Pharmacy utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology populations.

Telehealth applications are demonstrated to be useful tools for patients with cancer to facilitate improvements in quality of care. The use of electronic patient-reported outcomes is one way to leverage telehealth to better understand outcomes important to patients. However, use of electronic patient-reported outcomes and direct involvement of pharmacists is not yet a standard practice across cancer centers. The use of pharmacist-led telehealth services offers a unique opportunity for pharmacists to provide cost-effective and convenient patient care interventions. This survey work describes the current practices of pharmacy utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes in oncology populations at National Comprehensive Cancer Network member institutions. Of survey respondents, only 33% of the institutions reported current engagement with electronic patient-reported outcomes. These initiatives largely focused on symptom management. Limitations in staff, resources, and competing priorities limit many institutions from introducing or expanding upon direct pharmacist involvement in electronic patient-reported outcomes. Further work developing the involvement of pharmacists in electronic patient-reported outcomes will be an important way to leverage the growing landscape of telehealth within oncology and highlight the value of the pharmacist.

Comparison of subsequent infusion hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel using two different infusion strategies.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of rescue medication utilization with up to 3 subsequent doses of paclitaxel in patients who underwent an infusion rate escalation versus those who continued on the standard infusion rate after experiencing an initial paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) requiring rescue medications. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on patients who experienced a paclitaxel infusion HSR requiring rescue medications to their first or second lifetime dose of paclitaxel. RESULTS: A total of 99 patients were included for analysis, and from this group, 22 patients were continued on the standard infusion rate, while 77 patients were changed to an infusion rate escalation. The rate of subsequent rescue medication utilization was 5% in patients who were continued at the standard infusion rate versus 23% in patients who were changed to an infusion rate escalation (p = 0.064). The incidence of subsequent rescue medication utilization was unrelated to disease stage (p = 0.39), the paclitaxel dosing regimen (p = 0.99), or a diagnosis of asthma (p = 0.99). CONCLUSION: This single-center, retrospective study suggests that while not statistically significant, there was a potentially clinically meaningful increase in the rate of subsequent rescue medication utilization in patients who were changed to an infusion rate escalation compared to those who continued on the same standard infusion rate after experiencing an initial HSR to paclitaxel.

Efficacy of different dosing schedules of capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer: a single-institution experience.

Purpose Capecitabine is widely used as a single agent on a 21-day cycle in the management of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Our primary objective was to compare the standard dosing of capecitabine (Arm A: days 1-14 on 21-day cycle) to biweekly dosing (Arm B: days 1-7 and 15-21 on 28-day cycle) using retrospective data analysis. Methods 166 patients with MBC treated with single agent capecitabine at The Ohio State University from 2002 to 2014 were considered eligible. Median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. KM curves were compared using log-rank tests with Holm's correction for multiplicity. Results Patients were grouped by dose schedule into one of three arms: Arm A (21-day cycle; capecitabine given at 1000 mg/m2 orally, twice daily on days 1-14 of 21-day cycle); Arm B (28-day cycle; capecitabine given at 1000 mg/m2 orally, twice daily on days 1-7 and 15-21 of 28-day cycle); and Arm C (changeover regimen where patients started on the 21-day cycle, but changed to a 28-day cycle for tolerability). No difference was found in TTF or OS for patients with MBC between those who received capecitabine on either standard dosing (Arm A) and those on a biweekly cycle (Arm B or C). Overall, 41% of patients required dose reduction. Conclusions Our single institution experience showed that alternate dosing of capecitabine (biweekly, 28-day cycle) may be a reasonable alternative to standard 21-day cycle with similar efficacy and fewer dose reductions.

Pathological complete response rates with pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has demonstrated successful pathologic complete response (pCR) rates when administered to patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, locally advanced breast cancer and has become standard of care. This study aimed to identify pCR rates in patients receiving a variety of pertuzumab-based NAC regimens. The effect of the addition of an anthracycline and impact of anthracycline and taxane sequencing on pCR was also assessed. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on patients with operable, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer that received one of five pertuzumab-containing NAC regimens followed by definitive surgery. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were included in the analysis; overall, pCR was attained in 49 patients (51%). Of the 61 patients who received an anthracycline-containing NAC regimen, 30 (49%) attained a pCR. Of the 35 patients who received the non-anthracycline NAC regimen, 19 (54%) attained a pCR; difference in pCR was not statistically significant (p = 0.63). Anthracycline/taxane sequence analysis showed that of the patients attaining pCR with an anthracycline-containing NAC, 77% of patients received the taxane portion upfront (p = 0.17). Relative dose intensity of the anthracycline portion was similar irrespective of treatment sequence. However, relative dose intensity of the taxane portion was decreased with upfront anthracycline administration. CONCLUSION: These findings support current recommendations of adding pertuzumab to established regimens for treatment of locally advanced, HER2-positive, early stage breast cancer. The benefit of adding an anthracycline in the neoadjuvant setting remains unclear. Patients treated with the taxane portion of NAC upfront appeared to have a higher rate of pCR and better relative dose intensity than patients who received the anthracycline portion upfront, but differences were not statistically significant. These findings should be verified in a prospective clinical trial.

Safety of dose-reduced pemetrexed in patients with renal insufficiency.

PURPOSE: Pemetrexed has been shown to be effective in the treatment of advanced and metastatic nonsquamous nonsmall cell lung cancer. In this population, renal insufficiency is common; however, pemetrexed is not recommended in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 45 ml/min due to increased myelosuppression reported in phase I trials. The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety of dose-reduced pemetrexed in patients with a CrCl < 45 ml/min. METHODS: This is a retrospective case series describing the incidence of grade 3 or higher toxicity in patients with CrCl < 45 ml/min treated with dose-reduced pemetrexed at The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at The Ohio State University. RESULTS: A total of eighteen patients were included. Seven (39%) patients experienced a grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Only 18% of administrations led to a grade ≥ 3 toxicity. Four (22%) patients had grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity; three of which were receiving concomitant platinum agents. The fourth patient had a CrCl < 30 ml/min. No patients receiving single-agent pemetrexed with a CrCl > 30 ml/min experienced grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Dose-adjusted pemetrexed may be cautiously administered to patients with a CrCl between 30 and 45 ml/min. Extra caution is warranted in patients receiving concomitant chemotherapy with a platinum agent as well as those with a CrCl < 30 ml/min. Pemetrexed in combination with a platinum agent should not be routinely recommended for patients with a CrCl < 30 ml/min.

Time to treatment failure of palbociclib and letrozole as second-line therapy or beyond in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The management of endocrine therapy resistance is one of the most challenging facets of advanced breast cancer treatment. Palbociclib is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with disease progression following endocrine therapy. However, treatment responsiveness of tumors to palbociclib after multiple lines of endocrine therapy is not clearly established. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of palbociclib and letrozole in patients pretreated with one or more lines of endocrine therapy. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of all postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who received palbociclib and letrozole as a second-line endocrine therapy or beyond (and no prior cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitor therapy) between February 1, 2015, and July 31, 2016. The primary objective was to evaluate time to treatment failure of palbociclib in combination with letrozole as a second-line of therapy or beyond. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients meeting eligibility criteria were included in the analysis. For the primary outcome, the median time to treatment failure of palbociclib and letrozole was 6.3 months (95% CI 3.1-7.4 months). Progression-free survival of palbociclib and letrozole therapy was 6.4 months (95% CI 4.9-8.3 months). CONCLUSIONS: Palbociclib and letrozole therapy is a viable, effective treatment option for metastatic breast cancer patients who were not exposed to cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors as a first-line endocrine therapy. The benefits of palbociclib and letrozole therapy were seen without excessive toxicity, and although neutropenia was common, it may be managed with dose reduction.

Occurrence and characterization of everolimus adverse events during first and subsequent cycles in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Endocrine therapy remains the standard therapy for patients with metastatic hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer. The novel combination of everolimus and exemestane has been shown to prolong progression-free survival but with increased adverse events compared to exemestane alone. In this study, we aimed to describe the frequency and timing of everolimus dose reductions and/or interruptions due to adverse events. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective case series including all patients who received everolimus in combination with exemestane from May 1, 2012, through July 31, 2013. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of first-cycle interruptions or dose reductions with everolimus. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included in the analysis. First-cycle dose reductions or interruptions were observed in 21 (45.6 %) patients. The most common adverse events leading to dose reduction or interruption was stomatitis (57.1 %), fatigue (14.3 %), and diarrhea (14.3 %). The median time to dose reduction was 14 days, and the median duration of the interruption was 14 days. The median progression-free survival was 6.2 months, and the median time to treatment failure was 4.4 months. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, almost half of the patients treated with everolimus and exemestane required a dose reduction or interruption of everolimus during the first cycle of treatment. This early onset of adverse events requires thorough patient education and close clinical monitoring during the first 28 days of therapy.

Stopping paclitaxel premedication after two doses in patients not experiencing a previous infusion hypersensitivity reaction.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel-based chemotherapy continues to be an integral component of breast cancer treatment. Prolonged use of paclitaxel may result in repeated doses of premedications that can have unwanted side effects. Infusion hypersensitivity reactions occurring beyond the second dose of paclitaxel are infrequent and not well characterized. We previously published the results of a small, prospective pilot trial demonstrating the safety and feasibility of discontinuing premedications in patients who received the first two doses of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy without experiencing an infusion hypersensitivity reaction. In this study, we aimed to retrospectively characterize the incidence of rescue medication using this abbreviated premedication regimen in our institution following the publication of the pilot study. METHODS: Patients with stages I-IV breast cancer who received paclitaxel from January 2011 through June 2013 were screened for eligibility. Patients who did not experience an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with their first or second dose of paclitaxel and discontinued paclitaxel premedication for subsequent doses were included in this analysis. The primary endpoint was to estimate the incidence of rescue medication use for the treatment of paclitaxel infusion hypersensitivity during doses three to six of paclitaxel in the study population. RESULTS: In total, 449 patients received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer during the interval time period. After receiving the first two doses of paclitaxel-based chemotherapy without experiencing an infusion hypersensitivity reaction, 234 breast cancer patients had their premedications discontinued for all remaining paclitaxel doses. These patients tolerated future paclitaxel doses without severe or life-threatening complications related to infusion hypersensitivity. The majority of patients did not have any symptoms of an infusion reaction, with only two of these patients requiring rescue medication to treat an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with subsequent paclitaxel doses (0.85; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.10-3.05 %). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of paclitaxel premedications in breast cancer patients who have not experienced an infusion hypersensitivity reaction with the first two doses of paclitaxel is not associated with increased rate of rescue medication use for infusion hypersensitivity.

Effect of Concurrent Proton Pump Inhibitors With Palbociclib Tablets for Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Palbociclib is indicated for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Two retrospective studies found that concurrent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with palbociclib capsules significantly reduced progression free survival (PFS) versus patients without a PPI. Palbociclib tablets were released in 2020 without restriction on PPI use. No study to date has evaluated the combination of palbociclib tablets with concurrent PPI use. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively evaluated after they received palbociclib tablets for the treatment of HR+ HER2- MBC in the first line setting with or without a PPI. Patients were assigned to the no PPI use arm if they never used a PPI and the PPI use arm if they used a PPI for >50% of the duration of palbocicib therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients were identified; 50 in the no PPI use group and 32 in the PPI use group. The median PFS was 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.07 to not estimable) in the no PPI use arm versus 21.0 months (95% CI, 15.15 to not estimable) in the PPI use arm (P = 0.95). Median OS was not reached in either arm. Adverse effects did not differ between arms. CONCLUSION: Use of a concurrent PPI with palbociclib tablets does not significantly reduce PFS in patients treated for HR+ HER2- MBC.

Biomechanical effect of neurologic dance training (NDT) for breast cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and preliminary baseline data.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is among the most common forms of cancer experienced by women. Up to 80% of BC survivors treated with chemotherapy experience chemotherapy-induced neuropathy (CIN), which degrades motor control, sensory function, and quality of life. CIN symptoms include numbness, tingling, and/or burning sensations in the extremities; deficits in neuromotor control; and increased fall risk. Physical activity (PA) and music-based medicine (MBM) are promising avenues to address sensorimotor symptoms. Therefore, we propose that we can combine the effects of music- and PA-based medicine through neurologic dance training (NDT) through partnered Adapted Tango (NDT-Tango). We will assess the intervention effect of NDT-Tango v. home exercise (HEX) intervention on biomechanically-measured variables. We hypothesize that 8 weeks of NDT-Tango practice will improve the dynamics of posture and gait more than 8 weeks of HEX. METHODS: In a single-center, prospective, two-arm randomized controlled clinical trial, participants are randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to the NDT-Tango experimental or the HEX active control intervention group. Primary endpoints are change from baseline to after intervention in posture and gait. Outcomes are collected at baseline, midpoint, post, 1-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include clinical and biomechanical tests of function and questionnaires used to compliment primary outcome measures. Linear mixed models will be used to model changes in postural, biomechanical, and PROs. The primary estimand will be the contrast representing the difference in mean change in outcome measure from baseline to week 8 between treatment groups. DISCUSSION: The scientific premise of this study is that NDT-Tango stands to achieve more gains than PA practice alone through combining PA with MBM and social engagement. Our findings may lead to a safe non-pharmacologic intervention that improves CIN-related deficits. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was first posted on 11/09/21 at ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05114005.

The Immunomodulatory Effects of Dexamethasone on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The immunomodulatory impact of corticosteroids and concurrent chemotherapy is poorly understood within triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). On a biochemical level, steroids have been linked to the signaling of chemotherapy-resistant pathways. However, on a clinical level, steroids play an essential role in chemotherapy tolerance through the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) and hypersensitivity reactions. Given these conflicting roles, we wanted to evaluate this interplay more rigorously in the context of early-stage TNBC. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with operable TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between January 2012 and November 2018, with the primary goal of examining the dose-dependent relationship between pathological complete response (pCR) rates and corticosteroid use. Secondary endpoints included the impact of steroid dosing on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), along with a breakdown in pCR rates based on steroid doses provided during each chemotherapy phase. Further adjusted analyses were performed based on patient age, diabetic status, and anatomical stage. Finally, we explored the relationship between tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) seen on tissue samples at baseline and dexamethasone doses in terms of pCR rates. RESULTS: In total, of the 174 patients screened within this study period, 116 met full eligibility criteria. Of these eligible patients, all were female, with a median age of 51.5 years (27.0 to 74.0) and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.7 [standard deviation (SD) 7.04]. The majority were nondiabetic (80.2%). For cancer stage, 69.8% (n = 81) had stage 2 breast cancer. We found no statistically significant association between pCR rates and dexamethasone use, both in terms of the total dose (p = 0.55) and mean dose per NAC cycle (p = 0.74). Similarly, no difference was noted when adjusting for diabetic status, metformin use, or age at diagnosis, regardless of the total steroid dose provided (p = 0.72) or mean dose per cycle (p = 0.49). No meaningful changes to pCR rate were seen with higher mean or higher total steroid doses during the paclitaxel (T) phase (adjusted p = 0.16 and p = 0.76, respectively) or doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) phase (adjusted p = 0.83 and p = 0.77, respectively). Furthermore, we found no clinically significant association between dexamethasone dose and either RFS (p = 0.45) or OS (p = 0.89). Of the 56 patients who had available pre-treatment biopsy tissue samples, 27 achieved pCR, with higher TILs at baseline being associated with higher pCR rates, regardless of the mean dexamethasone dose used. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that dexamethasone has no clinically significant impact on pCR, RFS, or OS when given concurrently with NAC in patients with curative TNBC, regardless of diabetic status.

Impact of Dose Intensity on Pathologic Complete Response Rate in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Carboplatin, Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab (TCHP).

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment for locally advanced breast cancer. Balancing toxicity and efficacy are a common concern of patients treated with chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of dose intensity on pathologic complete response (pCR) at the time of surgery in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted on patients with HER2+ breast cancer who received neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (TCHP) followed by definitive surgery. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients were included in the analysis; pCR was obtained in 66 patients (42%). There was no statistically significant difference between the mean dose intensity of each of the individual agents in TCHP and pCR rates. The mean overall dose intensity of docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab and pertuzumab was 90.5%, 90.9%, 97.5%, and 93.9%, respectively. Although higher chemotherapy dose intensity (> 85%) was associated with higher pCR rates, no statistically significant difference was found compared with chemotherapy dose intensity < 85%. The TCHP regimen was difficult to tolerate; 104 patients (65%) required a dose reduction or dose delay during treatment due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: The TCHP regimen, which combines chemotherapy and HER2-directed therapy is effective at obtaining pCR in patients with locally advanced HER2+ breast cancer. These results suggest that the dose intensity of the individual agents did not have a significant impact on pCR rates. Given these findings, providers may be more comfortable allowing dose reductions for greater patient tolerability without sacrificing efficacy.

Prophylaxis with sirolimus and tacrolimus ± antithymocyte globulin reduces the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease without an overall survival benefit following allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Methotrexate (MTX) is a standard agent used in combination with calcineurin inhibitors for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell (HCT) transplantation. We retrospectively compared the incidence of acute GVHD (aGVHD), transplant-related morbidity, and mortality in patients given sirolimus/tacrolimus ± antithymocyte globulin (ATG) versus MTX/tacrolimus or cyclosporine and allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2009, 106 consecutive patients received peripheral blood HCT or bone marrow grafts after 1 of 6 myeloablative conditioning regimens. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD was 18.6% in patients who received sirolimus/tacrolimus compared to 48.9% who received MTX (P = .001). The incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was 5% and 17% (P = .045), respectively. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the groups (P = .160). Chronic GVHD (cGVHD) occurred in 40.4% who received sirolimus and 41.9% receiving MTX (P = .89). The incidence of thrombotic microangiopathy or interstitial pneumonitis was not significantly different between groups. The reduction in the risk of severe aGVHD was offset by an increased (20% versus 4%, P = .015) incidence of and mortality from sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS). Sirolimus/tacrolimus appears to reduce the incidence of aGVHD after conventional allotransplantion compared to MTX-calcineurin inhibitor prophylaxis; however, this did not improve survival.

Progression-Free Survival for Real-World Use of Palbociclib in Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Additional use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hormone receptor (HR)-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. However, neutropenia is a common reason for dose reductions, leading to concerns about palbociclib efficacy at lower doses. A safety analysis confirmed no PFS differences between palbociclib doses in the second-line setting, but to our knowledge, this has not been evaluated for first-line treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study we evaluated real-world use of first-line palbociclib with aromatase inhibitor (AI) treatment in HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients who received treatment between February 2015 and July 2017. The primary objective was to determine PFS of treatment with palbociclib and an AI in a real-world first-line setting. Secondary objectives included determining the PFS for patients treated with palbociclib on the basis of final doses, time to first dose reduction, time to treatment failure (TTF), and safety. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included in the final analysis. Median PFS was 26.4 months. No significant differences in PFS were observed on the basis of final doses of palbociclib (P = .77). Time to first dose reduction was 2.3 months. Median TTF was 26.1 months. Dose delays, reductions, and Grade 3/4 neutropenia were common (63%, n = 44; 57%, n = 40; and 62%, n = 43, respectively). CONCLUSION: Real-world first-line palbociclib treatment produced outcomes similar to those in PALOMA-2 (Palbociclib and Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer) (median PFS 26.4 months vs. 24.8 months) despite more dose reductions (57%, n = 40 vs. 36%, n = 160) and shorter time to first dose reduction (2.3 vs. 3.0 months). No significant differences in PFS were observed for the varying palbociclib doses. Palbociclib dose reductions might not significantly affect PFS in the first-line setting.

T-DM1 Activity in Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancers That Received Prior Therapy With Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab.

Purpose Ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) is currently approved for treatment in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who previously received trastuzumab and a taxane. However, there are no data on the activity of T-DM1 in patients who received prior pertuzumab, which is now included as standard first-line therapy. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of T-DM1 in routine clinical practice in a contemporary patient population that received both prior trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Patients and Methods We identified all patients with HER2-positive MBC who received T-DM1 after trastuzumab and pertuzumab between March 1, 2013, and July 15, 2015, via electronic pharmacy records and departmental databases at three institutions: MD Anderson Cancer Center, Smilow Cancer Hospital at Yale, and The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University. We reviewed medical records of each case to confirm treatment sequencing and outcome. Results Of patients, 82 were identified and 78 were available for outcome analysis; 32% received T-DM1 as first- and second-line line therapy, and 48% received it as fourth-line treatment or later. Rate of prolonged duration on therapy, defined as duration on therapy ≥ 6 months, was 30.8% (95% CI, 20.6% to 41.1%), and tumor response rate was 17.9% (95% CI, 9.4% to 26.4%). Median duration on therapy was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.7 to 5.1; range, 0 to 22.5 months). T-DM1 was discontinued for disease progression in 84% of patients and for toxicity in 10%. Conclusion Tumor response rates were lower than in prior reports of trastuzumab-resistant, HER2-positive MBC, but one third of patients received therapy with T-DM1 for ≥ 6 months, which suggests a clinically relevant benefit in patients who received prior pertuzumab.

