Fat grafting in breast surgery: a retrospective single-breast centre 6-year experience.

PURPOSE: In recent years, fat grafting has gained importance as a valuable technique in breast surgery. As a breast center that has embraced this approach, we aimed to investigate the indications and complications of fat grafting. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we examined a total of 263 lipofilling treatments on 121 patients. Five groups were identified: the reconstruction group (72.7%), consisting of 24.8% autologous and 38% implant-based reconstructions after cancer, and correction of the tuberous breasts (10.7%). An almost equivalent group (10.7%), consisted of patients treated for cosmetic reasons. Patients after breast-conserving therapy amounted to 16.5%. Twenty patients (16.5%) were treated to alleviate pain. RESULTS: No major complications, and no cancer recurrence or metastasis were observed. One case of infection occurred at the injection site (infection rate: 0.38%). ANOVA showed statistically significant results for age (p < 0.001) and mean fat volume (p = 0.001). Posthoc analysis showed that the mean age of the tuberous group (21 years) was significantly smaller compared to all other categories (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis for fat volume indicated that the mean value for the cosmetic category (447.08 cc) was significantly greater than that of the breast-conserving and implant reconstruction categories (p = 0.009 and p = 0.030, respectively), while not significantly different from the tuberous and autologous reconstruction categories (p = 0.928 and p = 0.648, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Lipofilling has proven a valuable adjunct in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery with a low complication profile. The versatility of this low-cost technique and the low rate of complications make it a powerful asset of modern breast centers.

Correction of the Tuberous Breast with Fat Grafting and Implant: Techniques, Evaluation with BREAST-Q, and Preliminary Results.

BACKGROUND: The correction of tuberous breast deformity with fat grafting has gained popularity in recent years, but it remains unclear whether this new technique can produce patient satisfaction levels comparable to those achieved with implant-based correction. METHODS: This study aimed to compare patients' satisfaction and quality of life using the BREAST-Q questionnaire after correction of tuberous breast deformity with fat grafting and implants. Twenty-four patients (36 breasts) were included in our study. Thirteen patients (15 breasts) had a correction with lipofilling (mean 2.67 interventions) and 11 patients (21 breasts) had an implant-based correction (mean 1 intervention). RESULTS: Both fat and implant treatments showed statistically significant improvements in breast satisfaction (p value=0.001, 0.002, respectively), psychosocial (p value=0.003, 0.003, respectively), and sexual satisfaction (p value=0.008, 0.002, respectively) between the pre-treatment and post-treatment stages. However, the only statistically significant differences between the treatments were observed in the physical condition pre-treatment (p value=0.008) and sexual condition post-treatment (p value=0.030). The outcome of both treatments was not statistically different. Furthermore, the outcome exhibited a statistically significant positive linear relationship with breast satisfaction for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that lipofilling can achieve breast and outcome satisfaction comparable to that of implants, although this parity in results comes at the cost of more interventions. These preliminary results lend support to the notion that, as surgeons have access to two equally effective techniques, it is crucial to provide appropriate guidance to patients to ensure their satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Treating Pain and Fat Necrosis after Breast Cancer Surgery with Fat Grafting: Is one Session Enough?

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain after breast cancer surgery is affecting up to 60% of patients, causing significant morbidity to patients. Lately, fat grafting has been applied as a therapy for chronic neuropathic pain. METHODS: We report a series of eighteen patients, who were treated for pain after breast cancer surgery. Twelve patients had a breast conserving therapy, two a mastectomy and four an autologous flap-based reconstruction. While most presented with neuropathic pain, six patients had fat necrosis in their history. Most patients presented with severe pain (77%) and were treated with fat grafting sessions, performed by water-assisted liposuction. RESULTS: All patients responded to the interventions; the median number of fat grafting sessions was 2, the median duration of the interventions was 4 months, and the median follow-up period was 56.5 months. The median pain prior to the fat grafting procedure had an intensity of 8 (range 7-9) numeric rating scale points; after the first intervention, this was reduced to 4 (range 2.3-5.8); and after the second intervention, it was down to 2 (range 0.8-3.3). Patients with pain intensities of 4-5 had a good chance of achieving analgesia after one session. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting could be a new treatment modality for symptomatic fat necrosis: complete or partial suction of the necrosis and/or fat grafting around the necrosis to reduce inflammation and pain. Fat grafting proved a valuable tool, reducing pain or even achieving analgesia after breast cancer surgery presenting with a highly favorable risk-benefit ratio. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Using Fat Grafting to Treat Breast Implant Capsular Contracture.

Capsular contracture is a frequent complication of breast augmentation and reconstruction that affects up to 30% of patients. The authors describe the effect of fat grafting on capsular contracture used in cases with the primary intention of improving soft-tissue characteristics before implant to implant or implant to fat exchange. Fifteen patients (18 breasts) with capsular contracture Baker grade 4 were reviewed. Pain from capsular formation was able to be ameliorated in all cases after lipofilling sessions, with 11 of them achieving analgesia. Afterward, 4 patients underwent implant to implant and 7 patients implant to fat exchange. Four patients chose to keep the implants after the end of fat grafting procedures, due to satisfying cosmetic results and excellent pain management. Fat grafting may be a useful addition to therapies currently used to treat capsular contracture.