Effect of COVID-19 on Kidney Graft Function One Year after Onset.

Background and Objectives: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at a higher risk of severe COVID-19 development. The course of the infection may vary. Long-term consequences for graft function are still being studied. We investigate whether the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection among KTRs had a long-term effect on graft function. Patients and method: 128 KTRs with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in the study. They were divided into two groups: mild (without the need for oxygen therapy; n = 91) and severe (with the need for oxygen therapy; n = 21). Baseline characteristics and medical data, especially creatinine level, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) CKD-EPI, and proteinuria, were analyzed. The main outcomes were the absolute and relative change in eGFR during the one-year follow-up after COVID-19. In the final models, sex, age, smoking, presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) were included. Results: KTRs with severe COVID-19 were older, more likely to smoke, and had DM and CVD more frequently. Our analysis reveals that COVID-19 severity was associated with a significantly more pronounced relative eGFR decline one year after recovery only in males [-13.94 (95% CI: -25.13 to -2.76, p = 0.015) percentage points]. One year after the disease onset, males with a severe course of the infection had a higher eGFR decline than those with a mild one. The COVID-19 severity did not affect eGFR loss in females. Conclusions: In KTRs suffering from COVID-19, deterioration of graft function was noticed. The eGFR decline was associated with disease severity and sex. It indicates a need for further research, observation, and preventive actions for KTRs, especially males.

Blood Pressure Control and Antihypertensive Treatment among Hemodialysis Patients-Retrospective Single Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: Hypertension affects at least 80% of hemodialysis patients. Inappropriate control of blood pressure is mentioned as one of the essential cardiovascular risk factors associated with development of cardiovascular events in dialysis populations. The aim of the cross-sectional, retrospective study was the evaluation of the antihypertensive treatment schedule and control of blood pressure in relation to the guidelines in the group of hemodialysis patients. Additionally, we assessed the level of decrease in blood pressure by each group of hypotensive agents. Materials and Methods: 222 patients hemodialyzed in a single Dialysis Unit in three distinct periods of time-2006, 2011, and 2016-with a diagnosis of hypertension were enrolled in the study. The analysis of the antihypertensive treatment was based on the medical files and it consisted of a comparison of the mean blood pressure results reported during the six consecutive hemodialysis sessions. Results: The mean values of blood pressure before hemodialysis were as follows: 134/77, 130/74, and 140/76 mmHg, after hemodialysis 124/74, 126/73, and 139/77 mmHg in 2006, 2011, and 2016 respectively. The goal of predialysis blood pressure control (<140/90) was achieved by up to 64.3% of participants in 2006 as compared to 49.4% in 2016. Additionally, the postdialysis goal (<130/90) reached 57.1% of the study population in 2006 as compared to 27.1% of patients in 2016. The differences in percentage of patients using single, double, triple, and multidrug therapy during observation were not statistically significant. The most often used drugs were ß-blockers, diuretics, and calcium channel blockers in all points of the study. Blockades of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in 2006 and calcium channel blockers in 2011 and 2016 were the drugs with highest impact on lowering blood pressure. Conclusions: The goal of predialysis or postdialysis blood pressure control was achieved in a lower percentage of patients during the period of the study. Blockade of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and calcium channel blockers decrease the blood pressure significantly. It is necessary to achieve better control of blood pressure in prevention of cardiovascular incidents.

Safety and Tolerability of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Dialyzed Patients. COViNEPH Project.

