Associations between the ALSFRS-R score and urate levels during 12 months of edaravone treatment for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Post hoc analysis of ALSFRS-R scores in clinical studies MCI186-16, MCI186-17, and MCI186-19.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: In this study we examined the relationship between urate levels at baseline and functional change measured by the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) total score after edaravone treatment. METHODS: Data from the edaravone trials MCI186-16, MCI186-17, and MCI186-19 were analyzed, including the following treatment sequence groups: edaravone-edaravone (EE, n = 113); edaravone-placebo (EP, n = 45); and placebo-edaravone (PE, n = 146). Subgroups were defined as low baseline urate (below the median value of 4.8 mg/dL) and high baseline urate (≥4.8 mg/dL). The differences in ALSFRS-R total score change and urate change were evaluated using the mixed model for repeated measurement for overall population, by urate-level subgroup, and by trial. RESULTS: Compared with the PE group, the EE group showed a slower decline in ALSFRS-R score, regardless of the urate baseline level, and a slower decline in urate level in the higher baseline urate subgroup. Smaller changes in ALSFRS-R score and urate were observed in patients diagnosed with "probable, laboratory-supported ALS." There was a positive correlation between changes from baseline to cycle 12 in urate levels and ALSFRS-R score. DISCUSSION: Edaravone treatment in ALS patients diagnosed with "definite ALS" or "probable ALS" showed slowing of disease progression, regardless of baseline urate level. In addition, because edaravone treatment was associated with a slower decline in urate level in the higher baseline urate subgroup and urate-level changes were associated with changes in ALSFRS-R score, urate level, and/or change may be one indicator in predicting disease progression after edaravone administration.

Associations between urate levels and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional score with edaravone treatment: Post hoc analysis of studies MCI186-16, MCI186-17, and MCI186-19.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Edaravone in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) was analyzed in two phase 3 studies (MCI186-16 and MCI186-19). Those trials enrolled patients with Japanese ALS severity grades 1 and 2 (less severe ALS), but many patients progressed to grades 3 and 4 during the double-blind treatment period. The placebo patients who initiated edaravone treatment in the open-label periods provided an opportunity to assess the effects of edaravone in more severe ALS. This study also assessed the association between ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) slope and biomarker changes after open-label edaravone initiation. METHODS: Change in ALSFRS-R slope in placebo patients before and after initiating edaravone treatment was assessed using the random coefficient model. The association of ALSFRS-R change and blood marker changes was explored by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method of machine learning. RESULTS: Twenty-four percent of patients (35/146) in the placebo-edaravone group showed ≥25% slowing of decline in the ALSFRS-R slope. Within the 25% slower-decline group, 60% (21/35) had Japanese ALS severity grades 3 or 4 at the start of edaravone treatment. The LASSO model identified serum urate as associated with the percentage change in ALSFRS-R slope. The rate of decrease in urate was smaller in the 25% slower-decline group than in the non-25% slower-decline group during edaravone treatment. DISCUSSION: This post hoc analysis indicated that ALS patients, including those with advanced ALS severity grades, may receive benefit in the group of patients whose urate levels are stable during the course of the edaravone treatment.

A novel digital tool for detection and monitoring of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis motor impairment and progression via keystroke dynamics.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a debilitating neurodegenerative condition leading to progressive muscle weakness, atrophy, and ultimately death. Traditional ALS clinical evaluations often depend on subjective metrics, making accurate disease detection and monitoring disease trajectory challenging. To address these limitations, we developed the nQiALS toolkit, a machine learning-powered system that leverages smartphone typing dynamics to detect and track motor impairment in people with ALS. The study included 63 ALS patients and 30 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. We introduce the three core components of this toolkit: the nQiALS-Detection, which differentiated ALS from healthy typing patterns with an AUC of 0.89; the nQiALS-Progression, which separated slow and fast progression at specific thresholds with AUCs ranging between 0.65 and 0.8; and the nQiALS-Fine Motor, which identified subtle progression in fine motor dysfunction, suggesting earlier prediction than the state-of-the-art assessment. Together, these tools represent an innovative approach to ALS assessment, offering a complementary, objective metric to traditional clinical methods and which may reshape our understanding and monitoring of ALS progression.

Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor medication on new prescriptions of antihypertensives, antigout/antihyperuricemics and antidyslipidemics in Japan: Analysis using the JMDC Claims Database.

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on new prescriptions of drugs, including antihypertensives, antigout/antihyperuricemics and antidyslipidemics, for the treatment of lifestyle-related diseases in Japanese patients with diabetes mellitus using the JMDC Claims Database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were newly treated with SGLT2i or other oral antidiabetic drugs and had not been prescribed any antihypertensives, antigout/antihyperuricemics or antidyslipidemics for at least 1 year were extracted from the database. Using propensity score calibration matching (1:1), we assessed the proportion of patients who started the aforementioned concomitant medications within 2 years, and the risk ratio of SGLT2i to other antidiabetic medication groups was calculated. RESULTS: In 856,796 patients with diabetes mellitus, 734, 1,197 and 703 propensity score calibration-matched patients in each group were analyzed for the prescription of antihypertensives, antigout/antihyperuricemics and antidyslipidemics, respectively. The new prescriptions of antihypertensives and antigout/antihyperuricemics were lower in the SGLT2i group than those in the other oral antidiabetic drug group (risk ratio 0.66 and 0.37, respectively), whereas those of antidyslipidemics were more common in the SGLT2i group (risk ratio 1.43). CONCLUSIONS: New prescriptions of antihypertensives or antigout/antihyperuricemics were lower for patients taking SGLT2i than those taking other oral antidiabetic drugs, probably due to a reduction of blood pressure and uric acid levels by SGLT2i. The more frequent prescriptions of antidyslipidemics might partially reflect a moderate increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels as a result of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition.

Efficacy and Safety of Teneligliptin 40 mg in Type 2 Diabetes: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase III Clinical Studies.

INTRODUCTION: Teneligliptin, an antihyperglycemic agent belonging to the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor class, is usually prescribed at a dose of 20 mg/day. In Japan, the dose can be increased to 40 mg/day if needed. We examined the treatment response when the teneligliptin dose was increased from 20 to 40 mg in a post hoc pooled analysis of data from two 52-week, open-label, phase III clinical trials of teneligliptin 20-40 mg/day as monotherapy or combination treatment in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: In both studies, patients received teneligliptin 20 mg for at least 28 weeks; thereafter the dose was increased if glycemic control was inadequate. The data set for this post hoc analysis comprised those patients whose teneligliptin dose was increased to 40 mg at week 28 (N = 204). We assessed (i) the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c reduction after teneligliptin dose increase [≤ - 0.1% change in HbA1c during weeks 28-52 (24 weeks); responders] and (ii) the response to teneligliptin 40 mg according to whether or not patients experienced HbA1c re-elevation (≥ 0.1% increase) during 28 weeks of teneligliptin 20 mg. RESULTS: Of 204 patients, 108 (52.9%) showed a response to teneligliptin 40 mg (HbA1c change ≤ - 0.1% during weeks 28-52) and had mean (± SD) HbA1c reduction of 0.50 ± 0.44%. Of patients showing re-elevation of HbA1c during treatment with teneligliptin 20 mg, 89/143 (62.2%) achieved HbA1c reduction after dose increase to 40 mg. Logistic regression analyses suggested that change in body weight is one of the parameters linked to HbA1c reduction after dose increase to teneligliptin 40 mg. The incidence of adverse events was not changed after teneligliptin dose increase. CONCLUSION: Increasing the dosage of teneligliptin from 20 to 40 mg/day has potential as a well-tolerated and effective option for treating type 2 diabetes. FUNDING: Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation.