Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 179(1): 1-9, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30893694

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is still considered to be the gold standard in food allergy diagnosis. This test is however not common practice in routine due to several practical limitations, especially for non-IgE-mediated food allergy with its typical delayed food allergic reactions. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate DBPCFC matrices for the diagnosis of milk and egg allergies which can be applied at home for the diagnosis of delayed food allergic reactions. The main focus was the blinding of milk and raw egg and the development of matrices which can be prepared and consumed conveniently at home with a sufficiently long shelf life (+/- 6 months or longer). METHODS: A sensory test evaluated the blinding of the egg and milk in the matrices. The microbiological analysis confirmed the safety and stability of the developed matrices. To assess the applicability of the matrices, a pilot DBPCFC study for milk including 7 patients was conducted. RESULTS: Sensory tests confirmed that the masking of the allergenic ingredients was sufficient. Microbial safety and stability of the matrices were confirmed up to 6 months of storage at ambient temperatures in the dark. The DBPCFC for milk showed different outcomes and proved its applicability for use at home. CONCLUSION: A novel stable DBPCFC matrix for milk and raw egg has been developed that allows convenient use at the patients' home.


Assuntos
Hipersensibilidade a Ovo/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidade a Leite/diagnóstico , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Placebos , Sensação , Testes Cutâneos
2.
Anal Bioanal Chem ; 409(22): 5201-5207, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28744561

RESUMO

The recent detection of nuts (including peanut) in spices across the globe has led to enormous recalls of several spices and food products in the last two years. The lack of validated detection methods specific for spices makes it difficult to assess allergen presence at trace levels. Because of the urgent need for confirmation of possible peanut presence in chili peppers, an LC-MS/MS method was optimized and developed for this particular food matrix. Although several studies optimized LC-MS detection strategies specific for peanuts, the presence of complex components in the spices (e.g., phenolic components) makes method optimization and validation necessarily. Focus was laid on validation of the method with real incurred chili peppers (whereby a known amount of peanut is added) at low concentrations, to deal with possible matrix interferences. LC-MS/MS proves to be a good alternative to the currently most applied methods (ELISA and RT-PCR) and can be used as a complementary method of analysis when results are unclear. Peanut marker peptides were selected based on their abundancy in digested incurred chili peppers. The limit of detection was determined to be 24 ppm (mg peanut/kg), a level whereby the risk for potential allergic reactions is zero, considering the typical portion size of spices. The chili pepper powder under investigation proved to contain low levels of peanuts after LC-MS/MS, ELISA, and RT-PCR testing. Graphical abstract Standard curve of the detected peanuts in chili pepper samples using the novel LC-MS/MS method.


Assuntos
Alérgenos/análise , Arachis/química , Capsicum/química , Análise de Alimentos/métodos , Alérgenos/química , Cromatografia Líquida , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Limite de Detecção , Peptídeos/análise , Peptídeos/química , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
3.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0305650, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38885212

RESUMO

Accurate DNA quantification is key for downstream application including library preparations for whole genome sequencing (WGS) and the quantification of standards for quantitative PCR. Two commonly used technologies for nucleic acid quantification are based on spectrometry, such as NanoDrop, and fluorometry, such as Qubit. The DS-11+ Series spectrophotometer/fluorometer (DeNovix) is a UV spectrophotometry-based instrument and is a relatively new spectrophotometric method but has not yet been compared to established platforms. Here, we compared three DNA quantification platforms, including two UV spectrophotometry-based techniques (DeNovix and NanoDrop) and one fluorometry-based approach (Qubit). We used genomic prokaryotic DNA extracted from Streptococcus pneumoniae using a Roche DNA extraction kit. We also evaluated purity assessment and effect of a single freeze-thaw cycle. Spectrophotometry-based methods reported 3 to 4-fold higher mean DNA concentrations compared to Qubit, both before and after freezing. The ratio of DNA concentrations assessed by spectrophotometry on the one hand, and Qubit on the other hand, was function of the A260/280. In case DNA was pure (A260/280 between 1.7 and 2.0), the ratio DeNovix or Nanodrop vs. Qubit was close or equal to 2, while this ratio showed an incline for DNA with increasing A260/280 values > 2.0. The A260/280 and A260/230 purity ratios exhibited negligible variation across spectrophotometric methods and freezing conditions. The comparison of DNA concentrations from before and after freezing revealed no statistically significant disparities for each technique. DeNovix exhibited the highest Spearman correlation coefficient (0.999), followed by NanoDrop (0.81), and Qubit (0.77). In summary, there is no difference between DeNovix and NanoDrop in estimated gDNA concentrations of S. pneumoniae, and the spectrophotometry methods estimated close or equal to 2 times higher concentrations compared to Qubit for pure DNA.


Assuntos
DNA Bacteriano , Streptococcus pneumoniae , DNA Bacteriano/análise , DNA Bacteriano/genética , DNA Bacteriano/isolamento & purificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Fluorometria/métodos , Espectrofotometria Ultravioleta/métodos , Espectrofotometria/métodos , Lisados Bacterianos
4.
Clin Transl Allergy ; 8: 3, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29416847

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is considered the gold standard for food allergy diagnosis. However, this test is rarely performed routinely in clinical practice because of various practical issues, e.g. the lack of a standardized matrix preparation. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a convenient DBPCFC matrix, that can easily be implemented in daily clinical practice. The focus of this study was the blinding of hazelnuts, whereby the hazelnuts retained as much as possible their allergenicity and could be mixed homogenously in low-doses to the matrices. METHODS: A basophil-activation test (BAT), microbial tests and an LC-MS/MS test were performed to assess respectively the allergenicity of the used hazelnuts, the microbial stability of the novel developed matrices and the homogeneity of the hazelnuts in the matrices. A sensory test was conducted to validate the blinding of the hazelnuts in the matrices. A pilot DBPCFC study included eight patients as proof of concept. RESULTS: The BAT-test gave the first insights concerning the retained allergenicity of the hazelnuts. The microbial safety could be assured after 12 months of storage. Sufficient masking was assessed by several sensory tests. Homogeneous hazelnut distribution could be achieved for the different hazelnut concentrations. The DBPCFC's results showed diverse allergic responders (from no reactions to distinct objective symptoms). CONCLUSION: A novel stable and validated DBPCFC matrix using raw hazelnuts has been developed that allows easy preparation in a standardized way for convenient use in daily clinical practice.Trial registration EC Project number: EC/2015/0852; Date of registration: 13 Oct 2015; End date: 01 Feb 2017.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA