Point-of-care testing performed by healthcare professionals outside the hospital setting: consensus based recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Point-of-Care Testing (IFCC C-POCT).

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) Committee on Point-of-Care Testing (C-POCT) supports the use of point-of-care testing (POCT) outside of the hospital setting performed by healthcare professionals without formal laboratory education because of its numerous benefits. However, these benefits are associated with risks that must be managed, to ensure the provision of reliable test results and minimize harm to the patient. Healthcare professionals, local regulatory bodies, accredited laboratories as well as manufacturers should actively be engaged in education, oversight and advice to ensure that the healthcare professional selects the appropriate equipment and is able to analyze, troubleshoot and correctly interpret the point-of-care (POC) test results.

Validation and verification of examination procedures in medical laboratories: opinion of the EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO) on dealing with ISO 15189:2012 demands for method verification and validation.

This paper reflects the opinion of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). It aims to provide guidance for drawing up local/national documents about validation and verification of laboratory methods. We demonstrate how risk evaluation can be used to optimize laboratory policies to meet intended use requirements as well as requirements of standards. This is translated in a number of recommendations on how to introduce risk evaluation in various stages of the implementation of new methods ultimately covering the whole process cycle.

Documenting metrological traceability as intended by ISO 15189:2012: A consensus statement about the practice of the implementation and auditing of this norm element.

ISO15189:2012 requires medical laboratories to document metrological traceability of their results. While the ISO17511:2003 standard on metrological traceability in laboratory medicine requires the use of the highest available level in the traceability chain, it recognizes that for many measurands there is no reference above the manufacturer's selected measurement procedure and the manufacturer's working calibrator. Some immunoassays, although they intend to measure the same quantity and may even refer to the same reference material, unfortunately produce different results because of differences in analytical selectivity as manufacturers select different epitopes and antibodies for the same analyte. In other cases, the cause is the use of reference materials, which are not commutable. The uncertainty associated with the result is another important aspect in metrological traceability implementation. As the measurement uncertainty on the clinical samples is influenced by the uncertainty of all steps higher in the traceability chain, laboratories should be provided with adequate and appropriate information on the uncertainty of the value assignment to the commercial calibrators that they use. Although the between-lot variation in value assignment will manifest itself as part of the long-term imprecision as estimated by the end-user, information on worst-case to be expected lot-lot variation has to be communicated to the end-user by the IVD provider. When laboratories use ancillary equipment that potentially could have a critical contribution to the reported results, such equipment needs verification of its proper calibration and criticality to the result uncertainty could be assessed by an approach based on risk analysis, which is a key element of ISO15189:2012 anyway. This paper discusses how the requirement for metrological traceability as stated in ISO15189 should be met by the medical laboratory and how this should be assessed by accreditation bodies.

Accreditation process in European countries - an EFLM survey.

BACKGROUND: Accreditation is a valuable resource for medical laboratories. The development of quality systems based on ISO 15189 has taken place in many laboratories in the European countries but data about accreditation remain scarce. The EFLM Working Group "Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards" conducted a survey that reviews the current state of the accreditation process in European countries. METHODS: An on-line questionnaire was addressed to delegates of 39 EFLM scientific societies in March 2014. One answer by country was taken into account. The survey was dealing with mandatory status, number of accredited medical laboratories in each country, possibility of flexible scope and concerned medical fields. The status of point-of-care testing (POCT) in each country was also studied. RESULTS: Twenty-nine responses (74%) were registered. All the assessed countries (100%) have begun an accreditation process in various ways. All the national accreditation bodies (NAB) offer or are working to offer an ISO 15189 accreditation. The accreditation process most often concerns all phases of the examination and various medical fields. Medical laboratories are responsible for POCT in 20 (69%) countries. The accreditation process for POCT, according to ISO 15189 and ISO 22870, is also developing. CONCLUSIONS: While there are several variations in the approaches to accreditation of medical laboratories in the European countries, the ISO 15189 accreditation project has been widely accepted. The use of a unique standard and the cooperation among countries due to scientific societies, EFLM, accreditation bodies and EA enable laboratory professionals to move toward uniform implementation of the accreditation concept.

