Vocal tract shape and acoustic adjustments of children during phonation into narrow flow-resistant tubes.

The goal of the study is to quantify the salient vocal tract acoustic, subglottal acoustic, and vocal tract physiological characteristics during phonation into a narrow flow-resistant tube with 2.53 mm inner diameter and 124 mm length in typically developing vocally healthy children using simultaneous microphone, accelerometer, and 3D/4D ultrasound recordings. Acoustic measurements included fundamental frequency (fo), first formant frequency (F1), second formant frequency (F2), first subglottal resonance (FSg1), and peak-to-peak amplitude ratio (Pvt:Psg). Physiological measurements included posterior tongue height (D1), tongue dorsum height (D2), tongue tip height (D3), tongue length (D4), oral cavity width (D5), hyoid elevation (D6), pharynx width (D7). All measurements were made on eight boys and ten girls (6-9 years) during sustained /o:/ production at typical pitch and loudness, with and without flow-resistant tube. Phonation with the flow-resistant tube resulted in a significant decrease in F1, F2, and Pvt:Psg and a significant increase in D2, D3, and FSg1. A statistically significant gender effect was observed for D1, with D1 higher in boys. These findings agree well with reported findings from adults, suggesting common acoustic and articulatory mechanisms for narrow flow-resistant tube phonation. Theoretical implications of the findings are discussed.

Psychometric Analysis of an Ecological Vocal Effort Scale in Individuals With and Without Vocal Hyperfunction During Activities of Daily Living.

Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of an ecological vocal effort scale linked to a voicing task. Method Thirty-eight patients with nodules, 18 patients with muscle tension dysphonia, and 45 vocally healthy control individuals participated in a week of ambulatory voice monitoring. A global vocal status question was asked hourly throughout the day. Participants produced a vowel-consonant-vowel syllable string and rated the vocal effort needed to produce the task on a visual analog scale. Test-retest reliability was calculated for a subset using the intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(A, 1). Construct validity was assessed by (a) comparing the weeklong vocal effort ratings between the patient and control groups and (b) comparing weeklong vocal effort ratings before and after voice rehabilitation in a subset of 25 patients. Cohen's d, the standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change (MDC) assessed sensitivity. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) assessed responsiveness. Results Test-retest reliability was excellent, ICC(A, 1) = .96. Weeklong mean effort was statistically higher in the patients than in controls (d = 1.62) and lower after voice rehabilitation (d = 1.75), supporting construct validity and sensitivity. SEM was 4.14, MDC was 11.47, and MCID was 9.74. Since the MCID was within the error of the measure, we must rely upon the MDC to detect real changes in ecological vocal effort. Conclusion The ecological vocal effort scale offers a reliable, valid, and sensitive method of monitoring vocal effort changes during the daily life of individuals with and without vocal hyperfunction.