Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: a rare etiology of upper intestinal obstruction in adults.

The superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome is an atypical cause of high intestinal obstruction in adults. Formerly considered controversial, this syndrome has now been recognized as a real clinical entity which results from extrinsic compression of the third portion of the duodenum by reduction of the angle formed between the SMA and the aorta, usually favoured by rapid and dramatic weight loss. We report a case observed in a 25-year-old female. The abdominal scan provided the diagnosis. Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy provided cure after failure of initial conservative treatment.

[Susac syndrome, retinocochleocerebral microangiopathy: contribution of MRI]. / Le syndrome de Susac, microangiopathie rétinocochléocérébrale : apport de l'IRM.

This is a new case of Susac syndrome in a 27-year-old woman with polymorphic neurological disorders, her brain MRI showed multifocal hyperintense signals on T2-weighted images with possible effects on the corpus callosum. However, visualization of an occlusion in the retinal arterial branch of the right eye and hypoacusia on the right side allowed confirmation of the diagnosis. In this case report, we describe the imaging aspects of Susac syndrome and demonstrate that brain MRI allows the syndrome to be diagnosed at an early stage.

Detection of locally radio-recurrent prostate cancer at multiparametric MRI: Can dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging be omitted?

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess the added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging in detecting locally radio-recurrent prostate cancer using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) at 3Tesla (T). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 45 patients with rising prostate-specific antigen level after prostate radiotherapy who underwent mpMRI [T2-weighted (T2w), diffusion-weighted (Dw) and DCE imaging] at 3T before prostate biopsy. Four readers assigned a 5-level Likert score of cancer likelihood in 8 prostate sectors (6 sextants, 2 seminal vesicles) on T2w+Dw and T2w+Dw+DCE images. Biopsy results were used as the standard of reference. RESULTS: T2w+Dw and T2w+Dw+DCE imaging had similar areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves on per-sector (0.87-0.89 vs. 0.87-0.89; P=0.19-0.78) and per-lobe (0.82-0.94 vs. 0.80-0.91; P=0.21-0.84) analysis. Using a Likert score≥2/5 for diagnosis threshold, T2w+Dw+DCE imaging showed non-significantly higher sensitivities on per-sector (0.56-0.72 vs. 0.52-0.73, P=0.34-0.69) and per-lobe (0.80-0.90 vs. 0.73-0.88; P=0.63-0.99) analysis. It also showed non-significantly lower specificities on per-sector (0.74-0.89 vs. 0.82-0.89; P=0.09-0.99) and per-lobe (0.48-0.81 vs. 0.61-0.84; P=0.10-0.99) analysis. Weighted kappa values were respectively 0.57-0.70 and 0.55-0.66 for T2w+Dw and T2w+Dw+DCE imaging at the sector level, and 0.66-0.83 and 0.58-0.85 at the lobe level. CONCLUSION: The use of DCE MR imaging tends to increase sensitivity and decrease specificity for all readers, but the differences are not significant.