Anatomic Landmarks in Transoral Oropharyngeal Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive transoral surgery for oropharyngeal cancer is a challenge for head and neck surgeons because of the inside-out anatomic presentation and the confined workspace. This study was performed to describe the main neurovascular and muscular landmarks in a transoral approach. The authors propose an anatomic stratification for this surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral wall of the oropharynx and base of the tongue of 15 formalin-fixed heads (30 sides) and 5 fresh cadaveric heads (10 sides) sagittal sectioned were dissected from the inside outwards. Dissection of 7 fresh cadaveric heads via an endoscopic transoral approach was also performed. RESULTS: The lateral oropharyngeal wall was divided into 3 layers from medial to lateral, based in the styloid muscle diaphragm. The first layer, medial to styloid muscles, includes the tonsillar vascularization and the lingual branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve. The second layer, lateral to constrictor muscles, includes the pharyngeal venous plexus, the glossopharyngeal nerve, and the lingual artery. The third layer, lateral to styloid diaphragm, includes the parapharyngeal and submandibular spaces, the carotid vessels and lingual, vagus, glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves. The base of the tongue was divided into central and lateral parts, which contain the lingual artery and lingual branches of the glossopharyngeal nerve. The main landmarks to find the neurovascular structures in each layer are described. CONCLUSION: The authors propose an anatomic division, which helps to plan oropharynx and base of the tongue surgery. This anatomic stratification is useful to surgeons when performing a reconstruction of the oropharynx with a transoral approach.

Transoral robotic parapharyngeal space dissection.

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) provides a minimally invasive approach to address tumors in selected and challenging anatomical locations. Among the critical areas where TORS demonstrates its prowess is the oropharynx. Oropharyngeal tumors can invade parapharyngeal space (PPS) which contains vital structures such as the carotid artery, internal jugular vein, and cranial nerves IX-XII. A deeper understanding of the endoscopic anatomy of the parapharyngeal space could reduce the morbidity associated with tumor resection in this dense neurovascular area. This video-article provides a step-by-step cadaveric dissection of the lower PPS though a transoral robotic approach.

Oropharyngeal free flap reconstruction: Transoral robotic surgery versus open approach.

Objective: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has evolved since its 2009 US Food and Drug Administration approval for use in local stage T1-T2 oropharyngeal carcinoma. The ability to resect increasingly larger and more complex lesions has led to the need to introduce reconstructive techniques through this route, avoiding the classic transmandibular or pull-through approach. Few studies have compared the safety, efficacy, and advantages of TORS versus classic open approaches in oropharyngeal salvage surgery with reconstruction using microanastomosed flaps. Here we retrospectively compare our center's experience with the open approach and TORS and describe the technical variations used. Methods: Between 2013 and 2021, 30 stage III-IV oropharyngeal cancer patients underwent salvage surgery with reconstruction in our center. From 2013 to 2017, 15 patients underwent surgery with the classic open approach, and from 2018 to 2021, an additional 15 patients underwent TORS. We have compared surgical outcomes, post-surgical results, and survival in the two groups. Results: Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. TORS was associated with shorter surgical time (p < .001), fewer complications (p = .01), shorter hospital stay (p < .001), and lower feeding tube requirements (p = .003). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the free margin rate or survival. Conclusion: Oropharyngeal salvage surgery with TORS with free flap reconstruction reduced associated morbidity compared to the open approach in a patient cohort with poor prognosis. Level of Evidence: 4.

A retrospective analysis of surgery in prestyloid parapharyngeal tumors: Lateral approaches vs transoral robotic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery is the standard treatment for most tumors in the prestyloid parapharyngeal space (PPS) but it can be a challenging procedure because of the anatomical complexity of the area. Prestyloid surgery can be performed with various lateral approaches or with a medial approach using transoral robotic surgery (TORS)-either alone or in combination with a transcervical incision. We have retrospectively compared our center's results with lateral and medial approaches. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, 28 patients with prestyloid PPS tumors underwent surgery at our center: 14 with lateral approaches, including transcervical, transcervical-parotid, and transcervical-mandibular, and 14 with medial approaches (12 with TORS and two with TORS plus a transcervical incision). We compared surgical time, postsurgical complications, length of hospital stay, need for feeding tube, and relapse-free survival in the two patient groups. RESULTS: Pleomorphic adenoma was the most frequent tumor and 60.7% of the tumors were benign. Tumor volume and maximum length were similar in the two groups of patients. Intraoperative image guidance and ultrasound were used in 33% of TORS. TORS was associated with less surgical time, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stays. Recurrence rates were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The medial approach by TORS offers superior results in prestyloid tumors than the open lateral approach and can be refined by intraoperative guidance. Level of Evidence: 4.

Reconstruction of oropharyngeal defects after transoral robotic surgery. Review and recommendations of the Commission of Head and Neck Surgery of the Spanish Society of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery. / Reconstrucción de defectos orofaríngeos tras cirugía transoral robótica. Revisión y recomendaciones de la Comisión de Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Cirugía de Cabeza y Cuello.

Transoral surgery of the oropharynx has seen an important evolution in recent years, expanding the surgical options available (TORS, TOUSS, TOLS). The capacity to resect increasingly extensive lesions and the number of patients who benefit from them. This fact has led to an evolution in the reconstruction of surgical defects after transoral surgery. This article aims to review the possible reconstructive techniques, indications and factors to be taken into account prior to surgery, proposing a protocol to assess the need for transoral reconstruction based on the depth of the defect, the staging, and previous treatment.