Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Suicide Res ; 27(2): 246-260, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34632952

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evidence-based suicide prevention interventions directed to those seeking psychiatric crisis services for suicidality in the emergency department (ED) can reduce death by suicide and related suffering. Best practice guidelines for the care of suicidal patients in the ED exist but are not accompanied by fidelity tools for use in determining whether the interventions were applied, particularly when more than one intervention is delivered concurrently. We sought to develop a universal, treatment-agnostic Suicide Care Fidelity Checklist comprised of Key Performance Elements (KPE) across the recommended suicide-specific ED interventions. METHOD: A comprehensive review of published care standards was first conducted to determine suicide-specific ED best practice treatment domains and KPEs. Subject matter experts (SMEs) were identified for each domain. Using the Delphi Consensus method, SMEs iteratively revised and refined the KPEs within their domain until achieving KPE item consensus. RESULTS: A total of three iterations was required to obtain consensus in five of six domains: comprehensive suicide assessment, lethal means counseling, suicide crisis planning, behavioral skills training, and psychoeducation about suicidality. Consensus was not fully attained for the domain involving engagement with people with lived experience. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully identified six intervention domains and 74 KPEs across domains (60 deemed essential, and 14 deemed optional), with full consensus reached for 70 KPEs. While replication of the initial findings is required, the Suicide Care Fidelity Checklist can be used as a fidelity checklist to verify delivery of suicide-specific ED interventions.HIGHLIGHTSApplied Delphi Consensus method with suicide-specific subject matter experts.Generated a treatment-agnostic, universal set of suicide prevention KPEs for EDs.Expert-derived KPEs help real-world settings to assess suicide care fidelity.


Assuntos
Suicídio , Humanos , Técnica Delphi , Suicídio/psicologia , Prevenção do Suicídio , Ideação Suicida , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
2.
Psychotherapy (Chic) ; 59(2): 143-149, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34410761

RESUMO

The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) provides clinicians with an evidence-based suicide-focused therapeutic framework to help patients understand and manage suicidal thoughts and behaviors. A key component in CAMS suicide-focused treatment planning is the development and use of the CAMS Stabilization Plan (CSP). The CSP is used to ensure between-session safety and stability by helping patients learn to cope differently, enabling clinicians to care for suicidal patients on an outpatient basis, and thereby rendering suicidal-oriented coping obsolete. While implementing and maintaining the CSP, clinicians work to identify, target, and treat patient-identified suicidal drivers aimed at lowering the patient's suicide risk. The CSP employs a collaborative, flexible, and problem-focused approach creating a unique dynamic between clinician and patient as they work together to address the patient's suicidal struggle. CAMS allows clinicians to be flexible in their approach to treating suicidal behavior, utilizing techniques and tools they know, while providing them with a unique framework to engage their suicidal patients. Additionally, there is an overt and ongoing emphasis on encouraging patients to cultivate purpose and meaning in their lives with plans, goals, and hope for the future-ultimately leading patients to discover a life worth living, which is the final focus in CAMS-guided care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Ideação Suicida , Prevenção do Suicídio , Adaptação Psicológica , Humanos , Medição de Risco/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA