Checkpoint inhibition in combination with an immunoboost of external beam radiotherapy in solid tumors (CHEERS): study protocol for a phase 2, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: While the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as standard of care treatment for various tumor types has led to considerable improvements in clinical outcome, the majority of patients still fail to respond. Preclinical data suggest that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) could work synergistically with CPIs by acting as an in situ cancer vaccine, thus potentially increasing response rates and prolonging disease control. Though SBRT administered concurrently with CPIs has been shown to be safe, evidence of its efficacy from large randomized trials is still lacking. The aim of this multicenter randomized phase II trial is to assess whether SBRT administered concurrently with CPIs could prolong progression-free survival as compared to standard of care in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS/DESIGN: Ninety-eight patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive CPI treatment combined with SBRT (Arm A) or CPI monotherapy (Arm B). Randomization will be stratified according to tumor histology (melanoma, renal, urothelial, head and neck squamous cell or non-small cell lung carcinoma) and disease burden (≤ or > 3 cancer lesions). The recommended SBRT dose is 24Gy in 3 fractions, which will be administered to a maximum of 3 lesions and is to be completed prior to the second or third CPI cycle (depending on CPI treatment schedule). The study's primary endpoint is progression-free survival as per iRECIST. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response, local control, quality of life and toxicity. Translational analyses will be performed using blood, fecal and tissue samples. DISCUSSION: The CHEERS trial will provide further insights into the clinical and immunological impact of SBRT when combined with CPIs in patients with advanced solid tumors. Furthermore, study results will inform the design of future immuno-radiotherapy trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03511391 . Registered 17 April 2018.

MRI-based tumor inter-fraction motion statistics for rectal cancer boost radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, dose escalation is currently being investigated in a large number of studies. Since there is little known on gross tumor volume (GTV) inter-fraction motion for rectal cancer, a wide variety in margins is used. Purpose of this study is to quantify GTV inter-fraction motion statistics on different timescales and to give estimates of planning target volume (PTV) margins. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients, diagnosed with rectal cancer, were included. To investigate motion from week-to-week, 16 patients underwent a pretreatment and five weekly MRIs, prior to a radiotherapy (RT) fraction of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. To investigate motion from day-to-day, the remaining 16 patients underwent five daily MRIs before each fraction in one week of RT. GTV was delineated on all scans according to guidelines. Scans were aligned on bony anatomy with the first MRI. For both datasets separately, GTV inter-fraction motion was determined based on center-of-gravity displacement. Therefrom, systematic and random errors were determined in left/right (LR), anterior/posterior and cranial/caudal (CC) direction. PTV margin estimates were calculated and evaluated on GTV coverage. RESULTS: Systematic and random errors were found in the range of 2.3-4.8 mm and 1.5-3.3 mm from week-to-week, and 1.8-4.5 mm and 1.8-4.0 mm from day-to-day, respectively. On both timescales, similar motion patterns were found; the most motion was observed in CC whilst the least motion was observed in LR. On the week-to-week data more systematic and less random motion was observed compared to the day-to-day data. Overall, only slight differences in margin estimates were found. Derived PTV margin estimates were found to give adequate GTV coverage. CONCLUSION: GTV inter-fraction motion, on a week-to-week and day-to-day timescale, can be accounted for using motion statistics presented in this study.

Tumor volume regression during preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a prospective observational study with weekly MRI.

PURPOSE: Few data is available on rectal tumor shrinkage during preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This regression pattern is interesting to optimize timing of dose escalation on the tumor. METHODS: Gross tumor volumes (GTV) were contoured by two observers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) obtained before, weekly during, 2-4 weeks after, and 7-8 weeks after a 5-week course of concomitant CRT for rectal cancer. RESULTS: Overall, 120 MRIs were acquired in 15 patients. A statistically significant tumor volume reduction is seen from the first week, and between any two time points (p < .007). At the end of CRT, 46.3% of the initial tumor volume remained, and 32.4% at time of surgery. PTV measured 61.2% at the end of treatment. Tumor shrinkage is the fastest in the beginning of treatment (26%/week), slows down to 7%/week in the last 2 weeks of CRT, and finally to 1.3%/week in the last 5 weeks before surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The main rectal tumor regression occurs during CRT course itself, and mostly in the first half, with shrinking speed decreasing over the course. This suggests that a sequential boost is preferably done after the elective fields, yielding an average PTV-reduction of 39%. A simultaneous integrated boost strategy could benefit from adaptive planning during the course.

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 have improved the outcome for many cancer types, the majority of patients fails to respond to ICI monotherapy. Hypofractionated radiotherapy has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of ICIs. Objective: To assess the addition of radiotherapy to ICIs compared with ICI monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial was conducted in 5 Belgian hospitals and enrolled participants between March 2018 and October 2020. Patients 18 years or older with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, or non-small cell lung carcinoma were eligible. A total of 99 patients were randomly assigned to either the control arm (n = 52) or the experimental arm (n = 47). Of those, 3 patients (1 in the control arm vs 2 in the experimental arm) withdrew consent and thus were not included in the analysis. Data analyses were performed between April 2022 and March 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive anti-PD-1/PD-1 ligand 1 ICIs alone as per standard of care (control arm) or combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy 3 × 8 gray to a maximum of 3 lesions prior to the second or third ICI cycle, depending on the frequency of administration (experimental arm). Randomization was stratified according to tumor histologic findings and disease burden (3 and fewer or more than 3 cancer lesions). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) as per immune Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Key secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate, local control rate, and toxic effects. Efficacy was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, while safety was evaluated in the as-treated population. Results: Among 96 patients included in the analysis (mean age, 66 years; 76 [79%] female), 72 (75%) had more than 3 tumor lesions and 65 (68%) had received at least 1 previous line of systemic treatment at time of inclusion. Seven patients allocated to the experimental arm did not complete the study-prescribed radiotherapy course due to early disease progression (n = 5) or intercurrent illness (n = 2). With a median (range) follow-up of 12.5 (0.7-46.2) months, median PFS was 2.8 months in the control arm compared with 4.4 months in the experimental arm (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.58-1.53; P = .82). Between the control and experimental arms, no improvement in median OS was observed (11.0 vs 14.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.48-1.41; P = .47), and objective response rate was not statistically significantly different (22% vs 27%; P = .56), despite a local control rate of 75% in irradiated patients. Acute treatment-related toxic effects of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 79% and 18% of patients in the control arm vs 78% and 18% in the experimental arm, respectively. No grade 5 adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: This phase 2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that while safe, adding subablative stereotactic radiotherapy of a limited number of metastatic lesions to ICI monotherapy failed to show improvement in PFS or OS. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03511391.

The Road to Dissemination: The Concept of Oligometastases and the Barriers for Widespread Disease.

Over the last years, the oligometastatic disease state has gained more and more interest, and randomized trials are now suggesting an added value of stereotactic radiotherapy on all macroscopic disease in oligometastatic patients; but what barriers could impede widespread disease in some patients? In this review, we first discuss the concept of oligometastatic disease and some examples of clinical evidence. We then explore the route to dissemination: the hurdles a tumoral clone has to overtake before it can produce efficient and widespread dissemination. The spectrum theory argues that the range of metastatic patterns encountered in the clinic is the consequence of gradually obtained metastatic abilities of the tumor cells. Tumor clones can obtain these capabilities by Darwinian evolution, hence early in their genetic progression tumors might produce only a limited number of metastases. We illustrate selective dissemination by discussing organ tropism, the preference of different cancer (sub)types to metastasize to certain organs. Finally we discuss biomarkers that may help to distinguish the oligometastatic state.

Lymphocyte-sparing pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer: An in-silico study.

Background and Purpose: Evidence regarding radiation-induced lymphopenia and its negative impact on oncological outcome is incrementing. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of lymphocyte-rich organs at risk (LOAR) sparing in pelvic irradiation for localized prostate cancer and to estimate its impact on the effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC). Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with pelvic nodal and prostate or prostate bed irradiation were included. The following bone marrow (BM) structures were delineated as LOARs using semi-automatic segmentation: lumbosacral spine (Ls-BM), ilium (Il-BM), lower pelvis (Lp-BM), and the combined whole-pelvis (Wp-BM). Twenty new lymphocyte sparing treatment plans (LS plans) were calculated, optimizing doses to LOARs while maintaining strict coverage of the targets and respecting standard OARs dose constraints. Finally, we elaborated an EDIC calculation model for pelvic irradiation. Results: LS plans showed a statistically significant dose decrease for LOAR compared to standard of care plans without compromising target coverage nor classic OAR dose constraints: in prostate plans, the V40Gy for Ls-BM, Il-BM, and Lp-BM was decreased by 23 %, 36 %, 52 % respectively. For prostate bed plans, the V40Gy for Ls-BM, Il-BM, and Lp-BM was decreased by 25 %, 59 %, 56 %, respectively. For Wp-BM, the V10Gy, V20Gy, and Dmean have been decreased by 3 %, 14 %, 15 %, and by 5 %, 15 %, 17 %, respectively for prostate and prostate bed plans. A statistically significant decrease in EDIC was seen for LS plans in both groups. Conclusions: We successfully demonstrated the feasability of lympocyte-sparing treatment planning in pelvic irradiation, also proposing a model for EDIC calculation.

Split-VMAT technique to control the deep inspiration breath hold time for breast cancer radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: To improve split-VMAT technique by optimizing treatment delivery time for deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy in left-sided breast cancer patients, when automatic beam-interruption devices are not available. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients were treated with an eight partial arcs (8paVMAT) plan, standard of care in our center. A four partial arcs (4paVMAT) plan was also created and actual LINAC outputs were measured, to evaluate whether there was a dosimetric difference between both techniques and potential impact on the delivered dose. Subsequently, ten other patients were consecutively treated with a 4paVMAT plan to compare the actual treatment delivery time between both techniques. The prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy/15 fractions on the PTV breast (breast or thoracic wall), lymph nodes (LN) and intramammary lymph node chain (IMN). Treatment delivery time, PTVs coverage, conformity index (CI), organs at risk (OAR) dose, monitor units (MU), and gamma index were compared. RESULTS: Both split-VMAT techniques resulted in similar dose coverage for the PTV Breast and LN, and similar CI. For PTV IMN we observed a 5% increased coverage for the volume receiving ≥ 36 Gy with 4paVMAT, with an identical volume receiving ≥ 32 Gy. There was no difference for the OAR sparing, with the exception of the contralateral organs: there was a 0.6 Gy decrease for contralateral breast mean (p ≤ 0.01) and 1% decrease for the volume of right lung receiving ≥ 5 Gy (p = 0.024). Overall, these results indicate a modest clinical benefit of using 4paVMAT in comparison to 8paVMAT. An increase in the number of MU per arc was observed for the 4paVMAT technique, as expected, while the total number of MU remained comparable for both techniques. All the plans were measured with the Delta4 phantom and passed the gamma index criteria with no significant differences. Finally, the main difference was seen for the treatment delivery time: there was a significant decrease from 8.9 to 5.4 min for the 4paVMAT plans (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study is mainly of interest for centers who are implementing the DIBH technique without automatic beam-holding devices and who therefore may require to manually switch the beam on and off during breast DIBH treatment. Split-VMAT technique with 4 partial arcs significantly reduces the treatment delivery time compared to 8 partial arcs, without compromising the target coverage and the OAR sparing. The technique decreases the number of breath holds per fraction, resulting in a shorter treatment session.

Evaluation of the XVI dual registration tool for image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the reliability and the required time for two cone-beam CT (CBCT) registration methods for prostate irradiation (PI) and prostate bed irradiation (PBI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two-hundred treatment fractions (in 10 PI and 10 PBI patients) were reanalyzed, using two CBCT registration methods: (1) a combination of an automated chamfer matching (CM) with manual matching (MM), and (2) the automated XVI dual registration tool (DRT). Bland-Altman 95% Limits of Agreement (LoA) were used to assess agreement with manual registration by Radiation Oncologists. RESULTS: All 95% LoA for CM + MM were ≤ 0.33 cm. For DRT, several 95% LoA were notably larger than the predefined clinical threshold of 0.3 cm: -0.47 to +0.25 cm (PI) and -0.36 to +0.23 cm (PBI) for the superior-inferior direction and -0.52 to +0.24 cm (PI) and -0.38 to +0.31 cm (PBI) for the anterior-posterior direction.For PI, the average time required was 33 s with CM + MM versus only 18 s with DRT (p = 0.002). For PBI, this was 13 versus 19 s, respectively (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: For PI, DRT was significantly faster than CM + MM, but the accuracy is insufficient to use without manual verification. Therefore, manual verification is still warranted, but could offset the time benefit. For PBI, the CM + MM method was faster and more accurate.

