Safety and efficacy results of a randomized trial comparing adjuvant toremifene and tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer. Finnish Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: In this multicenter trial, toremifene 40 mg/d was compared with tamoxifen 20 mg/d, both given orally for 3 years to postmenopausal, axillary node-positive women after breast surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 899 patients (toremifene, n = 459; tamoxifen, n = 440) of the total of 1,480 patients accrued to the trial were included in this scheduled safety analysis. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient and disease characteristics. The subjective side-effect profile was similar in both treatment groups. Slightly more vascular complications (deep vein thromboses, cerebrovascular events, and pulmonary embolisms) were seen among tamoxifen-treated patients (5.9%) as compared with toremifene-treated patients (3.5%) (P: =.11), whereas bone fractures (P: =.09) and vaginal leukorrhea (P: =.05) were more common in the toremifene group. The number of subsequent second cancers was similar. The breast cancer recurrence rate was 23.1% (n = 106) in the toremifene group and 26.1% (n = 115) in the tamoxifen group (P: =.31). When only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive cancer were considered (n = 556), the risk for breast cancer recurrence was nonsignificantly lower among the toremifene-treated women, with a hazards ratio of 0.74 (90% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.04; P: =.14). The mean time to breast cancer recurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The side-effect profile of toremifene resembles that of tamoxifen. The efficacy of toremifene seems to be no less than that of tamoxifen. The trend for fewer breast cancer recurrences in the ER-positive subgroup is encouraging, but a longer follow-up is needed to confirm this.

The ratios of serum bioactive/immunoreactive luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in various clinical conditions with increased and decreased gonadotropin secretion: reevaluation by a highly sensitive immunometric assay.

Serum bioactive and immunoreactive LH and FSH were measured in clinical conditions with increased or decreased gonadotropin secretion. Gonadotropin immunoreactivity was measured using a conventional RIA (I) and an ultrasensitive immunofluorometric method (F). Bioactive (B) LH was assessed by the mouse interstitial cells in vitro bioassay, and B-FSH using the immature rat granulosa cell assay. Acute GnRH stimulation of adult men (n = 6) increased LH levels measured by the different methods 4.3- to 5.3-fold. The B/I ratio of LH increased from 2.34 +/- 0.21 to 3.71 +/- 0.36 (mean +/- SEM) at 120 min (P less than 0.05), but no change was found in the B/F ratio. After ovariectomy of premenopausal women (n = 6), the LH levels increased in 1 week 4- to 6-fold, the B/I ratio from 1.85 +/- 0.22 to 2.59 +/- 0.24, and the B/F ratio from 1.78 +/- 0.22 to 2.90 +/- 0.30 (P less than 0.05 for both). In addition, the LH levels were measured during GnRH agonist treatment of ovarian carcinoma (n = 8), endometriosis (n = 8), and prostatic carcinoma after orchiectomy (n = 8). In the two former groups, serum B-LH decreased in 1 month to undetectable levels (less than 0.5 IU/L), and in the prostate cancer patients to 1.2 (0.8-1.9) IU/L (log mean and range of +/- SEM). The concomitant decline of I-LH was to 1.5-1.9 IU/L in the agonist-treated female patients, and that of F-LH to 0.10-0.15 IU/L; in the prostate cancer patients, respectively, these values were 7-8 and 0.3-0.7 IU/L. The B/I and B/F ratios during the agonist treatments could only be calculated in the prostate cancer patients (in the others, B-LH became undetectable). The B/I ratio decreased from 2.34 +/- 0.5 to 0.14 +/- 0.03 (P less than 0.01), but no suppression was found in the B/F ratio from a pretreatment value of 3.6 +/- 0.8. B-, I-, and F-FSH levels were measured in the GnRH agonist-treated orchiectomized prostate cancer patients. The pretreatment level of B-FSH was 154 (137-175), that of I-FSH was 38.0 (34.4-42.0), and that of F-FSH was 39.8 (35.3-44.9) IU/L. The B/I ratio of FSH was 3.76 +/- 0.49, and the B/F ratio was 3.53 +/- 0.59. The mean B-FSH level decreased during treatment by 87-93.5%, that of I-FSH by 98%, and that of F-FSH by 91.5% (P less than 0.01 for all).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Radiotherapy treatment planning and long-term follow-up with [(11)C]methionine PET in patients with low-grade astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of [(11)C]-methionine positron emission tomography (MET PET) in radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning and long-term follow-up in patients with low-grade glioma. PATIENTS: Thirteen patients with low-grade astrocytoma and 1 with anaplastic astrocytoma underwent sequential MET PET and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and 3, 6, 12, and 21-39 months after RT, respectively. Ten patients were studied after initial debulking surgery or biopsy and 4 in the recurrence phase. METHODS: A total of 58 PET scans were performed. After transmission scanning, a median dose of 425 MBq of MET was injected intravenously and emission data was acquired 20 min after injection for 20 min. The uptake of MET in tumor area was measured as standardized uptake value (SUV) and tumor-to-contralateral brain SUV ratios were generated to assess irradiation effects on tumor metabolism. Functional imaging with PET was compared with concurrent MRI in designing the RT planning volumes and in assessment of response to RT during a median follow-up time of 33 months. RESULTS: In 12 patients (86%), tumor area was clearly discernible in the baseline PET study. In the remaining 2 patients with a suspected residual tumor in MRI, PET showed only a diffuse uptake of MET interpreted as negative in the original tumor area. In the dose planning of RT, MET PET was helpful in outlining the gross tumor volume in 3 of 11 cases (27%), whereas PET findings either coincided with MRI (46%) or were less distinctive (27%) in other cases. In quantitative evaluation, patients with a low tumor SUV initially had significantly better prognosis than those with a high SUV. Tumor-to-contralateral brain uptake ratios of MET discriminated well patients remaining clinically stable from those who have since relapsed or died of disease. CONCLUSION: Quantitative MET PET has prognostic value at the time of initial treatment planning of low-grade glioma. Some patients may benefit of RT volume definition with MET PET, which seems to disclose residual tumor better than MRI in selected cases. Stable or decreasing uptake of MET in tumor area after RT during follow-up seems to be a favorable sign.

Postoperative PINP in serum reflects metastatic potential and poor survival in node-positive breast cancer.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the postoperative serum markers of type I collagen synthesis (PINP,PICP) and degradation (ICTP) and their possible potential for predicting the spread of disease and survival. 373 node-positive breast cancer patients were enrolled. 120 patients (32%) developed recurrent disease in the follow-up. The mean time to recurrence was 17 months and the mean follow-up time was 45 months. The mean level of PINP was significantly elevated in the patients who developed metastatic disease in the follow-up as compared with those without metastases. PINP was statistically significantly higher in all the patients who developed bone metastases than in those without metastases. When patients with only bone metastases or patients with bone and soft tissue and/or visceral metastases and patients with only visceral or soft tissue metastases were compared with those not exhibiting metastases, PINP was significantly higher in the group with recurrence in the bone, but there were no significant differences in serum PINP, PICP or ICTP values between the patients with only bone metastases and those who developed soft or visceral metastases during the follow-up. Postoperative high PINP was also a factor for poorer survivaL Tumor size, malignancy grade and progesterone receptors were shown in multivariate analysis to be predictors of recurrence and tumor size and PINP and progesterone receptors to be predictors of survivaL

Reliability of estrogen receptors in predicting response to antiestrogens.

In postmenopausal women, about 65% to 80% of breast cancers contain estrogen receptors (ERs) and 50% to 65%, progesterone receptors (PRs). Receptor-positive breast cancer is somewhat less common in premenopausal patients. Recently, the biochemical dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) assay for ERs has been replaced in many laboratories by immunohistochemical and immunocytochemical methods, which are not disturbed by endogenous estrogen or antiestrogen treatment. Receptors now can also be assayed from fine-needle biopsy and paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. The ER has been shown to be a prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival in newly diagnosed and relapsed breast cancer. The value of the ER in predicting response to both surgical and medical endocrine treatment of breast cancer has been demonstrated. Ample evidence supports the predictive value of the ER in the treatment of breast cancer with the antiestrogen tamoxifen (Nolvadex). The first studies of a new antiestrogen, toremifene (Fareston), support the value of the ER in predicting breast cancer treatment results.

Open phase II study of high-dose toremifene as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer.

