Neonatal herpes: case series in two obstetric centres over a 10-year period (2013-2023), France.

Neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection (HSV infection in infants less than 6 weeks of age) is rare but mortality and morbidity rates are high after disseminated disease and encephalitis. In France, the epidemiology is poorly described, and two decades ago, incidence was estimated to be 3 per 100,000 live births a year. We describe determinants, epidemiologic and clinical characteristics of neonatal HSV infection in a managed-care population attending in two major obstetric and paediatric centres, Paris, France, over a 10-year period. This retrospective case series study was conducted from 2013 to 2023, in infants less than 42 days of age who had virologically confirmed HSV infection. We report an overall rate of neonatal herpes of 5.5 per 100,000 live births a year and an incidence of symptomatic cases of 1.2 per 100,000 live births a year. HSV-1 was the major serotype involved (84.2%) and post-natal acquisition through the orolabial route reached 63.2%. All neonates who had neonatal HSV PCR screening (owing to clinical signs in parents) and who received prompt acyclovir treatment remained asymptomatic. Symptomatic forms accounted for 21.1% cases of the total and mortality was high (62.5% of symptomatic forms).   Conclusion: This case series confirms that neonates at risk for HSV disease and poor outcome are those born to HSV-seronegative mothers, preterm infants, and those who received acyclovir after onset of symptoms (mainly because mothers did not present evidence of acute HSV infection). Our study confirms the major role of HSV-1 and the frequency of its early post-natal acquisition. What is known: • Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection is rare but motality and morbidity rates are high after disseminted disease and encephalitis. National recommendations exist worldwide but mangement of this disease is not always easy. What is new: • As in France epidemiology of neonatal herpes is poorly described, our report is potentially an important addition to the existing literature. Moreover, we describe local practice that may be useful to physicians.

Cell-free DNA screening for common autosomal trisomies using rolling-circle replication in twin pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of prenatal screening for common autosomal trisomies in twin pregnancies through the use of rolling-circle replication (RCR)-cfDNA as a first-tier test. METHOD: Prospective multicenter study. Women who underwent prenatal screening for trisomy (T) 21, 18 and 13 between January 2019 and March 2022 in twin pregnancies were included. Patients were included in two centers. The primary endpoint was the rate of no-call results in women who received prenatal screening for common autosomal trisomies by RCR-cfDNA at the first attempt, compared to that in prospectively collected samples from 16,382 singleton pregnancies. The secondary endpoints were the performance indices of the RCR-cfDNA. RESULTS: 862 twin pregnancies underwent screening for T21, T18 and T13 by RCR-cfDNA testing at 10-33 weeks' gestation. The RCR-cfDNA tests provided a no-call result from the first sample obtained from the patients in 107 (0.7%) singleton and 17 (2.0%) twin pregnancies. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that significant independent predictors of test failure were twin pregnancy and in vitro fertilization conception. All cases of T21 (n = 20/862; 2.3%), T18 (n = 4/862; 0.5%) and T13 (n = 1/862; 0.1%) were correctly detected by RCR-cfDNA (respectively, 20, 4 and 1 cases). Sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 83.1%-100%), 100% (95% CI 39.8%-100%) and 100% (95% CI 2.5%-100%) for T21, T18 and T13, respectively, in twin pregnancies. CONCLUSION: The RCR-cfDNA test appears to have good accuracy with a low rate of no-call results in a cohort of twin pregnancies for the detection of the most frequent autosomal trisomies.

Performance of cell-free DNA testing for common fetal trisomies in triplet pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: In singleton pregnancies, the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) analysis as a screening test for common fetal trisomies has spread worldwide though we still lack sufficient data for its use in triplet pregnancies. The objective of this study is to assess the performance of cfDNA testing in detecting fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies as a first-tier test. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study including data from pregnant women with a triplet pregnancy who underwent cfDNA testing between May 1, 2017, and January 15, 2020. cfDNA was obtained by massive parallel sequencing (VeriSeq NIPT solution; Illumina®). The objectives of the study were to assess the diagnostic performance of cfDNA testing for trisomy 21 (T21) (primary outcome), trisomy 18 (T18) and 13 (secondary outcomes). RESULTS: During the study period, cfDNA testing was performed in 255 women with triplet pregnancy, of which 165 (64.7%) had a neonatal outcome available. Three tests were positive for T21, one of which was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype, and the other was confirmed at birth. The third case did not undergo an invasive procedure and was not confirmed at birth (false positive). In one case, cfDNA testing was positive for T18 and was confirmed by an antenatal karyotype. There were no cases of trisomy 13 in the cohort. The no-call rate was 2.4% at first sampling. Fifty-eight (22.7%) women had embryo reduction, which in 40 (69%) of whom was performed after the cfDNA test result. CONCLUSION: cfDNA testing could be offered as primary screening for main fetal aneuploidies in triplet pregnancies after provision of appropriate patient information.

Perinatal outcomes between immediate vs deferred selective termination in dichorionic twin pregnancies with fetal congenital anomalies: a French multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Because selective termination for discordant dichorionic twin anomalies carries a risk of pregnancy loss, deferring the procedure until the third trimester can be considered in settings where it is legal. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether perinatal outcomes were more favorable following deferred rather than immediate selective termination. STUDY DESIGN: A French multicenter retrospective study from 2012 to 2023 on dichorionic twin pregnancies with selective termination for fetal conditions, which were diagnosed before 24 weeks gestation. Pregnancies with additional risk factors for late miscarriage were excluded. We defined 2 groups according to the intention to perform selective termination within 2 weeks after the diagnosis of the severe fetal anomaly was established (immediate selective termination) or to wait until the third trimester (deferred selective termination). The primary outcome was perinatal survival at 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy losses before 24 weeks gestation and preterm delivery. RESULTS: Of 390 pregnancies, 258 were in the immediate selective termination group and 132 in the deferred selective termination group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Overall survival of the healthy co-twin was 93.8% (242/258) in the immediate selective termination group vs 100% (132/132) in the deferred selective termination group (P<.01). Preterm birth <37 weeks gestation was lower in the immediate than in the deferred selective termination group (66.7% vs 20.2%; P<.01); preterm birth <28 weeks gestation and <32 weeks gestation did not differ significantly (respectively 1.7% vs 0.8%; P=.66 and 8.26% vs 11.4%; P=.36). In the deferred selective termination group, an emergency procedure was performed in 11.3% (15/132) because of threatened preterm labor, of which 3.7% (5/132) for imminent delivery. CONCLUSION: Overall survival after selective termination was high regardless of the gestational age at which the procedure was performed. Postponing selective termination until the third trimester seems to improve survival, whereas immediate selective termination reduces the risk of preterm delivery. Furthermore, deferred selective termination requires an expert center capable of performing the selective termination procedure on an emergency basis if required.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of French prospective multicenter cohort study COVIPREG during the first two COVID-19 waves.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection on pregnant women was the subject of many questions since the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We aim to assess maternal and neonatal outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection contracted during 2nd and 3rd trimesters of pregnancy during the first two COVID-19 waves across a prospective French multicenter cohort study. Patients were included between April 2020 and January 2021 in 10 maternity hospitals in Paris area with two groups (i) pregnant women with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR between [14WG; 37WG[(symptomatic infection), (ii) pregnant women with a negative serology (or equivocal) at delivery and without a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR at any time during pregnancy (G2 group) MAIN FINDINGS: 2410 pregnant women were included, of whom 310 had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal RT-PCR and 217 between [14WG; 37WG[. Most infections occurred between 28 and 37 weeks of gestation (56 %). Most patients could be managed as outpatients, while 23 % had to be hospitalized. Among women with a positive RT-PCR, multiparous women were over-represented (OR = 2.45[1.52;3.87]); were more likely to deliver before 37 weeks of gestation (OR = 2.19[1.44;3.24]) and overall cesarean deliveries were significantly increased (OR = 1.53[1.09;2.13]). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal burden associated with SARS-CoV-2 infections during the first two pandemic waves before availability of vaccines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04355234 (registration date: 21/04/2020).