RESUMO
OBJECTIVES:: To perform a clinical and risk audit of private hospital inpatients staying in hospital at least 21 days. METHODS:: Of 492 admissions for ≥21 days in 2016, 40 were randomly selected for audit. Characteristics, illness severity and course using the Clinical Global Impression severity (CGI-S) subscale and improvement (CGI-I) subscale, and clinical risk profiles were ascertained at admission, day 15 and discharge by two psychiatrists. RESULTS:: The cases were 65% female, age 50.0±16.2 years (range 24-86), 43% in relationships, and 28% on disability support. The length of stay was 29±7 days. On admission 88% were severely or markedly ill on the CGI-S subscale. Thirty-nine of 40 cases had ≥3 psychiatric diagnoses: 93% depression, 48% bipolar, 15% schizophrenia. High risk was present in suicide risk (48%), illness-induced dysfunction risk (78%) and physical risk (28%). By day 15, 63% were not improved or marginally worse. Suicide ratings were unimproved. By the time of discharge, illness severity and risk ratings were significantly reduced. CONCLUSION:: Private hospital inpatients staying ≥21 days were predominantly female and had severe, diagnostically complex illnesses and high risk ratings. Most were still seriously unwell after 15 days. Patients improved significantly by the time of discharge (though were by no means recovered), indicating that the duration of hospitalisation was appropriate.
Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Privados/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Psiquiátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The practice of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) varies considerably across sites with a lack of certainty as to what constitutes seizure adequacy. The aim of this study was to trial a method to explore decision making and to describe any differences between Australian and US practitioners. METHOD: Two hundred and thirty-six consultant psychiatrists from Australia and US were asked what dosage of electrical energy they would prescribe after reading a standardized clinical vignette in which an unremarked upon change in seizure tracings followed the first two treatments. RESULTS: Considerable variability in the dosage was found with 17.3% decreasing, 46.8% maintaining and 30% increasing charge. Involvement in administration of ECT was unrelated to this decision. CONCLUSION: Standardized vignettes may be a useful method to assess clinicians' responses in dosage selection.