Clinical relevance of detecting anti-infliximab antibodies with a drug-tolerant assay: post hoc analysis of the TAXIT trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical relevance of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) measured using a drug-tolerant assay in a post hoc analysis of the Trough Concentration (TC) Adapted Infliximab Treatment (TAXIT) randomised controlled trial. DESIGN: ADA in serum samples (n=221) of 76 patients enrolled in TAXIT, who presented with an infliximab TC <3 µg/mL at screening, were reanalysed after optimisation and at the end of the study using a drug-tolerant ADA assay. Patients underwent dose escalation to achieve therapeutic TCs between 3 µg/mL and 7 µg/mL prior to randomisation. Patients were grouped into quartiles (Q1-4) according to ADA concentration at screening. RESULTS: Using a drug-tolerant assay, the immunogenicity detection rate increased from 21% (drug-sensitive assay) to 63% at screening, from 0% to 51% after optimisation and from 3% to 42% at the end of TAXIT. Patients in ADA Q4 required a higher cumulative infliximab dose (2390 (880-2998) mg) to achieve target TCs, resulting in a higher drug cost (€10 712 (4120-13 596)) compared with ADA-negative patients (€2060 (1648-3296)) and patients in ADA Q1/Q2 (€2060 (1648-4120)/€2060 (1751-3296), p<0.001). However, all but one patient belonging to ADA Q4 were also ADA-positive using a drug-sensitive assay. CONCLUSIONS: Upon dose intensification, low concentration ADAs, not detectable using a drug-sensitive assay, disappear in more than half of the patients over time and are clinically non-relevant. In contrast, high concentration ADAs which are typically also detected in a drug-sensitive assay, persist over time and necessitate a higher cumulative dose and drug cost. In the latter group, proactive drug switching may be more cost-efficient. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTER: 2011-002061-38; Post-results.

Immunoassay for Detection of Infliximab in Whole Blood Using a Fiber-Optic Surface Plasmon Resonance Biosensor.

Monitoring the concentration of a therapeutic drug antibody, infliximab (IFX), is recommended for enhancing its efficacy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, IFX concentrations are currently determined in patients' serum/plasma, which requires sample preparation from blood, hence hampering the turnaround time. In this paper, we present a short immunoassay (10 min) using a fiber-optic surface plasmon resonance (FO-SPR) biosensor for detection of IFX spiked in 100-fold diluted serum, plasma, and whole blood. The calculated limits of detection (LOD) based on calibration curves were 1.42, 1.00, and 1.34 ng/mL, respectively, which coincides with expected IFX concentrations in diluted samples from IBD patients. A linear correlation was established among different matrixes, indicating that the matrix effect was insignificant. The established point-of-care (POC) FO-SPR bioassay was also used to measure IFX in 100-fold diluted extracts of dried blood spots (DBS), and LOD achieved was below 2 ng/mL. Although DBS might be ideal for POC, this is the first report of using an SPR biosensor for measuring DBS samples. Finally, the POC FO-SPR immunoassay was validated by using matching serum and plasma samples from five IBD patients. A Pearson correlation of 0.968 was obtained between serum and plasma samples. IFX concentrations determined with FO-SPR were compared to a clinically validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), resulting in excellent Pearson correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient, both being 0.99 for serum and plasma samples. In conclusion, this paper demonstrates that our FO-SPR biosensor can be used as a true POC diagnostic tool for determining IFX concentrations in a variety of matrixes.

Current Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biopharmaceuticals in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Since the late 90s, biopharmaceuticals targeting tumor necrosis factor alpha have revolutionized the treatment of moderately to severely active inflammatory bowel disease. The robust efficacy witnessed in many patients stands in stark contrast with the observation of a proportion of patients who fail to respond or who lose response over time. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed as a means to understand and respond to the variability in clinical response and remission. Various treatment algorithms have been proposed, but optimal use of these measurements in daily practice awaits additional prospective validation trials. This review provides an updated overview on the subject of therapeutic drug monitoring of biopharmaceuticals for the management of inflammatory bowel disease and how we could implement its concepts in a changing landscape.

Infliximab Concentration Thresholds During Induction Therapy Are Associated With Short-term Mucosal Healing in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Mucosal healing is an independent predictor of sustained clinical remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with infliximab. We investigated whether infliximab concentrations during induction therapy are associated with short-term mucosal healing (STMH) in patients with UC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center analysis of data collected from a tertiary referral center from 101 patients with UC who received scheduled induction therapy with infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6 and had an endoscopic evaluation at baseline and after induction therapy. STMH was defined as Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1, assessed at weeks 10-14, with baseline sub-score ≥2. Infliximab concentrations were evaluated in serum samples collected at weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14 of infliximab therapy by using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay we developed. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (53.4%) achieved STMH. Patients with STMH had a higher median infliximab concentration at weeks 2, 6, and 14 than patients without STMH. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified infliximab concentration thresholds of 28.3 (area under the ROC curve [AUROC], 0.638), 15 (AUROC, 0.688), and 2.1 µg/mL (AUROC, 0.781) that associated with STMH at weeks 2, 6, and 14, respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified infliximab concentration ≥15 at week 6 (P = .025; odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-17.1) and ≥2.1 µg/mL at week 14 (P = .004; odds ratio, 5.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-18) as independent factors associated with STMH. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of data from real-life clinical practice, we associated infliximab concentrations during the induction therapy with STMH in patients with UC.

Generation of a Highly Specific Monoclonal Anti-Infliximab Antibody for Harmonization of TNF-Coated Infliximab Assays.

BACKGROUND: Determination of infliximab (IFX) serum concentrations has been used for treatment optimization of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. A wide range of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) exists to quantitate IFX. Most of these assays lack specificity and cross-react with other anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents. The ability of these IFX assays to detect IFX in complex with antidrug antibodies is not known. The objective of our study was to develop an IFX-specific immunoassay to monitor IFX serum concentrations and to evaluate the impact of antidrug antibodies on the assay performance. METHODS: A panel of monoclonal antibodies toward IFX (MA-IFX) was generated by hybridoma technology and evaluated to replace the polyclonal antibody in a TNF-coated IFX assay. The selected monoclonal antibody-based (MA-based) IFX ELISA was benchmarked to a clinically validated, reference polyclonal antibody-based (pAb-based) IFX ELISA using 209 inflammatory bowel disease serum samples. RESULTS: Fifty-five MA-IFX were generated and grouped into 9 clusters. Of the 22 monoclonal antibodies tested, MA-IFX6B7 was selected for use in the IFX ELISA and the assay was further optimized. MA-IFX6B7 is a high-affinity (KD = 1.40E-09 mol/L), noninhibitory IgG1 antibody that binds to the Fab fragment of IFX and exhibits no cross-reactivity with other anti-TNF drugs. The linearity of an IFX dose-response curve was demonstrated in the range of 1.2-37.5 ng/mL (R = 0.988). The MA-based assay showed a good Pearson correlation (R = 0.986) and agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.985) with the pAb-based assay. The MA-based assay detects IFX in complex with nonneutralizing anti-IFX antibodies but not when complexed with neutralizing anti-IFX antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a highly specific MA-IFX was developed as detection antibody in an ELISA to quantify IFX serum concentrations. The assay was benchmarked to the clinically validated reference pAb-based IFX ELISA.

Anti-infliximab antibodies: How to compare old and new data?

BACKGROUND: Anti-drug-antibodies (ADA) against infliximab are frequently measured in patients receiving infliximab treatment with loss of response and undetectable infliximab concentrations. Different ADA bridging assays (1st generation, 2nd generation and ready-to-use kit) have been developed successively and were applied over the last 10 years, making comparison between ADA concentrations very challenging. A cutoff of 8 µg/ml was established to discriminate low from high ADA concentrations using the 1st generation ADA bridging assay. The objective of this study was to enable comparison of ADA concentrations determined with the different assays that were developed over the years. METHODS: 166 serum samples were collected from patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab. 98 samples were measured simultaneously with the 1st and 2nd generation ADA assay, 67 serum samples were measured with the 2nd generation assay and the ready-to-use kit. RESULTS: From our ADA concentration comparison experiments, we deduced that the previously established cutoff of 8 µg/ml with the 1st generation ELISA has a similar impact as the cutoff of 374 ng/ml with the 2nd generation ELISA and a cutoff of 119 ng/ml in the ready-to-use ELISA kit. CONCLUSION: ADA concentrations measured with the different assays were compared and a cutoff concentration was determined for each of them to distinguish between low and high ADA concentrations. These cutoff concentrations may serve as a tool for clinicians to make treatment decisions for patients with a loss of response to infliximab and undetectable infliximab serum concentrations.

Influence of early adalimumab serum levels on immunogenicity and long-term outcome of anti-TNF naive Crohn's disease patients: the usefulness of rapid testing.