Recommendation for the review of biological reference intervals in medical laboratories.

This document is based on the original recommendation of the Expert Panel on the Theory of Reference Values of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), updated guidelines were recently published under the auspices of the IFCC and the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). This document summarizes proposals for recommendations on: (i) The terminology, which is often confusing, noticeably concerning the terms of reference limits and decision limits. (ii) The method for the determination of reference limits according to the original procedure and the conditions, which should be used. (iii) A simple procedure allowing the medical laboratories to fulfill the requirements of the regulation and standards. The updated document proposes to verify that published reference limits are applicable to the laboratory involved. Finally, the strengths and limits of the revised recommendations (especially the selection of the reference population, the maintenance of the analytical quality, the choice of the statistical method used…) will be briefly discussed.

Flexible scope for ISO 15189 accreditation: a guidance prepared by the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO).

The recent revision of ISO15189 has further strengthened its position as the standard for accreditation for medical laboratories. Both for laboratories and their customers it is important that the scope of such accreditation is clear. Therefore the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) demands that the national bodies responsible for accreditation describe the scope of every laboratory accreditation in a way that leaves no room for doubt about the range of competence of the particular laboratories. According to EA recommendations scopes may be fixed, mentioning every single test that is part of the accreditation, or flexible, mentioning all combinations of medical field, examination type and materials for which the laboratory is competent. Up to now national accreditation bodies perpetuate use of fixed scopes, partly by inertia, partly out of fear that a too flexible scope may lead to over-valuation of the competence of laboratories, most countries only use fixed scopes. The EA however promotes use of flexible scopes, since this allows for more readily innovation, which contributes to quality in laboratory medicine. In this position paper, the Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN Standards belonging to the Quality and Regulation Committee of the EFLM recommends using an approach that has led to successful introduction of the flexible scope for ISO15189 accreditation as intended in EA-4/17 in The Netherlands. The approach is risk-based, discipline and competence-based, and focuses on defining a uniform terminology transferable across the borders of scientific disciplines, laboratories and countries.

EFLM Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards on dealing with ISO 15189 demands for retention of documents and examination objects.

Many aspects of the activity of a medical laboratory have to be documented so as to facilitate the maintenance of the ongoing quality of service. As a consequence, many documents, forms and reports are generated. The retention time for each of these has to be specified. In addition to medical laboratory reports as part of the patient's medical record, the medical laboratory has to retain many documents and specimens according to national legislation or guidance from professional organizations, if these exist. If not, the laboratory management needs to define a retention schedule, which shall define the storage conditions and period of storage, according to ISO 15189:2022 requirements for retention of general quality management documents and records. The EFLM Working Group on Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards provides here a proposal on retention periods of documentation and specimens based on a failure-mode-effects-analysis (FMEA) risk-based approach, a concept of risk reduction that has become an integral part of modern standards.

Comparison between radiometry and spectrophotometry for the determination of angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in cerebrospinal fluid.

Determination of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) activity in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can help for establishing the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. We investigated the performance characteristics of two assays for ACE determination in 57 CSF, radiometry with [glycine-1-14C] benzoyl-L-histidyl-L-leucine and spectrophotometry with furylacryloyl-phenylalanyl-L-glycyl-L-glycine (FAPGG) as substrates. We compared both kinetic assays to an ELISA specific for human ACE. Within run and between run imprecisions were 14-17% for radiometry, 6-19% for spectrophotometry and 5-8% for ELISA. The limit of detection was 0.04 U/L for radiometry, 1.0 U/L for spectrophotometry and 0.156 µg/L for ELISA. The limit of quantification was 0.06 U/L for radiometry, 1.5 U/L for spectrophotometry, but not known for ELISA. The domain for quantification was 0.06-4.0 U/L for radiometry, 1.5-24 U/L for spectrophotometry and 0.156-10 µg/L for ELISA. Deming regression and Bland-Altman plots show good correlations between the three assays, but with high slopes, because both kinetic assays use different substrates and ELISA measures ACE molecule but not activity. Radiometry was more sensitive than spectrophotometry, which has a limit of detection above most pathological levels. ELISA could be an alternative to radiometry but only after complete evaluation, determination of normal values and assessment of its clinical value. We claim for standardization of ACE determination as well as in serum as in other biological fluids, in particular CSF.

