Clinical significance of baseline Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and its dynamics in metastatic colorectal cancer patients under first-line chemotherapy.

Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) has been recently proposed as a new blood-based prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Herein we aimed to validate its prognostic significance and to evaluate its utility for disease monitoring in patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study involving 130 previously untreated mCRC patients under first-line standard chemotherapy in a real-world scenario. PIV was calculated as (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count at three different time-points: baseline, week 4 after therapy initiation, and at disease progression. We analyzed the influence of baseline PIV on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and overall response rate (ORR). We also explored the utility of PIV dynamics for disease monitoring. Baseline PIV high was significantly associated with worse OS in univariate [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.10, 95% CI, 1.41-3.15; p = 0.000299] and multivariate (HR = 1.82, 95% CI, 1.15-2.90; p = 0.011) analyses. Baseline PIV was also associated with worse PFS in univariate (HR = 2.04, 95% CI, 1.40-2.97; p = 0.000187) and multivariate (HR = 1.56, 95% CI, 1.05-2.31; p = 0.026) analyses. Baseline PIV was not correlated either with DCR or ORR. Regarding PIV dynamics, there was a statistically significant increase from week 4 to disease progression (p = 0.0003), which was at the expense of cases with disease control as best response (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, this study validates the prognostic significance of baseline PIV in patients with mCRC receiving first-line standard chemotherapy in a real-world scenario. Moreover, it suggests the potential utility of PIV monitoring to anticipate the disease progression among those patients who achieve initial disease control.

Noninvasive early detection of colorectal cancer by hypermethylation of the LINC00473 promoter in plasma cell-free DNA.

BACKGROUND: Current noninvasive assays have limitations in the early detection of colorectal cancer. We evaluated the clinical utility of promoter methylation of the long noncoding RNA LINC00473 as a noninvasive biomarker to detect colorectal cancer and associated precancerous lesions. METHODS: We evaluated the epigenetic regulation of LINC00473 through promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer cell lines using bisulfite genomic sequencing and expression analyses. DNA methylation of LINC00473 was analyzed in primary colorectal tumors using 450K arrays and RNA-seq from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Tissue-based findings were validated in several independent cohorts of colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal polyp patients by pyrosequencing. We explored the clinical utility of LINC00473 methylation for the early detection of colorectal cancer in plasma cell-free DNA by quantitative methylation-specific PCR and droplet digital PCR. RESULTS: LINC00473 showed transcriptionally silencing due to promoter hypermethylation in colorectal cancer cell lines and primary tumors. Methylation of the LINC00473 promoter accurately detected primary colorectal tumors in two independent clinical cohorts, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) of 0.94 and 0.89. This biomarker also identified advanced colorectal polyps from two other tissue-based clinical cohorts with high diagnostic accuracy (AUCs of 0.99 and 0.78). Finally, methylation analysis of the LINC00473 promoter in plasma cell-free DNA accurately identified patients with colorectal cancer and advanced colorectal polyps (AUCs of 0.88 and 0.84, respectively), which was confirmed in an independent cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Hypermethylation of the LINC00473 promoter is a new promising biomarker for noninvasive early detection of colorectal cancer and related precancerous lesions.

Efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI/aflibercept (FA) in an elderly population with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of an oxaliplatin-based regimen.