BACKGROUND: Proactive testing of adalimumab serum levels is debated. AIM: To study the association between adalimumab serum levels at week 4 and the development of anti-adalimumab drug antibodies and long-term outcome in anti-TNF naive Crohn's disease patients. METHODS: Serum samples from 116 biologically naive Crohn's disease patients with active disease were prospectively collected at baseline, and weeks 4 and 12. Adalimumab serum levels were measured using the RIDA® QUICK adalimumab lateral flow assay and anti-adalimumab drug antibodies were determined using a drug-resistant assay. Pharmacokinetic data were studied in relation to clinical outcome. Patients who stopped adalimumab by week 12 due to persisting symptoms were considered primary non-responders, whereas initial improvement with increasing symptoms after week 12 was considered loss of response. Adalimumab continuation until the end of follow-up was considered sustained clinical benefit. RESULTS: Patients with low serum levels at week 4 (<8.3 µg/mL) were at significantly higher risk of being anti-adalimumab positive by week 12 (46.7% vs 13.0%, P = 0.009). After a median follow-up of 89 weeks, dose-escalation and sustained clinical benefit were observed in 37.1% and 48.3% of patients. The 21.4% of patients who were anti-adalimumab drug antibody positive by week 12, had a significantly higher need of dose escalation (P < 0.001), and experienced sustained clinical benefit less frequently due to primary non-response or secondary loss of response (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support early monitoring of adalimumab serum levels to guide dose optimisation, which may prevent immunogenicity and influence long-term outcome. We validated a novel lateral flow assay for quantitative determination of adalimumab levels, facilitating physicians to optimise therapy immediately at the outpatient clinic.

Validation of a sample pretreatment protocol to convert a drug-sensitive into a drug-tolerant anti-infliximab antibody immunoassay.

A meta-analysis revealed that up to 51% of patients treated with infliximab develop anti-drug Abs (ADA) which are associated with loss of response. Detection of ADA is strongly influenced by assay technique since drug-sensitive ADA assays are not able to detect ADA in the presence of drug and therefore underestimate ADA development. In addition, the lack of a calibrator antibody that can be used in a drug-sensitive and drug-tolerant assay hampers an adequate comparison among different assays. Here we present a sample pretreatment protocol to convert the bridging assay, originally developed as a drug-sensitive assay, into a drug-tolerant assay, allowing use of the same assay and calibrator antibody MA-IFX10F9. Using the sample pretreatment protocol, the bridging assay detects antibodies towards infliximab in samples containing up to 5-fold infliximab over anti-infliximab. Analysis of consecutive serum samples from infliximab treated patients revealed that the drug-tolerant assay detects ADA development up to 40 weeks earlier compared to the drug-sensitive assay. In conclusion, the sample pretreatment protocol can be implemented in various assay formats and allows determination of ADA in the presence of drug, providing the possibility for early treatment optimization. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Comparisons of Serum Infliximab and Antibodies-to-Infliximab Tests Used in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clinical Trials of Remicade®.

Monitoring infliximab (IFX) concentrations and antibodies-to-IFX (ATI) titers during inflammatory bowel disease treatment may allow more informed decisions in assessing exposure/response and determining appropriate dosing. To aid in interpreting results from different commercial tests in the context of Janssen's published Remicade® results, the reliability of Janssen's IFX and ATI assays was compared with commercial assays from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp. Test results were independently reported to Janssen. All assays were tested for specificity, selectivity, and precision. ATI assays were evaluated for sensitivity, drug interference, and potential interference of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). IFX assays were specific, accurate, and reproducible. Intra-class correlation of Janssen IFX assay results with those from KU Leuven, Sanquin, Dynacare, and LabCorp were 0.960, 0.895, 0.931, and 0.971, respectively. ATI titers >10 interfered with IFX assessment in all IFX assays, whereas TNF-α (≤50 ng/mL) did not interfere with IFX detection in any assay. ATI assays specifically and reproducibly detected ATI. Janssen, Sanquin, and LabCorp ATI methods were more resistant to IFX interference than Dynacare and KU Leuven, which were affected by IFX concentrations at ≥2 µg/mL. TNF-α (<5 ng/mL) did not interfere with ATI detection. Strong agreement was observed between Janssen's IFX and ATI assays and the diagnostic service provider assays. Our study results indicate that all four commercially available assays are suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of IFX. The substantial agreement reported here between the comparator assays and the Janssen drug-tolerant assay provides support to clinicians in their use of these commercial assays, and for understanding their patients' IFX and ATI results relative to published data from clinical studies of Remicade.