An antimicrobial stewardship program's real-world experience with fidaxomicin for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection: a case series.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-world clinical and economic outcomes in patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treated with fidaxomicin. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 61 patients with CDI who were treated with fidaxomicin monotherapy or combination therapy from September 2011 to December 2012. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Data on demographics, infection characteristics, and clinical and economic outcomes were evaluated. Clinical cure was defined as resolution of diarrhea (less than or equal to three unformed stools for at least 2 consecutive days) maintained for the duration of therapy with no further requirement for CDI therapy and was achieved in 44 (72.1%) patients. Clinical cure was significantly higher for patients receiving fidaxomicin monotherapy compared with fidaxomicin combination therapy (25/29 [86.2%] patients vs 19/32 [59.4%] patients, p=0.04). Clinical cure was similar in patients with a first or prior CDI episode (65.5% vs 78.1%, p=0.27) and in patients with severe versus nonsevere disease (68.4% vs 73.8%, p=0.66). Recurrence occurred in 6 (13.6%) of the 44 patients who achieved clinical cure. Mortality attributable to CDI was 11.5%, and 30-day readmission rate was 4.9%. Median cost accrued during CDI was $19,483/patient. CONCLUSION: Our real-world experience with fidaxomicin significantly differs from the findings of phase III clinical trials. Fidaxomicin is also associated with substantial costs. Multicenter studies are needed to determine the optimal role of fidaxomicin in the treatment of CDI.

Possible correlation of sirolimus plasma concentration with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome of the liver in patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation who received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with sirolimus and tacrolimus, and to assess whether the occurrence of SOS correlates with immunosuppressant levels. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Hematopoietic cell transplant unit at an academic medical center. PATIENTS: Fifty-nine adults who received myeloablative preparative regimens for transplantation of any hematologic malignancy and received sirolimus and tacrolimus for GVHD prophylaxis between January 1, 2007, and May 1, 2009; all donors and transplant recipients were human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched for at least HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the occurrence of SOS after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Plasma concentrations of sirolimus and tacrolimus and the summative levels of sirolimus and tacrolimus were then compared in patients who developed SOS with those who did not develop SOS. Trough levels were measured from blood samples collected 30-60 minutes before the morning doses of sirolimus and tacrolimus on days 0-35, or until the development of SOS. Of the 59 patients, 12 (20%) developed SOS. The mean sirolimus level was significantly higher in patients who developed SOS relative to those who did not develop SOS (10.5 vs 8.7 ng/ml, p=0.003). The mean summative trough level of sirolimus and tacrolimus was also significantly higher in those who developed SOS compared with those who did not (19.7 vs 17.1 ng/ml, p=0.003). The mean ± SD time to the occurrence of SOS was 28 ± 8.7 days. The median time to death was 101 days for patients who developed SOS compared with 433 days for patients who did not develop SOS (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Sirolimus plasma concentration may correlate with the development of delayed SOS; however, further research is needed to prospectively evaluate the role of sirolimus exposure in the pathogenesis of SOS.

The role of vascular endothelial growth factor SNPs as predictive and prognostic markers for major solid tumors.

Angiogenesis is crucial for development and metastasis of tumors, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a key mediator of this process. The importance of VEGF in tumorigenesis and tumor progression makes it an attractive target for the development of anticancer therapies. Inhibition of angiogenesis has shown promising clinical efficacy; however, not all patients treated with antiangiogenic agents derive benefit from them. Some patients are predisposed to refractory disease, whereas others develop resistance after initial response. Patients may also have different severity of drug-related adverse events. Optimization of drug administration based on disease status and individual responsiveness is important in limiting the treatment failure and minimization of side-effects. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in VEGF may alter VEGF protein concentrations, influence the process of angiogenesis, and may relate to interindividual variation in the risk and progression of selected tumors, and their resistance to treatments. This review examines the role of SNPs in the VEGF gene as predictive and prognostic markers for major solid tumors, including the breast, non-small cell lung, colorectal, and prostate cancers. Selected VEGF SNPs seem to be associated with risk of these cancers; however, there is lack of unanimity in findings, in part influenced by differences in study design and analysis.