In an open phase II study conducted in Finland and Latvia, 73 postmenopausal women were treated with 240 mg of toremifene (Fareston) as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Among the 56 patients evaluable for responses, 59% achieved objective responses [complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR)], 29% showed no change (NC), and 12% had progressive disease (PD). When all treated patients were included, the objective response rate was 47%. Several very long durations of responses up to 86 months and survival durations up to 95 months were observed. In assessable patients, the best objective response rates were seen in those with soft-tissue (74%) and visceral (60%) disease. In 54% of patients with very large inoperable primary cancers, a PR was achieved. Half of patients reported side effects, about 60% of which were mild; 30%, moderate; and 5%, severe. Based on response rate and safety, high-dose toremifene is useful as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Tumour regression during radiation treatment as a guide to prognosis.

The response to radiation treatment was studied in 110 patients with head and neck cancer with a minimum follow-up of two years. If the tumour had disappeared by the mid-point of treatment (3000 rad), a significantly more favourable prognosis was found in early (T1-2N0) tumours. On the other hand, whether these tumours had disappeared or were persisting at the end of treatment, there was no difference in the recurrence during the observation time of two years. In advanced tumours there was no significant relationship between disappearance by the mid-point of treatment and recurrence up to two years. But when an advanced tumour had disappeared at the end of treatment, the prognosis was significantly more favourable. The unpredictability and often impossibility of judging the prognosis in individual cases encourages the authors to stress the importance of executing the original individual surgical plan irrespective of radiation response.

Low-dose and conventional-dose high resolution CT of pulmonary changes in breast cancer patients treated by tangential field radiotherapy.

Twenty-seven consecutive breast cancer patients receiving tangential field radiation therapy were followed by high resolution CT (HRCT) in order to compare the accuracy of reduced-dose HRCT and conventional-dose HRCT in the evaluation of subtle pulmonary changes. Thin section 1-mm HRCT images were obtained at identical levels at 120 kVp, with 320 mAs, 200 mAs, 160 mAs, 120 mAs and 60 mAs settings. HRCT was performed during the planning of radiotherapy and 4, 8 and 24 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy. Radiation was administered according to an individual CT-based plan by tangential fields with 4 or 6 MV photons to the whole breast given with 5 fractions of 1.9 Gy weekly to a total dose of 50 Gy. The tumor bed was boosted by electrons to 60 Gy. Pathological changes were detected in 21 examinations of 10 patients: 9 patients out of 27 (33%) showed radiation induced changes; 1 patient developed metastases within the irradiated volume. Septal thickening appeared in 5 patients at 4 weeks and in another 5 patients at 8 weeks. Parenchymal consolidation was detected in 1 patient at 4 weeks and in 5 patients at 8 weeks. HRCT using 160 mAs yield good quality images of subtle radiation induced injuries. The diagnostic validity of HRCT using lower than 160 mAs depends on the detail analyzed.

Phase II trials with toremifene in advanced breast cancer: a review.

The antitumor activity of the new triphenylethylene drug toremifene has been studied in advanced breast cancer of postmenopausal women as first line treatment at dose levels of 20, 60, and 240 mg, and as second line or later treatment at high dose levels of 200-240 mg. The response rates (complete + partial response) have been 21% with 20 mg (14 patients), 52% with 60 mg (93 patients in three separate trials), and 68% with 240 mg (38 patients) as first line treatment. After failure on previous therapy (hormonal or chemotherapy) the response rates have been about 10% with 200 mg of toremifene (71 patients in two different trials). In patients whose disease had previously responded to tamoxifen with at least stabilization, the response rate with toremifene has been 23%; but among unselected patients, including patients progressing during adjuvant tamoxifen, the response rate (CR + PR) with toremifene in tamoxifen failures has been 3%. If long lasting (more than 5 months) stabilization of the disease is also considered, a further 20% of previously treated patients have benefitted from toremifene. The treatment has been well tolerated at all dose levels. The most reported side effects have been hot flushes (8-19%) and nausea (8%). 0-6% of patients in different trials have interrupted the treatment because of side effects.

The significance of estrogen receptors in tamoxifen and toremifene therapy.