Harmonization of Infliximab and Anti-Infliximab Assays Facilitates the Comparison Between Originators and Biosimilars in Clinical Samples.

BACKGROUND: The availability of an infliximab ELISA for measuring the originator drug Remicade and its biosimilars, such as Remsima and Inflectra (CT-P13), would facilitate the implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring of biosimilars and enhance the extrapolation of treatment stratification algorithms established for Remicade. A universal calibrator for all anti-infliximab antibody bridging assays allows harmonization of anti-drug antibody titers. METHODS: A panel of 55 mouse monoclonal antibodies raised against Remicade, including MA-IFX6B7 and MA-IFX10F9, were evaluated for their reactivity toward the biosimilars using a sandwich-type ELISA and surface plasmon resonance. To analyze the similarity of detection of the biosimilars and Remicade in the infliximab ELISA, quality control samples were used. Bridging assays to determine anti-infliximab antibodies were developed according to the bridging ELISA of Remicade using MA-IFX10F9 as calibrator. Serum of 36 patients treated with Remicade was analyzed for anti-infliximab antibodies toward Remicade, Remsima and Inflectra using their respective bridging ELISA. RESULTS: MA-IFX6B7 and MA-IFX10F9 exhibit equal reactivity toward Remicade, Remsima, and Inflectra. The infliximab ELISA quantifies the biosimilars equally well as Remicade. Quantification of anti-infliximab antibodies in the serum of patients treated with Remicade revealed highly correlated titers between biosimilars and Remicade. CONCLUSIONS: The assay for therapeutic drug monitoring of Remicade can also be used to determine Remsima and Inflectra concentrations. Anti-drug antibody assays for biosimilars were developed. Anti-Remicade antibodies cross-react with infliximab biosimilars and reveal consistent negative/positive anti-drug antibody responses and highly correlated titers.

Fiber optic-SPR platform for fast and sensitive infliximab detection in serum of inflammatory bowel disease patients.

Infliximab (IFX) is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody used for treating patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In order to improve therapeutic outcomes it is recommended to monitor IFX trough concentrations. Although ELISA is currently widely used for this purpose, this method is not suitable for single patient testing. In this paper we describe the development of a fast bioassay for determining IFX concentration in serum using an in-house developed fiber-optic surface plasmon resonance (FO-SPR) biosensor. Studies were first conducted to optimize covalent immobilization of the IFX-specific antibody on the sensor surface as well as to select an optimal blocking buffer for restraining the non-specific binding. In order to reach clinically relevant sensitivity for detecting IFX in patients' serum, the SPR signal was amplified by employing gold nanoparticles functionalized with another set of IFX specific antibodies. Using the optimized sandwich bioassay, calibration curves were made with series of IFX concentrations spiked in buffer and 100-fold diluted serum, reaching the limit of detection of 0.3 and 2.2ng/ml, respectively. The established bioassay was finally validated using five IFX treated IBD patients samples. Results from the FO-SPR platform were compared with an in-house developed, clinically validated ELISA resulting in excellent Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.998 and 0.983, respectively. Furthermore, the assay time of the FO-SPR platform was significantly reduced compared to ELISA, demonstrating the potential of this platform to be used as a point-of-care diagnostic tool for improving therapeutic outcomes of IBD patients.

Rapid Test for Infliximab Drug Concentration Allows Immediate Dose Adaptation.

OBJECTIVES: Therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab improves treatment outcomes, but available assays to monitor infliximab lack speed to implement treatment algorithms immediately. Our aim is to validate a rapid, lateral flow-based assay (LFA) for quantitative determination of infliximab and to assess thresholds associated with mucosal healing in patients with ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Samples (n=190) from 29 anti-tumor necrosis factor naive patients with ulcerative colitis starting infliximab induction therapy between June 2010 and February 2012 were prospectively collected. All patients had a Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≥2 at baseline. Mucosal healing (MH), defined as a Mayo endoscopic sub-score ≤1, was evaluated at week 10-14. Infliximab trough concentrations (TC) were determined with a novel LFA, which was benchmarked with the RIDASCREEN infliximab Monitoring (ELISA). RESULTS: The LFA showed an excellent agreement with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for quantification of infliximab, as observed from Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.95 and 0.95 during induction and 0.93 and 0.87 during maintenance therapy, respectively. In total, 45% of patients achieved MH. Using the LFA, week 14 TC ≥2.1 µg/ml (AUROC: 0.819, P=0.008) were associated with MH. After 2 years follow-up, 77% of patients with MH were still receiving infliximab therapy vs. 25% of patients without MH. CONCLUSIONS: We validated a LFA for quantification of infliximab and identified TC associated with MH. With a time-to-result of 20 min, individual sample analysis and user-friendliness, the LFA outplays ELISA as a rapid, accurate tool to monitor infliximab concentrations.

