Phase II trials of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F for the control of vomiting caused by cisplatin.

Three phase II studies of the serotonin antagonist GR38032F were conducted. In trial 1, 20 patients given initial chemotherapy with cisplatin at doses greater than or equal to 100 mg/m2 were randomized to receive three GR38032F doses (0.18 mg/kg) on an every-2-hour or every-4-hour schedule. In trial 2, eight similar patients were given three 0.04-mg/kg doses every 2 hours. In trial 3, 12 previously treated patients receiving cisplatin at 20-25 mg/m2 on 4 or 5 consecutive days each received three daily GR38032F doses (0.15 mg/kg) every 2 hours. In trial 1, 35% of the patients had no emesis [95% confidence interval (CI), 16%-58%] and 55% had one or two emetic episodes (95% CI, 32%-76%). Results were similar between the every-2-hour and every-4-hour schedules. In trial 2, only one of eight patients (13%) had no vomiting (95% CI, 1%-50%). In trial 3, in which previously treated patients were studied, complete control ranged from 75% on day 1 to 33% on day 3. Mild sedation, headache, and transient elevations of serum SGOT (AST) were observed. No extrapyramidal symptoms occurred. A dose of 0.15-0.18 mg/kg every 2 hours for three iv doses is recommended. Further comparison and combination studies of GR38032F are warranted.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist GR-C507/75 (GR38032F) when used as an antiemetic in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy.

GR-C507/75 (GR38032F) antagonizes the 5-HT3 (serotonin) receptor and prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in animals. In this dose-ranging trial, 44 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy known to produce nausea and vomiting (including cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) received three intravenous (IV) infusions of GR-C507/75 every two hours beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Ten dosage levels were explored, ranging from 0.04 mg/kg to 0.35 mg/kg in each of the three infusions. Toxicities were mild and included sedation, dizziness, headache, transient elevations of SGOT or alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and dry mouth. No akathisia or acute dystonic reactions were observed. Antiemetic effects were seen in patients receiving cisplatin at 120 mg/m2. GR-C507/75 can be safely administered on this schedule at IV dosages up to 0.35 mg/kg in patients receiving chemotherapy. Further studies of this agent at higher dosages and by different schedules are appropriate.

Control of chemotherapy-induced diarrhea with the synthetic enkephalin BW942C: a randomized trial with placebo in patients receiving cisplatin.

Diarrhea commonly occurs following the administration of cisplatin. BW942C, a pentapeptide, is a synthetic enkephalin shown to control castor oil-induced and traveler's diarrhea. To assess the safety and efficacy of BW942C in controlling diarrhea caused by cisplatin, 30 adults with lung cancer who had already experienced diarrhea (three or more loose bowel movements) during the 24-hour period following a prior cisplatin administration were randomized to receive either BW942C or placebo during the next cisplatin course. All patients received a concomitant antiemetic regimen including metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam during all courses. Patients administered BW942C experienced less diarrhea (27% v 67%, P = .02). Twenty-seven percent of patients given the pentapeptide had loose bowel movements as opposed to 93% who received placebo (P = .0002). There were no significant differences in the incidence and degree of vomiting and other treatment-related side effects observed between the placebo and treatment groups. We conclude that oral BW942C is more effective than placebo in controlling diarrhea following cisplatin chemotherapy.

Controlling delayed vomiting: double-blind, randomized trial comparing placebo, dexamethasone alone, and metoclopramide plus dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin.

The majority of patients receiving cisplatin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 experience delayed nausea and vomiting occurring between 24 and 120 hours after chemotherapy administration. Ninety-one patients who were receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) as initial chemotherapy were entered into this double-blind trial. All patients received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam for the control of acute emesis during the period from 0 to 24 hours after cisplatin. Patients were then randomized to one of three treatment regimens: placebo; oral dexamethasone, 8 mg twice daily for two days, then 4 mg twice daily for two days; or the combination of oral metoclopramide, 0.5 mg/kg four times daily for four days, plus oral dexamethasone administered as above. Forty-eight percent of individuals who received the two-drug combination of metoclopramide plus dexamethasone experienced delayed vomiting as opposed to 65% who were administered dexamethasone alone and 89% who received placebo (P = .006). Scores assessing the severity of delayed nausea and vomiting were consistently worse in individuals receiving placebo. The incidences of sleepiness, restlessness, heartburn, hiccoughs, loose bowel movements, insomnia, and acute dystonic reactions did not differ significantly among the three regimens and were mild and self-limited. The two-drug combination of oral metoclopramide plus dexamethasone is well tolerated, safe, and more effective than dexamethasone alone or placebo in controlling delayed vomiting following cisplatin.

Incidence, course, and severity of delayed nausea and vomiting following the administration of high-dose cisplatin.