Comparison of nine blood tests and transient elastography for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: the ANRS HCEP-23 study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Blood tests and transient elastography (Fibroscan™) have been developed as alternatives to liver biopsy. This ANRS HCEP-23 study compared the diagnostic accuracy of nine blood tests and transient elastography (Fibroscan™) to assess liver fibrosis, vs. liver biopsy, in untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). METHODS: This was a multicentre prospective independent study in 19 French University hospitals of consecutive adult patients having simultaneous liver biopsy, biochemical blood tests (performed in a centralized laboratory) and Fibroscan™. Two experienced pathologists independently reviewed the liver biopsies (mean length=25±8.4 mm). Performance was assessed using ROC curves corrected by Obuchowski's method. RESULTS: Fibroscan™ was not interpretable in 113 (22%) patients. In the 382 patients having both blood tests and interpretable Fibroscan™, Fibroscan™ performed similarly to the best blood tests for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis. Obuchowski's measure showed Fibrometer® (0.86), Fibrotest® (0.84), Hepascore® (0.84), and interpretable Fibroscan™ (0.84) to be the most accurate tests. The combination of Fibrotest®, Fibrometer®, or Hepascore® with Fibroscan™ or Apri increases the percentage of well classified patients from 70-73% to 80-83% for significant fibrosis, but for cirrhosis a combination offers no improvement. For the 436 patients having all the blood tests, AUROC's ranged from 0.82 (Fibrometer®) to 0.75 (Hyaluronate) for significant fibrosis, and from 0.89 (Fibrometer® and Hepascore®) to 0.83 (FIB-4) for cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Contrarily to blood tests, performance of Fibroscan™ was reduced due to uninterpretable results. Fibrotest®, interpretable Fibroscan™, Fibrometer®, and Hepascore® perform best and similarly for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Collective opinion paper on findings of the 2011 convocation of experts on laboratory quality.

In April of 2011, Bio-Rad Laboratories Quality System Division (Irvine, CA, USA) hosted its third annual convocation of experts on laboratory quality in the city of Salzburg, Austria. As in the past 2 years, over 60 experts from across Europe, Israel, USA and South Africa convened to discuss contemporary issues and topics of importance to the clinical laboratory. This year's conference had EN/ISO 15189 and accreditation as the common thread for most discussions, with topics ranging from how to meet requirements like uncertainty to knowledge gained from those already accredited. The participants were divided into five discussion working groups (WG) with assigned topics. The outcome of these discussions is the subject of this summary.

POCT management of neonatal bilirubinemia ­ guidelines for an optimization of kernicterus monitoring / Intérêt de la bilirubinémie en néonatalogie : recommandations pour une utilisation coordonnée par le LBM de la biologie délocalisée et des tests rapides d'orientation diagnostique

In pediatrics, accurate measurement of total serum bilirubin (TSB) is of major importance for reliable diagnosis and appropriate management of neonatal jaundice. However, several studies evidenced poor comparability of results obtained with the different available methods either in central lab or in POCT, on serum, capillary blood or transcutaneous. This situation is partly due to the lack of Reference Materials, especially for high bilirubin concentrations but also on poor communication between central lab and neonatology unit. To progress on these issues, we have compiled some data from CNRHP to propose guidelines for choice, use and management of POCT devices and to help clinical laboratories to achieve a better answer to clinical needs with specific local constraints. The results from several CNRHP studies are presented: traceability to International System of Units, inter-laboratories comparability, POCT vs central labs comparisons with POCT CO-oximeter or photometer, integration of transcutaneous bilirubinometer. We propose, based on an analysis of devices advantages and issues, guidelines to help labs either to improve neonates monitoring in their local context; we distinguished the choices inside laboratory for a better harmonization of results compared to published thresholds and outside lab contexts, to organize a coordinated chain with POCT devices, with capillary and/or transcutaneous approaches.

