Experiences and insights from partners of individuals with single-ventricle CHD: a pilot qualitative research study.

INTRODUCTION: With advances in care, an increasing number of individuals with single-ventricle CHD are surviving into adulthood. Partners of individuals with chronic illness have unique experiences and challenges. The goal of this pilot qualitative research study was to explore the lived experiences of partners of individuals with single-ventricle CHD. METHODS: Partners of patients ≥18 years with single-ventricle CHD were recruited and participated in Experience Group sessions and 1:1 interviews. Experience Group sessions are lightly moderated groups that bring together individuals with similar circumstances to discuss their lived experiences, centreing them as the experts. Formal inductive qualitative coding was performed to identify salient themes. RESULTS: Six partners of patients participated. Of these, four were males and four were married; all were partners of someone of the opposite sex. Themes identified included uncertainty about their partners' future health and mortality, becoming a lay CHD specialist, balancing multiple roles, and providing positivity and optimism. Over time, they took on a role as advocates for their partners and as repositories of medical history to help navigate the health system. Despite the uncertainties, participants described championing positivity and optimism for the future. CONCLUSIONS: In this first-of-its-kind pilot study, partners of individuals with single-ventricle CHD expressed unique challenges and experiences in their lives. There is a tacit need to design strategies to help partners cope with those challenges. Further larger-scale research is required to better understand the experiences of this unique population.

Determining Unmet Needs Among Workers' Compensation Stakeholders to Prevent Work Disability in the State of Vermont.

PURPOSE: Vermont has high rates of young people receiving federal disability benefits leading to substantial gaps in the workforce. The purpose of this project was to determine the unmet needs of interested parties in the workers' compensation (WC) process. METHODS: A type of focus group, experience groups, was used to elicit key parties' experiences in the WC system. Facilitators used open-ended prompts to encourage discussion among participants about their experience with the WC system. Data were analyzed using thematic coding procedures to identify common motifs. RESULTS: Common themes emerged including challenges in navigating the WC system, lack of communication among stakeholders, and providing and receiving appropriate health care to facilitate RTW. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding unmet needs of interested parties in the WC process allows for the creation of targeted, high-value, early intervention strategies to reduce long-term work disability.

Examining the Real-Life Journey of Individuals and Families Affected by Single-Ventricle Congenital Heart Disease.

Background The lifetime journey of patients with single-ventricle congenital heart disease is characterized by long-term challenges that are incompletely understood and still unfolding. Health care redesign requires a thorough understanding of this journey to create and implement solutions that improve outcomes. This study maps the lifetime journey of individuals with single-ventricle congenital heart disease and their families, identifies the most meaningful outcomes to them, and defines significant challenges in the journey. Methods and Results This qualitative research study involved experience group sessions and 1:1 interviews of patients, parents, siblings, partners, and stakeholders. Journey maps were created. The most meaningful outcomes to patients and parents and significant gaps in care were identified across the life journey. A total of 142 participants from 79 families and 28 stakeholders were included. Lifelong and life-stage specific journey maps were created. The most meaningful outcomes to patients and parents were identified and categorized using a "capability (doing the things in life you want to), comfort (experience of physical/emotional pain/distress), and calm (experiencing health care with the least impact on daily life)" framework. Gaps in care were identified and classified into areas of ineffective communication, lack of seamless transitions, lack of comprehensive support, structural deficiencies, and insufficient education. Conclusions There are significant gaps in care during the lifelong journey of individuals with single-ventricle congenital heart disease and their families. A thorough understanding of this journey is a critical first step in developing initiatives to redesign care around their needs and priorities. This approach can be used for people with other forms of congenital heart disease and other chronic conditions. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04613934.

Outcomes That Matter Most to Young Adults Diagnosed with Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to provide insight for improvement in care for young adults diagnosed with cancer (YADC), by identifying underemphasized outcomes that strongly matter to YADC and the gaps in care that may limit achieving these outcomes for this unique and vulnerable population. Methods: Twenty-seven YADC, ages 25-39, participated in unstructured discussions focusing on topics relating to diagnosis, daily experiences living with cancer outside of the clinical setting, goals, concerns, and clinical care experience. Most participants engaged in group discussions using Experience Group methodology. Discussions were designed to collect information on three dimensions of health: capability, comfort, and calm (CCC). Data were coded using thematic analysis with NVivo software. Results: Several themes were identified within the CCC framework: capability in terms of confronting mortality at a young age, losing youthful identity and control over major life course decisions, especially fertility, and debilitating side effects, comfort in terms of the lack of understanding from peers and family and the fear of cancer recurrence, and calm was discussed as the difficulty of making complex medical decisions, financial toxicity, and loss of clinical support in survivorship. Conclusion: This research highlighted four care additions that are important for YADC: (1) concise and understandable education about their condition and treatment; (2) same-age support groups; (3) fertility support; and (4) better care transitions for life after cancer. These findings emphasize the importance of creating a collaborative, multidisciplinary care team and a holistic approach with care innovations that support clinicians to meet the unique needs of YADC.