Although many trials have evaluated the severity and treatment of nausea and vomiting immediately after cisplatin administration, no studies have focused on vomiting occurring more than 24 hours after chemotherapy--delayed emesis. Two consecutive trials were undertaken to evaluate the incidence, course (trial 1), and severity (trial 2) of delayed nausea and emesis and to develop methods to study these conditions. Eighty-six patients receiving cisplatin (120 mg/m2) for the first time were entered. On the day of cisplatin treatment, all received intravenous (IV) metoclopramide (3 mg/kg X 2 doses) plus dexamethasone (20 mg IV X 1 dose) with either diphenhydramine (50 mg IV) or lorazepam (1.0 to 1.5 mg/m2). Sixty-two percent of patients experienced no vomiting during the 24 hours immediately after administration of cisplatin. Overall, 93% of studied patients experienced some degree of delayed nausea or vomiting from 24 to 120 hours after cisplatin. In trial 1, the incidence of delayed vomiting ranged from 21% to 61% and delayed nausea from 24% to 78% in 58 patients. The highest incidence of both delayed nausea and emesis occurred during the period from 48 to 72 hours after administration of cisplatin. Patients who had no emesis during the initial 24 hours after cisplatin were less likely to experience delayed emesis. The severity of delayed nausea and vomiting was evaluated in 28 patients in trial 2. The amount of delayed nausea and vomiting was assessed daily by patients using a visual analogue scale and by an observer rating. The highest nausea and vomiting scores were seen during the period from 48 to 72 hours after administration of cisplatin, with acceptable correlation between patient scores and observer ratings. Although the nausea and vomiting occurring 24 or more hours after cisplatin administration is not as severe as that seen during the initial 24 hours after administration of cisplatin in patients not receiving antiemetics, it is a common condition that merits both further study and specific treatment.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the serotonin antagonist dolasetron mesylate in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin.

PURPOSE: This dose-ranging trial of intravenous dolasetron mesylate (MDL73,147EF) was performed to determine its adverse and antiemetic effects in patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients treated with initial cisplatin received a single intravenous dose of dolasetron mesylate administered over 20 minutes beginning 30 minutes before chemotherapy. The following four dose levels were studied: 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5.0 mg/kg. Emesis and adverse effects were measured for 24 hours after cisplatin. RESULTS: All adverse effects were mild and transient including loose stools, headache, serum AST/ALT elevations, and asymptomatic prolongation of ECG intervals. Among the dose levels, no-emesis rates from 24% to 52% were observed, and the percentage of patients having zero, one, or two emetic episodes ranged from 48% to 82%. Complete control of vomiting increased as the dose was escalated to 2.4 mg/kg, but did not improve further with higher doses. CONCLUSION: Dolasetron mesylate can be administered safely at doses up to 5.0 mg/kg, with comparable complete protection rates and increased adverse effects at doses greater than 2.4 mg/kg. Antiemetic activity was seen after cisplatin. Trials comparing single infusions of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron are under way.

High-dose edatrexate with oral leucovorin rescue: a phase I and clinical pharmacological study in adults with advanced cancer.

Our objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity of i.v. edatrexate with p.o. leucovorin. Thirty-one adults with advanced solid tumors received edatrexate as a 2-h infusion, once a week for 3 weeks, recycled every 28 days. p.o. leucovorin (10 mg/m2, every 6 h for 10 doses) began 24 h later. All had urinary alkalinization and p.o. hydration. Nine dosage levels ranging from 120 to 3750 mg/m2 were explored. Fatigue, epistaxis, nausea/emesis, mucositis, rash, myalgias, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and transient elevations of serum aspartate transferase were observed. Leukoencephalopathy with clinical manifestations occurred in two patients (one had prior cranial irradiation). Pharmacokinetic studies carried out at the 120- and 1080-mg/m2 dose levels revealed no significant difference in the elimination half-life at the two dose levels studied and no significant intrapatient variability between day 1 and day 8 edatrexate administration. Serum edatrexate levels measured using a dihydrofolate reductase inhibition assay correlated with those by high-performance liquid chromatography. Three major and two minor antitumor responses occurred. The maximum tolerated dose was 3750 mg/m2, with grade 3 or 4 leukopenia (one patient), stomatitis (one patient), and leukoencephalopathy (one patient). Because of the occurrence of leukoencephalopathy, further study of high-dose edatrexate with leucovorin rescue is not recommended.

Methodology in anti-emetic trials.

Major progress in the ability to control chemotherapy-induced emesis has been made over the past 10 years. One of the several factors contributing to this improved control has been the development of accurate assessment methodology. The application of proper study methodology fostered the identification of active single agents and led to the formation of effective anti-emetic combinations. In this communication, important areas in anti-emetic study evaluation will be outlined. Proper methodology includes selection of agents or regimens that have a good rationale for study. Patient, chemotherapy, and anti-emetic factors must be controlled or standardised in good trial design, and the evaluation techniques for determining the amount of emesis or of nausea must be performed using reliable and valid methods. The statistical design employed and number of patients entered in the trial should be determined based on achievable and relevant goals.

