The relationship between bullying and symptom presentation in first-episode psychosis.

Multiple recent studies have indicated that adverse psycho-traumatic experiences are particularly significant, if not the most significant, among the environmental factors that participate in the aetiology of schizophrenic spectrum disorders. The prevalence of bullying in the adolescent population has increased dramatically compared to earlier reports. This may be related to the recent development of communication technology and the use of social media, which have expanded the means by which bullying can be practiced. The present study aims to investigate the association between bullying victimisation and psychotic symptoms in First-Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients, hypothesising that patients who have a bullying history may have increased psychotic symptoms and a more unfavourable early trajectory after treatment as usual compared to patients who do not have a bullying history. Research data were collected from a sample of men and women of the Greek general population aged between 16 and 45 (N=225) who experienced a FEP in the context of the Athens First-Episode Psychosis (FEP) Study. The assessment of bullying was performed using the Retrospective Bullying Questionnaire (RBQ). Assessment of positive and negative psychotic symptoms and general psychopathology was performed using the corresponding subscales of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment as usual. Clinical remission was assessed based on the baseline and follow-up values of the PANSS and on Andreasen's symptomatic criteria. Methodologically, Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare the history of bullying between men and women, while linear and logistic regression models were used to check the correlations between history of bullying and symptom severity at baseline and 4-week follow-up, as well as the correlation between history of bullying and remission. The prevalence of bullying history in our sample of patients (N:225) with a FEP was 51.4% (114/225). Bullying was recorded in our study participants with equal frequency in women and men. According to the analysis results, the patients who had experienced bullying did not present at baseline with significantly increased psychotic symptoms compared to the patients who did not have a history of bullying. In addition, bullying was not associated with reduced remission according to Andreasen's criteria. However, the patients who had experienced bullying were found to have significantly increased negative symptoms (B=1.66; SE=0.70; p=0.018) and increased PANSS total score (B=4.81; SE=2.34; p=0.041) at 4-week follow-up. Our results highlight the persistence of negative and overall symptoms as an impact of bullying on the development of the FEP and align with studies that support the consideration of a history of bullying during both the diagnostic and therapeutic processes.

[Crisis intervention for serious mental disorders. The example of the First Department of Psychiatry of Athens University].

We describe the crisis management and resolution service for serious mental disorders established by the First Department of Psychiatry of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. The service is intended to meet patients' needs for adequate management of acute mental crisis without hospitalization, while implementing modern standards in mental care and considering existing restrictions in mental health resources and public expenditure. Last decade we witness an increase in demand for psychiatric beds in Psychiatric clinics of General Hospitals resulting in a drastic increase of auxiliary beds that becomes a serious problem in mental health provision. The shutdown of big psychiatric hospitals in the process of psychiatric reform, accompanied by a delay in the establishment of all the anticipated beds in general hospitals together with overloaded and insufficient network of mental health services in the community are the major determinants. Additionally, fiscal economic crisis of the last decade intensified even more the problem by diminishing funding for the recruitment of new personnel and drastically reducing allocated funding for new and old services. In 2016 we set up a crisis intervention service for serious mental disorders within the operational framework of the emergency psychiatric services of the Department of Psychiatry in Eginition Hospital in Athens. The crisis resolution team is composed by two psychiatrists, a psychiatric nurse, social workers, a psychologist, mental health volunteers, and mental health trainees/students. The patient enters the service through the emergency service when an indication for hospitalization is given by the emergency psychiatrist, followed by the clinical estimation of a member of our team. The therapeutic team convenes twice a week for the new entrants and for follow-up sessions with the participation of the patient and the family members whenever feasible. The rest of the therapeutic interventions take place during the week. The work 'with' the person and not 'to' the person encapsulates the philosophy of the service, which is characterized by a holistic treatment approach aiming to empower the individual strengths and sense of control of the patient for crisis resolution on the basis of a safe therapeutic milieu. Therapeutic interventions include family and supportive members, as well as community interventions. In summation, interventions consist of a) comprehensive evaluation (psychiatric/ physical) and therapeutic plan, b) psychopharmacological treatment, c) psychotherapeutic support for the patient and the family for management of the crisis, d) training for the management of future crises and e) referral to appropriate community services for follow up management and treatment. Treatment lasts approximately 6-8 weeks. Initial data of the evaluation study indicate clinical effectiveness and high levels of satisfaction for patients and family. Conclusively, crisis management and resolution services are feasible even in a time of heavy restrictions in recourses, and anticipated benefits are multiple for the economy, mental health provision, the public health system, patients and relatives alike.