The METABANK score: A clinical tool to predict survival after stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT, SBRT) is widely used in oligometastatic cancer, but the heterogeneity of the population complicates estimation of the prognosis. We investigated the role of different clinical and inflammatory parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients treated with SRT for 1-5 oligometastases between 2003 and 2017 in our center. Patients were randomized between a model training set (2/3) and a separate validation set (1/3). A Cox regression model was built, validated and risk points were attributed to the resulting parameters. RESULTS: 403 patients received SRT for 760 metastases. Treated sites were mainly lung, liver, nodal areas, and brain. Most common primaries were colorectal and lung cancer. Median follow-up for living patients reached 42 months and median overall survival (MS) was 26.6 months (95% CI 23.8-29.3). Five independent adverse factors were discriminated: male sex, synchronous timing of oligometastases, brain metastasis, non-adenocarcinoma histology, KPS <80. A risk score is formed by summation of the points of each factor (M:4, T:2, B:7, N:7, K:8). Four risk groups were defined: (1) 0-2 points: MS 41.2 months (95% CI 30.2-52.3); (2) 3-8 points: 29.3 months (24.6-34.0); (3) 9-13 points: 17.4 months (10.1-24.7), and (4) 14-28 points: 7.9 months (5.5-10.3). CONCLUSION: We propose a prognostic score applicable in a variety of primary tumors and disease locations, including presence of brain metastases. The nomogram and risk groups can be used to stratify patients in new trials and to support individualized care for oligometastatic patients. An online calculator will become available at predictcancer.org.

Successful treatment with intralesional talimogene laherparepvec in two patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory, advanced-stage melanoma.

Monoclonal antibodies that block the programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) immune checkpoint receptors (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, or the combination of nivolumab with ipilimumab) are approved treatment option for patients with advanced melanoma. Over half of all patients are refractory to these immunotherapies and are in need of alternative or complementary treatment options. Talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) is a first-in-class intralesionally delivered oncolytic immunotherapy, which has proven efficacy in the treatment of advanced melanoma. A proportion of patients treated with T-VEC will benefit from an abscopal response of noninjected metastases indicative of a systemic antitumor immune response elicited by the intratumoral injections. At present it remains unknown whether the systemic antitumor responses elicited by T-VEC are nonredundant with immune-checkpoint blockade. Recent data on potential synergy between T-VEC and both PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade suggest that the mechanism of action may be complementary. We report on the successful treatment with intralesional T-VEC of two female patients with locoregionally advanced BRAF V600 wild-type melanoma who previously progressed on anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors.

Focal radiation necrosis of the brain in patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with pembrolizumab.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 60% of patients with metastatic melanoma develop melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) during the course of their disease. Surgery, radiosurgery (SRS), stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) or combinations of these are commonly used local treatment modalities. Inhibitory monoclonal antibodies against the CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint receptors significantly improved the survival of metastatic melanoma patients, including patients with MBM. This prolonged survival, and potentially also the immunostimulatory mechanisms, may expose patients to a higher risk for long-term complications such as focal postradiation necrosis of the brain (RNB). METHODS: We analyzed the incidence of pseudotumoral RNB in a single institution cohort of 142 melanoma patients that were prospectively followed after starting treatment with pembrolizumab in an expanded access program. RESULTS: Of the 142 patients, 43 (30.7%) patients had MBM at initiation pembrolizumab. Of these, 31 (72.1%) were treated with SRS, 8 (18.6%) with WBRT while 4 (9.3%) had no prior local therapy. Of patients treated with RT, 28 (71.1%) received RT before the initiation of pembrolizumab. 5 (12.8%) patients developed a new symptomatic pseudotumoral lesion at a median time of 11.15 months (range 8-46) after the RT. In all patients, the diagnosis of RNB was radiologically confirmed. The RNB was treated with corticosteroids in two patients, bevacizumab in two patients, and surgery in three symptomatic patients. The diagnosis was histologically confirmed in the patients treated with surgery. CONCLUSION: Melanoma patients with MBM treated with radiosurgery and showing a beneficial response to pembrolizumab are at risk for late RNB. In case of suspected isolated progression at the site of a previously irradiated MBM, the diagnosis of RNB should be considered.

The long- and short-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion in lung and liver over the course of a radiotherapy treatment.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the short and long-term variability of breathing induced tumor motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 3D tumor motion of 19 lung and 18 liver lesions captured over the course of an SBRT treatment were evaluated and compared to the motion on 4D-CT. An implanted fiducial could be used for unambiguous motion information. Fast orthogonal fluoroscopy (FF) sequences, included in the treatment workflow, were used to evaluate motion during treatment. Several motion parameters were compared between different FF sequences from the same fraction to evaluate the intrafraction variability. To assess interfraction variability, amplitude and hysteresis were compared between fractions and with the 3D tumor motion registered by 4D-CT. Population based margins, necessary on top of the ITV to capture all motion variability, were calculated based on the motion captured during treatment. RESULTS: Baseline drift in the cranio-caudal (CC) or anterior-poster (AP) direction is significant (ie. >5 mm) for a large group of patients, in contrary to intrafraction amplitude and hysteresis variability. However, a correlation between intrafraction amplitude variability and mean motion amplitude was found (Pearson's correlation coefficient, r = 0.72, p < 10-4). Interfraction variability in amplitude is significant for 46% of all lesions. As such, 4D-CT accurately captures the motion during treatment for some fractions but not for all. Accounting for motion variability during treatment increases the PTV margins in all directions, most significantly in CC from 5 mm to 13.7 mm for lung and 8.0 mm for liver. CONCLUSION: Both short-term and day-to-day tumor motion variability can be significant, especially for lesions moving with amplitudes above 7 mm. Abandoning passive motion management strategies in favor of more active ones is advised.

Treating patients with Dynamic Wave Arc: First clinical experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dynamic Wave Arc (DWA) is a system-specific noncoplanar arc technique that combines synchronized gantry-ring rotation with D-MLC optimization. This paper presents the clinical workflow, quality assurance program, and reports the geometric and dosimetric results of the first patient cohort treated with DWA. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The RayStation TPS was clinically integrated on the Vero SBRT platform for DWA treatments. The first 15 patients treated with DWA represent a broad range of treatment sites: breast boost, prostate, lung SBRT and bone metastases, which allowed us to explore the potentials and assess the limitations of the current DWA site-specific template solution. For the DWA verification a variety of QA equipment was used, from 3D diode array to an anthropomorphic end-to-end phantom. The geometric accuracy of each arc was verified with an independent orthogonal fluoroscopy method. RESULTS: The average beam-on delivery time was 3min, ranging from 1.22min to 8.82min. All patient QAs passed our institutional clinical criteria of gamma index. For both EBT3 film and Delta4 measurements, DWA planned versus delivered dose distributions presented an average agreement above 97%. An overall mean gantry-ring geometric deviation of -0.03°±0.46° and 0.18°±0.26° was obtained, respectively. CONCLUSION: For the first time, DWA has been translated into the clinic and used to treat various treatment sides. DWA has been successfully added to the noncoplanar rotational IMRT techniques arsenal, allowing additional flexibility in dose shaping while preserving dosimetrically robust delivery.

Initial characterization, dosimetric benchmark and performance validation of Dynamic Wave Arc.