En néonatalogie, la mesure précise de la bilirubinémie est essentielle pour le diagnostic et le suivi de l'ictère, en regard de seuils consensuels internationaux. Toutefois, une faible comparabilité des résultats est observée entre les laboratoires de biologie médicale (LBM) et avec les dispositifs délocalisés ou transcutanés. Cette situation est en partie due à des défauts de standardisation des méthodes, mais aussi à une coordination insuffisante entre les laboratoires et les unités de soins. L'objectif de ce travail est de progresser dans l'optimisation de la prise en charge des nouveau-nés en proposant des critères de choix et d'articulation des différentes réponses biologiques, EBM, EBMD et TROD, en fonction des besoins cliniques locaux et des moyens disponibles. Les résultats de plusieurs études ciblées sur la bilirubinémie néonatale sont présentés : raccordement au système international, harmonisation interlaboratoires, comparabilité EBMD-CNRHP d'un CO-oxymètre délocalisé en maternité, comparabilité EBMD-CNRHP d'un photomètre délocalisé en maternité, intégration d'un bilirubinomètre transcutané. Nous proposons ensuite, sur la base d'une analyse critique des différents types de dispositifs, des recommandations pour aider les LBM à améliorer la prise en charge des nouveau-nés dans leur contexte local, d'une part sur la mesure de la bilirubinémie néonatale au sein du LBM et d'autre part sur l'organisation d'une chaîne coordonnée EBM ­ EBMD ­ TROD en concertation avec les unités de soins.

[Precision intra-assay study in the absence of internal quality control: example of radioimmunoassay of procollagen III peptide]. / Étude de répétabilité en l'absence de contrôle interne de qualité : exemple du dosage radioimmunologique du peptide amino-terminal du procollagène de type III.

The first step to complete in a method validation of a biological analysis is the study of precision intra-assay. In the absence or insufficient quantity of control material, this study may be difficult to perform. This article proposes a methodology for preparing its own control samples for the radioimmunological assay of the amino-terminal peptide of procollagene type III (PIIIP). This methodology is easy to carry out, cost-effective and can be applied to analyses other than PIIIP. Furthermore, it allows the execution of control samples which have similar concentrations of analytes to those described in the precision studies of the datasheets provided by the manufacturers.

Improving the laboratory result release process in the light of ISO 15189:2012 standard.

The ISO 15189:2012 standard section 5.9.1 requires laboratories to review results before release, considering quality control, previous results, and clinical information, if any, and to issue documented procedures about it. While laboratory result reporting is generally regarded as part of the post-analytical phase, the result release process requires a general view of the total examination process. Reviewing test results may follow with troubleshooting and test repetition, including reanalyzing an individual sample or resampling. A systematic understanding of the result release may help laboratory professionals carry out appropriate test repetition and ensure the plausibility of laboratory results. In this paper, we addressed the crucial steps in the result release process, including evaluation of sample quality, critical result notification, result reporting, and recommendations for the management of the result release, considering quality control alerts, instrument flags, warning messages, and interference indexes. Error detection tools and plausibility checks mentioned in the present paper can support the daily practice of results release.

Distinct proteomic features of two fibrogenic liver cell populations: hepatic stellate cells and portal myofibroblasts.

