Ambulation in patients with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and concomitant femoral intra-aortic balloon pump support.

INTRODUCTION: The mobilization and ambulation of patients with severe cardiogenic shock supported with peripheral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) and concomitant femoral intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support is not well-described. This technical paper describes an ambulation protocol to prevent deconditioning in this critically ill patient population. METHODS: A protocol for the ambulation of patients with pVA-ECMO and concomitant IABP support was created in December 2022 and implemented at a single center. To initiate ambulation, patients were initially placed in a vertical position utilizing the VitalGo Total Lift Bed (VitalGo Systems, Miramar, FL) with mechanical circulatory support device monitoring performed by a critical care multidisciplinary team. Retrospective analysis of successfully ambulated patients was performed from December 2022 to January 2024. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients out of 112 patients with ECMO support were ambulated in the study period. Four of these patients had pVA-ECMO with concomitant IABP support with this cohort completing a total of 11 sessions during the study period. Patients ambulated an average of 200 feet per session without any adverse events, including cannula and balloon pump migration or displacement. Three of the four patients studied were either bridged to an advanced therapy including orthotopic heart transplant or durable left ventricular assist device or were discharged. CONCLUSION: A protocol for ambulation of CS patients with pVA-ECMO support and concomitant femoral IABP support is feasible and can safely be implemented in this critically ill patient population. Further multicenter studies are necessary to determine the overall impact of ambulation on patient outcomes.

Hemodynamic monitoring in cardiogenic shock.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiogenic shock remains a major cause of mortality today. With recent advancements in invasive mechanical support strategies, reperfusion practice, and a new classification scheme is proposed for cardiogenic shock, an updated review of the latest hemodynamic monitoring techniques is important. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple recent studies have emerged supporting the use of pulmonary artery catheters in the cardiogenic shock population. Data likewise continues to emerge on the use of echocardiography and biomarker measurement in the care of these patients. SUMMARY: The integration of multiple forms of hemodynamic monitoring, spanning noninvasive and invasive modalities, is important in the diagnosis, staging, initial treatment, and subsequent management of the cardiogenic shock patient.

External validation of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage clinical decision rule in patients with acute headache.

We aim to externally validate the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage (OSAH) clinical decision rule. This rule identifies patients with acute nontraumatic headache who require further investigation. We conducted a medical record review of all patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with headache from January 2011 to November 2013. Per the OSAH rule, patients with any of the following predictors require further investigation: age 40 years or older, neck pain, stiffness or limited flexion, loss of consciousness, onset during exertion, or thunderclap. The rule was applied following the OSAH rule criteria. Patients were followed up for repeat visits within 7 days of initial presentation. Data were electronically harvested from the electronic medical record and manually abstracted from individual patient charts using a standardized data abstraction form. Calibration between trained reviewers was performed periodically. A total of 5034 ED visits with acute headache were reviewed for eligibility. There were 1521 visits that met exclusion criteria, and 3059 had headache of gradual onset or time to maximal intensity greater than or equal to 1 hour. The rule was applied to 454 patients (9.0%). There were 9 cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), yielding an incidence of 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0%-3.9%) in the eligible cohort. The sensitivity for SAH was 100% (95% CI, 62.9%-100%); specificity, 7.6% (95% CI, 5.4%-10.6%); positive predictive value, 2.1% (95% CI 1.0%-4.2%); and negative predictive value, 100% (95% CI, 87.4%-100%). The OSAH rule was 100% sensitive for SAH in the eligible cohort. However, its low specificity and applicability to only a minority of ED patients with headache (9%) reduce its potential impact on practice.