BACKGROUND: Dynamic Wave Arc (DWA) is a clinical approach designed to maximize the versatility of Vero SBRT system by synchronizing the gantry-ring noncoplanar movement with D-MLC optimization. The purpose of this study was to verify the delivery accuracy of DWA approach and to evaluate the potential dosimetric benefits. METHODS: DWA is an extended form of VMAT with a continuous varying ring position. The main difference in the optimization modules of VMAT and DWA is during the angular spacing, where the DWA algorithm does not consider the gantry spacing, but only the Euclidian norm of the ring and gantry angle. A preclinical version of RayStation v4.6 (RaySearch Laboratories, Sweden) was used to create patient specific wave arc trajectories for 31 patients with various anatomical tumor regions (prostate, oligometatstatic cases, centrally-located non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer-LAPC). DWA was benchmarked against the current clinical approaches and coplanar VMAT. Each plan was evaluated with regards to dose distribution, modulation complexity (MCS), monitor units and treatment time efficiency. The delivery accuracy was evaluated using a 2D diode array that takes in consideration the multi-dimensionality of DWA during dose reconstruction. RESULTS: In centrally-located NSCLC cases, DWA improved the low dose spillage with 20 %, while the target coverage was increased with 17 % compared to 3D CRT. The structures that significantly benefited from using DWA were proximal bronchus and esophagus, with the maximal dose being reduced by 17 % and 24 %, respectively. For prostate and LAPC, neither technique seemed clearly superior to the other; however, DWA reduced with more than 65 % of the delivery time over IMRT. A steeper dose gradient outside the target was observed for all treatment sites (p < 0.01) with DWA. Except the oligometastatic cases, where the DWA-MCSs indicate a higher modulation, both DWA and VMAT modalities provide plans of similar complexity. The average É£ (3 % /3 mm) passing rate for DWA plans was 99.2 ± 1 % (range from 96.8 to 100 %). CONCLUSIONS: DWA proven to be a fully functional treatment technique, allowing additional flexibility in dose shaping, while preserving dosimetrically robust delivery and treatment times comparable with coplanar VMAT.

Motion management during SBRT for oligometastatic cancer: Results of a prospective phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To optimize the local control of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the Vero-SBRT system and respiratory motion management in patients with oligometastatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with five or less metastases were eligible. In metastases with significant motion, a fiducial was implanted for Vero dynamic tracking. For other metastases an internal target volume (ITV) was defined to encompass the respiratory tumor trajectory. A dose of 50Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed on the 80% isodose line. RESULTS: We treated 87 metastases in 44 patients, with colorectal cancer as the most common primary origin (65.9%). Metastatic sites were mainly lung (n=62) and liver (n=17). Twenty-seven metastases were treated with dynamic tracking, the remaining 60 using the ITV-concept. Three patients (7%) experienced grade ⩾3 toxicity. After a median follow-up of 12months, the overall one-year local control (LC) amounted to 89% (95% CI 77-95%), with corresponding values of 90% and 88% for the metastases irradiated with the ITV-approach and dynamic tracking, respectively. Median progression-free survival reached 6.5months, one-year overall survival 95%. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT with proper respiratory motion management resulted in a high LC and an acceptable toxicity profile in oligometastatic cancer patients.

Dynamic Lung Tumor Tracking for Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiation Therapy.

Physicians considering stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of extracranial cancer targets must be aware of the sizeable risks for normal tissue injury and the hazards of physical tumor miss. A first-of-its-kind SBRT platform achieves high-precision ablative radiation treatment through a combination of versatile real-time imaging solutions and sophisticated tumor tracking capabilities. It uses dual-diagnostic kV x-ray units for stereoscopic open-loop feedback of cancer target intrafraction movement occurring as a consequence of respiratory motions and heartbeat. Image-guided feedback drives a gimbaled radiation accelerator (maximum 15 x 15 cm field size) capable of real-time ±4 cm pan-and-tilt action. Robot-driven ±60° pivots of an integrated ±185° rotational gantry allow for coplanar and non-coplanar accelerator beam set-up angles, ultimately permitting unique treatment degrees of freedom. State-of-the-art software aids real-time six dimensional positioning, ensuring irradiation of cancer targets with sub-millimeter accuracy (0.4 mm at isocenter). Use of these features enables treating physicians to steer radiation dose to cancer tumor targets while simultaneously reducing radiation dose to normal tissues. By adding respiration correlated computed tomography (CT) and 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-ᴅ-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) images into the planning system for enhanced tumor target contouring, the likelihood of physical tumor miss becomes substantially less. In this article, we describe new radiation plans for the treatment of moving lung tumors.

