The cost of providing hospital-based (early) antiretroviral treatment in Indonesia: what has changed in almost a decade?

17% of all people living with HIV in Indonesia who are in need of antiretroviral treatment (ART) actually receive the treatment. The cost of ART based on three CD4 cell count groups (e.g., 0-200, 201-350, >350 cells/mm3) in a main referral hospital in West Java, Indonesia, in 2011-2016 was compared to the results from a decade earlier in the same setting. Costs were estimated including resources used for opportunistic infection treatment, laboratory tests, and antiretroviral (ARV) drugs. For each group, we divided the costs into several periods: pre-ART, and every 6 months up to 24 months after onset of treatment. Before ART, costs were dominated by laboratory tests (>80%); ARV drugs were the main cost after treatment onset (>92%). Average cost of treatment per year was US$600 across all groups. Moreover, the patient cost to access ART (n = 49 patients) did not exceed 10% of their household monthly expenditures (i.e., 4%). The unit cost of providing ART per patient/year is half the cost under the previous treatment initiation guidelines. A lower ARV drug cost, more patients in higher CD4 cell-count groups, and lower viral load test cost characterize the current cost profile.

Cost of improved test and treat strategies in Indonesia.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the cost of improved test and treat strategies in Indonesia under HIV Awal (Early) Testing and Treatment Indonesia (HATI) implementation trial in community-based and hospital-based clinics. DESIGN: The cost and outcome [i.e. CD4 + cell count] and viral load (VL) at the beginning of interventions and their change overtime) analysis of Simplifying ART Initiation (SAI), Community-based Organization and community-based ART Service (CBO), Motivational Interviewing (MI), Oral Fluid-based Testing (OFT), and Short Message Service (SMS) reminder in community-based and hospital-based clinics in 2018-2019. METHOD: We estimated the total and unit costs per patient (under HATI implementation trial interventions) per year from societal perspective in various settings, including costs from patients' perspective for SAI and MI. We also analyzed the outcome variables (i.e. CD4 + cell count and VL at the beginning of each intervention, the change in CD4 + cell count and VL over time, and adherence rate). RESULT: The unit cost per patient per year of SAI and SMS were lower at the community-based clinics, and more patients visited community-based clinics. The cost per patient visit from patient perspective for SAI and MI was mostly lower than 10% of the patients' household monthly expenditure. Average CD4 + cell count was higher and average VL was lower at the start of interventions at the community-based clinics, while average CD4 + cell count and VL changes and adherence rate were similar between the two types of clinics. CONCLUSION: Community-based clinics hold the potential for scaling up the interventions as it costs less from societal perspective and showed better outcome improvement during the HATI implementation trial.