RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: BAG3 (Bcl2-associated athanogene3) is able to induce the transformation of cancer-associated fibroblasts to alpha smooth muscle actin (a-SMA) positive (+) myofibroblasts. In systemic sclerosis (SSc), a-SMA+ myofibroblasts also play an important role in the progression of fibrosis in the skin and involved internal organs. The aim of the study was to investigate whether BAG3 is overexpressed in SSc and may be a biomarker of fibrogenesis. METHODS: BAG3 serum levels were measured in 106 patients with SSc, 47 with the limited (lc) and 59 the diffuse (dc) SSc, and in age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC). BAG3 levels were then compared according to their clinical subset, nailfold video-capillaroscopic (NVC) patterns, interstitial lung disease (ILD, and correlated with modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and global disease activity. BAG3 expression was also investigated in skin biopsies of 8 dcSSc patients. RESULTS: BAG3 serum levels were significantly higher in dcSSc (143.3 pg/mL, 95%CI 78-208.5) than in HC (0.68 pg/mL, 95%CI 0.13-1.23), and were significantly higher in patients with late NVC pattern and ILD but did not correlate with disease activity and mRSS. Of note, BAG3 was strongly expressed in the skin biopsies of dcSSc patients. CONCLUSIONS: BAG3 is overexpressed in dcSSc patients and may contribute to skin and organ fibrosis by prompting the transition of fibroblasts into myofibroblasts and increasing their survival. Thus, BAG3 may play an important role in SSc fibrotic pathogenesis and be a potential biomarker of fibrosis. Further research on its role as a therapeutic target is warranted.
RESUMO
The therapeutic management of Sjögren syndrome (SjS) has not changed substantially in recent decades: treatment decisions remain challenging in clinical practice, without a specific therapeutic target beyond the relief of symptoms as the most important goal. In view of this scenario, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) promoted and supported an international collaborative study (EULAR SS Task Force) aimed at developing the first EULAR evidence and consensus-based recommendations for the management of patients with SjS with topical and systemic medications. The aim was to develop a rational therapeutic approach to SjS patients useful for healthcare professionals, physicians undergoing specialist training, medical students, the pharmaceutical industry and drug regulatory organisations following the 2014 EULAR standardised operating procedures. The Task Force (TF) included specialists in rheumatology, internal medicine, oral health, ophthalmology, gynaecology, dermatology and epidemiology, statisticians, general practitioners, nurses and patient representatives from 30 countries of the 5 continents. Evidence was collected from studies including primary SjS patients fulfilling the 2002/2016 criteria; when no evidence was available, evidence from studies including associated SjS or patients fulfilling previous sets of criteria was considered and extrapolated. The TF endorsed the presentation of general principles for the management of patients with SjS as three overarching, general consensus-based recommendations and 12 specific recommendations that form a logical sequence, starting with the management of the central triplet of symptoms (dryness, fatigue and pain) followed by the management of systemic disease. The recommendations address the use of topical oral (saliva substitutes) and ocular (artificial tear drops, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, topical corticosteroids, topical CyA, serum tear drops) therapies, oral muscarinic agonists (pilocarpine, cevimeline), hydroxychloroquine, oral glucocorticoids, synthetic immunosuppressive agents (cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, leflunomide and mycophenolate), and biological therapies (rituximab, abatacept and belimumab). For each recommendation, levels of evidence (mostly modest) and TF agreement (mostly very high) are provided. The 2019 EULAR recommendations are based on the evidence collected in the last 16 years in the management of primary 2002 SjS patients and on discussions between a large and broadly international TF. The recommendations synthesise current thinking on SjS treatment in a set of overarching principles and recommendations. We hope that the current recommendations will be broadly applied in clinical practice and/or serve as a template for national societies to develop local recommendations.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Lubrificantes Oftálmicos/uso terapêutico , Agonistas Muscarínicos/uso terapêutico , Saliva Artificial/uso terapêutico , Síndrome de Sjogren/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oftálmica , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Ciclosporina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of a new deformity correction philosophy treatment for AIS called apical vertebral derotation and translation (AVDT). METHODS: It is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data concerning two different scoliosis correction techniques used in our department. A total of 81 patients (22M, 59F) with a mean age of 15.5 years and minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the correction technique: 36 patients underwent single-rod derotation using all screws construct (AS), while 45 patients underwent apical vertebral derotation and translation using screws and sublaminar bands (SB). RESULTS: The mean improvement of the MT curve was 70% in the AS group and 60.6% in the SB group, while the mean improvement of the TL/L curve was 65.5 and 72.4%, respectively. PT increased in both groups after surgery with a mean amount of 2.5° in the AS group and only 1° in the SB group. We observed also a greater amount of cervical lordosis reduction in the AS group (4.5°) compared with the SB group (only 1°). The SB group had less operative time and less blood loss. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between the two groups at the final follow-up and both techniques led to an excellent correction in the frontal plane; in the sagittal plane, the AVDT technique seemed to give less sagittal imbalance with better cervical profile; the surgical procedure is easy with less operative time, less blood loss and less risk of potential complications. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Escoliose/cirurgia , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/métodos , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Escoliose/fisiopatologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an international set of classification criteria for primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) using guidelines from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR). These criteria were developed for use in individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS. METHODS: We assigned preliminary importance weights to a consensus list of candidate criteria items, using multi-criteria decision analysis. We tested and adapted the resulting draft criteria using existing cohort data on primary SS cases and non-SS controls, with case/non-case status derived from expert clinical judgement. We then validated the performance of the classification criteria in a separate cohort of patients. RESULTS: The final classification criteria are based on the weighted sum of five items: anti-SSA/Ro antibody positivity and focal lymphocytic sialadenitis with a focus score of ≥1 foci/4â mm2, each scoring 3; an abnormal Ocular Staining Score of ≥5 (or van Bijsterveld score of ≥4), a Schirmer's test result of ≤5â mm/5â min and an unstimulated salivary flow rate of ≤0.1â mL/min, each scoring 1. Individuals with signs and/or symptoms suggestive of SS who have a total score of ≥4 for the above items meet the criteria for primary SS. Sensitivity and specificity against clinician-expert-derived case/non-case status in the final validation cohort were high, that is, 96% (95% CI92% to 98%) and 95% (95% CI 92% to 97%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Using methodology consistent with other recent ACR/EULAR-approved classification criteria, we developed a single set of data-driven consensus classification criteria for primary SS, which performed well in validation analyses and are well suited as criteria for enrolment in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Seleção de Pacientes , Glândulas Salivares/patologia , Sialadenite/patologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/classificação , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Autoanticorpos/sangue , Autoantígenos/imunologia , Biópsia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Consenso , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , RNA Citoplasmático Pequeno/imunologia , Ribonucleoproteínas/imunologia , Saliva/metabolismo , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Síndrome de Sjogren/sangue , Síndrome de Sjogren/patologiaRESUMO
Labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy is used in the classification of primary Sjögren's syndrome (PSS) and in patient stratification in clinical trials. It may also function as a biomarker. The acquisition of tissue and histological interpretation is variable and needs to be standardised for use in clinical trials. A modified European League Against Rheumatism consensus guideline development strategy was used. The steering committee of the ad hoc working group identified key outstanding points of variability in LSG acquisition and analysis. A 2-day workshop was held to develop consensus where possible and identify points where further discussion/data was needed. These points were reviewed by a subgroup of experts on PSS histopathology and then circulated via an online survey to 50 stakeholder experts consisting of rheumatologists, histopathologists and oral medicine specialists, to assess level of agreement (0-10 scale) and comments. Criteria for agreement were a mean score ≥6/10 and 75% of respondents scoring ≥6/10. Thirty-nine (78%) experts responded and 16 points met criteria for agreement. These points are focused on tissue requirements, identification of the characteristic focal lymphocytic sialadenitis, calculation of the focus score, identification of germinal centres, assessment of the area of leucocyte infiltration, reporting standards and use of prestudy samples for clinical trials. We provide standardised consensus guidance for the use of labial salivary gland histopathology in the classification of PSS and in clinical trials and identify areas where further research is required to achieve evidence-based consensus.
Assuntos
Centro Germinativo/patologia , Linfócitos/patologia , Glândulas Salivares Menores/patologia , Sialadenite/patologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/patologia , Biópsia , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Leucócitos/patologia , Lábio , Padrões de ReferênciaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate ClinESSDAI (Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index), ie, ESSDAI without the biological domain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 702 fictive vignettes derived from 96 real cases of primary Sjögren's syndrome of the ESSDAI development study were used. As for ESSDAI development, the physician assessment of disease activity (0-10 scale) was used as the 'gold standard' in a multivariate model for weighting domains, after removing the biological domain. The reliability, assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between ClinESSDAI and ESSDAI, explored if ClinESSDAI was equivalent to ESSDAI. Its psychometric (ie, measurement) properties were compared with that of ESSDAI in an independent cohort. Also, its use was evaluated on data of two clinical trials. RESULTS: In multivariate modelling, all 11 domains remained significantly associated with disease activity, with slight modifications of some domain weights. Reliability between clinESSDAI and ESSDAI was excellent (ICC=0.98 and 0.99). Psychometric properties of clinESSDAI, disease activity levels and minimal clinically important improvement thresholds and its ability to detect change over time in clinical trials were very close to that of ESSDAI. CONCLUSIONS: ClinESSDAI appears valid and very close to the original ESSDAI. This score provides an accurate evaluation of disease activity independent of B-cell biomarkers. It could be used in various circumstances: (i) in biological/clinical studies to avoid data collinearity, (ii) in clinical trials, as secondary endpoint, to detect change independent of biological effect of the drug, (iii) in clinical practice to assess disease activity for visits where immunological tests have not been done.
Assuntos
Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Psicometria , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To define disease activity levels, minimal clinically important improvement (MCII) and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) with the primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) disease activity indexes: European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) and EULAR SS patient-reported index (ESSPRI). METHODS: For 790 patients from two large prospective cohorts, ESSDAI, physician evaluation of disease activity, ESSPRI and patients' satisfaction with their current health status were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses and anchoring methods were used to estimate disease activity levels of ESSDAI and the PASS of ESSPRI. At follow-up visit, patients and physicians assessed, respectively, whether symptoms and disease activity have improved or not. An anchoring method based on this evaluation was used to estimate MCII of ESSDAI and ESSPRI. RESULTS: Low-activity (ESSDAI<5), moderate-activity (5≤ESSDAI≤13) and high-activity (ESSDAI≥14) levels were defined. MCII of ESSDAI was defined as an improvement of at least three points. The PASS estimate was defined as an ESSPRI<5 points and MCII as a decrease of at least one point or 15%. CONCLUSIONS: This study determined disease activity levels, PASS and MCII of ESSDAI and ESSPRI. These results will help designing future clinical trials in SS. For evaluating systemic complications, the proposal is to include patients with moderate activity (ESSDAI≥5) and define response to treatment as an improvement of ESSDAI at least three points. For addressing patient-reported outcomes, inclusion of patients with unsatisfactory symptom state (ESSPRI≥5) and defining response as an improvement of ESSPRI at least one point or 15% seems reasonable.
Assuntos
Nível de Saúde , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Idoso , Autoavaliação Diagnóstica , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Síndrome de Sjogren/psicologia , Avaliação de Sintomas/psicologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To validate the two recently developed disease activity indexes for assessment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS): the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI) and the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI). METHODS: A prospective international 6-month duration validation study was conducted in 15 countries. At each visit, physicians completed ESSDAI, SS disease activity index (SSDAI), Sjögren's Systemic Clinical Activity Index (SCAI) and physician global assessment (PhGA); and patients completed ESSPRI, Sicca Symptoms Inventory (SSI), Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort (PROFAD) and patient global assessment (PGA). Psychometric properties (construct validity, responsiveness and reliability) were evaluated and compared between scores. RESULTS: Of the 395 patients included, 145 (37%) and 251 (64%) had currently active or current or past systemic manifestations, respectively. EULAR scores had higher correlation with the gold standard than other scores (ESSDAI with PhGA: r=0.59; ESSRPI with PGA: r=0.70). Correlations between patient and systemic scores were very low (ranging from 0.07 to 0.29). All systemic scores had similar large responsiveness in improved patients. Responsiveness of patient scores was low but was significantly higher for ESSPRI compared with SSI and PROFAD. Reliability was very good for all scores. CONCLUSIONS: ESSDAI and ESSPRI had good construct validity. All scores were reliable. Systemic scores had a large sensitivity to change in patients whose disease activity improves. Patient scores had a small sensitivity to change, however, significantly better for ESSPRI. Systemic and patient scores poorly correlated, suggesting that they are 2 complementary components that should be both evaluated, but separately.
Assuntos
Fadiga/fisiopatologia , Dor/fisiopatologia , Autorrelato , Síndrome de Sjogren/fisiopatologia , Xeroftalmia/fisiopatologia , Xerostomia/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Fadiga/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/etiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/complicações , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Xeroftalmia/diagnóstico , Xeroftalmia/etiologia , Xerostomia/diagnóstico , Xerostomia/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To reach a European consensus on the definition and characterization of the main organ-specific extraglandular manifestations in primary SS. METHODS: The EULAR-SS Task Force Group steering committee agreed to approach SS-related systemic involvement according to the EULAR SS Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) classification and proposed the preparation of four separate manuscripts: articular, cutaneous, pulmonary and renal ESSDAI involvement; muscular, peripheral nervous system, CNS and haematological ESSDAI involvement; organs not included in the ESSDAI classification; and lymphoproliferative disease. Currently available evidence was obtained by a systematic literature review focused on SS-related systemic features. RESULTS: The following information was summarized for articular, cutaneous, pulmonary and renal involvement: a clear, consensual definition of the clinical feature, a brief epidemiological description including an estimate of the prevalence reported in the main clinical series and a brief list of the key clinical and diagnostic features that could help physicians clearly identify these features. Unfortunately we found that the body of evidence relied predominantly on information retrieved from individual cases, and the scientific information provided was heterogeneous. The analysis of types of involvement was biased due to the unbalanced reporting of severe cases over non-severe cases, although the main sources of bias were the heterogeneous definitions of organ involvement (or even the lack of definition in some studies) and the heterogeneous diagnostic approach used in studies to investigate involvment of each organ. CONCLUSION: The proposals included in this article are a first step to developing an optimal diagnostic approach to systemic involvement in primary SS and may pave the way for further development of evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines.
Assuntos
Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Adulto , Comitês Consultivos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Artropatias/diagnóstico , Artropatias/epidemiologia , Nefropatias/diagnóstico , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Prognóstico , Síndrome de Sjogren/epidemiologia , Dermatopatias/diagnóstico , Dermatopatias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
We report here a case of a 62-year-old Caucasian woman, suffering from diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (SSc), who developed a tumoural calcinosis (TC) localised in the left side of the neck around the cervical spine that caused severe pain and motion impairment, without involvement of regional neurological structures. A review of the literature on this issue (based on PubMed database) allowed us to identify 35 previously described cases of TC in para-vertebral area in the course of SSc. The main characteristics of these patients have been summarised.
Assuntos
Calcinose/etiologia , Vértebras Cervicais , Esclerodermia Difusa/complicações , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/etiologia , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Biópsia , Calcinose/diagnóstico , Calcinose/fisiopatologia , Calcinose/cirurgia , Vértebras Cervicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Cervicais/patologia , Vértebras Cervicais/fisiopatologia , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cervicalgia/etiologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Esclerodermia Difusa/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/fisiopatologia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Escleroderma Sistêmico , Úlcera Cutânea , Acetamidas , Dedos , Humanos , Pirazinas , ÚlceraRESUMO
Lymphocytic infiltration of different exocrine and non-exocrine epithelia is the pathological hallmark of primary Sjögren's syndrome, whereas involvement of salivary and lachrymal glands with the clinical counterpart of dry eye and dry mouth are the predominant features of the disease, together with fatigue and musculoskeletal pain. In addition, systemic manifestations, like arthritis, skin vasculitis, peripheral neuropathy, glomerulonephritis, may also be present in a consistent number of patients. As result, clinical features in SS can be divided into two facets: the benign subjective but disabling manifestations such as dryness, pain and fatigue, and the systemic manifestations. In the past decades, great efforts have been made to develop valid tools for the assessment of these both facets. Disease specific questionnaires such as Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort (PROFAD) and Sicca Symptom Inventory (SSI) have been proposed for evaluation of patients' symptoms, whereas different composite indexes have been suggested for the assessment of systemic disease activity. After that, an international project supported by EULAR, emerged to develop consensus disease activity indexes: the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patients Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), a systemic activity index to assess systemic manifestations. Both EULAR indexes have been developed in an international collaboration to be consensual. Both indices have now been validated in a large independent international cohort. They both have been shown to be feasible, valid and reliable instruments. Also, we have found that these two scores did not correlate, suggesting that these two indexes assess two different disease components that poorly overlap, but were complementary. The sensitivity to change of both scores has been assessed, they are both able to detect change, however, ESSDAI score, like other systemic score, is more sensitive to change than ESSPRI and other patient scores. Current work is ongoing to define disease activity levels and clinically important changes for defining significant clinical improvement with the systemic score ESSDAI, and ESSPRI. We hope that this increased knowledge on the way to assess patients with primary SS, along with the emergence of new targeted therapy, will put a great input in the improvement of conduction of clinical trials in pSS.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sjogren/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autorrelato , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
A new approach for the classification of patients with Sjögren's syndrome (SS) has been recently proposed. Although these new criteria substantially differ from the American European Consensus Group criteria, which have represented the gold standard for the last decade, when compared with each other the two sets show a high statistical degree of agreement. However, the fact that two different criteria to classify patient with SS could be available may introduce some additional difficulties in the scientific communication, making cohorts of patients selected by using different methods less than completely equivalent, and the results of epidemiological studies and therapeutic trials not entirely comparable. Consequently, to reach a consensus agreement on universally accepted classification criteria for SS seems to be a very desirable objective.
Assuntos
Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/normas , Reumatologia/normas , Síndrome de Sjogren/classificação , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores , Consenso , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Síndrome de Sjogren/terapiaRESUMO
Lymphocytic infiltration of different exocrine and non-exocrine epithelia is the pathological hallmark of primary Sjögren's syndrome, whereas involvement of salivary and lachrymal glands with the clinical counterpart of dry eye and dry mouth are the predominant features of the disease, together with fatigue and musculoskeletal pain. In addition, systemic manifestations, like arthritis, skin vasculitis, peripheral neuropathy, glomerulonephritis, may also be present in a consistent number of patients. As result, clinical features in SS can be divided into two facets: the benign subjective but disabling manifestations such as dryness, pain and fatigue, and the systemic manifestations. In the past decades, a core set of domains, which included sicca symptoms, objective measurements of tear and saliva production, fatigue, quality of life, disease activity and damage was indicated as essential for outcome assessment in this disorder. Afterwards, great efforts have been made to develop valid tools for the assessment of different domains. Specific questionnaires such as the Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort (PROFAD) and Sicca Symptoms Inventory (SSI) have been proposed as dedicated tools for the evaluation of patients symptoms, whereas different composite indexes have been suggested for the assessment of disease activity and damage. Some of these preliminary studies served as bases of an international project supported by EULAR, aimed at developing two consensus disease activity indexes: the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patients Reported Index (ESSPRI), and the EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), a systemic activity index to assess systemic manifestations. A detailed and critical review of all these indexes is provided in this article. Both EULAR indexes showed, in recent studies, to be feasible, valid, and reliable instruments. After their final validation, which is currently in process, they could be used as consensus outcome criteria in therapeutic trials and in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Sjogren/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Aparelho Lacrimal/metabolismo , Qualidade de Vida , Glândulas Salivares/metabolismo , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/metabolismo , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The minor salivary gland biopsy (MSGB) is widely considered an important component of the diagnostic algorithm of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) and is mentioned in all the classification criteria sets for the disease. The aim of this study, coordinated by the Italian Society of Rheumatology, was to verify the inter-observer agreement on the evaluation of MSGB among different experienced Italian rheumatologic centres, in order to better standardise the diagnostic methodology. METHODS: Seven centres participated in the study, providing a total of 50 MSGB samples. Each center blindly classified all the samples according to the Chisholm and Mason (CM) grading. The results were collected and analysed. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement was satisfactory when the samples were stratified as consistent and non-consistent with the final diagnosis of pSS (median κ =0.75; mean κ =0.70). Nonetheless, significant discrepancies in the histopathologic evaluation of MSGB emerged when the agreement was assessed on the single scores. Considering the modal CM grading for each sample as the correct grading, upon re-examination, a potential bias in the final clinical diagnosis was detected in 7 out of 50 samples. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown significant discrepancies in the evaluation of MSGB among different rheumatologic centres in the same country. Greater standardisation of the procedure is clearly necessary, both to improve the diagnostic performance and scientific communication.
Assuntos
Biópsia , Reumatologia/métodos , Glândulas Salivares Menores/patologia , Síndrome de Sjogren/patologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Reumatologia/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normas , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is a vasoactive and profibrotic peptide that plays a pivotal role in diseases such as systemic sclerosis (SSc) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), by inducing fibrosis and vascular remodeling. Such effects may be sustained by the induction of aldosterone production and reactive oxygen species (ROS). We have used fibroblasts obtained from skin of healthy donors and SSc patients and commercial fibroblasts from lung to evaluate whether ET-1 is able to stimulate ROS production directly or indirectly through aldosterone induction. We found that ET-1 receptors are present in all types of fibroblasts analyzed, whereas the expression of mineralocorticoid receptor (MCR) is lower in dermal fibroblasts from healthy donors (HDFs) compared to fibroblasts derived from lung (HPFs) or from skin of SSc patients (SScHDFs). ET-1 induces ROS production in HDFs and SScHDFs after 24 h of incubation involving its receptor B (ETB), whereas aldosterone exerts its effects after 40 min of incubation. Moreover, ROS production was inhibited by the pre-incubation of cells with MCR inhibitor. Our results indicate that ET-1 induces ROS indirectly through aldosterone production suggesting that aldosterone may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of SSc and PAH.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop a score for assessment of patients' symptoms in primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS): the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI). METHODS: Dryness, pain, somatic and mental fatigue were identified as the main symptoms of patients with primary SS, in studies developing the Profile of Fatigue and Discomfort (PROFAD) and Sicca Symptoms Inventory (SSI). It was suspected that a single 0-10 numerical scale for each domain was sufficient to assess these symptoms. These four scales were gathered to form the ESSPRI. 230 patients, from 12 countries completed the ESSPRI, SSI and PROFAD questionnaires and a 0-10 patient global assessment (PGA). Correlations between each symptom and PGA were obtained. Multiple regression modelling, using PGA as 'gold standard' was used to select domains and estimate their weights. RESULTS: PGA had good correlation with dryness, limb pain, fatigue and mental fatigue (r=0.49-0.59, all p<0.0001), but correlated less well with individual dryness features. In multivariate analysis, dryness, limb pain and fatigue, but not mental fatigue, were significantly associated with PGA; weights derived from the regression were identical for these three domains. Thus, ESSPRI was redefined as the mean of the three scales: dryness, limb pain and fatigue. Lastly, ESSPRI significantly correlated with PGA (r=0.70), PROFAD (r=0.73) and SSI (r=0.66). CONCLUSION: ESSPRI is a very simple index designed to measure patients' symptoms in primary SS. It has good construct validity and is well correlated with SSI and PROFAD. ESSPRI should now be validated for use as an outcome measure in clinical trials.
Assuntos
Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Síndrome de Sjogren/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Síndromes do Olho Seco/diagnóstico , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fadiga Mental/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Síndrome de Sjogren/complicações , Síndrome de Sjogren/tratamento farmacológico , Xerostomia/diagnósticoRESUMO
In view of the new possibilities for the treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) given by the availability of new biotechnological agents targeting the various molecular and cellular actors of the pathological process of the disease, classification criteria aimed at selecting patients to be enrolled in therapeutic trials, and validated outcome measures to be used as response criteria to these new therapies, have been developed and validated in the last decades. Unfortunately, the therapeutic trials so far completed with these new treatments have yielded unsatisfactory or only partially positive results. The main issues that have been evoked to justify the poor results of the new therapeutic attempts are: (i) the extreme variability of the disease phenotypes of the patients enrolled in the trials, which are dependent on different underlying patterns of biological mechanisms, (ii) the fact that the disease has a long indolent course, and that most of the enrolled patients might already have irreversible clinical features. The advances in the research of new disease biomarkers that can better distinguish the different clinical phenotypes of patients and diagnose the disease in an earlier phase are also discussed.