Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Oncologist ; 21(12): 1416-e17, 2016 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27903924

RESUMO

LESSONS LEARNED: Cabazitaxel has activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and taxane-resistant cell lines. For the first time, cabazitaxel was investigated in incurable patients with recurrent SCCHN. Patients were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel every 3 weeks or weekly methotrexate.This phase II study did not meet its primary endpoint.Cabazitaxel has low activity in SCCHN.The toxicity profile in this population also was not favorable owing to the high rate of febrile neutropenia observed (17%). BACKGROUND: Cabazitaxel is a second-generation taxane that improves the survival of patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel therapy. Cabazitaxel has activity in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) and taxane-resistant cell lines. In this randomized phase II trial, we investigated cabazitaxel in patients with recurrent SCCHN. METHODS: Patients with incurable SCCHN with progression after platinum-based therapy were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel every 3 weeks (cycle 1, 20 mg/m2, increased to 25 mg/m2 for subsequent cycles in the absence of nonhematological adverse events [AEs] greater than grade 2 and hematological AEs greater than grade 3) or methotrexate (40 mg/m2/week). The patients were stratified according to their performance status and previous platinum-based chemotherapy for palliation versus curative intent. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 18 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 101 patients, 53 and 48, with a median age of 58.0 years (range, 41-80), were randomly assigned to cabazitaxel or methotrexate, respectively. The PFSR at 18 weeks was 13.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-25%) for cabazitaxel and 8.3% (95% CI, 2%-20%) for methotrexate. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months in both arms. The median overall survival was 5.0 and 3.6 months for cabazitaxel and methotrexate, respectively. More patients experienced serious adverse events with cabazitaxel than with methotrexate (54% vs. 36%). The most common drug-related grade 3-4 AE in the cabazitaxel arm was febrile neutropenia (17.3%). CONCLUSION: This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Cabazitaxel has low activity in recurrent SCCHN.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/tratamento farmacológico , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidade , Feminino , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço , Taxoides/efeitos adversos
2.
PLoS One ; 8(8): e66848, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23990869

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Genomic Grade Index (GGI) is a 97-gene signature that improves histologic grade (HG) classification in invasive breast carcinoma. In this prospective study we sought to evaluate the feasibility of performing GGI in routine clinical practice and its impact on treatment recommendations. METHODS: Patients with pT1pT2 or operable pT3, N0-3 invasive breast carcinoma were recruited from 8 centers in Belgium. Fresh surgical samples were sent at room temperature in the MapQuant Dx™ PathKit for centralized genomic analysis. Genomic profiles were determined using Affymetrix U133 Plus 2.0 and GGI calculated using the MapQuant Dx® protocol, which defines tumors as low or high Genomic Grade (GG-1 and GG-3 respectively). RESULTS: 180 pts were recruited and 155 were eligible. The MapQuant test was performed in 142 cases and GGI was obtained in 78% of cases (n=111). Reasons for failures were 15 samples with <30% of invasive tumor cells (11%), 15 with insufficient RNA quality (10%), and 1 failed hybridization (<1%). For tumors with an available representative sample (≥ 30% inv. tumor cells) (n=127), the success rate was 87.5%. GGI reclassified 69% of the 54 HG2 tumors as GG-1 (54%) or GG-3 (46%). Changes in treatment recommendations occurred mainly in the subset of HG2 tumors reclassified into GG-3, with increased use of chemotherapy in this subset. CONCLUSION: The use of GGI is feasible in routine clinical practice and impacts treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01916837, http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01916837.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Carcinoma/genética , Hibridização Genômica Comparativa , Tomada de Decisões , Gradação de Tumores/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bélgica , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Genômica , Hospitais Comunitários , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica , Metástase Neoplásica , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Temperatura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA