Over-transfusion with blood for suspected hemorrhagic shock is not associated with worse clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated patient outcomes after early, small volume red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the setting of presumed hemorrhagic shock. We hypothesized that transfusion with even small amounts of blood would be associated with more complications. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective review of trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2016-2021. Patients predicted to require massive transfusion who survived ≥72 h were categorized according to units of RBCs transfused in the first 24 h. A Cox regression model stratified by dichotomized ISS and adjusted for SBP <90 mm Hg and pulse >120 bpm on arrival was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 3121 (24%) received RBC transfusion within the first 24 h. Massive transfusion protocol (MTP) was activated in 38% (1188/3121): 17% received no RBCs, 27.4% 1-3 units, 32.4% 4-9 units, and 22.7% ≥10 units. Mean ISS increased with each category of RBC transfusion. There was no difference in the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), infection, cardiac arrest, venous thromboembolism or stroke for patients receiving 1-3 units compared to the non-transfused group or 4-9 units group (p > 0.05). Compared to those receiving ≥10 units, the 1-3 units group had a significantly lower risk of AKI, ARDS, and cardiac arrest. DISCUSSION: Early empiric RBC transfusion for presumed hemorrhagic shock may subject patients to potential over-transfusion and end-organ damage. Among patients meeting clinical triggers for MTP, 1-3 units of allogeneic RBCs is not associated with worse outcomes.

A new definition for massive transfusion in the modern era of whole blood resuscitation.

BACKGROUND: Multiple thresholds are defined to identify patients at risk of death from hemorrhage, including massive transfusion (MT), critical administration threshold (CAT), and resuscitation intensity (RI). All fail to account for the use of whole blood (WB). We hypothesized that a definition including WB transfusion would better predict early mortality following trauma. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all trauma patients with activation of the MT protocol from December 2018 to February 2020. Combinations of WB, RBCs, and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) units transfused during the initial hour of resuscitation were compared using receiver operating characteristic and area under the receiver curve (AUC) for 3- and 6-h mortality. WB massive transfusion (WB MT) score was defined as the sum of each unit RBC plus three times each unit of WB transfused within the first hour of resuscitation. RESULTS: There were 235 patients eligible for analysis with 60 resuscitated using ≥1 unit of WB. Overall, 27 and 29 patients died in the first 3 and 6 h, respectively. WB MT ≥7 had the greatest 3-h and 6-h mortality AUC values (0.78 and 0.79, respectively) when compared to MT, CAT, RI4+, and other attempted definitions using units of WB, RBC, and FFP. Compared to WB MT-, WB MT+ patients died at significantly higher rates at 3 h (28.9% vs. 3.1%, p < .001), 24 h (35.5% vs. 5.7%, p < .001), and 28 days (42.1% vs. 11.9%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: WB MT is the first measure of massive resuscitation to incorporate WB and better identifies early mortality than other definitions.

Perception of risk in massive transfusion as it relates to fetal outcomes: A survey of surgeons and nurses at one American trauma center.

BACKGROUND: The use of blood products early in the resuscitation of bleeding trauma patients is widely accepted, but made difficult by limited supplies of D- red blood cell (RBC)-containing products. Use of D+ RBC-containing products would alleviate this issue, but could lead to alloimmunization. Risk associated with transfusing D+ RBC in emergency bleeding situations is being reconsidered. The level of concern surrounding emergency transfusion as it relates to future fetal harm was surveyed among surgeons and nurses. METHODS: Faculty and staff in the Departments of Surgery and Nursing were surveyed on the risks of receiving an emergency RBC transfusion and the subsequent potential for fetal harm. Answers were grouped as likely to accept (likely/very likely) or refuse transfusion (unlikely/very unlikely). Participants were compared by sex, and women by child-bearing age, ([15-50 years] vs. [>50 years]). RESULTS: Ninety surveys were initiated with 76 fully completed. Male (n = 39) and female (n = 37) respondents were comparable. Most female respondents (30/37, 81%) were of childbearing age. Overall, both males (38/39, 95%) and females (33/37, 89%; p = .19) were likely to accept a transfusion in an emergency. There was no difference in transfusion acceptance if the risk of fetal harm was presented as 1% (p = .73) or 0.1% (p = .51). Most females (34/37, 92%) were not opposed to transfusion even if there was an unspecified risk of future fetal harm. CONCLUSION: Most of the surgeons and nurses who responded would accept a transfusion in an emergency situation even if it might lead to harming a future fetus.

The Depth of Sternal Fracture Displacement Is Not Associated With Blunt Cardiac Injury.

BACKGROUND: Little evidence exist associating displaced sternal fractures with blunt cardiac injury (BCI), especially regarding the depth and severity of sternal fracture displacement and risk of BCI. The purpose of this study was to quantify sternal fracture severity by the degree of displacement and to evaluate the association of fracture severity with BCI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective review was performed from 2011 to 2014. All adult patients with sternal fracture were identified from the trauma registry, and sternal fracture displacement was quantified as mild (>0 mm, <5 mm), moderate (≥5 mm, <10 mm), or severe (≥10 mm). BCI was diagnosed according to standard AAST grading. Analysis was performed to assess the association of sternal fracture displacement with BCI, which was the primary outcome of interest. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-five patients with sternal fractures were included in the study. Forty-five percentage of patients suffered a displaced fracture, and 42.6% were diagnosed with BCI. There was no difference in mean fracture displacement when compared to patients without BCI (2.4 versus 1.6 mm, P = 0.07). There was no significant increase in BCI with sternal fracture displacement when compared to patients with nondisplaced fractures (44.3% versus 41.1%, P = 0.62). Neither fracture displacement (OR 1.10, CI 95% 0.65-1.88) nor severe displacement (OR 2.34, CI 95% 0.64-8.54) was associated with significantly increased risk of BCI. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant association between the depth of sternal fracture displacement and BCI. Further evaluation and management for BCI should be reserved in the absence of additional symptoms or findings.

In-flight ultrasound identification of pneumothorax.

Ultrasound is a standard adjunct to the initial evaluation of injured patients in the emergency department. We sought to evaluate the ability of prehospital, in-flight thoracic ultrasound to identify pneumothorax. Non-physician aeromedical providers were trained to perform and interpret thoracic ultrasound. All adult trauma patients and adult medical patients requiring endotracheal intubation underwent both in-flight and emergency department ultrasound evaluations. Findings were documented independently and reviewed to ensure quality and accuracy. Results were compared to chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT). One hundred forty-nine patients (136 trauma/13 medical) met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.4 (18-94) years; 69 % were male. Mean injury severity score was 17.68 (1-75), and mean chest injury score was 2.93 (0-6) in the injured group. Twenty pneumothoraces and one mainstem intubation were identified. Sixteen pneumothoraces were correctly identified in the field. A mainstem intubation was misinterpreted. When compared to chest CT (n = 116), prehospital ultrasound had a sensitivity of 68 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 46-85 %), a specificity of 96 % (95 % CI 90-98 %), and an overall accuracy of 91 % (95 % CI 85-95 %). In comparison, emergency department (ED) ultrasound had a sensitivity of 84 % (95 % CI 62-94 %), specificity of 98 % (95 % CI 93-99 %), and an accuracy of 96 % (95 % CI 90-98 %). The unique characteristics of the aeromedical environment render the auditory element of a reliable physical exam impractical. Thoracic ultrasonography should be utilized to augment the diagnostic capabilities of prehospital aeromedical providers.

Comparison of military and civilian surgeon outcomes with emergent trauma laparotomy in a mature military-civilian partnership.

Introduction: Medical readiness is of paramount concern for active-duty military providers. Low volumes of complex trauma in military treatment facilities has driven the armed forces to embed surgeons in high-volume civilian centers to maintain clinical readiness. It is unclear what impact this strategy may have on patient outcomes in these centers. We sought to compare emergent trauma laparotomy (ETL) outcomes between active-duty Air Force Special Operations Surgical Team (SOST) general surgeons and civilian faculty at an American College of Surgeons verified level 1 trauma center with a well-established military-civilian partnership. Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-center database of ETL from 2019 to 2022 was performed. ETL was defined as laparotomy from trauma bay within 90 min of patient arrival. The primary outcome was to assess for all-cause mortality differences at multiple time points. Results: 514 ETL were performed during the study period. 22% (113 of 514) of patients were hypotensive (systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg) on arrival. Six SOST surgeons performed 43 ETL compared with 471 ETL by civilian faculty. There were no differences in median ED length of stay (27 min vs 22 min; p=0.21), but operative duration was significantly longer for SOST surgeons (129 min vs 110 min; p=0.01). There were no differences in intraoperative (5% vs 2%; p=0.30), 6-hour (3% vs 5%; p=0.64), 24-hour (5% vs 5%; p=1.0), or in-hospital mortality rates (5% vs 8%; p=0.56) between SOST and civilian surgeons. SOST surgeons did not significantly impact the odds of 24-hour mortality on multivariable analysis (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.10, 6.09). Conclusion: Trauma-related mortality for patients undergoing ETL was not impacted by SOST surgeons when compared with their civilian counterparts. Military surgeons may benefit from the valuable clinical experience and mentorship of experienced civilian trauma surgeons at high volume trauma centers without creating a deficit in the quality of care provided. Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic/care management.

Intra-abdominal packing does not increase infection risk or mandate longer presumptive antibiotic therapy.

BACKGROUND: Damage control laparotomy allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy with improved mortality. In-tra-abdominal packing is often used to limit hemorrhage. Temporary abdominal closure is associated with increased rates of subse-quent intra-abdominal infection. The effect of increased duration of antibiotics is unknown on these infection rates. We sought to determine the role of antibiotics in damage control surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy on admission to an ACS verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was intra-abdominal abscess formation following damage control laparotomy. RESULTS: Two-hundred and thirty-nine patients underwent DCS during the study period. A majority were packed (141/239, 59.0%). No differences existed in demographics or injury severity between groups, and infection rates were similar (30.5% vs. 38.8%, P=0.18). Patients with infection were more likely to have suffered gastric injury (23.3% vs. 6.1%, P=0.003) than those without complication. There was no significant association between gram negative and anaerobic (Odds Radio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.05) or antifungal therapy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.74-1.31) and infection rate, regardless of duration on multivariate regression CONCLUSION: Our study offers the first review of the effect of antibiotic duration on intra-abdominal complications following DCS. Gastric injury was more commonly identified in patients who developed intra-abdominal infection. Duration of antimicrobial therapy does not affect infection rate in patients who are packed following DCS.

Early Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Traumatically Injured Patients: A National Trauma Database Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in acute trauma patients is a poorly characterized event. While ECMO most commonly has been deployed for advanced cardiopulmonary or respiratory failure following initial resuscitation, growing levels of evidence for out of hospital cardiac arrest support early ECMO cannulation as part of resuscitative efforts. We sought to perform a descriptive analysis evaluating traumatically injured patients, who were placed on ECMO, during their initial resuscitation period. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program Database from 2017 to 2019. All traumatically injured patients who received ECMO within the first 24 hours of their hospitalization were assessed. Descriptive statistics were used to define patient characteristics and injury patterns associated with the need for ECMO, while mortality represented the primary outcome evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 696 trauma patients received ECMO during their hospitalization, of which 221 were placed on ECMO within the first 24 hours. Early ECMO patients were on average 32.5 years old, 86% male, and sustained a penetrating injury 9% of the time. The average ISS was 30.7, and the overall mortality rate was 41.2%. Prehospital cardiac arrest was noted in 18.2% of the patient population resulting in a 46.8% mortality. Of those who underwent resuscitative thoracotomy, a 53.3% mortality rate was present. CONCLUSION: Early cannulation for ECMO in severely injured patients may provide an opportunity for rescue therapy following severe injury patterns. Further evaluation regarding the safety profile, cannulation strategies, and optimal injury patterns for these techniques should be evaluated.

Balanced resuscitation and earlier mortality end points: bayesian post hoc analysis of the PROPPR trial.

Introduction: The Pragmatic Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial failed to demonstrate a mortality difference for hemorrhaging patients receiving a balanced (1:1:1) vs a 1:1:2 resuscitation at 24 hours and 30 days. Recent guidelines recommend earlier mortality end points for hemorrhage-control trials, and the use of contemporary statistical methods. The aim of this post hoc analysis of the PROPPR trial was to evaluate the impact of a balanced resuscitation strategy at early resuscitation time points using a Bayesian analytical framework. Methods: Bayesian hierarchical models were created to assess mortality differences at the 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours time points between study cohorts. Posterior probabilities and Bayes factors were calculated for each time point. Results: A 1:1:1 resuscitation displayed a 96%, 99%, 94%, 92%, 96%, and 94% probability for mortality benefit at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours, respectively, when compared with a 1:1:2 approach. Associated Bayes factors for each respective time period were 21.2, 142, 14.9, 11.4, 26.4, and 15.5, indicating 'strong' to 'decisive' supporting evidence in favor of balanced transfusions. Conclusion: This analysis provides evidence in support that a 1:1:1 resuscitation has a high probability of mortality benefit when compared with a 1:1:2 strategy, especially at the newly defined more proximate time points during the resuscitative period. Researchers should consider using Bayesian approaches, along with more proximate end points when assessing hemorrhage-related mortality, for the analysis of future clinical trials. Level of evidence: Level III/Therapeutic.

The females have spoken: A patient-centered national survey on the administration of emergent transfusions with the potential for future fetal harm.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death. Early in the resuscitation, only RhD-positive red blood cells are likely to be available, which poses a small risk of causing harm to a future fetus if transfused to an RhD-negative females of childbearing age (CBA), that is, 15 to 49 years old. We sought to characterize how the population, in particular females of CBA, felt about emergency blood administration vis-a-vis potential future fetal harm. METHODS: A national survey was performed using Facebook advertisements in three waves from January 2021 to January 2022. The advertisements directed users to the survey site with seven demographic questions and four questions on accepting transfusion with differing probabilities for future fetal harm (none/any/1:100/1:10,000). Acceptance of transfusion questions were scored on 3-point Likert scale (likely/neutral/unlikely). Only completed responses by females were analyzed. RESULTS: Advertisements were viewed 16,600,430 times by 2,169,805 people with 15,396 advertisement clicks and 2,873 surveys initiated. Most (2,256 of 2,873 [79%]) were fully completed. Majority (2,049 of 2,256 [90%]) of respondents were female. Eighty percent of females (1,645 of 2,049) were of CBA. Most females responded "likely" or "neutral" when asked whether they would accept a lifesaving transfusion if the following risk of fetal harm were present: no risk (99%), any risk (83%), 1:100 risk (85%), and 1:10,000 risk (92%). There were no differences between females of CBA versus non-CBA with respect to the likelihood of accepting lifesaving transfusion with any potential for future fetal harm ( p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: This national survey suggests that most females would accept lifesaving transfusion even with the potential low risk of future fetal harm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

It is time to look in the mirror: Individual surgeon outcomes after emergent trauma laparotomy.

BACKGROUND: Multiple quality indicators are used by trauma programs to decrease variation and improve outcomes. However, little if any provider level outcomes related to surgical procedures are reviewed. Emergent trauma laparotomy (ETL) is arguably the signature case that trauma surgeons perform on a regular basis, but few data exist to facilitate benchmarking of individual surgeon outcomes. As part of our comprehensive performance improvement program, we examined outcomes by surgeon for those who routinely perform ETL. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ETL directly from the trauma bay by trauma faculty from December 2019 to February 2021 was conducted. Patients were excluded from mortality analysis if they required resuscitative thoracotomy for arrest before ETL. Surgeons were compared by rates of damage control and mortality at multiple time points. RESULTS: There were 242 ETL (7-32 ETLs per surgeon) performed by 14 faculties. Resuscitative thoracotomy was performed in 7.0% (n = 17) before ETL. Six patients without resuscitative thoracotomy died intraoperatively and damage-control laparotomy was performed on 31.9% (n = 72 of 226 patients). Mortality was 4.0% (n = 9) at 24 hours and 7.1% (n = 16) overall. Median Injury Severity Score (p = 0.21), new injury severity score (p = 0.21), and time in emergency department were similar overall among surgeons (p = 0.15), while operative time varied significantly (40-469 minutes; p = 0.005). There were significant differences between rates of individual surgeon's mortality (range [hospital mortality], 0-25%) and damage-control laparotomy (range, 14-63%) in ETL. CONCLUSION: Significant differences exist in outcomes by surgeon after ETL. Benchmarking surgeon level performance is a necessary natural progression of quality assurance programs for individual trauma centers. Additional data from multiple centers will be vital to allow for development of more granular quality metrics to foster introspective case review and quality improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level III.

Use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade is associated with improved outcomes in patients with multiple rib fractures.

BACKGROUND: Rib fractures are common among trauma patients and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. There are numerous treatment options, but ideal management is unclear. Delivery of local anesthetic via an analgesia catheter for continuous intercostal nerve blockade offers an attractive potential option for management of patients with rib fractures. METHODS: We performed a single-center, retrospective case-control analysis of trauma patients with multiple rib fractures from 2016 to 2018, comparing patients managed with continuous intercostal nerve blockade with standard care. Matching was performed in a 2:1 ratio by Injury Severity Score, age, and gender. Respiratory morbidity potentially secondary to rib fractures, including unplanned intubation, failure of extubation, need for tracheostomy, pneumonia, or mortality, were all identified and included. Potential complications due to catheter insertion were identified to be recorded. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day hospital-free days. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-three patients were eligible for analysis, with 48 managed using intercostal blockade compared with 96 matching controls. No complications of intercostal blockade were identified during the study period. Controls demonstrated fewer rib fractures (6.60±4.11 vs. 9.3±3.73, p=0.001) and fewer flail segments (0.8±1.76 vs. 2.0±2.94, p=0.02). Those managed with intercostal blockade demonstrated significantly more 30-day hospital-free days (15.9±6.43 vs. 13.2±9.94, p=0.048), less incidence of pneumonia (4.2% vs. 16.7%, p=0.03), and lower hospital mortality (2.1% vs. 13.5%, p=0.03). When adjusting for number of rib fractures and number of flail segments, use of continuous intercostal nerve blockade was significantly associated with lower hospital mortality (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.91), pneumonia (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.76), or need for tracheostomy (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.83). DISCUSSION: The addition of continuous intercostal nerve blockade may help to improve outcomes in patients with multiple rib fractures compared with standard care alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management; level IV.

Splenectomy does not affect the development of pneumonia following severe traumatic brain injury.

The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway offers a proposed mechanism to describe the increased risk of pneumonia following severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Vagal activity transmitted to the spleen results in decreased inflammatory cytokine production and immunosuppression. However, no clinical evidence exists. We sought to compare pneumonia rates among patients with TBI and splenectomy using a retrospective analysis of all trauma patients with splenic injury requiring splenectomy or TBI admitted to an ACS verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016. Admission Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) ≤ 8 was used to identify sTBI. Pneumonia was defined by respiratory culture obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage. Analysis included χ2 and one-way analysis of variance followed by multivariate logistic regression to determine the association of sTBI and splenectomy of development of pneumonia. Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were included for primary analysis, 247 with sTBI, 180 with splenectomy, and 14 with both sTBI and splenectomy. Rates of pneumonia were increased, although not significant among patients with sTBI and splenectomy and both sTBI alone (71.4 vs. 49.4%, p = 0.11). On multivariate regression, the risk of pneumonia was increased with both splenectomy and sTBI (OR 3.18; 95% CI, 0.75-13.45) and sTBI alone, although significant in the latter only (OR 3.56; 95% CI, 2.12-5.97). Based on these results, splenectomy does not appear to influence the development of pulmonary immunosuppression and pneumonia following sTBI.

Early comprehensive testing for COVID-19 is essential to protect trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic presents a threat to health care systems worldwide. Trauma centers may be uniquely impacted, given the need for rapid invasive interventions in severely injured and the growing incidence of community infection. We discuss the impact that SARS-CoV-2 has had in our trauma center and our steps to limit the potential exposures. METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of the trauma service, from March 16 to 30, following the appearance of SARS-CoV-2 in our state. We recorded the daily number of trauma patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the presence of clinical symptoms or radiological signs of COVID-19, and the results of verbal symptom screen (for new admissions). The number of trauma activations, admissions, and census, as well as staff exposures and infections, was recorded daily. RESULTS: Over the 14-day evaluation period, we tested 85 trauma patients for SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 21 (25%) were found to be positive. Sixty percent of the patients in the trauma/burn intensive care unit were infected with SARS-CoV-2. Positive verbal screen results, presence of ground glass opacities on admission chest CT, and presence of clinical symptoms were not significantly different in patients with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection (p > 0.05). Many infected patients were without clinical symptoms (9/21, 43%) or radiological signs on admission (18/21, 86%) of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Forty-five percent of trauma patients are asymptomatic at the time of SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Respiratory symptoms, as well as verbal screening (recent fevers, shortness of breath, cough, international travel, and close contact with known SARS-CoV-2 carriers), are inaccurate in the trauma population. These findings demonstrate the need for comprehensive rapid testing of all trauma patients upon presentation to the trauma bay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic tests or criteria, level III, Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

Temporal Dysregulation of the Angiopoietin-2/-1 Ratio After Trauma and Associations With Injury Characteristics and Outcomes.

Traumatic injury and hemorrhagic shock result in endothelial cell activation and vascular dysfunction that, if not corrected, can propagate multiorgan failure. Angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 are important regulators of endothelial cell function, and the ratio of plasma angiopoietin-2-to-1 is a useful indicator of overall vascular health. We therefore characterized plasma angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios over time after trauma in adults in an effort to gain insight into the pathophysiology that may drive post-traumatic vasculopathy and organ injury. We performed a single-center prospective observational study to measure plasma angiopoietin-1 and -2 levels and determine angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios in adult trauma patients upon hospital arrival and after 12, 24, and 48 h. Compared with levels in healthy adults, angiopoietin-1 levels were significantly elevated at hospital arrival, and angiopoietin-2 levels were significantly elevated at 12, 24, and 48 h. These kinetics translated in angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios that were significantly greater than controls at 24 and 48 h. After regression analysis, elevated angiopoietin-2 levels were independently associated with blunt injuries at admission, with coagulopathy at admission and 12 h, and with hemorrhagic shock at 24 and 48 h. Significant correlations were observed between both angiopoietins and 24-h transfusion requirements. Angiopoietin-2/-1 ratios correlated with mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. In this study, we demonstrate novel temporal associations between angiopoietin dysregulation and blunt injuries, acute coagulopathy, and hemorrhagic shock. Moreover, our findings highlight the presence of endothelial activation following traumatic insults in adults that may contribute to worse clinical outcomes.

Plasma Angiopoietin-2/-1 Ratio is Elevated and Angiopoietin-2 Levels Correlate With Plasma Syndecan-1 Following Pediatric Trauma.

BACKGROUND: Angiopoietin-1 (Agpt-1) and Agpt-2 are cytokine regulators of vascular endothelial integrity. Elevated plasma Agpt-2 levels and ratios of Agpt-2:Agpt-1 are associated with adverse outcomes in adult trauma and pediatric sepsis populations. However, the behavior of the angiopoietins after pediatric trauma has not been characterized, and their relationship to endothelial glycocalyx damage, indicated by plasma syndecan-1 (Syn-1) levels, has not been established. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively collected data from 52 pediatric trauma patients and 12 control patients at a level one pediatric trauma center from 2013 to 2016. We measured Agpt-1, Agpt-2, and Syn-1 levels from plasma taken upon hospital arrival and 24 h after admission. Angiopoietin levels were compared to controls, and the correlation between Agpt-2 and Syn-1 was assessed. RESULTS: Plasma Agpt-1 and Agpt-2 levels are elevated immediately after pediatric trauma compared with controls. At 24 h, trauma patients demonstrated significantly elevated plasma Agpt-2:Agpt-1 ratios relative to controls due to decline of Agpt-1 levels to near that of controls. Higher 24-h Agpt-2 levels are associated with more hypoperfusion, and elevated 24-h Agpt-2:Agpt-1 ratios are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Significant positive correlations between Agpt-2 and Syn-1 upon admission and at 24 h after injury were identified. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest dysregulation of circulating angiopoietins after pediatric trauma that may be linked to endothelial glycocalyx injury. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and determine the relationship of Agpt-2 with other markers of endotheliopathy.

Outcomes in patients with gunshot wounds to the brain.

INTRODUCTION: Gunshot wounds to the brain (GSWB) confer high lethality and uncertain recovery. It is unclear which patients benefit from aggressive resuscitation, and furthermore whether patients with GSWB undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have potential for survival or organ donation. Therefore, we sought to determine the rates of survival and organ donation, as well as identify factors associated with both outcomes in patients with GSWB undergoing CPR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study at 25 US trauma centers including dates between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Patients were included if they suffered isolated GSWB and required CPR at a referring hospital, in the field, or in the trauma resuscitation room. Patients were excluded for significant torso or extremity injuries, or if pregnant. Binomial regression models were used to determine predictors of survival/organ donation. RESULTS: 825 patients met study criteria; the majority were male (87.6%) with a mean age of 36.5 years. Most (67%) underwent CPR in the field and 2.1% (n=17) survived to discharge. Of the non-survivors, 17.5% (n=141) were considered eligible donors, with a donation rate of 58.9% (n=83) in this group. Regression models found several predictors of survival. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. CONCLUSION: We found that GSWB requiring CPR during trauma resuscitation was associated with a 2.1% survival rate and overall organ donation rate of 10.3%. Several factors appear to be favorably associated with survival, although predictions are uncertain due to the low number of survivors in this patient population. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. These results are a starting point for determining appropriate treatment algorithms for this devastating clinical condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Diagnosis of diaphragm injuries using modern 256-slice CT scanners: too early to abandon operative exploration.

