Consensus Recommendations for Sick Day Medication Guidance for People With Diabetes, Kidney, or Cardiovascular Disease: A Modified Delphi Process.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Sick day medication guidance (SDMG) involves withholding or adjusting specific medications in the setting of acute illnesses that could contribute to complications such as hypotension, acute kidney injury (AKI), or hypoglycemia. We sought to achieve consensus among clinical experts on recommendations for SDMG that could be studied in future intervention studies. STUDY DESIGN: A modified Delphi process following guidelines for conducting and reporting Delphi studies. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: An international group of clinicians with expertise relevant to SDMG was recruited through purposive and snowball sampling. A scoping review of the literature was presented, followed by 3 sequential rounds of development, refinement, and voting on recommendations. Meetings were held virtually and structured to allow the participants to provide their input and rapidly prioritize and refine ideas. OUTCOME: Opinions of participants were measured as the percentage who agreed with each recommendation, whereas consensus was defined as >75% agreement. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Quantitative data were summarized using counts and percentages. A qualitative content analysis was performed to capture the context of the discussion around recommendations and any additional considerations brought forward by participants. RESULTS: The final panel included 26 clinician participants from 4 countries and 10 clinical disciplines. Participants reached a consensus on 42 specific recommendations: 5 regarding the signs and symptoms accompanying volume depletion that should trigger SDMG; 6 regarding signs that should prompt urgent contact with a health care provider (including a reduced level of consciousness, severe vomiting, low blood pressure, presence of ketones, tachycardia, and fever); and 14 related to scenarios and strategies for patient self-management (including frequent glucose monitoring, checking ketones, fluid intake, and consumption of food to prevent hypoglycemia). There was consensus that renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, diuretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, and metformin should be temporarily stopped. Participants recommended that insulin, sulfonylureas, and meglitinides be held only if blood glucose was low and that basal and bolus insulin be increased by 10%-20% if blood glucose was elevated. There was consensus on 6 recommendations related to the resumption of medications within 24-48 hours of the resolution of symptoms and the presence of normal patterns of eating and drinking. LIMITATIONS: Participants were from high-income countries, predominantly Canada. Findings may not be generalizable to implementation in other settings. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary panel of clinicians reached a consensus on recommendations for SDMG in the presence of signs and symptoms of volume depletion, as well as self-management strategies and medication instructions in this setting. These recommendations may inform the design of future trials of SDMG strategies.

Managing 'sick days' in patients with chronic conditions: An exploration of patient and healthcare provider experiences.

INTRODUCTION: People with chronic medical conditions often take medications that improve long-term outcomes but which can be harmful during acute illness. Guidelines recommend that healthcare providers offer instructions to temporarily stop these medications when patients are sick (i.e., sick days). We describe the experiences of patients managing sick days and of healthcare providers providing sick day guidance to their patients. METHODS: We undertook a qualitative descriptive study. We purposively sampled patients and healthcare providers from across Canada. Adult patients were eligible if they took at least two medications for diabetes, heart disease, high blood pressure and/or kidney disease. Healthcare providers were eligible if they were practising in a community setting with at least 1 year of experience. Data were collected using virtual focus groups and individual phone interviews conducted in English. Team members analyzed transcripts using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 48 participants (20 patients and 28 healthcare providers). Most patients were between 50 and 64 years of age and identified their health status as 'good'. Most healthcare providers were between 45 and 54 years of age and the majority practised as pharmacists in urban areas. We identified three overarching themes that summarize the experiences of patients and healthcare providers, largely suggesting a broad spectrum in approaches to managing sick days: Individualized Communication, Tailored Sick Day Practices, and Variation in Knowledge of Sick Day Practices and Relevant Resources. CONCLUSION: It is important to understand the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers with respect to the management of sick days. This understanding can be used to improve care and outcomes for people living with chronic conditions during sick days. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Two patient partners were involved from proposal development to the dissemination of our findings, including manuscript development. Both patient partners took part in team meetings and contributed to team decision-making. Patient partners also participated in data analysis by reviewing codes and theme development. Furthermore, patients living with various chronic conditions and healthcare providers participated in focus groups and individual interviews.

Advancing Exercise Science for Better Health Outcomes Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Despite over 30 years of evidence for improvements in physical function, physical fitness, and health-related quality of life with exercise training in individuals with chronic kidney disease, access to dedicated exercise training programs remains outside the realm of standard of care for most kidney care programs. In this review, we explore possible reasons for this by comparing approaches in other chronic diseases where exercise rehabilitation has become the standard of care, identifying enablers and factors that need to be addressed for continued growth in this area, and discussing knowledge gaps for future research. For exercise rehabilitation to be relevant to all stakeholders and become a sustainable component of kidney care, a focus on the effect of exercise on clinically relevant outcomes that are prioritized by individuals living with kidney disease, use of evidence-based implementation strategies for diverse settings and populations, and approaching exercise as a medical therapy are required.

Healthcare provider perspectives on integrating peer support in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease care: a mixed methods study.

BACKGROUND: Peer support complements traditional models of chronic kidney disease (CKD) care through sharing of peer experiences, pragmatic advice, and resources to enhance chronic kidney disease self-management and decision-making. As peer support is variably offered and integrated into multi-disciplinary CKD care, we aimed to characterize healthcare providers' experiences and views on peer support provision for people with non-dialysis-dependent CKD within Canada. METHODS: In this concurrent mixed methods study, we used a self-administered online survey to collect information from multi-disciplinary CKD clinic providers (e.g., nurses, nephrologists, allied health professionals) on peer support awareness, program characteristics and processes, perceived value, and barriers and facilitators to offering peer support in CKD clinics. Results were analyzed descriptively. We undertook semi-structured interviews with a sample of survey respondents to elaborate on perspectives about peer support in CKD care, which we analyzed using inductive, content analysis. RESULTS: We surveyed 113 providers from 49 clinics. Two thirds (66%) were aware of formal peer support programs, of whom 19% offered in-house peer support through their clinic. Peer support awareness differed by role and region, and most referrals were made by social workers. Likert scale responses suggested a high perceived need of peer support for people with CKD. Top cited barriers to offering peer support included lack of peer support access and workload demands, while facilitators included systematic clinic processes for peer support integration and alignment with external programs. Across 18 interviews, we identified themes related to peer support awareness, logistics, and accessibility and highlighted a need for integrated support pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest variability in awareness and availability of peer support among Canadian multi-disciplinary CKD clinics. An understanding of the factors influencing peer support delivery will inform strategies to optimize its uptake for people with advanced CKD.

Global Policy Barriers and Enablers to Exercise and Physical Activity in Kidney Care.

OBJECTIVE: Impairment in physical function and physical performance leads to decreased independence and health-related quality of life in people living with chronic kidney disease and end-stage kidney disease. Physical activity and exercise in kidney care are not priorities in policy development. We aimed to identify global policy-related enablers, barriers, and strategies to increase exercise participation and physical activity behavior for people living with kidney disease. DESIGN AND METHODS: Guided by the Behavior Change Wheel theoretical framework, 50 global renal exercise experts developed policy barriers and enablers to exercise program implementation and physical activity promotion in kidney care. The consensus process consisted of developing themes from renal experts from North America, South America, Continental Europe, United Kingdom, Asia, and Oceania. Strategies to address enablers and barriers were identified by the group, and consensus was achieved. RESULTS: We found that policies addressing funding, service provision, legislation, regulations, guidelines, the environment, communication, and marketing are required to support people with kidney disease to be physically active, participate in exercise, and improve health-related quality of life. We provide a global perspective and highlight Japanese, Canadian, and other regional examples where policies have been developed to increase renal physical activity and rehabilitation. We present recommendations targeting multiple stakeholders including nephrologists, nurses, allied health clinicians, organizations providing renal care and education, and renal program funders. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly recommend the nephrology community and people living with kidney disease take action to change policy now, rather than idly waiting for indisputable clinical trial evidence that increasing physical activity, strength, fitness, and function improves the lives of people living with kidney disease.

Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Glomerular Disease: A Narrative Review of the Epidemiology, Mechanisms, Management, and Patient Priorities.

Purpose of review: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality for patients with glomerular disease. Despite the fact that mechanisms underpinning CV disease risk in this population are likely distinct from other forms of kidney disease, treatment and preventive strategies tend to be extrapolated from studies of patients with undifferentiated chronic kidney disease (CKD). There is an unmet need to delineate the pathophysiology of CV disease in patients with glomerular disease, establish unique risk factors, and identify novel therapeutic targets for disease prevention. The aims of this narrative review are to summarize the existing knowledge regarding the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, and management of CV disease in patients with common glomerular disease, highlight the patient perspective, and propose specific areas for future study. Sources of information: The literature for this narrative review was accessed using common research search engines, including PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline, and Google Scholar. Information for the patient perspective section was collected through iterative discussions with a patient partner. Methods: We reviewed the epidemiology, molecular mechanisms of disease, management approaches, and the patient perspective in relation to CV disease in patients with glomerulopathies. Throughout, we have highlighted the current knowledge and have discussed future research approaches, both clinical and translational, while integrating the patient perspective. Key findings: Patients with glomerular disease have significant CV disease risk driven by multifactorial, molecular mechanisms originating from their glomerular disease but complicated by existing comorbidities, kidney disease, and medication side effects. The current approach to risk stratification and treatment relies heavily on existing data from CKD patients, but this may not always be appropriate given the unique pathophysiology and mechanisms associated with CV disease risk in patients with glomerular disease. We highlight the need for ongoing glomerular disease-focused studies aimed to better delineate CV disease risk, while integrating the patient perspective. Limitations: This is a narrative review and does not represent a comprehensive and systematic review of the literature.

Motif de la revue: Les maladies cardiovasculaires sont une cause majeure de morbidité et de mortalité chez les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire. Bien que les mécanismes qui sous-tendent le risque de maladie cardiovasculaire dans cette population sont probablement distincts des autres formes de néphropathies, le traitement et les stratégies préventives ont tendance à être extrapolés à partir d'études portant sur des patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique indifférenciée. Il existe ainsi un besoin de délimiter la physiopathologie des maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire, d'établir les facteurs de risque propres à la maladie glomérulaire et d'identifier de nouvelles cibles thérapeutiques pour la prévenir. Les objectifs de cette revue narrative sont de résumer les connaissances existantes concernant l'épidémiologie, les mécanismes moléculaires et la prise en charge des maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire commune, de mettre en évidence le point de vue des patients et de proposer des domaines précis pour de futures études. Sources de l'information: La documentation a été consultée par le biais des moteurs de recherche courants, notamment PubMed, PubMed Central, Medline et Google Scholar. Les points de vue des patients ont été recueillis au moyen de discussions itératives avec un patient partenaire. Méthodologie: Nous avons examiné l'épidémiologie et les mécanismes moléculaires de la maladie, les approches de prise en charge et la perspective des patients en lien avec les maladies cardiovasculaires chez les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire. Nous avons fait état des connaissances actuelles et discuté des approches à envisager pour les recherches futures, tant cliniques que translationnelles, tout en intégrant la perspective du patient. Principales observations: Les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire présentent un risque significatif de maladie cardiovasculaire associé à des mécanismes moléculaires multifactoriels provenant de la maladie glomérulaire elle-même. Ce risque est compliqué par les comorbidités existantes, la néphropathie et les effets secondaires des médicaments. L'approche actuelle de stratification du risque et de traitement repose en grande partie sur les données existantes pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique; cette approche pourrait ne pas toujours convenir, compte tenu de la physiopathologie unique et des mécanismes associés au risque de maladie cardiovasculaire chez les patients atteints d'une maladie glomérulaire. Nos résultats mettent en lumière le besoin d'études continues, axées sur les maladies glomérulaires, qui visent à mieux cerner le risque de maladies cardiovasculaires chez ces patients, tout en intègrant leur point de vue. Limites: Il s'agit d'une revue narrative; cette étude ne constitue pas une revue exhaustive et systématique de la littérature.

Exercise perceptions and practices of people receiving peritoneal dialysis: An international cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity and functional impairment are prevalent and unaddressed in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Exercise has been shown to improve physical function and mental health for people with kidney disease. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive survey aimed at identifying the exercise and physical activity perceptions and practice patterns of people receiving PD. The survey was developed and pretested with persons living with kidney disease, PD clinicians and exercise specialists. RESULTS: There were 108 respondents (people receiving PD) with the majority from Canada (68%) and the United Kingdom (25%). Seventy-one per cent were engaged in physical activity two or more times per week. Most (91.8%) believed that physical activity is beneficial, and 61.7% reported healthcare provider discussion about physical activity. Perceptions regarding weightlifting restrictions varied: 76% were told not to lift weight with a maximum amount ranging from 2 kg to 45 kg. Few (28%) were instructed to drain PD fluid prior to physical activity. Mixed advice regarding swimming ability was common (44% were told they could swim and 44% were told they should not). CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge gaps suggest that education for both healthcare providers and patients is needed regarding the practice of exercise for people living with PD. Common areas of confusion include the maximum weight a person should lift, whether exercise was safe with or without intrabdominal PD fluid in situ and whether swimming is allowed. Further research is needed to provide patients with evidence-based recommendations rather than defaulting to restricting activity.

Managing Medications During "Sick Days" in Patients With Diabetes, Kidney, and Cardiovascular Conditions: A Theory-informed Approach to Intervention Design and Implementation.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this work was to 1) explore barriers and enablers to patient and health-care provider (HCP) behaviours related to sick-day medication guidance (SDMG), 2) identify theory-informed strategies to advise SDMG intervention design, and 3) obtain perspectives on an eHealth tool for this purpose. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study using qualitative conventional content analysis was undertaken. Interviews and focus groups were held with patients and HCPs from January 2021 to April 2022. Data were analyzed using the Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework to inform intervention design. RESULTS: Forty-eight people (20 patients, 13 pharmacists, 12 family physicians, and 3 nurse practitioners) participated in this study. Three interventions were designed to address the identified barriers and enablers: 1) prescriptions provided by a community-based care provider, 2) pharmacists adding a label to at-risk medications, and 3) built-in prompts for prescribing and dispensing software. Most participants accepted the concept of an eHealth tool and identified pharmacists as the ideal point-of-care provider. Challenges for an eHealth tool were raised, including credibility, privacy of data, medical liability, clinician remuneration and workload impact, and equitable access to use of the tool. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and HCPs endorsed non-technology and eHealth innovations as strategies to aid in the delivery of SDMG. These findings can guide the design of future theory-informed SDMG interventions.

Precision Medicine in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review Framed by Lived Experience.

Purpose of review: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) for which many treatments exist that have been shown to prevent CKD progression and kidney failure. However, DKD is a complex and heterogeneous etiology of CKD with a spectrum of phenotypes and disease trajectories. In this narrative review, we discuss precision medicine approaches to DKD, including genomics, metabolomics, proteomics, and their potential role in the management of diabetes mellitus and DKD. A patient and caregivers of patients with lived experience with CKD were involved in this review. Sources of information: Original research articles were identified from MEDLINE and Google Scholar using the search terms "diabetes," "diabetic kidney disease," "diabetic nephropathy," "chronic kidney disease," "kidney failure," "dialysis," "nephrology," "genomics," "metabolomics," and "proteomics." Methods: A focused review and critical appraisal of existing literature regarding the precision medicine approaches to the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of diabetes and DKD framed by a patient partner's/caregiver's lived experience. Key findings: Distinguishing diabetic nephropathy from CKD due to other types of DKD and non-DKD is challenging and typically requires a kidney biopsy for a diagnosis. Biomarkers have been identified to assist with the prediction of the onset and progression of DKD, but they have yet to be incorporated and evaluated relative to clinical standard of care CKD and kidney failure risk prediction tools. Genomics has identified multiple causal genetic variants for neonatal diabetes mellitus and monogenic diabetes of the young that can be used for diagnostic purposes and to specify antiglycemic therapy. Genome-wide-associated studies have identified genes implicated in DKD pathophysiology in the setting of type 1 and 2 diabetes but their translational benefits are lagging beyond polygenetic risk scores. Metabolomics and proteomics have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy in DKD, have been used to identify novel pathways involved in DKD pathogenesis, and can be used to improve the prediction of CKD progression and kidney failure as well as predict response to DKD therapy. Limitations: There are a limited number of large, high-quality prospective observational studies and no randomized controlled trials that support the use of precision medicine based approaches to improve clinical outcomes in adults with or at risk of diabetes and DKD. It is unclear which patients may benefit from the clinical use of genomics, metabolomics and proteomics along the spectrum of DKD trajectory. Implications: Additional research is needed to evaluate the role of the use of precision medicine for DKD management, including diagnosis, differentiation of diabetic nephropathy from other etiologies of DKD and CKD, short-term and long-term risk prognostication kidney outcomes, and the prediction of response to and safety of disease-modifying therapies.

Motif de la revue: La maladie rénale diabétique (MRD) est une cause majeure d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) pour laquelle il existe de nombreux traitements ayant démontré une capacité à prévenir la progression vers l'insuffisance rénale. Avec son spectre de phénotypes et de trajectoires, la MRD s'avère cependant une étiologie complexe et hétérogène de l'IRC. Dans cette revue narrative, nous discutons des approches de la médecine de précision liées à la MRD­notamment la génomique, la métabolomique et la protéomique­et de leur rôle potentiel dans la prise en charge du diabète et de la MRD. Des soignants et un patient ayant une expérience vécue de l'IRC ont participé à cette revue. Sources: Les articles de recherche pertinents ont été identifiés dans MEDLINE et Google Scholar à l'aide des termes de recherche suivants: « diabète ¼, « insuffisance rénale diabétique ¼, « néphropathie diabétique ¼, « insuffisance rénale chronique ¼, « insuffisance rénale ¼, « dialyse ¼, « néphrologie ¼, « génomique ¼, « métabolomique ¼ et « protéomique ¼. Méthodologie: Revue ciblée et évaluation critique­encadrées par l'expérience vécue d'un partenaire patient et de soignants­de la littérature existante portant sur les approches de la médecine de précision pour le diagnostic, le pronostic et le traitement du diabète et de la MRD. Principales observations: Il est difficile de distinguer la néphropathie diabétique de l'IRC due ou non à d'autres types de MRD; le diagnostic nécessite généralement une biopsie rénale. Des biomarqueurs ont été identifiés pour aider à prédire l'apparition et la progression de la MRD, mais ceux-ci doivent encore être intégrés aux normes cliniques de soins et évalués par rapport aux outils prédictifs du risque d'IRC et d'insuffisance rénale. La génomique a permis d'identifier plusieurs variantes génétiques causales du diabète néonatal et du diabète monogénique chez l'enfant, lesquelles peuvent être utilisées à des fins diagnostiques et de définition du traitement hypoglycémiant. Des études couvrant l'ensemble du génome ont permis d'identifier des gènes impliqués dans la physiopathologie de la MRD en contexte de diabète de type 1 et 2, mais leurs avantages translationnels restent en deçà des scores de risque polygéniques. Il a été démontré que la métabolomique et la protéomique améliorent la précision diagnostique de la MRD, qu'elles ont été utilisées pour identifier de nouvelles voies impliquées dans la pathogenèse de la MRD et qu'elles peuvent être employées pour améliorer la prédiction de la progression de l'insuffisance rénale, ainsi que pour prédire la réponse au traitement de la MRD. Limites: Il existe un nombre limité d'études observationnelles prospectives de qualité et d'envergure, dont aucun essai clinique randomisé, appuyant le recours à des d'approches fondées sur la médecine de précision pour améliorer les résultats cliniques des adultes diabétiques ou atteints de MRD, ou présentant un risque pour ces maladies. On ne sait pas exactement quels patients pourraient bénéficier d'une utilisation clinique de la génomique, de la métabolomique et de la protéomique tout au long de la trajectoire de la MRD. Conclusion: Des recherches supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour mieux évaluer le rôle de la médecine de précision dans la prise en charge de la MRD, notamment pour le diagnostic, la différenciation de la néphropathie diabétique d'autres étiologies de la MRD et de l'IRC, la prédiction des risques à court et à long terme sur le pronostic rénal, et la prédiction de l'innocuité et de la réponse aux traitements pouvant modifier l'évolution de la maladie.

Priorities for peer support delivery among adults living with chronic kidney disease: a patient-oriented consensus workshop.

BACKGROUND: Peer support can address the informational and emotional needs of people living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and enable self-management. We aimed to identify preferences and priorities for content, format and processes of peer support delivery for patients with non-dialysis CKD and their loved ones. METHODS: Using a patient-oriented research approach, we conducted a half-day, virtual consensus workshop with stakeholder participants from across Canada, including patients, caregivers, peer mentors and clinicians. Using personas (fictional characters), participants discussed and voted on preferences for delivery of peer support across format, content and process categories. We analyzed transcripts from small- and large-group discussions inductively using content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one stakeholders, including 9 patients and 4 caregivers, participated in the workshop. In the voting exercise on format, participants prioritized peer mentor matching, programming for both patients and caregivers, and flexible scheduling. For content, participants prioritized informational and emotional support focus, and for process, they prioritized leveraging kidney care programs and alternative sources (e.g., social media) for promotion and referral. Analysis of workshop transcripts complemented prioritization results and emphasized tailoring of peer support delivery to accommodate the diversity of people living with CKD and their support needs. This concept was elaborated in 3 themes, namely alignment of program features with needs, inclusive peer support options and multiple access points. INTERPRETATION: We identified preferences for peer support delivery for people living with CKD and underscore the importance of tailored, flexible programming in this context. Findings could be used to develop, adapt or study CKD-focused peer support interventions.

Transportation Burden Associated With Hemodialysis in Canada: A Qualitative Study of Stakeholders.

Rationale & Objective: For patients requiring in-center hemodialysis, suboptimal transportation arrangements are commonly cited as a source of ongoing stress and anxiety and have been associated with a reduced quality of life and increased mortality risk. Transportation-related problems are especially pronounced in Canada given its size, low population density, and long, often snowy winters. We aimed to identify and better understand transportation options for hemodialysis patients in Canada and to describe stakeholder experiences. Study Design: We used a qualitative descriptive research design to explore stakeholder experiences and perspectives of transportation to and from dialysis facilities. Setting & Participants: We recruited participants from a large urban hemodialysis program in Western Canada and included 11 participants from a project group, 45 participants from an open forum, and a survey of 8 social workers. Data collection occurred at a series of project group meetings and an open forum (n=45). In addition, we asked 8 renal social workers based in major cities across Canada to comment on the provision of transport for patients in their area via email or telephone consult. Analytical Approach: We used conventional content analysis to explore stakeholder experiences. Results: Traveling to and from dialysis facilities remains a source of stress and anxiety for many patients and their families. Patients described several factors contributing to these feelings including: the challenges of physically getting to the treatment center, particularly in adverse weather conditions; being a burden on family and friends; difficulties accessing the treatment facility; issues with public transport; and financial worries related to high costs. Limitations: Findings may not be relevant in low- and middle-income countries and those with a warmer climate. Conclusions: Without a concerted and collaborative approach to address the barriers identified here, it is likely that travel to and from in-center hemodialysis will continue to adversely affect patients' quality of life.

Multidisciplinary Support To Access living donor Kidney Transplant (MuST AKT): A Clinical Research Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Living Kidney Donation.

Background: Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the optimal treatment for eligible patients with kidney failure, although it is underutilized. Contextually tailored patient- and family-centered interventions may be effective to increase LDKT. Objective: We outline a protocol to test the feasibility of the Multidisciplinary Support To Access living donor Kidney Transplant (MuST AKT) intervention designed to increase LDKT. Design: Non-blinded single-center pilot randomized controlled trial with a qualitative interview component. Setting: Academic transplant referral center in Northern Alberta Region with a population of more than 2 million in its catchment area. Patients: English-speaking patients of the age range 18 to 75 years who are referred for kidney transplantation are eligible to participate. Measurements: Feasibility will be assessed by indicators of recruitment, retention, and completion rates, treatment fidelity, adherence to intervention, engagement in intervention, and acceptability. Methods: Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to either standard care (control) or the experimental group who receive standard care plus the MuST AKT intervention, a person-centered program designed to assist and enable the kidney transplant candidate to achieve what is required to receive an LDKT. The intervention consists of an introductory session and 4 intervention sessions delivered in-person or virtually. Limitations: Inferences cannot be drawn regarding the efficacy/effectiveness of the MuST AKT intervention. This study is non-blinded. Conclusions: This pilot study is the first step in our broader initiative to increase LDKT in our health care jurisdiction. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of a future definitive randomized controlled trial. Trial registration number: NCT04666545.

Contexte: Bien qu'elle soit encore sous-utilisée, la transplantation d'un rein provenant d'un donneur vivant (TRDV) constitue le traitement optimal pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale qui sont admissibles. Des interventions personnalisées, axées sur le patient et la famille, pourraient s'avérer efficaces pour favoriser la TRDV. Objectif: Nous décrivons un protocole examinant la faisabilité de l'intervention MuST AKT (Multidisciplinary Support To Access living donor Kidney Transplant), laquelle vise l'augmentation des TRDV. Conception: Essai clinique pilote unicentrique, sans insu, comportant une composante d'entretiens qualitatifs. Cadre: Un center universitaire pour les transplantations du Nord de l'Alberta, situé dans une zone de référence comptant plus de deux millions de personnes. Sujets: Seront admissibles tous les patients anglophones âgés de 18 à 75 ans aiguillés pour une transplantation rénale. Mesures: La faisabilité sera évaluée par des indicateurs du taux de recrutement, de rétention et d'achèvement, de même que par la fidélité au traitement, l'adhésion à l'intervention, l'engagement dans l'intervention et l'acceptabilité. Méthodologie: Les sujets seront répartis aléatoirement 1:1 dans le groupe témoin, qui recevra les soins habituels, ou dans le groupe expérimental, qui recevra les soins habituels et l'intervention MuST AKT. Ce program axé sur le patient est conçu pour aider les candidats à une greffe rénale à réaliser les étapes nécessaires pour recevoir une TRDV. L'intervention est constituée d'une séance d'introduction et de quatre séances d'intervention réalisées en personne ou virtuellement. Limites: Nous ne serons pas en mesure de tirer des conclusions quant à l'efficacité de l'intervention MuST AKT. Cette étude n'est pas menée en aveugle. Conclusion: Cette étude pilote constitue la première étape d'une initiative plus vaste qui vise à accroître la TRDV dans notre région sanitaire. Les résultats de cette étude seront utilisés pour guider l'élaboration d'un futur essai clinique définitif.

Identification and Prioritization of Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Topics With Multidisciplinary Stakeholders and People Living With Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.

Background: Despite efforts to provide evidence-based care for people living with kidney disease, health care provider goals and priorities are often misaligned with those of individuals with lived experience of disease. Coupled with competing interests of time, resources, and an abundance of suitable guideline topics, identifying and prioritizing areas of focus for the Canadian nephrology community with a patient-oriented perspective is necessary and important. Similar priority-setting exercises have been undertaken to establish research priorities for kidney disease and to standardize outcomes for kidney disease research and clinical care; however, research priorities are distinct from priorities for guideline development. Inclusion of people living with health conditions in the selection and prioritization of guideline topics is suggested by patient engagement frameworks, though the process to operationalizing this is variable. We propose that the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CSN CPGC) takes the opportunity at this juncture to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with involvement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to inform future guideline activities. In this protocol, we describe our planned research methods to address this. Objective: To establish consensus-based guideline topic priorities for the CSN CPGC using a modified Delphi survey with involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders, including people living with kidney disease and their caregivers. Study design: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Survey. Setting: Pilot-tested surveys will be distributed via email and conducted using the online platform SurveyMonkey, in both French and English. Participants: We will establish a group of multidisciplinary clinical and research stakeholders (both within and outside CSN membership) from Canada, in addition to people living with kidney disease and/or their caregivers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted to generate an initial list of guideline topics, which will be organized into three main categories: (1) International nephrology-focused guidelines that may require Canadian commentary, (2) Non-nephrology specific guidelines from Canada that may require CSN commentary, and (3) Novel topics for guideline development. Participants will engage in a multi-round Modified Delphi Survey to prioritize a set of "important guideline topics." Measures: Consensus will be reached for an item based on both median score on the Likert-type scale (≥ 7) and the percentage agreement (≥ 75%); the Delphi process will be complete when consensus is reached on each item. Guideline topics will then be given a priority score calculated from the total Likert ratings across participants, adjusted for the number of participants. Limitations: Potential limitations include participant response rates and compliance to survey completion. Conclusions: We propose to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with the engagement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to establish consensus-based guideline topics and inform future guidelines activities of the CSN CPGC.

Contexte: Malgré les efforts déployés pour fournir aux personnes atteintes de néphropathies des soins fondés sur les données probantes, il s'avère que les objectifs et priorités des prestataires de soins de santé sont souvent mal alignés avec ceux des personnes qui ont une expérience concrète de la maladie. Compte tenu des intérêts concurrents en matière de temps et de ressources, et de l'abondance de sujets pertinents pour l'élaboration de lignes directrices, il est nécessaire et important d'identifier et de hiérarchiser les domaines prioritaires pour la communauté néphrologique canadienne dans une perspective orientée vers le patient. Des exercices semblables pour la définition des priorités ont été entrepris afin d'établir les priorités de la recherche sur les maladies rénales et normaliser les soins cliniques et les résultats de la recherche sur les maladies rénales. Or, les priorités de la recherche diffèrent des priorités pour l'élaboration des lignes directrices. Bien que les façons de procéder varient, les cadres d'engagement des patients suggèrent que des personnes vivant avec des problèmes de santé soient incluses dans la sélection et la hiérarchisation des sujets des lignes directrices. À cet égard, nous proposons que le Comité sur les lignes directrices de pratique clinique de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (CSN CPGC ­ Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee) profite de l'occasion pour intégrer des exercices d'établissement des priorités fondés sur des données probantes et impliquer des personnes vivant avec une néphropathie et des soignants afin de guider les futures activités d'élaboration de lignes directrices. Dans ce protocole, nous décrivons la méthodologie de recherche que nous suivrons pour y remédier. Objectif: Établir des priorités consensuelles en matière de sujets de lignes directrices pour le CSN CPGC à l'aide d'une enquête Delphi modifiée et avec la participation d'intervenants multidisciplinaires, notamment des personnes vivant avec une néphropathie et leurs soignants. Conception: Protocole pour une enquête Delphi modifiée. Cadre: Des sondages pilotes, en anglais et en français, seront distribués par courriel et réalisés à l'aide de la plateforme en ligne SurveyMonkey. Participants: Nous créerons un groupe d'intervenants multidisciplinaires canadiens œuvrant en clinique et en recherche (à la fois des membres et des non membres de la SCN) auquel s'ajouteront des personnes atteintes d'une néphropathie et/ou leurs soignants. Méthodologie: Une recherche exhaustive sera effectuée dans la littérature afin de constituer une première liste de sujets de lignes directrices, laquelle sera divisée en trois catégories principales: (1) lignes directrices internationales axées sur la néphrologie et pouvant nécessiter des commentaires canadiens, (2) lignes directrices canadiennes non spécifiquement liées à la néphrologie et pouvant nécessiter des commentaires de la SCN, (3) nouveaux sujets pour l'élaboration de lignes directrices. Les participants s'engageront dans une enquête Delphi modifiée à plusieurs tours afin de hiérarchiser un ensemble de « sujets importants pour l'élaboration de lignes directrices ¼. Mesures: Un consensus sera atteint pour un énoncé s'il atteint à la fois un score médian (≥7) sur l'échelle de Likert et le pourcentage d'accord établi (≥ 75 %); le processus Delphi sera terminé lorsque le consensus sera atteint pour chaque énoncé. Les sujets pour l'élaboration de lignes directrices recevront ensuite une cote de priorité calculée à partir du total des scores des participants sur l'échelle Likert et ajustée en fonction du nombre de participants. Limites: L'étude pourrait être limitée par le taux de réponse des participants et leur engagement à compléter toutes les étapes de l'enquête. Conclusion: Nous proposons d'intégrer des exercices de définition des priorités fondés sur des données probantes et impliquant la participation de personnes vivant avec une néphropathie et de leurs soignants afin de déterminer des sujets consensuels pour l'élaboration de lignes directrices et de guider les futures activités du CSN CPGC en lien avec ce processus.

An International Survey of Peritoneal Dialysis Exercise Practices and Perceptions.

Introduction: Low activity levels and poor physical function are associated with technique failure and mortality in people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Adequate levels of physical function are required to maintain independence for people choosing this predominantly home-based therapy. The objective of this study was to identify the exercise-related perceptions and practices of PD clinicians globally. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of PD clinicians from English-, Thai-, Spanish-, and Portuguese-speaking PD-prevalent countries exploring clinicians' perceptions and practices of swimming, activity following PD catheter insertion, lifting, and falls prevention. This study was convened by the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis and Global Renal Exercise Network between July and December 2021. Results: Of 100 of the highest PD-prevalent countries, 85 responded and were represented in the findings. A total of 1125 PD clinicians (448 nephrologists, 558 nephrology nurses, 59 dietitians, and 56 others) responded from 61% high-income, 32% upper middle-income and 7% lower middle-income countries. The majority (n = 1054, 94%) agreed that structured exercise programs would be beneficial for people receiving PD. Most respondents believed people on PD could perform more exercise (n = 907, 81%) and that abdominal strengthening exercises could be safely performed (n = 661, 59%). Compared to clinicians in high-income countries, clinicians from lower middle-income status (odds ratio [OR], 5.57; 1.64 to 18.9) are more likely to promote participation in physical activity. Conclusion: Clinicians know the importance of physical activity in people receiving PD. Exercise counseling and structured exercise plans could be included in the standard care of people receiving PD to maintain independence.

Bridging Gaps in Diabetic Nephropathy Care: A Narrative Review Guided by the Lived Experiences of Patient Partners.

Purpose of review: Diabetes affects almost a 10th of the Canadian population, and diabetic nephropathy is one of its main complications. It remains a leading cause of kidney failure despite the availability of effective treatments. Sources of information: The sources of information are iterative discussions between health care professionals and patient partners and literature collected through the search of multiple databases. Methods: Major pitfalls related to optimal diabetic nephropathy care were identified through discussions between patient partners and clinician researchers. We identified underlying factors that were common between pitfalls. We then conducted a narrative review of strategies to overcome them, with a focus on Canadian initiatives. Key findings: We identified 5 pitfalls along the diabetic nephropathy trajectory, including a delay in diabetes diagnosis, suboptimal glycemic control, delay in the detection of kidney involvement, suboptimal kidney protection, and deficient management of advanced chronic kidney disease. Several innovative care models and approaches have been proposed to address these pitfalls; however, they are not consistently applied. To improve diabetic nephropathy care in Canada, we recommend focusing initiatives on improving awareness of diabetic nephropathy, improving access to timely evidence-based care, fostering inclusive patient-centered care environment, and generating new evidence that supports complex disease management. It is imperative that patients and their families are included at the center of these initiatives. Limitations: This review was limited to research published in peer-reviewed journals. We did not perform a systematic review of the literature; we included articles that were relevant to the major pitfalls identified by our patient partners. Study quality was also not formally assessed. The combination of these factors limits the scope of our conclusions.

Motif de la revue: Le diabète touche près d'un dixième de la population canadienne et la néphropathie diabétique est l'une de ses principales complications. Le diabète demeure une cause principale d'insuffisance rénale malgré la disponibilité de traitements efficaces. Sources: Discussions itératives entre des professionnels de la santé et des patients partenaires, ainsi que la documentation recueillie à la suite d'une recherche dans plusieurs bases de données. Méthodologie: Les principaux obstacles liés aux soins optimaux en néphropathie diabétique ont été définis grâce à des discussions entre des patients partenaires et des cliniciens-chercheurs. Des facteurs sous-jacents, communs à tous ces obstacles, ont été dégagés, puis nous avons procédé à un examen narratif des stratégies visant à surmonter ces obstacles, en privilégiant les initiatives canadiennes. Principaux résultats: Cinq obstacles jalonnant la trajectoire de la néphropathie diabétique ont été identifiés, soit un retard dans le diagnostic du diabète, une régulation glycémique sous-optimale, un retard dans la détection de l'atteinte rénale, une protection rénale sous-optimale et une gestion déficiente de l'insuffisance rénale chronique de stade avancé. Plusieurs approches et modèles de soins novateurs ont été proposés pour remédier à ces obstacles, mais ils ne sont pas appliqués de façon uniforme. Pour améliorer les soins de néphropathie diabétique au Canada, nous recommandons de concentrer les initiatives visant la sensibilisation à la néphropathie diabétique, l'amélioration de l'accès en temps opportun à des soins fondés sur des données probantes, la promotion d'un environnement de soins inclusif axé sur le patient et la production de données probantes appuyant la gestion complexe de la maladie. Il est impératif que les patients et leurs familles soient au cœur de ces initiatives. Limites: Notre revue s'est limitée aux articles publiés dans des revues examinées par des pairs. Nous n'avons pas procédé à une revue systématique de la littérature; nous avons inclus des articles pertinents pour les principaux obstacles identifiés par nos patients partenaires. La qualité des études n'a pas été évaluée officiellement. La combinaison de ces facteurs limite la portée de nos conclusions.

'It's the empathy'-defining a role for peer support among people living with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: Persons with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) have unique support needs associated with managing a chronic yet often silent condition, complex treatment-related decisions and care transitions. The aim of this study was to explore perspectives on how peer support could address CKD support needs and augment care. DESIGN: This study employed a qualitative descriptive methodology. Data were collected through focus groups (cofacilitated by patient partners) and semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four multidisciplinary CKD clinics across Southern Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: We purposively sampled among adult patients with advanced, non-dialysis CKD and their caregivers, as well as trained peer mentors from The Kidney Foundation of Canada's Kidney Connect programme. ANALYSIS: Transcripts were coded in duplicate, and themes were generated inductively through a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: We conducted seven focus groups with a total of 39 patient and caregiver participants. Seven patients and caregivers who were unable to attend a focus group and 13 peer mentors participated in a telephone interview. Although patients and caregivers had limited awareness of peer support, participants acknowledged its central role in affirming their experiences and enabling confidence to live well with kidney disease. We identified four themes related to the anticipated role of peer support in addressing support needs for people with non-dialysis CKD: (1) creating connection; (2) preparing for uncertainty; (3) adapting to new realities; and (4) responsive peer support delivery. Aligning peer support access with patient readiness and existing CKD management supports can promote optimism, community and pragmatic adaptations to challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Patients, caregivers and peer mentors highlighted a unique value in the shared experiences of CKD peers to anticipate and manage disease-related challenges and confidently face a future living with kidney disease.

A pilot randomised controlled trial of an energy management programme for adults on maintenance haemodialysis: the fatigue-HD study.

BACKGROUND: Identifying interventions to reduce fatigue and improve life participation are top research priorities of people on maintenance haemodialysis. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to explore the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial of an energy management programme for people on maintenance haemodialysis. DESIGN: Parallel-arm, 1:1, blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were recruited from 6 dialysis units in Calgary, Canada. Eligible patients were on maintenance haemodialysis, clinically stable and reported disabling fatigue on the Fatigue Severity Scale items 5, 7, 8 and 9. RANDOMISATION: Participants were randomised using a computer-generated random number sequence according to permuted blocked randomisation, stratified by dialysis unit. BLINDING: Participants were blinded to treatment allocation. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received an attention control (general disease self-management education) or the Personal Energy Planning (PEP) programme, a tailored, web-supported 7-9 weeks energy management programme. OUTCOMES: Eligibility, recruitment and attrition rates were recorded, and standardised intervention effects (Hedge's G) were calculated for fatigue and life participation questionnaires at one1-week postintervention and 12-week postintervention. RESULTS: 159 of 253 screened patients were eligible to be approached. 42 (26%) had fatigue, were interested and consented to participate, of whom 30 met eligibility criteria and were randomised (mean age 62.4 years (±14.7), 60% male). 22 enrolled participants (73%) completed all study procedures. Medium-sized intervention effects were observed on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM)-Performance Scale, Global Life Participation Scale and Global Life Participation Satisfaction Scale at 1-week postintervention follow-up, compared with control. At 12-week follow-up, large and very large intervention effects were observed on the COPM-Performance Scale and COPM-Satisfaction Scale, respectively. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to enrol and follow patients on haemodialysis in a randomised controlled trial of an energy management intervention. As the intervention was associated with improved life participation on some measures, a larger trial is justified.

Sick Day Medication Guidance for People With Diabetes, Kidney Disease, or Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Rationale & Objective: Sick day medication guidance has been promoted to prevent adverse events for people with chronic conditions. Our aim was to summarize the existing sick day medication guidance and the evidence base for the effectiveness of interventions for implementing this guidance. Study Design: Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Setting & Population: Sick day medication guidance for people with chronic conditions including diabetes mellitus, kidney diseases, and cardiovascular diseases. Selection Criteria for Studies: A search of 6 bibliographic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library [via Wiley]) and a comprehensive gray literature search were completed in June 2021. Data Extraction: Intervention and study characteristics were extracted using standardized tools. Analytical Approach: Data were summarized descriptively, and our approach observed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. Results: The literature search identified 2,308 documents, which were screened against the eligibility criteria, leading to 74 documents that were included. The majority of the identified documents (n = 55) were guidelines or educational resources. Of the 19 primary research studies identified, 10 studies described an intervention, with only 2 examining the effect of sick day medication guidance interventions within clinical care and no studies reporting beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Most documents (n = 58) included guidance specific to patients with diabetes mellitus, with fewer including guidance for patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 9) or heart failure (n = 2). Limitations: Risk of bias was not assessed. Conclusions: Many resources promoting sick day medication guidance have been developed; however, there is very little empirical evidence for the effectiveness of current approaches in implementing sick day medication guidance into practice. Recommendations for the use of sick day medication guidance will require further research to develop consistent, understandable, and usable approaches for its implementation within self-management strategies as well as empirical studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of these interventions.

Physical activity and exercise in peritoneal dialysis: International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis and the Global Renal Exercise Network practice recommendations.

Life participation requiring physical activity and physical function is a key patient-reported outcome for people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). Clinician guidance is required from multidisciplinary sources regarding exercise and activity advice to address the specific needs of this group. From August 2020 through to June 2021, the Global Renal Exercise Network and the International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis reviewed the published literature and international clinical experience to develop a set of clinical practice points. A set of questions relevant to physical activity and exercise were developed from the perspective of a person receiving PD and were the basis for the practice point development. The GRADE framework was used to evaluate the quality of evidence and to guide clinical practice points. The review of the literature found sparse quality evidence, and thus the clinical practice points are generally based on the expert consensus of people receiving PD, PD exercise expert clinicians and experienced PD exercise researchers. Clinical practice points address timing of exercise and activity (post-catheter insertion, peritoneal space empty or full), the uptake of specific activities (work, sex, swimming, core exercise), potential adverse outcomes related to activity and exercise (exit site care, perspiration, cardiovascular compromise, fatigue, intra-abdominal pressure), the effect of exercise and activity on conditions of interest (mental health, obesity, frailty, low fitness) and exercise nutrition.

Involving Patient Partners in the KRESCENT Peer Review: Intent, Process, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Purpose of review: The Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training (KRESCENT) is a national Canadian training program for kidney scientists, funded by the Kidney Foundation of Canada (KFOC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN). We describe our first year of incorporating patient partners into a scientific peer-review committee, the 2017 committee to select senior research trainees and early-career kidney researchers for funding and training, in the hope that it will be helpful to others who wish to integrate the perspective of people with lived experience into the peer-review process. Sources of information: Other peer-review committees, websites, journal articles, patient partners, Kidney Foundation of Canada Research Council, Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) Patient Council, participants in the 2017 Kidney Foundation of Canada KRESCENT peer-review panel. Methods: We describe our motivation, rationale, guiding principles, plans, feedback, implementation, and response. Key findings: We disseminated a "call for patient partners" 8 weeks before the meeting, seeking patients or their care givers to partner with the KRESCENT peer-review panel; we defined these people with lived experience of kidney disease as patient partners. Eight patient partners came forward and all participated as reviewers. Patient partners first participated in a webinar to learn about the function, structure, and processes of a peer-review committee. They practiced reviewing plain language summaries and giving feedback. In a subsequent teleconference, they shared and discussed their reviews. Plain language summaries were scored, overall, on the same 0-5 quality scale used by scientific reviewers. Three patient reviewers participated in some or all of the 6-hour meeting, which was conducted as usual, for this panel, by teleconference (initially audio only; from 2020 onwards by videoconference). In the meeting, the 2 assigned scientific reviewers first gave their scores, followed by the patient reviewers giving their scores, and discussion (mostly scientific, and conducted in usual scientific language). Scientific reviewers then negotiated a consensus score based on their initial scores, the discussion, patient reviewers' scores and statements, and the scientific officer's notes. Patient reviewers, scientific reviewers, and the Kidney Foundation of Canada (KFOC) were generally positive about the process. The increased length of the meeting (estimated at 1 hour) was generally thought to be acceptable. Patient reviewers also provided feedback on the methods used to incorporate patients into the research under review. These comments were concrete, insightful, and helpful. The patients did not uniformly recommend that basic scientists involve patients in their work. We did not detect bias against preclinical science, work that did not involve patients, or rarer diseases. Some patients found participation inspiring and enlightening. All participants appreciated the idea of patient partners as community witnesses to a group process committed to fairness and supportiveness. We discussed assigning formal meaningful weight to patient reviewers' assessments. Most, but not all, patients thought that the scientific reviewers were ultimately the best judges of the allocation of scarce research resources. Limitations: Patient participants tended to be Caucasian, middle class, and well educated. Because of the difficulties of travel for some people living with or supporting those living with kidney disease, our findings may not generalize fully to peer-review meetings that are conducted face to face. This is explicitly a supportive panel, committed to reviewing junior scientists with kindness as well as rigor; our findings may not generalize to panels conducted differently. We did not use formal qualitative methodology. Implications: Inclusion of patient partners as patient reviewers for the KRESCENT program peer-review panel was feasible, added value for scientific and patient reviewers, and for the funding stakeholders (CIHR, KFOC, and CSN). We were glad that we had taken this step and continue to refine the process with each successive competition.

Motif de la revue: Le KRESCENT (Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training) est un programme national de formation pour les chercheurs en santé rénale financé par la Fondation canadienne du rein (FCR), les Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (IRSC) et la Société canadienne de néphrologie (SCN). Nous décrivons notre première année d'intégration de partenaires patients dans un comité d'examen scientifique par les pairs, le comité de 2017, visant la sélection de stagiaires de recherche et de chercheurs en santé rénale en début de carrière pour le financement et la formation, dans l'espoir que cela sera utile à ceux qui souhaitent intégrer la perspective des personnes ayant une expérience vécue au processus d'examen par les pairs. Sources: Autres comités d'examen par les pairs, sites Web, articles de revues, partenaires patients, Conseil de recherche de la Fondation canadienne du rein, conseil des patients de Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (CAN-SOLVE CKD), participants au comité d'examen par les pairs de la Fondation canadienne du rein de 2017. Méthodologie: Nous décrivons ce qui a motivé cette étude, notre raisonnement, nos principes directeurs, nos plans, la rétroaction, la mise en œuvre et les réponses. Principaux résultats: Nous avons diffusé un « appel à des partenaires patients ¼ huit semaines avant la réunion pour trouver des patients ou des soignants prêts à collaborer avec le comité d'examen par les pairs de KRESCENT; nous avons défini comme partenaires patients les personnes ayant une expérience vécue de maladie rénale. Huit partenaires patients ont répondu à l'appel et tous ont participé en tant qu'examinateurs. Les partenaires patients ont d'abord participé à un webinaire pour en apprendre davantage sur la fonction, la structure et les processus d'un comité d'examen par les pairs. Ils se sont ensuite entraînés à examiner des résumés en langage simple et à donner des commentaires. Lors d'une téléconférence ultérieure, ils ont partagé et discuté de leurs examens respectifs. Les résumés en langage clair ont été notés, dans l'ensemble, sur la même échelle de qualité de 0 à 5 utilisée par les examinateurs scientifiques. Trois patients examinateurs ont participé à une partie ou à la totalité de la réunion de 6 heures, qui s'est tenue comme d'habitude, pour ce panel, par téléconférence (initialement en audio seulement; par vidéoconférence à partir de 2020). Au cours de la réunion, les deux examinateurs scientifiques désignés ont d'abord donné leurs notes, puis les patients examinateurs ont donné leurs notes, et une discussion a suivi (principalement scientifique, et menée dans le langage scientifique habituel). Les examinateurs scientifiques ont ensuite négocié pour établir une note consensuelle en fonction de leurs notes initiales, de la discussion, des notes et des commentaires des patients examinateurs et des notes de l'agent scientifique.Les patients examinateurs, les examinateurs scientifiques et la Fondation canadienne du rein étaient généralement positifs à l'égard du processus. La durée accrue de la réunion (estimée à 1 heure) a généralement été jugée acceptable. Les patients examinateurs ont également fourni des commentaires sur les méthodes utilisées pour intégrer les patients à la recherche à l'étude. Ces commentaires étaient concrets, pertinents et utiles. Les patients ne recommandent pas uniformément que les scientifiques en recherche fondamentale impliquent les patients dans leur travail. Nous n'avons pas détecté de biais contre la science préclinique, les études qui n'impliquent pas de patients ou les maladies plus rares. Certains patients ont trouvé la participation inspirante et instructive. Tous les participants ont aimé l'idée des partenaires patients comme témoins communautaires d'un processus de groupe engagé dans l'équité et le soutien.Nous avons discuté de l'attribution d'un poids formel significatif aux évaluations des patients examinateurs. La plupart des patients, mais pas tous, étaient d'avis que les examinateurs scientifiques étaient en fin de compte les meilleurs juges de l'allocation des ressources limitées de la recherche. Limites: Les patients participants étaient pour la plupart de race blanche, de classe moyenne et bien éduqués. En raison des difficultés de déplacement pour certaines personnes vivant avec ou soutenant les personnes vivant avec une maladie rénale, nos résultats peuvent ne pas se généraliser entièrement aux réunions d'examen par les pairs menées en personne. Il s'agit essentiellement d'un groupe de soutien, qui s'est engagé à examiner les jeunes chercheurs avec bienveillance et rigueur; nos conclusions peuvent ne pas se généraliser à des groupes de travail menés différemment. Nous n'avons pas utilisé de méthodologie qualitative officielle. Résultats: L'inclusion de partenaires patients comme examinateurs dans un comité d'examen par les pairs du programme KRESCENT s'est avérée réalisable, et une valeur ajoutée pour les examinateurs scientifiques, les patients examinateurs et les parties responsables du financement (IRSC, FCR et SCN). Nous sommes heureux d'avoir franchi cette étape, nous continuons de raffiner le processus à chaque concours successif.