation (n = 4, 5%) was used for device implantation. MEASUREMENTS: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate were recorded periprocedurally for S-ICD implantation and DFTs. Major adverse events were SBP <90 mm Hg refractory to vasopressor agents, significant bradycardia (heart rate <45 beats per minute) requiring pharmacologic intervention and, "severe" pain at the lead tunneling site and the S-ICD generator insertion site based on patient perception. INTERVENTIONS: Of the 73 patients, 39 had SBP <90 mm Hg (53%), and intermittent boluses of vasopressors and inotropes were administered with recovery of SBP. In 2 patients, SBP did not respond, and the patients required vasopressor infusion in the intensive care unit. MAIN RESULTS: Although the S-ICD procedure involved extensive tunneling and a mean of 2.5 ± 1.7 DFTs per patient, refractory hypotension was a major adverse event in only 2 patients. The mean baseline SBP was 132.5 ± 22.0 mm Hg, and the mean minimum SBP during the procedure was 97.3 ± 9.2 mm Hg (P < .01). There was also a mean 13-beats per minute decrease in heart rate (P < .01), but no pharmacologic intervention was required. Eight patients developed "severe" pain at the lead tunneling and generator insertion sites and were adequately managed with intravenous morphine. CONCLUSIONS: Among a heterogeneous population, anesthesiologists can safely manage patients undergoing S-ICD implantation and repeated DFTs without wide swings in SBP and with minimal intermittent pharmacologic support.