Estrogen receptor (ER) concentration of breast cancer tissue is important in predicting the response of each patient to hormonal, especially antiestrogen treatment. About half of the patients with ER rich tumours respond and only about 10% of the patients with ER poor tumours respond to antioestrogen treatment. Tamoxifen is a well known and widely used drug. Toremifene is a new antioestrogen, developed in Finland. At standard doses both compounds have comparable hormonal and antitumour effects, and there is no clear difference between the compounds in the affinity to ER. The value of ER in predicting the response to tamoxifen and toremifene therapy in ER positive breast cancer is significant. It is not known, however, if the role of ER remains the same with high dose toremifene. Although ERs are an important predictive factor, the antioestrogens evidently act through them only in part. As the prediction is correct in about half of the patients, other mechanisms must influence tumour growth regulation, such as the expression of oncogenes and the synthesis and activity of growth factors.

Renal complications of mitomycin C therapy with special reference to the total dose.

One hundred forty-two patients with gastrointestinal cancer were treated with combination chemotherapy containing mitomycin C. The mitomycin C dose was less than or equal to 15 mg/m2 every 53rd day and the total cumulative dose was between 25 and 250 mg. Ten of the evaluable 118 patients (8.5%) developed renal toxicity due to mitomycin C. Five of these ten patients had microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, too. Six of them died 2 to 4.5 months after the last mitomycin C dose and four are alive 14 to 30 months after the last dose. Only 1 of the 63 patients (1.6%) who received less than 50 mg/m2 mitomycin C developed renal toxicity. Four of the 37 patients (10.8%) who received 50 to 69 mg/m2 and 5 of 18 (27.8%) who received more than 70 mg/m2 of mitomycin C developed nephrotoxicity. The toxicity of mitomycin C seems to be dose related, the safe total dose being less than 50 mg/m2 if delivered in doses of 10 to 15 mg/m2 at 8-week intervals.

Gastrointestinal complications after external megavoltage treatment.

66 cases treated with external megavoltage irradiation for various malignant diseases in the abdomen are presented 26 patients (39%) had radiation reactions during and immediately after the treatment. Late complications at least two months after the treatment appeared in 15 patients (23%). The relatively low frequency of intestinal disturbances induced by radiotherapy in the present series may have been caused by the low weekly dose in the abdomen and the practise of a split-course interval in the midst of treatment.

The immunological status of breast cancer patients during treatment with a new antiestrogen, toremifene.

The immune status of breast cancer patients was followed during antiestrogen treatment for at least 1 year or until progression of the disease. Twelve post-menopausal women with advanced estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer were treated with a novel antiestrogen, toremifene. Immune functions were determined before the start of the treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months. For NK cell cytotoxicity testing there were 74 healthy controls and for T cell subset measurements 28 healthy controls. No statistically significant changes in the T cell subsets or NK cell cytotoxicity were observed during treatment. However, throughout toremifene treatment patients had fewer CD4 cells (T helper lymphocytes) than did the controls. Cancer patients had higher pretreatment B cell values than the controls, P = 0.01, but during the first months of toremifene treatment B cell values decreased and remained within the normal range thereafter. A positive effect on mitogen-stimulation tests with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and concanavalin A (ConA) was observed during the first months of treatment (P = 0.01 for PHA and 0.03 for log [ConA] and a stabilization at the higher level thereafter. These results indicate that toremifene has a stimulatory effect on cell-mediated immunity in breast cancer patients.

Predictive value of tumor estrogen and progesterone receptor levels in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer treated with toremifene.

The predictive value of estrogen receptor (ER) concentrations was evaluated in a group of 113 postmenopausal patients with estrogen-receptor-positive (ER greater than 7 fmol/mg protein) advanced breast cancer. In 103 patients, tumors were also sampled for progesterone receptor (PgR) determination. All patients were treated with toremifene, a novel antiestrogen, 60 mg daily. The median ER in 51 responders was 78 fmol/mg protein, and in 62 nonresponders, 51 fmol/mg protein; the median PgR levels were 40 and 37 fmol/mg protein, respectively. The response rate in patients with ER less than 50 fmol/mg protein was 38%, and 51% in the group with ER greater than 50 fmol/mg protein (not significant [NS]). The response rate in patients with PgR less than 10 fmol/mg protein was 42%, and in patients with greater than 10 fmol/mg protein, 44%. The duration of response in patients with ER greater than 50 fmol/mg protein was significantly longer than with lower ER levels (P = 0.002). PgR was not associated with the duration of response. In Cox's multiple regression analysis, ER was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.005) for response duration. Thus, the ER concentration of tumor tissue predicts the duration of response but not the response rate to toremifene in patients with advanced breast cancer. The PgR status does not predict the response rate or the duration of response.