BACKGROUND: Missed injury of the diaphragm may result in hernia formation, enteric strangulation, and death. Compounding the problem, diaphragmatic injuries are rare and difficult to diagnose with standard imaging. As such, for patients with high suspicion of injury, operative exploration remains the gold standard for diagnosis. As no current data currently exist, we sought to perform a pragmatic evaluation of the diagnostic ability of 256-slice multidetector CT scanners for diagnosing diaphragmatic injuries after trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review of trauma patients from 2011 to 2018 was performed at an American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center to identify the diagnostic accuracy of CT scan for acute diaphragm injury. All patients undergoing abdominal operation were eligible for inclusion. Two separate levels of CT scan technology, 64-slice and 256-slice, were used during this time period. The prospective imaging reports were reviewed for the diagnosis of diaphragm injury and the results confirmed with the operative record. Injuries were graded using operative description per the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma guidelines. RESULTS: One thousand and sixty-eight patients underwent operation after preoperative CT scan. Acute diaphragm injury was identified intraoperatively in 14.7%. Most with diaphragmatic injury underwent 64-slice CT (134 of 157, 85.4%). Comparing patients receiving 64-slice or 256-slice CT scan, there was no difference in the side of injury (left side 57.5% vs. 69.6%, p=0.43) or median injury grade (3 (3, 3) vs. 3 (2, 3), p=0.65). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the 256-slice CT were similar to the 64-slice CT (56.5% vs. 45.5%, 93.7% vs. 98.1%, and 89.0% vs. 90.2%). DISCUSSION: The new 256-slice multidetector CT scanner fails to sufficiently improve diagnostic accuracy over the previous technology. Patients with suspicion of diaphragm injury should undergo operative intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, diagnostic test or criteria.

Impact of initial temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery: a retrospective analysis.

Background: Damage control surgery has revolutionized trauma surgery. Use of damage control surgery allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy at the risk of loss of abdominal domain and intra-abdominal complications. Temporary abdominal closure is possible with multiple techniques, the choice of which may affect ability to achieve primary fascial closure and further complication. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy upon admission to an ACS-verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was ability to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization. Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria for inclusion. Primary skin closure (57.7%), ABThera™ VAC system (ABT) (15.1%), Bogota bag (BB) (25.1%), or a modified Barker's vacuum-packing (BVP) (2.1%) were used in the initial laparotomy. Patients receiving skin-only closure had significantly higher rates of primary fascial closure and lower hospital mortality, but also significantly lower mean lactate, base deficit, and requirement for massive transfusion. Between ABT or BB, use of ABT was associated with increased rates of fascial closure. Multivariate regression revealed primary skin closure to be significantly associated with primary fascial closure while BB was associated with failure to achieve fascial closure. Conclusions: Primary skin closure is a viable option in the initial management of the open abdomen, although these patients demonstrated less injury burden in our study. Use of vacuum-assisted dressings continues to be the preferred method for temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery for trauma.

Sarcopenia Measured Using Masseter Area Predicts Early Mortality following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Sarcopenia is strongly associated with poor outcomes and mortality following injury among the geriatric population. Diagnosis using psoas area is most common but may be unavailable given limited radiographic evaluation following low-impact injuries. Masseter area has recently been identified as an available alternative and associated with 2-year mortality following injury. We sought to validate this measure and its association with early mortality following severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) using a retrospective analysis of all geriatric trauma patients with sTBI admitted from 2011-2016 to our trauma center. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 was used to identify sTBI. Bilateral masseter area was measured 2 cm below the zygomatic arch and the mean used for analysis. Sarcopenia was defined as mean masseter area one standard deviation or less from the sex-based mean. Multivariate models with logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards test followed univariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated and evaluated by log rank. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day mortality. A total of 108 patients were identified for inclusion. Twenty-five patients, 16 male and nine female, had sarcopenia with mean masseter areas of 2.81 ± 0.45 cm2 and 2.24 ± 0.42 cm2, respectively. Patients with sarcopenia had significantly increased rates of 30-day mortality (80.0% vs. 50.6%; p = 0.01). Sarcopenia (odds ratio [OR], 2.95; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-8.49) and decreasing masseter area were significantly associated with 30-day mortality (OR, 0.66; 95% CI 0.46-0.95) in multivariate modeling. Masseter area is a readily available and objective measure to determine sarcopenia, which is significantly associated with in-creased 30-day mortality following sTBI.