Variability in Golimumab Exposure: A 'Real-Life' Observational Study in Active Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Golimumab has been approved recently to treat refractory moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis [UC]. To date it is not clear why a considerable fraction of patients do not respond, or lose initial response, to golimumab therapy. Our aim was to investigate whether a low golimumab serum concentration and/or a positive anti-golimumab antibody status reduces the efficacy of this drug in patients with UC. METHODS: Serum samples of 21 patients with moderate-to-severe UC were collected during the first 14 weeks of golimumab therapy. For measurement of golimumab serum concentrations, both a tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-coated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA] and a sandwich-type ELISA were developed. Anti-golimumab antibodies were measured using a bridging ELISA and a newly-developed drug-tolerant immunoassay. Clinical response and mucosal healing were assessed 14 weeks after start of treatment. RESULTS: Out of 21 patients, 10 [48%] reached partial clinical response at Week 14. Median [interquartile range] serum golimumab concentration was significantly higher in partial clinical responders than in non-responders: 10.0 [7.8-10.5] µg/ml versus 7.4 [4.8-8.3] µg/ml at Week 2 [p = 0.035] and 5.1 [4.0-7.9] µg/ml versus 2.1 [1.8-4.2] µg/ml at week 6 [p = 0.037]. Four out of 21 UC patients developed anti-golimumab antibodies, detectable only using a drug-tolerant immunoassay, and three had a partial clinical response at that time. Clinical non-responders had a significantly more severe colitis, indicated by a higher endoscopic Mayo score at baseline compared with partial clinical responders [p = 0.048]. CONCLUSION: Adequate exposure to golimumab drives clinical response. A worse disease at baseline influences clinical response rate negatively.

An Optimized Anti-infliximab Bridging Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay for Harmonization of Anti-infliximab Antibody Titers in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND: The formation of anti-infliximab antibodies (ATI) is associated with loss of response and adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, leading to the introduction of ATI monitoring for guiding treatment adjustments. However, a lack of standardization among current available assays exists, hampering comparison of results from different studies. This study aimed to improve the harmonization of clinically validated ATI enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) by introducing a monoclonal anti-infliximab antibody (MA-IFX). METHODS: A panel of MA-IFX was evaluated as calibrator in the first generation ATI ELISA. After selection of 1 MA-IFX, assay conditions were optimized and biotin-streptavidin-enhanced detection of bound infliximab was introduced. The novel second generation ELISA was used for reanalysis of 127 serum samples from a cohort of 12 patients with inflammatory bowel disease, previously identified as ATI positive. RESULTS: Of 55 MA-IFX, MA-IFX10F9 was selected as calibrator in the ATI ELISA. After optimization of the assay conditions, a 4-fold improvement in sensitivity was obtained. Reanalysis of 127 serum samples revealed that in 5 of 12 patients (46%), ATI were detected at least 1 time point earlier with the second generation ELISA compared with the first generation ELISA. In 1 patient, the second generation ELISA allowed to detect ATI before the reinitiation of IFX after a drug holiday. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the improved sensitivity and specificity of the second generation ATI ELISA, MA-IFX10F9 can serve as a universal calibrator to achieve assay harmonization. Moreover, the superiority of the second generation assay in analyzing serum of restarters was demonstrated.

Heterobifunctional PEG ligands for bioconjugation reactions on iron oxide nanoparticles.

Ever since iron oxide nanoparticles have been recognized as promising scaffolds for biomedical applications, their surface functionalization has become even more important. We report the synthesis of a novel polyethylene glycol-based ligand that combines multiple advantageous properties for these applications. The ligand is covalently bound to the surface via a siloxane group, while its polyethylene glycol backbone significantly improves the colloidal stability of the particle in complex environments. End-capping the molecule with a carboxylic acid introduces a variety of coupling chemistry possibilities. In this study an antibody targeting plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 was coupled to the surface and its presence and binding activity was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and surface plasmon resonance experiments. The results indicate that the ligand has high potential towards biomedical applications where colloidal stability and advanced functionality is crucial.