Inoculation of sonicate fluid into blood culture bottles improves microbial detection in patients with orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections of the upper and lower extremities.

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of sonicate fluid culture for biological tissues in orthopedic bone and soft tissue infections have not been reported. We assessed whether inoculating the sonicate fluid of bone and soft tissue into a blood culture bottle could increase the diagnostic accuracy for biofilm-related orthopedic infections. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with infections (9 purulent arthritis, 4 osteomyelitis, 4 purulent tenosynovitis, 2 purulent bursitis, and 1 cellulitis) and 10 non-infected cases (6 carpal tunnel syndrome, 3 Dupuytren contracture, and 1 soft tissue tumor) between October 2018 and December 2020 were evaluated prospectively. We analyzed a total of 107 culture submissions (87 bone and tissue specimens and 20 controls); 42 intraoperative tissue specimens (32 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples) using the conventional method, 45 sonication samples (35 infected samples and 10 non-infected samples), and 20 control samples. Intraoperative infectious tissues were cultured using sonicate fluid culture in a blood culture bottle (SFC-CB). The applications of SFC-CB and the conventional culture method and the detection rate, sensitivity, and relationship between the sensitivity of the diagnostic methods and duration of administered preoperative antibiotics were assessed. RESULTS: The causative microorganism was detected only by SFC-CB in five patients (25%). The sensitivity (85% vs. 60%; P = 0.077) and detection rate (80% vs. 60%; P = 0.065) were higher for SFC-CB than for the conventional culture method. The sensitivity of SFC-CB was significantly higher than that of the conventional culture method in cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered for more than 1 week (77% vs. 39%; P = 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: Using SFC-CB, the diagnostic accuracy for bone and soft tissue infection was significantly improved. As biofilms are readily formed in biological tissues, sonication may also be useful for diagnosis. SFC-CB was particularly useful for cases in which preoperative antibiotics were administered.

Sonication of Extracted Implants Improves Microbial Detection in Patients With Orthopedic Implant-Associated Infections.

BACKGROUND: We assessed whether combining the conventional culture and implant sonicate fluid culture (SFC) methods increased the diagnostic accuracy of orthopedic implant-associated infection (OIAI). METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 66) undergoing implant removal (OIAI, 17; non-OIAI, 49) were evaluated prospectively. We analyzed 493 samples (39 preoperative joint aspirates, 243 peri-implant tissue specimens, 124 implant sonication, 67 controls, and 20 water bath samples). OIAI was preoperatively evaluated based on clinical evidence of infection or aspirate culture (AC). Conventional methods required positive results in either preoperative ACs or intraoperative tissue cultures (TCs), whereas the combination method required at least 1 positive culture among 3 sources (AC, TC, or SFC). The application of SFC and the detection rate, sensitivity, and specificity of the diagnostic methods were assessed. RESULTS: No controls or water bath samples harbored bacteria. Three patients (18%) were detected by SFC only and Peptostreptococcus and Corynebacterium species were isolated by SFC only. The OIAI detection rate attributable to SFC was significantly higher than that of TC (61% vs 36%; P = .02). The sensitivities of AC, TC, and SFC at a cutoff point of 1 colony-forming unit/plate and 1 positive culture were 60%, 59%, and 71%, respectively. At a cutoff point of 2 positive cultures, the combination (vs conventional) method showed significantly greater sensitivity (71% vs 47%; P = .008). CONCLUSION: By incorporating SFCs into conventional culture methods, the diagnostic accuracy in the context of OIAI was significantly improved.

Reattachment of an osteotomized greater trochanter in total hip arthroplasty using an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fiber cable.

BACKGROUND: The optimum approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA) should reduce the risk of postoperative dislocation or limping, be applicable in every case, and be reusable in the future. The purpose of this study was to introduce our transgluteal approach for THA and to evaluate the type and frequency of complications around the greater trochanter. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 892 THA cases between January 2010 and March 2015 performed using our transgluteal approach that osteotomized only the lateral anteroinferior greater trochanter. The trochanteric fragment was reattached using one of three different protocols: Group A, three non-absorbable polyester sutures; Group B, two non-absorbable polyester sutures and one ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber cable; or Group C, two UHMWPE fiber cables. Postoperative complications were assessed and recorded, and univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether risk factors and radiological complications around the greater trochanter were correlated. RESULTS: None of the hips required revision for infection, dislocation, or limping. The rate of radiological complications around the greater trochanter at 1 year was 19.2% in Group A, 16.3% in Group B, and 7.9% in Group C (p < 0.001). Risk factors for radiological complications included the patient's disease or the surgeon's experience in Group A and the patient's age or the surgeon's experience in Group C. In the relationship between postoperative pain around the greater trochanter and radiological complications, there were no significant differences in all groups; no group interaction was observed (p= 0.3875). CONCLUSION: The UHMWPE fiber cable was effective to reduce complications of the reattached osteotomized greater trochanter in THA.

In vivo serum concentration of vancomycin in antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement for the treatment and prevention of periprosthetic hip infection.

