Aortic Valve Replacement in the Failing Left Ventricle: Worthwhile?

Purpose: According to the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the aortic valve should be replaced in the setting of severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation, independent of left ventricular function (even for EF < 55%). However, in clinical practice, especially in a very low EF range, surgeons may avoid surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) because of concern over operative risk. This study examines outcomes of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing SAVR. Methods: From 2004 to 2019, 895 patients underwent SAVR for aortic stenosis (AS) and/or regurgitation (AR) by a single surgeon at our institution. From among these, 40 patients (4.47%) had an ejection fraction (EF) of 35% or less, forming the study group. Intra-aortic balloon pump was placed intraoperatively prophylactically pre-bypass in 18 out of the 40. Preoperative and post-operative echocardiograms were compared to determine changes in ejection fraction. Mid-term survival was assessed. Results: 16 patients presented with AS, 20 with AR, and 4 with a combination of AS and AR. Hospital survival was 97.5% (one patient death). The average ejection fraction progressively improved over time from 26% initially to 46% mid-term with mean follow-up of 43 months (0.1-140.7). Remarkably, five-year survival was comparable between the study group and an age- and gender-matched general population (p = 0.834). Downward trends in LV end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter were seen. The former achieved statistical significance (6.0 cm to 5.3 cm; p = 0.0046), while the latter fell slightly short (4.8 cm to 4.1 cm; p = 0.056). Patients in whom an IABP was used had lower EFs than those without IABP (range 10-35, mean 23% vs. 15-35%, mean 27.6%). The EFs of the three subgroups improved significantly postoperatively (p < 0.001 for AS, p = 0.002 for AR, and p = 0.046 for AS and AR). Conclusions: Surgical AVR can be done safely in patients with a failing LV with EF ≤ 35%. Significant improvements in the ejection fraction are seen over time. We believe there is a role for prophylactic pre-bypass IABP. Five-year survival is normalized. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform AVR in these highly jeopardized patients.

Routine anterior spinal artery visualization prior to descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair: High detection success.

BACKGROUND: Paraplegia is adevastating complication of open descending (DTAA) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair. Despite major advances in imaging and surgical techniques, paraplegia continues to be problematic. We present our experience with routine application of enhanced imaging techniques to detect the anterior spinal artery (ASA) before DTAA and TAAA repair. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 177 patients with DTAA and TAAA who underwent imaging to detect the ASA before open surgical repair. High definition CT angiography (CTA) and dual energy CT scanning (DECT) were our modalities of choice with angiography used earlier and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) used when CT was contraindicated. Descriptive statistics and χ2 analyses were conducted. RESULTS: The imaging protocol successfully detected the level of the ASA in 132 (74.5%) patients, utilizing CTA in 67, DECT in 28, spinal angiography in 31, and MRA in 6. Cross sectional modalities with advanced visualization technique (CT, DECT, and MRA) were more successful at detecting the ASA than angiography (80.72%, 82.35%, 75% vs 59.62%, respectively, P = .04). Concerted efforts were made not to leave the operating room without continuity of the ASA with the circulation (via limited resection, beveled anastomosis, or reimplantation). Transient lower extremity weakness was observed in 11 (6.2%) patients, and permanent paraplegia in 2 (1.12%) patients. CONCLUSION: Modern imaging technology provides multiple methodologies highly successful at detecting the ASA. The ASA can then be preserved intraoperatively, contributing to low paraplegia rates. We strongly recommend routine application of this technology to arm the surgeon with precise information about the specific patient's spinal cord blood supply.

Race and Socioeconomic Disparities in Proximal Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Substantial socioeconomics-based disparities exist in cardiac surgery. Although there are robust data for revascularization and valve procedures, the effect of race and socioeconomic status on proximal aortic surgery is not well studied. This study analyzed the impact of race and socioeconomic status on in-hospital outcomes after proximal aortic surgery. METHODS: All adult patients who underwent proximal aortic surgery for aortic dissection or thoracic aneurysm from the 2016 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample were included. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and in-hospital composite morbidity (stroke, pulmonary embolus, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, or permanent pacemaker insertion). Adjusted outcomes were assessed with multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A weighted total of 32,895 patients were included; 25,461 (77.4%) classified as White, 3224 (9.8%) Black, 2039 (6.2%) Hispanic, and 2171 (6.6%) other. Black and Hispanic patients had significantly lower median household income, higher proportion of self-pay insurance status, younger age, higher comorbidity burden, and a higher proportion of urgent or emergency procedures compared with White patients. There was no significant difference in observed in-hospital mortality by patient race, but non-White patients had significantly higher composite morbidity. On adjusted analysis, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality, but non-White race was an independent predictor of in-hospital morbidity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.8; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients of non-White race who undergo proximal aortic surgery have less insurance coverage, more urgent procedures, and a higher comorbidity burden than White patients, disparities that translate to significantly higher morbidity in non-White. A greater focus on nonfatal outcome differentials and improving access to care likely will improve aortic surgery disparities.

Bicuspid aortopathy does not require earlier surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVES: Guidelines for surgical correction of patients with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have oscillated over the years. In this study, we outline the natural history of the ascending aorta in patients with BAV and trileaflet aortic valve (TAV) ATAA followed over time, to ascertain if their behavior differs and to determine if a different threshold for intervention is required. METHODS: Aortic diameters and long-term complications (ie, adverse aortic events) of 2428 patients (554 BAV and 1874 TAV) with ATAA before operative repair were reviewed. Growth rates, yearly complication rates, event-free survival, and risk of complications as a function of aortic size were calculated. Long-term follow-up and precise cause of death granularity was achieved via a comprehensive 6-pronged approach. RESULTS: Aortic growth rate in patients with BAV vs TAV ATAA was 0.20 and 0.17 cm/year, respectively (P = .009), with the rate increasing with increasing aortic size. Yearly adverse aortic events rates increased with ATAA size and were lower for patients with BAV. The relative risk of adverse aortic events exhibited an exponential increase with aortic diameter. Patients with BAV had a lower all-cause and ascending aorta-specific adverse aortic events hazard. Age-adjusted 10-year event-free survival was significantly better for patients with BAV, and BAV emerged as a protective factor against type A dissection, rupture, and ascending aortic death. CONCLUSIONS: The threshold for surgical repair of ascending aneurysm with BAV should not differ from that of TAV. Prophylactic surgery should be considered at 5.0 cm for patients with TAV (and BAV) at expert centers.

Bovine Aortic Arch: A Result of Chance or Mandate of Inheritance?

Previous studies have shown that bovine arch incidence is higher in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms than in patients without an aneurysm. Although thoracic aortic aneurysm disease is known to be familial in some cases, it remains unknown if bovine arch results from a genetic mutation, thus allowing it to be inherited. Our objective was to determine the heritability of bovine arch from phenotypic pedigrees. We identified 24 probands from an institutional database of 202 living patients with bovine arch who had previously been diagnosed with thoracic aortic aneurysm and who had family members with previous chest computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans. Aortic arch configuration of all first-degree and second-degree relatives was determined from available scans. Heritability of bovine arch was estimated using maximum-likelihood-based variance decomposition methodology implemented by way of the SOLAR package (University of Maryland, Catonsville, Maryland). 43 relatives of 24 probands with bovine arch had preexisting imaging available for review. The prevalence of bovine arch in relatives with chest imaging was 53% (n = 23) and did not differ significantly by gender (male: 64.3%, female: 55.6%, p = 1). The bovine arch was shown to be highly heritable with a heritability estimate (h2) of 0.71 (p = 0.048). In conclusion, the high heritability of bovine arch in our sample population suggests a genetic basis.