Feasibility of markerless tumor tracking by sequential dual-energy fluoroscopy on a clinical tumor tracking system.

A novel approach to dual-energy imaging for markerless tumor tracking was proposed consisting of sequential dual-energy fluoroscopy, omitting the need for fast-switching kV generators. The implementation of this approach on a clinical tumor tracking system and its efficacy is shown feasible through optimization of the imaging parameters.

Impact of inadequate respiratory motion management in SBRT for oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) resulted in a disappointing 1-year local control rate of 54% in our experience. We aimed to determine the root cause(s). METHODS: 47 oligometastatic CRC patients were treated with SBRT by helical tomotherapy to a dose of 40 or 50Gy in 10 fractions, without specific respiratory motion management and PTV-margins of 10-10-12mm in all patients. The local recurrences (LRs) were delineated on diagnostic PET-CT scans and co-registered with initial planning CTs. LRs were classified as in-field or marginal with respect to the initial dose distribution, and predictors for LR were determined. RESULTS: Out of 105 irradiated metastases, LR modeling yielded 15 in-field and 15 marginal failures. Metastases in moving organs (liver and lung) exhibited a local control of 53% at 1-year (95% confidence interval (CI): 38-67%), compared to 79% for lymph nodes (95% CI: 32-95%). The first group exhibited a sixfold increased risk compared to the latter on multivariate analysis (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The nature and locations of LR indicated that dose prescription and methodology were both inadequate for liver and lung metastases. This study demonstrates the need for individual respiratory motion management and a biological effective dose of >75Gy.

Preoperative intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy with a simultaneous integrated boost in locally advanced rectal cancer: report on late toxicity and outcome.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The addition of chemotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy has been established as the standard of care for patients with cT3-4 rectal cancer. As an alternative strategy, we explored intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy (IMRT-IGRT) with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in a prospective phase II study. Here, we report outcome and late toxicity after a median follow-up of 54 months. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 108 patients were treated preoperatively with IMRT-IGRT, delivering a dose of 46 Gy in fractions of 2 Gy. Patients (n=57) displaying an anticipated circumferential resection margin (CRM) of less than 2mm based on magnetic resonance imaging received a SIB to the tumor up to a total dose of 55.2 Gy. RESULTS: The absolute incidence of grade ≥3 late gastrointestinal and urinary toxicity was 9% and 4%, respectively, with a 13% rate of any grade ≥3 late toxicity. The actuarial 5-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 97%, 57%, and 68%. On multivariate analysis, R1 resection and pN2 disease were associated with significantly impaired OS. CONCLUSIONS: The use of preoperative IMRT-IGRT with a SIB resulted in a high 5-year LC rate and non-negligible late toxicity.

Treating patients with real-time tumor tracking using the Vero gimbaled linac system: implementation and first review.

PURPOSE: To report on the first clinical application of a real-time tumor tracking (RTTT) solution based on the Vero SBRT gimbaled linac system for treatment of moving tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A first group of 10 SBRT patients diagnosed with NSCLC or oligometastatic disease in lung or liver was treated with the RTTT technique. The PTV volumes and OAR exposure were benchmarked against the widely used ITV approach. Based on data acquired during execution of RTTT treatments, a first review was performed of the process. RESULTS: The 35% PTV volume reduction with RTTT of the studied single lesions SBRT irradiations of small target volumes is expected to result in a small (<1%) reduction of lung or liver NTCP. A GTV-PTV margin of 5.0mm was applied for treatment planning of RTTT. From patient data on residual geometric uncertainties, a CTV-PTV margin of 3.2mm was calculated. Reduction of the GTV-PTV margin below 5.0mm without better understanding of biological definition of tumor boundaries was discouraged. Total treatment times were reduced to 34.4 min on average. CONCLUSION: A considerable PTV volume reduction was achieved applying RTTT and time efficiency for respiratory correlated SBRT was reestablished with Vero RTTT.