Background and Objectives: The Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 mRNA vaccine has demonstrated excellent efficacy and safety in phase 3 trials. However, no dialyzed patients were included, and therefore safety data for this patient group is lacking. The aim of the study was to assess the safety and tolerances of vaccinations with BNT162b2 performed in chronically dialyzed patients. Materials and Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study including a group of 190 dialyzed patients (65% male) at median age 68.0 (55-74) years. 169 (89.0%) patients were treated with hemodialysis and 21 (11.0%) with peritoneal dialysis. The control group consisted of 160 people (61% male) without chronic kidney disease at median age 63 (range 53-77) years. Both groups were vaccinated with BNT162b2 with a 21-day interval between the first and the second dose. Solicited local and systemic reactogenicity, unsolicited adverse events and antipyretic and pain medication use were assessed with a standardized questionnaire. The toxicity grading scales were derived from the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research guidelines. Results: 59.8% (dose 1), 61.4% (dose 2) and 15.9% (dose 1), 29.4% (dose 2) dialyzed patients reported at least one local and one systemic reaction respectively within seven days after the vaccination. Many local and systemic solicited reactions were observed less frequently in dialyzed patients than in the age and sex matched control group and much less frequently than reported in the pivotal study. They were mostly mild to moderate, short-lived, and more frequently reported in younger individuals and women. No related unsolicited adverse events were observed. Conclusions: We have shown here that BNT162b2, an mRNA vaccine from Pfizer-BioNTech against SARS-COV-2 is safe and well-tolerated by dialyzed patients. The results can be useful for the nephrological community to resolve patients' doubts and reduce their vaccine hesitancy.

Treatment of Hypertension in Renal Transplant Recipients in Four Independent Cross-Sectional Analyses.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This retrospective study analysed hypertension management and adherence to blood pressure (BP) targets among renal transplant recipients (RTRs) under specialized care in the Outpatient Transplantation Unit in the Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine at Gdansk University Hospital. METHODS: Medical records of 101, 316, 639 and 818 RTRs diagnosed with hypertension, who received outpatient care in 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2014, respectively were analysed in four independent cross-sectional surveys. All RTRs received antihypertensive regimens. RESULTS: The overall most commonly used antihypertensive agents were beta-blockers (BB) (range 66.3-82.5%) followed by calcium channel blockers (CCB) (range 52.8-64.2%). Whilst a significant, upward tendency of BB usage (p<0.01) was observed, CCB usage (p<0.001) displayed a downward tendency as a first line therapy in the subsequent years. The average number of antihypertensive agents used per patient increased significantly from 2.24±1.03 in 2001 to 2.55±1.25 in 2014 (p<0.05). The most frequently used combination of hypotensive therapy consisted of two or three antihypertensive drugs depending on the survey. The most common two drug combination consisted of BB and CCB followed by BB accompanied by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. A significant, upward tendency in the use of four (p<0.001) and five (p<0.05) antihypertensive drugs simultaneously, was observed in subsequent years. The target values of BP i.e. <140/90 mmHg were accomplished in 47, 58, 60 and 46% of RTRs in subsequent years. In a secondary - stratified analysis of data from 2014, younger patients (p<0.05), patients with better graft function (p<0.001), patients treated with a higher number of antihypertensive agents (p<0.001) and those not treated with BB (p<0.01) were shown to reach the BP target of below 140/90 mmHg more often. CONCLUSION: The study showed intensification of hypertension treatment in RTRs in subsequent years with BB assuming a dominant role.

[Health awareness and cooperation with the patient in the therapeutic process in a population of patients with chronic kidney disease in the center of Gdansk].

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is considered as a disease of civilization of the XXI century. The increase of patients with CKD is associated with a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes and aging. Hypertension occurs in 60-90% of patients with CKD. It is worth to underline that the nephroprotective therapy can delay or even stop the progression of CKD to end-stage renal disease. The therapy nephroprotective should be understood as both pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health awareness of patients with CKD, as well as the degree of patient compliance especially in terms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. Material and Methods: A crosssectional survey was offered for 1300 patients with CKD who are are under the care of the Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital in Gdansk. 972 patients (M/F) (74.8%) responded positively to participate in the study Results: It was shown that 91.2% of the patients measured blood pressure at home. 41.2% measured blood pressure everyday and 54.2% of patients used at least one non-pharmacological treatment for hypertension. 71.7% of patients declared that buy all drugs prescribed by the doctor. 53.4% of patients used the possibility of substitution drugs prescribed by a doctor for cheaper preparations recommended by the pharmacist. 85.7% of patients taking medicines according to doctor's advice (frequency, dose). Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that the education of patients, the therapeutic process and their health awareness are good, especially among patients treated with peritoneal dialysis. It should be continued as educational program because these activities may contribute to improving the prognosis and quality of life. A patients after kidney transplantation are particularly vulnerable to the effects of failure to comply with recommendations.