Dose-ranging evaluation of the substituted benzamide dazopride when used as an antiemetic in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy.

Dazopride, a substituted benzamide structurally related to metoclopramide, is a potent gastric prokinetic agent that prevents cisplatin-induced emesis in animals. Unlike metoclopramide, dazopride has no effect on dopamine receptors and therefore should not produce extrapyramidal side effects. In this dose-ranging trial, 23 patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy known to produce nausea and vomiting received three i.v. infusions of dazopride every 2 h beginning 30 min before the chemotherapy. Seven dose levels were explored ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 mg/kg in each of the three infusions. Toxicities were mild and included sedation, dizziness, visual disturbances, and headaches. All side effects were transient and were not dose-related. Antiemetic effects were observed. Dazopride can be safely given on this schedule at doses of up to 4.0 mg/kg to patients receiving chemotherapy. On the basis of the results of this trial, further studies of this agent are warranted.

The management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

This paper reviews one of the major side-effects of chemotherapy, emesis. Included are patient and treatment factors that can affect the control of nausea and vomiting as well as a summary of the management of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Midazolam in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy and antiemetics.

Benzodiazepines lessen anxiety and improve comfort in cancer patients. Midazolam is an effective benzodiazepine with a rapid onset and short duration of action, properties that could permit its use in outpatient areas or in short but stressful situations. Two consecutive trials were undertaken to study midazolam as an adjunct in patients receiving anticancer chemotherapy. Each studied midazolam given as a short infusion 30 min prior to chemotherapy at dose levels ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 mg/kg. Trial I determined the safety, sedation, and dose of midazolam in patients receiving chemotherapy of low to moderate emetic potential. Twenty-two patients were entered. No significant respiratory depression or oxygen desaturation was observed. At the optimal dose level (0.04 mg/kg), sedation began a median of 3 min following administration and continued for a median of 38 min. Sixty-four percent of patients experienced mild sedation. Trial II studied the same doses of midazolam when used in combination with intravenous metoclopramide and dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. Nineteen patients were entered; 79% experienced mild sedation. At the 0.04-mg/kg dose level, sedation began a median of 18 min following administration and continued for a median of 170 min. Midazolam can be given safely to patients receiving chemotherapy with and without concomitant antiemetics. The predictability and duration of its sedative effects suggest it can be used in outpatients.

Dose-ranging antiemetic trial of high-dose oral metoclopramide.

The present trial with high oral doses of metoclopramide was undertaken to (a) determine a well-tolerated dosage of oral metoclopramide; (b) measure the blood levels achieved with these oral doses; (c) determine the side effects of high doses; and (d) observe for antiemetic efficacy. Thirty-six patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy consisting primarily of high intravenous (i.v.) doses of cyclophosphamide plus adriamycin or cisplatin received 48 courses of oral metoclopramide. The metoclopramide dosage was escalated in six steps from 0.5 to 3.0 mg/kg and was given 1/2 h before chemotherapy, then 1 1/2, 3 1/2, 7 1/2, 11 1/2, and 15 1/2 after chemotherapy. Diphenhydramine (50 mg orally) was given with the first, third, and fifth dosages. Toxicity was generally mild, not dose related, and similar to that observed with the i.v. drug with the exception of an increased incidence of acute dystonic reactions. Antiemetic effects were observed at each dose level. In patients receiving oral metoclopramide doses of 2 or 3 mg/kg, all achieved serum levels greater than 1,000 ng/ml. High-dose oral metoclopramide was well tolerated and demonstrated antiemetic effects at the dose levels explored. We recommend 2-3 mg/kg oral metoclopramide doses with 50 mg diphenhydramine for use in future trials.

Phase 1 trial of levonantradol in chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Levonantradol is a synthetic cannabinoid with demonstrated preclinical antiemetic activity. The current phase I trial was undertaken to determine: 1) the maximally tolerated dose; 2) the side effects at the different dosage levels; and 3) to evaluate the antiemetic efficacy of levonantradol in patients receiving emesis-producing chemotherapy. Thirty-four patients received 52 courses of levonantradol. Concurrent chemotherapy most frequently consisted of high dose cisplatin (120 mg/m2), either alone or in combination with other agents. Levonantradol dosage was escalated through seven treatment levels (0.5-4.0 mg per dose) and was given intramuscularly every 4 hours. Toxicity was similar to that observed with other cannabinoids and primarily consisted of dizziness (65%), burning and erythema at the injection site (48%), mild sedation (44%), orthostatic hypotension (37%), dysphoria (29%), and urinary retention (10%). Marked urinary retention occurred in three of seven patients at the 4.0 mg per dose level, and two of 24 patients at either the 2.5 mg and 3.0 mg levels. Major or minor antiemetic responses (0-2 or 3-5 emetic episodes, respectively) occurred in 23% of patients receiving cisplatin and in 53% of patients receiving non-cisplatin containing chemotherapy. Intramuscular levonantradol can be given safely at doses up to 3.0 mg/kg, with toxicity and antiemetic efficacy similar to that observed with other cannabinoids.