In chronic liver diseases, the accumulation of extracellular matrix leading to fibrosis is caused by myofibroblasts, the origins of which are debatable. We performed a comparative proteomic study to identify markers and gain insight into distinct functions of myofibroblasts derived either from hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) or from portal mesenchymal cells. After isolation from normal liver and culture in similar conditions, myofibroblastic HSCs (MF-HSCs) presented enlarged cytoplasms whereas portal myofibroblasts (PMFs) were more proliferative, and formed more stress fibers. The two cell types were subjected to comparative analyses by 2-D MS/MS. Six proteins were overexpressed in PMFs, with myofibroblast-related typical functions. Among them, cofilin-1 showed the greatest difference in expression and a lower pI than expected. Immunoblot demonstrated higher levels of phosphorylation, a modification of the protein implicated in stress fiber formation. Eleven proteins, mostly involved in stress response, were overexpressed in MF-HSCs. Cytoglobin had the highest level of overexpression, as confirmed by reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR, immunoblot and immunocytochemical analyses. These results identify cytoglobin as the best marker for distinguishing MF-HSCs from PMFs and suggest different functions for the two cell populations in the liver wound healing response, with a prominent role for PMFs in scar formation.

[Analytical and clinical guidelines on neonatal bilirubinemia]. / Recommandations analytiques et cliniques pour l'utilisation de la bilirubinémie en néonatalogie.

The SFBC-CNBH-CNRHP "Neonatal bilirubin" working group performed a biological and clinical study on bilirubin use in neonates for reliable diagnosis and appropriate management of neonatal jaundice. A brief report of a national survey on analytical and biological practices in France is shown. The guidelines of the French Society of Neonatology (SFN) founded the decision of phototherapy set up upon an accurate lab measurement of total serum bilirubin. An abacus is proposed with defined thresholds, as a function of neonate lifetime in hours. However, several studies evidenced poor comparability of results obtained with the different available methods. This situation is partly due to the lack of reference materials, especially for high bilirubin concentrations. Clinical consequences might be observed. We present in this paper the results of a national harmonization study to progress on this issue. Beyond the analytical aspects, the clinical consequences of harmonization defects were investigated. Finally, guidelines for clinical laboratories are proposed, to be locally adapted.

False elevation of blood lactate reveals ethylene glycol poisoning.

Ethylene glycol poisoning is a medical emergency. Making a definitive diagnosis is challenging because few institutions have timely access to direct measurement of ethylene glycol. After ingestion, primary metabolism of ethylene glycol takes place in the liver, leading to glycolic acid and glyoxylic acid. These compounds may cross-react with L-lactate oxidase used in blood gas analyzers lactate electrodes to induce false elevation of blood lactate. We present the case of a 47-year-old male patient initially admitted to the intensive care unit for severe lactate acidosis of unknown cause (pH 6.96, lactate, 30 mmol/L). Knowledge of potent artifactual lactate results was the key to the diagnosis of ethylene glycol poisoning, and false lactate measurements were found at the central laboratory on our 3 different blood gas analyzers.

Point-of-care testing: false elevation of cardiac troponin I assayed in the emergency department.

In October 2007, an 18-year-old woman with no cardiac history was admitted to the emergency department for a major epigastric pain. The chest pain led to assay cardiac troponin I (cTnI) with the emergency department point-of-care testing analyzer (Stratus CS), which disclosed a value of 0.70 ng/mL, discordant with the atypical clinical presentation and the noncontributive electrocardiography. The biologist contacted for biological advice controlled cTnI with an Access II, which disclosed a value less than 0.04 ng/mL. These findings were confirmed with the discordant results of a new sample assayed on both analyzers. The interference of heterophilic antibodies (HAs) was suspected because these antianimal antibodies may lead to analytical errors in sandwich immunoassays using animal sources of immunoglobulins and can cause false-positive results. In this case, the HAs bind to the capture antibody and the conjugate antibody, simulating cTnI. The diagnosis of HA involvement was confirmed using Heterophilic Blocking Tube, a device that contains a blocking reagent composed of specific binders that attach HA. After treatment in Heterophilic Blocking Tube, the cTnI concentration measured by the Stratus CS decreased from 0.62 to 0.05 ng/mL. Finally, potentially invasive test or this patient's unnecessary hospitalization in cardiology was avoided. Our experience supports that collaboration between staffs of laboratories and medical departments owning point-of-care testing analyzers is essential to avoid mistaken diagnosis linked to analytical interferences and to ensure quality of results assayed outside the laboratory.