Serum lipid levels during and after adjuvant toremifene or tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer.

Tamoxifen decreases serum cholesterol (S-cholesterol) level about 10% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (S-LDL) 15-20%, but in most studies it has increased serum triglyceride levels and had little effect on serum high-density cholesterol (S-HDL). The effect of another antiestrogen, toremifene, on the serum lipid profile has not been completely studied. We monitored serum lipid levels longitudinally in 141 axillary node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer patients who received randomly either 40 mg toremifene or 20 mg tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy for 36 months, and in 34 postmenopausal women who received no adjuvant systemic therapy after surgery for axillary node-negative breast cancer. No significant differences were found between the drugs in their effects on S-cholesterol, LDL, HDL, or triglyceride levels, or on the cholesterol-to-HDL or LDL-to-HDL ratios. For both drugs the S-cholesterol and S-LDL absolute lowering effect was the greater the higher the pretreatment level. For a patient with a median pretreatment value, toremifene decreased S-cholesterol 6% and tamoxifen 13%, and S-LDL decreased by 13% and 23%, respectively, at 6 months of therapy. Six months after stopping three-year antiestrogen therapy S- cholesterol and S-LDL levels had returned to the pretreatment levels. In conclusion, we found no major differences between 40 mg toremifene and 20 mg of tamoxifen in their effect on the serum lipid levels, which return to the pretreatment levels within 6 months after cessation of therapy.

High dose toremifene in advanced breast cancer resistant to or relapsed during tamoxifen treatment.

Fifty patients with advanced breast cancer refractory to prior tamoxifen therapy were assigned to investigational treatment with high-dose toremifene administered 120 mg orally twice a day. Treatment was generally well tolerated. The majority (80%) of the patients had no side effects, and among the remaining 10 patients reported side effects were mostly mild and/or transient. Two objective tumor responses were observed: one complete response (CR), duration 6.2 months, and one partial response (PR), duration 8 months. The response rate was thus 4% (95% CI: 0.5 to 14%). In addition 3 patients experienced a mixed response, some metastatic sites responding, while at other sites disease progressed; 22 patients had disease stabilization for > 2 months. A subset analysis disclosed that a small subgroup of patients, including 7 patients in this study, who had achieved CR at some of the sites during preceding tamoxifen therapy, experienced a long progression-free time during high dose toremifene treatment. The median time to progression in this subgroup of patients was 9.4 months (95% CI: 3.8 to 9.4) as opposed to 2.1 months (95% CI: 2.0 to 2.8) for all the remaining 43 patients, which is a significant decrease in disease progression (p < 0.03). Such results reveal that although this kind of second-line hormonal treatment with high dose toremifene cannot be recommended for all tamoxifen failures, there might be a subset of patients, i.e. those who achieve CR in some lesion during tamoxifen therapy, who benefit from this type of treatment.

Interferon combined with irradiation in the treatment of operable head and neck carcinoma. A pilot study.

Twenty-two patients with operable head and neck cancer were randomized to receive natural leukocyte alpha interferon (IFN) and radiotherapy, or radiotherapy alone (control) before operation. IFN was administered at 6 MU i.m. daily for 4 weeks and thereafter 3 times per week for 2 months. IFN treatment was introduced simultaneously with radiotherapy (2 Gy daily, 5 fractions per week). The preoperative dose was 30-32 Gy. Tumor response and side-effects were registered. The patients underwent radical surgery 3 weeks after the preoperative irradiation, followed by postoperative irradiation with 22-32 Gy. After preoperative treatment there were one complete response and 4 partial responses among 10 patients receiving IFN and 2 partial responses among 12 patients treated with irradiation alone. No difference in survival was demonstrated between the 2 groups. In the histologic examination of the surgical samples malignant cells were found in 6 of the IFN patients and in 8 of the control patients. The IFN patients had considerably more pronounced mucosal radiation reactions than the controls. The accrual of patients to the study was discontinued due to the side-effects.