Use of approved Lu-177 radiopharmaceuticals in patients with end-stage renal disease: A review of the literature and proposed treatment algorithm.

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be a very useful treatment for patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer but it is routinely avoided in those with advanced kidney disease because it can adversely affect the renal function. Accordingly, no clear guidelines exist on the use of PRRT for patients on hemodialysis (HD). We performed a literature review to identify publications on HD patients who received PRRT with Lutetium-177 (Lu177) Dotatate and Y-90 and obtained information on Lu177 pharmacokinetics and early testing data from the manufacturer. We also perused the most recent North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (NANETS)/European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) recommendations. Seven relevant publications with a total of 15 patients were included. Patients received dose-adjusted fractions of PRRT with HD occurring usually within 24 h. There were no immediate or long-term serious adverse events attributed to the radioligand, although data was limited. Using available evidence and input from a multidisciplinary group, we have created an institutional workflow. Dose-adjusted PRRT can be offered to patients undergoing HD under careful, multidisciplinary supervision.

Implementing nasal povidone-iodine decolonization to reduce infections in hemodialysis units: a qualitative assessment.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients undergoing hemodialysis carry Staphylococcus aureus in their noses, and carriers are at increased risk of S. aureus bloodstream infections. Our pragmatic clinical trial implemented nasal povidone-iodine (PVI) decolonization for the prevention of bloodstream infections in the novel setting of hemodialysis units. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify pragmatic strategies for implementing PVI decolonization among patients in outpatient hemodialysis units. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: Outpatient hemodialysis units affiliated with five US academic medical centers. Units varied in size, patient demographics, and geographic location. INTERVIEWEES: Sixty-six interviewees including nurses, hemodialysis technicians, research coordinators, and other personnel. METHODS: We conducted interviews with personnel affiliated with all five academic medical centers and conducted thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS: Hemodialysis units had varied success with patient recruitment, but interviewees reported that patients and healthcare personnel (HCP) found PVI decolonization acceptable and feasible. Leadership support, HCP engagement, and tailored patient-focused tools or strategies facilitated patient engagement and PVI implementation. Interviewees reported both patients and HCP sometimes underestimated patients' infection risks and experienced infection-prevention fatigue. Other HCP barriers included limited staffing and poor staff engagement. Patient barriers included high health burdens, language barriers, memory issues, and lack of social support. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative study suggests that PVI decolonization would be acceptable to patients and clinical personnel, and implementation is feasible for outpatient hemodialysis units. Hemodialysis units could facilitate implementation by engaging unit leaders, patients and personnel, and developing education for patients about their infection risk.