Early acute kidney injury is associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes in critically ill burn patients: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: There are no studies in large series of burn patients on the relationship between acute kidney injury (AKI) and adverse outcomes using the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed data from a cohort of burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with the diagnosis of burn injury. The diagnosis of AKI over the first 7 days after injury was made according to the KDIGO guidelines. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. We used estimative models using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 960 patients were studied and AKI was diagnosed in 50.5%. In multivariable analysis, AKI was associated, as compared with patients without AKI, with ICU mortality {adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.135 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.384-3.293]} and secondary outcomes [kidney replacement therapy, aOR 4.030 (95% CI 1.838-8.835); infection, aOR 1.437 (95% CI 1.107-1.866); hospital mortality, aOR 1.652 (95% CI 1.139-2.697)]. AKI stage 1 was associated with a higher ICU [aOR 1.869 (95% CI 1.183-2.954)] and hospital mortality [aOR 1.552 (95% CI 1.050-2.296)] and infection [aOR 1.383 (95% CI 1.049-1.823)]. AKI meeting the urine output (UO) criterion alone was not associated with increased mortality. Ignoring the UO criterion would have missed 50 (10.3%) cases with AKI. CONCLUSION: The KDIGO guidelines are useful to diagnose AKI in burn patients. Even the mild form of AKI is independently associated with increased mortality. Considering the UO criterion is important to more accurately assess the incidence of AKI, but AKI meeting the UO criterion alone is not associated with increased mortality.

Metabolomic diferences between COVID-19 and H1N1 influenza induced ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a type of respiratory failure characterized by lung inflammation and pulmonary edema. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with ARDS in the more severe cases. This study aimed to compare the specificity of the metabolic alterations induced by COVID-19 or Influenza A pneumonia (IAP) in ARDS. METHODS: Eighteen patients with ARDS due to COVID-19 and twenty patients with ARDS due to IAP, admitted to the intensive care unit. ARDS was defined as in the American-European Consensus Conference. As compared with patients with COVID-19, patients with IAP were younger and received more often noradrenaline to maintain a mean arterial pressure > 65 mm Hg. Serum samples were analyzed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Multivariate Statistical Analyses were used to identify metabolic differences between groups. Metabolic pathway analysis was performed to identify the most relevant pathways involved in ARDS development. RESULTS: ARDS due to COVID-19 or to IAP induces a different regulation of amino acids metabolism, lipid metabolism, glycolysis, and anaplerotic metabolism. COVID-19 causes a significant energy supply deficit that induces supplementary energy-generating pathways. In contrast, IAP patients suffer more marked inflammatory and oxidative stress responses. The classificatory model discriminated against the cause of pneumonia with a success rate of 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the concept that ARDS is associated with a characteristic metabolomic profile that may discriminate patients with ARDS of different etiologies, being a potential biomarker for the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of this condition.

Síndrome de Austrian: quien no sabe lo que busca, no entiende lo que encuentra / Austrian Syndrome: he who does not know what he is looking for will not understand what he finds

Resumen El síndrome de Austrian es una tríada que engloba neumonía, meningitis y endocarditis causadas por Staphylococcus pneumoniae. Dado el aumento en el uso de antibióticos, cada vez vemos esta enfermedad de forma menos frecuente en la práctica clínica diaria. No obstante, se debe recordar su existencia ya que el conocimiento de esta entidad puede ser crucial en el pronóstico de estos enfermos. Desconocer algunos síndromes por presentar una frecuencia menor en los tiempos actuales no exime de mantener la buena práctica clínica ya que de ello puede depender el devenir del paciente. Se presenta un caso de síndrome de Austrian en un paciente joven, quien tuvo evolución tórpida los primeros días de ingreso; finalmente, tras la realización de varias pruebas, se solicitó un ecocardiograma que fue la clave para el diagnóstico. Se trata de un caso de interés para reflexionar en que, a pesar de poseer nuevas tecnologías a nuestro alcance en la actualidad, es preciso recordar la importancia de una buena exploración física.

Abstract Austrian syndrome is a triad that includes pneumonia, meningitis, and endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus pneumoniae. Given the increase in the use of antibiotics, it is becoming less common to see this disease in daily clinical practice. However, it should be remembered that it exists since knowledge of this condition could be crucial in the prognosis of these patients. To not recognise some syndromes due to currently having a lower frequency does not exempt maintaining good clinical practice, since the outcome of the patient may depend on this. A case of Austrian syndrome is presented in a young patient, who had a slow response in the first days of admission. Finally, after performing several tests, a cardiac ultrasound was requested, which was key for the diagnosis. It is an interesting case to reflect that, despite currently having new technologies within our reach, it is essential to remember the importance of a good physical examination.