Treatment of hypertension in chronic kidney disease patients under specialized care: one-center cross-sectional analyses.

AIM: The study analyzed hypertension management and control rates among non-dialysis, non-transplanted hypertensive chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients under specialized care in Gdansk nephrology center in 1996-2011. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It was a retrospective, cross-sectional study analyzing data from medical records of 190, 490, 1799 and 1696 subjects with CKD, who received outpatient care in 1996, 2001, 2006 and 2011, and were included in four independent surveys, respectively. RESULTS: The average number of antihypertensive drugs per patient increased significantly (p < 0.01) as follows 1.74 ± 0.9 (1996), 2.08 ± 1.01 (2011), 2.5 ± 1.19 (2006) and 2.65 ± 1.18 (2011). The percentage of patients receiving diuretics, beta-blockers and drugs inhibiting renin-angiotensin-aldosterone increased significantly in subsequent years, while a frequency of therapy with calcium channel blockers decreased (p < 0.001). 16%, 30%, 42% and 54% of subjects had causal BP values < 140/90 mmHg (p < 0.001). When specific thresholds for CKD patients according to JNC recommendations were used, the control rate was worse but also showed significant improvement in the second, third and final surveys, i.e. 9%, 12%, 14% and 24% (p < 0.001). The subgroup analysis revealed that a better control rate was observed in following groups: < 65 years old; I-II stage of CKD; primary glomerulonephritis; without cardiovascular complications or diabetes. CONCLUSION: The study may show an improvement in the effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment in CKD patients under specialized care in Gdansk Nephrology Centre in 1996-2011.

Nephroprotective action of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade in chronic kidney disease patients: the landscape after ALTITUDE and VA NEPHRON-D trails.

The intervention in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is currently the most effective strategy that combines blood pressure lowering and renoprotection. Several large, randomized, controlled trials evidenced the renoprotective potential of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in nephropathies of almost any etiology. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, as add-on treatments to standard therapy including the optimal dose of ACEIs or ARBs reduce albuminuria or proteinuria and slow development of renal dysfunction more than placebo. No clinical evidence is available however about whether these strategies may influence on long-term kidney outcome. Three recent trials suggested that aggressive RAAS blockade, that is, combination of 2 RAAS-blocking agents, does not decrease cardiovascular and renal morbidity and may carry an increased risk of serious complications. This article reviews an evidence-based approach on the use of RAAS-inhibiting agents in chronic kidney disease and considers the implementation of dual RAAS blockade with reference to the results of ALTITUDE and VA NEPHRON-D trails aiming to aid clinicians in their treatment decisions for patients with chronic kidney disease.

The Efficacy and Safety of High-Dose Cholecalciferol Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients.

Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency are highly prevalent in CKD, affecting over 80% of hemodialysis (HD) patients and requiring therapeutic intervention. Nephrological societies suggest the administration of cholecalciferol according to the guidelines for the general population. The aim of the observational study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the therapy with a high dose of cholecalciferol in HD patients with 25(OH)D deficiency and insufficiency to reach the target serum 25(OH)D level > 30 ng/mL. A total of 22 patients (16 M), with an average age of 72.5 ± 13.03 years and 25(OH)D concentration of 13.05 (9.00-17.90) ng/mL, were administered cholecalciferol at a therapeutic dose of 70,000 IU/week (20,000 IU + 20,000 IU + 30,000 IU, immediately after each dialysis session). All patients achieved the target value > 30 ng/mL, with a mean time of 2.86 ± 1.87 weeks. In the first week, the target level of 25(OH)D (100%) was reached by 2 patients (9.09%), in the second week by 15 patients (68.18%), in the fourth week by 18 patients (81.18%), and in the ninth week by all 22 patients (100%). A significant increase in 1,25(OH)2D levels was observed during the study. However, only 2 patients (9.09%) achieved a concentration of 1,25(OH)2D above 25 ng/mL-the lower limit of the reference range. The intact PTH concentrations remained unchanged during the observation period. No episodes of hypercalcemia were detected, and one new episode of hyperphosphatemia was observed. In conclusion, our study showed that the administration of a high-therapeutic dose of cholecalciferol allowed for a quick, effective, and safe leveling of 25(OH)D concentration in HD patients.

Intradialytic Tolerance and Recovery Time in Different High-Efficiency Hemodialysis Modalities.

There are several forms of maintenance high-efficiency hemodialysis (HD), including hemodiafiltrations (HDF) in different technical modes and expanded HD, using dialyzers with medium cut-off membranes. The aim of the study was to assess the intradialytic tolerance and length of dialysis recovery time (DRT) in these modalities. This is an exploratory, crossover study in maintenance HD patients with low comorbidity and no clinical indications for the use of high-efficiency HD, who were exposed to five intermittent dialyses in random order: high-flux hemodialysis (S-HD), expanded HD (HDx), pre-dilution HDF (PRE-HDF), mix-dilution HDF (MIX-HDF) and post-dilution HDF (POST-HDF). Twenty-four dialysis sessions of each method were included in the analysis. Dialysis parameters, including blood flow rate, dialysis fluid flow rate and temperature, and pharmacological treatment were constant. Average total convection volume for post-HDF, pre-HDF and mix-HDF were 25.6 (3.8), 61.5 (7.2) and 47.1 (11.4) L, respectively. During all therapies, patients were monitored for the similarity of their hydration statuses using bioimpedance spectroscopy, and for similar variability over time in systemic blood pressure and cardiac output, while peripheral resistance was monitored using impedance cardiography. The lowest frequency of all intradialytic adverse events were observed during HDx. Delayed DRT was the shortest during PRE-HDF. Patients were also more likely to report immediate recovery while receiving PRE-HDF. These differences did not reach statistical significance; however, the study results suggest that intradialytic tolerance and DRT may depend on the dialysis method used. This supports the need of taking into account patient preferences and quality of life while individualizing high-efficiency therapy in HD patients.

Direct renin inhibition--a promising strategy for renal protection?

Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a key role in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). RAAS inhibitors, such as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), decrease the rate of progression of diabetic and non-diabetic nephropathies and are first-line therapies for CKD. Although these agents are highly effective, current therapeutic strategies are unable to sufficiently suppress the RAAS and stop CKD progression. Aliskiren, the first in a new class of RAAS-inhibiting agents (direct renin inhibitors) has been approved to treat hypertension. Aliskiren exerts renoprotective, cardioprotective, and anti-atherosclerotic effects in animal models that appear to be independent of its blood pressure lowering activity. Early clinical studies using urinary protein excretion as a marker of renal involvement suggest a possibly novel role for aliskiren in treating CKD. This review discusses the antiproteinuric efficacy and safety of aliskiren and considers the evidence for its potential renoprotection.

[Isoprostanes - important marker of the oxidative stress estimation in patients with chronic kidney disease]. / Izoprostany - wazny wskaznik stresu oksydacyjnego u chorych z objawami przewleklej choroby nerek.

UNLABELLED: The discovery of isoprostanes, which are products of non-enzymatic lipid peroxidation, resulted in the research on the new role of free radicals in physiology and pathophysiology. Isoprostane quantitative analysis is a great achievement in the evaluation of free radical impact on many diseases in human. Isoprostanes were also found to be elevated in end-stage renal disease, another condition associated with increased oxidative stress. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of nephroprotective treatments on the urinary excretion of 15-F2alpha-isoprostane in the treated patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 84 patients (32 females and 52 males); age 18-65 years (average 39.06 +/- 4.92), with chronic non-diabetic proteinuric nephropathy, normal or slightly impaired stable renal function expressed as estimated creatinine cleamace above 30 mi/min, were selected from the cohort that attended our renal outpatients department. Clinical evaluation and laboratory tests were performed at the randomization point and after each period of the study A commercial ELISA Kit (Cayman Chemical Co) was used to measure the urinary excretion of 15-F2alpha-isoprostane in the treated patients. RESULTS: It was found that the blockade of renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system (with aliskiren, cilazapril, perindopril, spironolakton) and the treatment with atorwastatin significantly reduced urinary levels of 15-F2alpha-isoprostane relatively to the control group. It was not observed for pentoxyfilline treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Urine levels of isoprostanes are significantly decreased in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease during nephroprotective treatments.

Immunity after Vaccination against COVID-19.

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic at the turn of 2019 and 2020 posed a substantial challenge for the world [...].

Pharmacological Nephroprotection in Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease-Clinical Practice Position Statement of the Polish Society of Nephrology.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a modern epidemic worldwide. Introducing renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors (i.e., ACEi or ARB) not only as blood-pressure-lowering agents, but also as nephroprotective drugs with antiproteinuric potential was a milestone in the therapy of CKD. For decades, this treatment remained the only proven strategy to slow down CKD progression. This situation changed some years ago primarily due to the introduction of drugs designed to treat diabetes that turned into nephroprotective strategies not only in diabetic kidney disease, but also in CKD unrelated to diabetes. In addition, several drugs emerged that precisely target the pathogenetic mechanisms of particular kidney diseases. Finally, the role of metabolic acidosis in CKD progression (and not only the sequelae of CKD) came to light. In this review, we aim to comprehensively discuss all relevant therapies that slow down the progression of non-diabetic kidney disease, including the lowering of blood pressure, through the nephroprotective effects of ACEi/ARB and spironolactone independent from BP lowering, as well as the role of sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors, acidosis correction and disease-specific treatment strategies. We also briefly address the therapies that attempt to slow down the progression of CKD, which did not confirm this effect. We are convinced that our in-depth review with practical statements on multiple aspects of treatment offered to non-diabetic CKD fills the existing gap in the available literature. We believe that it may help clinicians who take care of CKD patients in their practice. Finally, we propose the strategy that should be implemented in most non-diabetic CKD patients to prevent disease progression.

Comprehensive Assessment of Eyes in Kidney Transplant Recipients after Recovering from COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Patients after organ transplantation with COVID-19 have a higher risk of morbidity and mortality than patients in the general population. There are single studies that assess the eyes of COVID-19 patients, but there are no such studies on organ transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively examine the eyes of kidney transplant recipients (KTR) after recovery from mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A total of 40 KTR after COVID-19 and 20 KTR without clinical and immunological symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection as a control group was qualified for the cross-sectional study. A total of 76 eyes from 38 KTR on an average of 7 weeks after COVID-19 and 36 eyes from 18 KTR from the control group were studied. The participants underwent an ophthalmological examination, and the retinal and choroid vessels and nerves were assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography. RESULTS: We found a lower vessel density (VD) in the deep capillary plexus in the central part of the retina (VD deep central) of the study group. Women had significantly lower VD deep central in the study group (15.51 vs. 18.91, p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed an independent, negative impact of COVID-19 (p < 0.001) and female gender (p = 0.001) on VD deep central. CONCLUSION: The results of our study confirmed that changes in microcirculation induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection may affect the retinal vessels in KTR. Mild to moderate COVID-19 in KTR resulted in a significant reduction in VD deep central of the retina, with these changes being more common in females.

