Randomized open-label controlled study of cancer vaccine OSE2101 versus chemotherapy in HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with resistance to immunotherapy: ATALANTE-1.

BACKGROUND: Patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) ultimately progress either rapidly (primary resistance) or after durable benefit (secondary resistance). The cancer vaccine OSE2101 may invigorate antitumor-specific immune responses after ICB failure. The objective of ATALANTE-1 was to evaluate its efficacy and safety in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: ATALANTE-1 was a two-step open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OSE2101 compared to standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy (CT). Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-positive advanced NSCLC without actionable alterations, failing sequential or concurrent CT and ICB were randomized (2 : 1) to OSE2101 or SoC (docetaxel or pemetrexed). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Interim OS futility analysis was planned as per Fleming design. In April 2020 at the time of interim analysis, a decision was taken to prematurely stop the accrual due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Final analysis was carried out in all patients and in the subgroup of patients with ICB secondary resistance defined as failure after ICB monotherapy second line ≥12 weeks. RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen patients were randomized (139 OSE2101, 80 SoC); 118 had secondary resistance to sequential ICB. Overall, median OS non-significantly favored OSE2101 over SoC {hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.86 [0.62-1.19], P = 0.36}. In the secondary resistance subgroup, OSE2101 significantly improved median OS versus SoC [11.1 versus 7.5 months; HR (95% CI) 0.59 (0.38-0.91), P = 0.017], and significantly improved post-progression survival (HR 0.46, P = 0.004), time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status deterioration (HR 0.43, P = 0.006) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) global health status compared to SoC (P = 0.045). Six-month disease control rates and progression-free survival were similar between groups. Grade ≥3 adverse effects occurred in 11.4% of patients with OSE2101 and 35.1% in SoC (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In HLA-A2-positive patients with advanced NSCLC and secondary resistance to immunotherapy, OSE2101 increased survival with better safety compared to CT. Further evaluation in this population is warranted.

Immunotherapy, cancer and PET. / Inmunoterapia, cáncer y PET.

The treatment of cancer by immunotherapy has been a revolution, as it is the first strategy that manages to control the disease for prolonged periods of time. Its efficacy is associated with different imaging response patterns and the appearance of new toxicities. We would highlight two patterns of tumour response: pseudoprogression, or growth of tumour lesions after the start of immunotherapy treatment, followed by a significant reduction in lesions, and hyperprogression, acceleration of tumour progression and metastasis early after the start of treatment. The emergence of such patterns has generated new metabolic response criteria, such as PECRIT, PERCIMT, imPERCIST and IPERCIST. Of particular interest are the new immunoPET-specific biomarkers, as they allow the identification of patients presenting the tumour target and are useful for predicting response to immunotherapy.

Preliminary results of the combination of bevacizumab and weekly Paclitaxel in advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Pretreated advanced melanoma is a poor prognosis scenario with few, if any, active therapeutic options. The antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor, bevacizumab, has demonstrated increased activity in combination with chemotherapy in many tumors. We intended to evaluate the activity of the combination of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab in previously treated metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma received paclitaxel 70 mg/m(2) weekly and bevacizumab 10 mg/kg biweekly for 5 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. RESULTS: Twelve patients were treated. Two patients (16.6%) achieved a partial response and 7 patients (58.3%) stable disease. Responses were seen in soft tissue, lung and brain metastases. Median disease-free and overall survival times were 3.7 and 7.8 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. Main toxicities were grade 3 asymptomatic lymphopenia in 6 patients, grade 3 leucopenia in 2 patients, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 1 patient. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results suggest that the combination of bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel is active and safe in patients with metastatic melanoma, warranting further investigation.

Response of resistant melanoma to a combination of weekly paclitaxel and bevacizumab.

We report here a taxol-bevacizumab-responsive metastatic melanoma case. Although the patient had been heavily pretreated for two years, she did not show any stabilisation or objective response of her disease. After treatment with taxol and bevacizumab combination an impressive response was obtained.

[Small-cell lung cancer]. / Carcinoma microcítico de pulmón.

Small cell lung cancer is one of the most aggressive solid tumors because of its rapid growth and early tendency to spread to distant organs. Nonetheless, it is also one of the most sensitive tumors to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which can give patients with limited disease a chance to become long-term survivors. These characteristics have made this tumor a clinical model to explore various treatment strategies, including concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, alternant chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with hematologic support, or use of whole-brain prophylactic radiotherapy. In addition, in recent years, small cell lung cancer has been used as a platform to develop some new targeted therapy agents or immunotherapeutic approaches.

[Mammographic findings in microcalcifications associated with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy]. / Hallazgos mamográficos en las microcalcificaciones asociadas a cáncer de mama tras quimioterapia neoadyuvante.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mammographic findings in microcalcifications associated with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From January 2000 to May 2005, a total of 99 breast cancer patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ten patients had microcalcifications on mammograms prior to treatment. We evaluated the evolution of the tumor and of the microcalcifications, correlating the imaging findings with the clinical and histological manifestations. RESULTS: Four different patterns of evolution were observed for the microcalcifications: the number of particles increased in two cases, remained stable in three, decreased in four, and in one patient the microcalcifications disappeared. The size of the tumor decreased in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: After neoadjuvant chemotherapy microcalcifications can evolve unpredictably and independently of tumor response.

Ecology of Indigenous Soil Rhizobia: Response of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to Readily Available Substrates.

Populations of indigenous Bradyrhizobium japonicum serocluster 123 and serogroups 110 and 138 were studied after various sugars were added to their soil habitat. Loam soil with approximately 10 cells of each group per g of soil were amended every 3 days with 0.1% glucose, sucrose, arabinose, xylose, or galactose. Enumerations of the populations were made every 12 days by immunofluorescence assay. Each B. japonicum population in the sugar-treated soils increased by about 1 log during the first 12 days, to a maximum of about 10 cells by day 36 or 48, irrespective of the sugar added. Maximum growth rates were similar for each group and occurred during the 12-day incubation period. The most rapid growth was in response to arabinose, with a mean generation time of about 3.0 days. Other mean doubling times were 4.0 days with glucose and galactose treatments, 4.5 days with xylose treatment, and 5.4 days with sucrose amendment. These data provide the first direct evidence that indigenous soil rhizobia can compete successfully with other soil bacteria for readily available substrates in soil in the absence of host legume roots or other rhizospheres. The growth rates in soil of the specific B. japonicum populations studied were nearly the same with a given sugar treatment but varied considerably with different sugars. The mean generation times of 3 to 5 days are among the first reported growth rates for heterotrophic bacteria in natural soil.