BACKGROUND: The VELOUR study showed the benefit of FOLFIRI-Aflibercept (FA) versus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in second-line treatment. However, only 36% of the included patients were ≥65 years. Thus, we seek to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FA in the elderly population in the context of routine practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational, retrospective, multicenter, observational study of patients ≥70 years with mCRC treated with FA after progression to oxaliplatin chemotherapy in routine clinical practice in 9 hospitals of the GITuD group. RESULTS: Of 388 patients treated with FA between June 2013 and November 2018, 75 patients ≥70 years were included. The median number of cycles was 10 and the objective response (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 33.8% and 72.0%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, median Progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.6 months and median Overall Survival (OS) was 15.1 months. One third fewer metastasectomies were performed in the ≥75 years' subgroup (24 vs. 52%, p = 0.024) and more initial FOLFIRI dose reductions (68 vs. 36%, p = 0.014). ORR (23.8% vs. 38.3%), DCR (42.8% vs. 85.1%), and PFS (4 vs. 7.8 months; p = 0.017) were significantly less, without difference in OS (9.9 vs. 17.1 months; p = 0.129). The presence of prior hypertension (HT) (PFS 7.9 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.049) and HT ≥ grade 3 during treatment (PFS 7.6 vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.024) were associated with longer PFS. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were: asthenia (21.3%), neutropenia (14.7%), and diarrhea (14.7%). 57.3% required FOLFIRI dose reduction; 34.7% of aflibercept, including discontinuation (5.3% and 18.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: FA combination is effective in patients ≥70 years. The occurrence of HT is predictive of efficacy. Close monitoring of toxicity and initial dose adjustment is recommended.

Evaluation of a Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Panel for the Non-Invasive Detection of Variants in Circulating DNA of Colorectal Cancer.

Molecular profiling of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has shown utility for the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). TruSight Tumor 170 (TST170) is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel that covers 170 cancer-related genes, including KRAS, which is a key driver gene in CRC. We evaluated the capacity of TST170 to detect gene variants in cfDNA from a retrospective cohort of 20 metastatic CRC patients with known KRAS variants in tumor tissue and in cfDNA previously analyzed by pyrosequencing and BEAMing, respectively. The cfDNA of most of the patients (95%) was successfully sequenced. We frequently detected variants with clinical significance in KRAS (79%, 15/19) and PIK3CA (26%, 5/19) genes. Variants with potential clinical significance were also identified in another 27 cancer genes, such as APC. The type of KRAS variant detected in cfDNA by TST170 showed high concordance with those detected in tumor tissue (77%), and very high concordance with cfDNA analyzed by BEAMing (94%). The variant allele fractions for KRAS obtained in cfDNA by TST170 and BEAMing correlated strongly. This proof-of-principle study indicates that targeted NGS analysis of cfDNA with TST170 could be useful for non-invasive detection of gene variants in metastatic CRC patients, providing an assay that could be easily implemented for detecting somatic alterations in the clinic.

Dynamic perspective of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in metastatic gastric cancer.

PURPOSE: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an accessible marker from a routine blood test. This study explored the prognostic and predictive value of a change in NLR (c-NLR) after chemotherapy, baseline NLR (bNLR) and chemotherapy response, in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) patients. METHODS: A total of 116 mGC patients treated between 2009 to 2019 at seven hospitals from Galician Research Group on Digestive Tumors (GITuD) were reviewed in a multicentre, ambispective and observational study. NLR was calculated and the optimal cut-off was defined as NLR=3.96 based on ROC method. NLR was determined at baseline and after two chemotherapy cycles in first line treatment. Change NLR was calculated as NLR after two chemotherapy cycles minus bNLR. The relation of bNLR and c-NLR to overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Dynamic Score (DScore) based on c-NLR and baseline NLR were correlated with OS and radiological response. Univariate, multivariate and chi-square analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median patient age was 68.7 years, and 66% were male. Univariate analysis showed OS correlation for bNLR ≥3.96 (5.97 vs 10.87 months, p=0.001), c-NLR increase (6.63 vs 10.34 months, p=0.021) and DScore (12.74 vs 7.68 vs 2.43 months, p<0.001). High DScore was associated with radiological progression after two cycles (x2=10.26, p=0.006). Multivariate analysis: bNLR ≥3.96 (HR=2.16, p=0.003) and c-NLR increase (HR= 2.36, p=0.003) were prognostic factors of poor OS. CONCLUSION: High bNLR and increased NLR after chemotherapy were associated with worse outcome. Dynamic measurement of NLR provides information for stratifying patients to guide optimal treatment.