The enhanced renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system pharmacological blockade--which is the best?.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pharmacological inhibition of renin-angiotensin-aldosteron system (RAAS) may reduce proteinuria and the rate of chronic kidney disease progression. The aim was to compare the effects on albuminuria of the therapy with either: (i) telmisartan 80 mg and aliskiren 300 mg, (ii) telmisartan 80 mg and eplerenone 50 mg, (iii) telmisartan 160 mg as monotherapy. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-center, double-blind, cross-over, three treatments-three periods of 8 weeks each study. 18 patients with non-diabetic proteinuric CKD stage 1-3 completed the protocol. RESULTS: There was significant difference in albuminuria between studied therapies (ANOVA; p<0.01). The combination therapy with telmisartan plus aliskiren decreased albuminuria more effectively than the treatment with telmisartan plus eplerenone and monotherapy with telmisartan 160 mg OD [376 mg/g creatinine (286-686) vs. 707 (502-1204) vs. 525 (318-763); post-hoc p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that the combination therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and renin inhibitor was more effective in albuminuria lowering than the concomitant usage of ARB and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist as well as than ARB in doses two-fold higher than usually used in treatment of hypertension in patients with non-diabetic CKD and that this higher antiproteinuric efficacy was independent on changes in blood pressure.

COVID­19 in patients requiring renal replacement therapy: an overview of current data and future challenges.

Patients with chronic kidney disease, especially those on renal replacement therapy, demonstrate increased incidence and mortality from COVID­ 19, as compared with the general population. One of the main reasons for this phenomenon is a dysfunction of the immune system associated with its accelerated aging, weakened immune functions, impaired regulation of proinflammatory reactions, chronic inflammation, and immunosuppressive therapy. Most of these patients have a high rate of comorbidities, which may also have a negative impact on the severity of COVID­ 19 and prognosis. Introduction of COVID 19 vaccines has significantly changed the course of the fight against the pandemic. Due to the very severe disease, in many countries the patients receiving renal replacement therapy were prioritized for vaccination right after health care professionals. Differences in the response to vaccination were noted, which required an individualized approach and modification of the vaccination program in this patient group. Difficulties in assessing these issues are due to the differences in the research methodology used in the available studies and their observational nature. Moreover, response to vaccination varied over time depending on the geographic region and variant of the virus causing the infection. The epidemiology was significantly influenced by the improved prevention methods and treatment of infections as well as the growing percentage of vaccinated and convalescent people. We present the most important differences in the epidemiology of COVID­ 19, the course of the disease, prognosis, and prevention, as well as the challenges associated with improving the prognosis in patients receiving renal replacement therapy.

Analysis of Experiences in Preventing COVID-19 in Hemodialysis Centers of the North of Poland before the Era of Vaccination.

BACKGROUND: The appearance of very contagious SARS-CoV-2 variants and waning vaccine immunity may indicate the need to return to using universal methods of preventing the spread of COVID-19. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort survey study to describe the methods used in dialysis units to prevent and control the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and also the association between these methods and the incidence of COVID-19 among hemodialyzed (HD) patients before the era of vaccination. The study population included all maintenance HD patients (n = 1569) in 14 dialysis units in the Pomeranian Voivodeship. RESULTS: The group of 352 patients (199 men, 153 female) were confirmed for COVID-19. The absolute cumulative incidence in the studied period was 22.4%. It varied widely by dialysis units, ranging from 9.4% to 36.9%. Universal preventive methods were applied by all units. Different additional methods were implemented in some stations with varying frequency (36-86%). In order to quantify the scale of the applied additional preventive methods, we calculated a summary prevention index (PI), i.e., one point for one additional method. Lower incidence was found in centers applying dialysis in isolation of patients hospitalized due to diseases requiring hospitalization (17.42% ± 6.89 vs. 26.54 ± 6.34; p = 0.028) and higher incidence in medium-size dialysis centers (ANOVA F: p = 0.017). Significant inverse correlation between PI and incidence was demonstrated as well (r = -0.759; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The higher the number of implemented preventive measures, the lower the risk of COVID-19 infection in HD patients. Among applied procedures the isolation of hospitalized patients is of significant importance. The measures proved to be effective in prevention before the vaccination era should be continued, as the threat of SARS-CoV-2 still exists.

Heterologous high dose SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine booster may improve immune response in seronegative kidney transplant recipients.

Introduction: Three-dose mRNA vaccination against COVID-19 is unable to elicit a sufficient immune response in immunocompromised subjects. Methods: The aim of the study was to conduct a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy of a heterologous mRNA booster with mRNA-1273 in constantly seronegative kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) after three doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Twelve seronegative KTRs received a mRNA-1273 booster 5 months after the third dose of BNT162b2. Results: A total of 5 out of 12 patients (41.7%) seroconverted, with a mean titer of 353 BAU/ml. Conclusions: The administration of a heterologous mRNA vaccine as a booster may be an effective alternative for achieving post-vaccination immunity in seronegative KTRs.

Changes in Kidney Graft Function in COVID-19 Convalescents.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an increased risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, with mortality from 13% to over 30%. However, data concerning the influence of COVID-19 on long-term graft function in convalescents is lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of COVID-19 on graft function at 6 months after recovery. METHODS: A longitudinal controlled study was conducted in a group of 1058 KTRs. Of 180 patients with COVID-19 in the past, 77 KTRs (45 male) with a mean age 50.57 ± 13.37 years, Charlson Comorbidity Index of 3 (median; interquartile range [IQR], 3-5), Fragility Score of 3 (median; IQR, 3-3), and minimum 6 months after acute COVID-19 were included. The most common symptoms were weakness (75.33%), fever (74.03%), cough (51.95%), and loss of appetite (48.05%). Thirty-three patients were hospitalized; none required invasive ventilation therapy, but 16 required oxygen support. The treatment of COVID-19 included antibiotics (38.96%), thromboprophylaxis (25.97%), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or paracetamol (25.97%). RESULTS: The median (IQR) values of serum creatinine 3 months before the onset and 6 months after COVID-19 were 1.25 (0.98-1.86) and 1.26 (1.03-1.78) mg/dL (nonsignificant difference); in strata analysis, there were also no differences with regards to patients with higher and lower comorbidity (3 < Charlson Comorbidity Index < 3) and fragility (3 < Fragility Score < 3). Furthermore, creatinine concentration in KTRs and controls did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: In the group of KTRs with a mild course of COVID-19, no negative impact of the infection on graft function was observed 6 months after transplantation.

COVID-19 vaccination reduces mortality in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Patients with chronic kidney disease on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) have a very high risk of death in the course of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination to reduce the incidence of COVID-19 and the fatality rate in HD patients. A retrospective registry-based cohort study was performed in all HD adult patients in the Pomeranian Voivodeship. Vaccinations were carried out from January to April 2021 with mRNA vaccines, either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 with two-dose schedule. In the first analysis (2nd pandemic wave), 1,160 unvaccinated patients were included (59.7% males, 25.7% diabetic). In the second analysis (4th pandemic wave), 1,131 (59.4% male, 30.7% diabetic) individuals were included, 1,042 (92.13%) were fully vaccinated. Three hundred and fifteen HD patients (27.2%) were COVID-19 positive during the 2nd wave, and 6.9% (78/1,131) during the 4th wave. Within the fully vaccinated patients of the 4th wave, 60 were COVID-19 positive, 5.8 vs. 20.2% of unvaccinated COVID-19 positive patients in 2nd wave, respectively. COVID-19 incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 0.21 (4th wave-vaccinated vs. 2nd wave-unvaccinated) indicating a 79% reduction. The IRR between vaccinated and unvaccinated patients of the 4th wave was 0.28 in favor of vaccinated patients with 72% reduction. In the 2nd wave, 93 patients died as a result of COVID-19 (fatality rate: 29.5%). The fatality rate of fully vaccinated patients during the 4th wave was 6.7% (p = 0.004), while the fatality rate in the 4th wave within unvaccinated patients accounted for 11.1%. Significant clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination was demonstrated in a multicenter study in HD patients.