BACKGROUND: Although antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (ALAC) is used to prevent and treat periprosthetic hip infection, it is unknown how much antibiotic is deposited in the body in vivo, how high the serum concentration rises, or how long its effects last. The aim of this study was firstly to determine the amount of vancomycin (VCM) deposited as ALAC in the body, and secondly to assess the safety and drug elution profile of VCM in ALAC. METHODS: We administered VCM to prevent infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) or to treat patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Patients were classified into two groups: a low-dose group (21 hips) that received primary THA for high-risk cases, revision THA without infection, or one-staged revision THA for infection; and a high-dose group (6 hips) that received cement beads during a two-staged revision THA. The amount of VCM placed as ALAC into the hip was calculated using the remaining ALAC. The serum concentrations of VCM and creatinine were evaluated at postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28, and at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The mean amount of VCM placed as ALAC into the hip was 0.9 g and 3.4 g for cemented THA and cement beads, respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean serum concentration of VCM from ALAC in the high-dose group was significantly increased compared with that in the low-dose group on postoperative days 1, 4, 7, 14, and 28 (P < 0.0001), but it remained within a clinically safe range. No significant differences were observed between the preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine levels of either group. CONCLUSION: The average serum concentrations of VCM from ALAC were always less than the effective blood concentration, and were detectable until 6 months after surgery.

Long-term results of acetabular reconstruction using three bulk bone graft techniques in cemented total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia.

PURPOSE: The aims of this retrospective study were to firstly introduce three practical bulk bone graft techniques based on acetabular morphology for dysplasia and secondly evaluate the long-term durability of acetabular reconstruction using those techniques combined with cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: The study comprised 101 consecutive THAs with a minimum follow-up of ten years; these procedures were categorised as being L shape (n = 58), Wall (n = 33) and D shape (n = 10) types. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, all bone grafts acquired trabecular reorientation, and no evidence of revision for aseptic or radiological loosening was noted. CONCLUSIONS: These bone graft techniques will be effective for improving the management of dysplasia in cemented THA by providing both acetabular reconstruction and cement containment.

Pre-operative scoring system to determine the surgical strategy for periprosthetic hip infection.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of one- and two-stage revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and to determine a rational surgical treatment strategy for periprosthetic hip infections. METHODS: We constructed a 12-point preoperative scoring system to suggest either one- or two-stage revision THAs, based on a retrospective analysis of 55 operative procedures. Prosthesis survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the validity of the scoring system was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: At the end point of implant removal due to recurrent infection, the ten year survival rates were 94 and 87% for one- and two-stage revision THAs, respectively. One-stage revision THA was recommended for patients scoring >9 points. The risk of recurrent infection in patients scoring 4 points was 83%. The sensitivity and specificity of a cut-off value of 4 points, determined by the scoring system, were 83 and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The novel pre-operative scoring system was useful for the management of periprosthetic hip infections.

Linezolid versus daptomycin treatment for periprosthetic joint infections: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid (LZD) and daptomycin (DAP) are predominantly used to target gram-positive pathogens; however, treatment effectiveness and adverse reactions for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and adverse reactions of LZD and DAP for PJIs. METHODS: This study retrospectively evaluated 82 patients between June 2009 and December 2017, to compare the effectiveness of LZD (group L, n = 39) and DAP (group D, n = 43) for treatment of PJIs harboring gram-positive microorganisms. Surgical options used with LZD or DAP therapy included implant retention, implant removal, and a shift to another appropriate antibiotic. Infection control was defined as not requiring implant removal after the final treatment. RESULTS: Gram-positive pathogens were isolated from 72% of group L and 70% of group D patients, respectively. Whole infection control rates against gram-positive pathogens in groups L and D were 79% and 77%, respectively. Furthermore, infection control rates were 94% and 58% in group L and 75% and 80% in group D, without and with implant removal, respectively. Significantly higher clinical success rates and lower adverse event rates were observed in group D, including higher red blood cell and platelet counts and lower C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. CONCLUSIONS: Although the effectiveness of LZD and DAP was equivalent in terms of infection control rates for refractory PJIs with gram-positive pathogens, DAP therapy significantly decreased CRP levels and caused fewer adverse events than LZD treatment.

[Anaphylactic reaction to latex during spinal anesthesia: a case report].

A 46-year-old man, with a history of atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma, underwent surgery for an inguinal hernia. Forty-three minutes subsequent to spinal anesthesia, the patient complained suddenly of dyspnea with wheezing. Blood pressure decreased and skin eruption was observed on his chest. Postoperative laboratory tests revealed high IgE concentration, and a skin test confirmed an allergy to latex. The patient's allergic reaction was easily overlooked because of his history of bronchial asthma and the possibility that the hypotension was caused by the high spinal anesthesia. Latex allergy should be considered in any suspicious case presenting with these symptoms during surgery. After recovery, a skin test should be used to confirm the allergy to avoid repeated allergic episodes.