Randomized phase II trial comparing two versus three doses of ondansetron when used in combination with dexamethasone in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansetron controls cisplatin-induced emesis when given in three 0.15 mg/kg doses, and preliminary data suggest that control may be maintained when fewer doses are employed. Prior trials have further shown improved antiemetic effects and fewer adverse effects of cisplatin treatment when neurotransmitter receptor blockers are combined with dexamethasone. This trial was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of the combination of dexamethasone and ondansetron and to see if equivalent results could be obtained with only two doses of ondansetron. There were 44 patients receiving initial cisplatin at a dose > or = 100 mg/m2, each given dexamethasone 20 mg and randomized to receive either two or three 0.15 mg/kg doses of ondansetron. Vomiting prevention was identical (35%) whether two or three doses were given. No new adverse effects were noted and cisplatin-induced diarrhea, usually seen in up to 60% of patients given this dose of cisplatin, was noted in only 5%. Although this trial did not demonstrate enhanced antiemetic effects with the combination, other investigators have done so and all agree that the regimen is safe and reduces adverse effects. Further exploration and use of the combination of ondansetron and dexamethasone, and studies testing fewer doses of ondansetron in this regimen are warranted.

Phase II trial of a single intravenous dose of ondansetron in patients receiving cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2.

Ondansteron, a serotonin antagonist antiemetic, controls emesis caused by cisplatin when given as multiple 0.15 mg/kg dosages in a variety of administration schedules. This trial evaluated a single 0.45 mg/kg i.v. dose of ondansetron in 21 cancer patients receiving cisplatin at doses > or = 100 mg/m2 as initial chemotherapy. Twenty-five percent of patients had no emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 9-49%), and 45% had two or fewer emetic episodes (95% confidence interval: 23-69%). No significant adverse effects were seen. In prior trials at this institution in similarly treated patients, ondansetron given in three divided doses yielded a 42% no emesis rate. In this trial a single i.v. 0.45 mg/kg dose of ondansetron prevented emesis in 25% of patients receiving initial cisplatin > or = 100 mg/m2. For this dose of cisplatin and ondansetron, the observed emesis complete control rate was lower than that previously seen using multiple dose schedules.

Antiemetic therapy: management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Physicians and nurses involved in the care of oncology patients share the responsibility for proper management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Oncology nurses have taken an active part in the research and investigation of new antiemetic agents and the sharing of this knowledge with others. Identifying patient characteristics, using specific guidelines for antiemetic selection, and a knowledge of the antiemetic agents that are active singly or in combination can mean the difference between success and failure in preventing or controlling vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Proper dosing and scheduling of antiemetics using recommendations that have proved efficacious can further decrease a patient's discomfort during a most difficult time in his or her life.

Enhancing the effectiveness of the specific serotonin antagonists. Combination antiemetic therapy with dexamethasone.

Combinations of drugs have become standard therapy for the prevention of vomiting caused by anticancer drugs like cisplatin. Recently, a new class of antiemetic agents, the potent and specific 5-HT3 receptor antagonists such as ondansetron, granisetron, and tropisetron, have been shown to be more effective and better tolerated than metoclopramide. This report describes the rationale for combination antiemetic therapy, details the testing of metoclopramide-based regimens as a model for combination therapy development, reviews completed trials of ondansetron plus dexamethasone, and offers strategies to further alleviate vomiting during anticancer chemotherapy. The reported trials testing metoclopramide-based combinations were reviewed and that experience was applied to the ongoing studies of ondansetron when used with dexamethasone and other agents. Combinations of metoclopramide, dexamethasone, and lorazepam prevented acute emesis caused by high-dose cisplatin in 63% of patients, lessened side effects, and were convenient enough to administer to outpatients. Completed trials of ondansetron and dexamethasone demonstrated improved vomiting control over ondansetron alone while using less cumbersome schedules. Attempts to improve ondansetron-based antiemetic regimens by developing optimal drug doses and schedules and adding adjuvant and different classes of antiemetic agents are now in clinical testing. Based on previous experience and current results, combinations of a specific serotonin agonist and dexamethasone are the best treatment for prevention of vomiting induced by chemotherapy. Future clinical research should aim to refine antiemetic regimens and improve emetic control through the use of new antiemetic and adjuvant agents.