Translating Pressure Into Practice: Operational Characteristics of Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring Program in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring (AHM) using an implantable pulmonary artery pressure sensor (CardioMEMS) is effective in improving outcomes for patients with heart failure. The operations of AHM programs are crucial to clinical efficacy of AHM yet have not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: An anonymous, voluntary, web-based survey was developed and emailed to clinicians at AHM centers in the United States. Survey questions were related to program volume, staffing, monitoring practices, and patient selection criteria. Fifty-four respondents (40%) completed the survey. Respondents were 44% (n = 24) advanced HF cardiologists and 30% (n = 16) advanced nurse practitioners. Most respondents practice at a center that implants left ventricular assist devices (70%) or performs heart transplantation (54%). Advanced practice providers provide day-to-day monitoring and management in most programs (78%), and use of protocol-driven care is limited (28%). Perceived patient nonadherence and inadequate insurance coverage are cited as the primary barriers to AHM. CONCLUSIONS: Despite broad US Food and Drug Administration approval for patients with symptoms and at increased risk for worsening heart failure, the adoption of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring is concentrated at advanced heart failure centers, and modest numbers of patients are implanted at most centers. Understanding and addressing the barriers to referral of eligible patients and to broader adoption in community heart failure programs is needed to maximize the clinical benefits of AHM.

Postoperative outcomes and management strategies for coronary artery disease in patients in need of a lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring lung transplantation (LTx) may also have coronary artery disease (CAD). The peri-operative management and long-term outcomes of these patients are not well established. METHODS: Patients referred for LTx from 2008 to 2014 were included in this study. CAD was defined by angiography as no CAD (stenosis <20%), moderate CAD (20%-69%), and significant CAD (stenosis ≥70%). Revascularization was per recommendations of local heart team. Postoperative cardiovascular outcomes and long-term survival are reported. RESULTS: A total of 1493 patients were screened for LTx during this period and 656 received a transplant. Of the patients that underwent LTx, 51% had no CAD, 33% had moderate non-obstructive CAD, and 16% had obstructive CAD. Forty-three patients underwent revascularization. There was a no increased risk of peri-operative cardiovascular events or for adjusted mortality for patients with obstructive CAD (HR=1.24, 95% CI: 0.83-1.86, P=.290) including those requiring revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of coronary disease in the population of patients with advanced lung disease requiring lung transplantation. Careful evaluation and treatment can allow for patients with all severities of CAD including those requiring revascularization to successfully undergo LTx.

Postpartum care in a cardio-obstetric clinic after preterm preeclampsia: patient and healthcare provider perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant disruption and health implications of preterm preeclampsia with severe features for birthing people, little is known about how the system of postpartum care might be strengthened for affected families. Multidisciplinary cardio-obstetric clinics are emerging; however, there is limited research on patient and healthcare provider perspectives. OBJECTIVE: To describe patient and healthcare provider perspectives of services in a cardio-obstetric clinic following preterm preeclampsia with severe features. STUDY DESIGN: Individuals who experienced preterm preeclampsia with severe features and presented to a cardio-obstetric clinic were approached for study participation. Providers were approached if they provided postpartum care to patients with preterm preeclampsia with severe features and considered a referral to the cardio-obstetric clinic. Participants completed a remotely conducted, semistructured interview between March 2022 and April 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded, professionally transcribed, and checked for accuracy. Responses were inductively coded for content analysis around the study questions of clinical referrals, patient education, visit expectations, and care coordination in relation to ambulatory clinical services. RESULTS: Twenty participants (n=10 patients and n=10 providers) completed interviews. Healthcare system navigation was difficult, particularly in the context of postpartum needs. When patients are informed about their diagnosis, the information could both increase anxiety and be useful for long-term healthcare planning. Language concordant care did not always occur, and both patients and providers described gaps in quality services. Within the theme of responsibility, patients described needing to be vigilant, and providers recognized the gaps in referral and care coordination systems. Comprehensible patient education provided with birthing parents' companions and enhanced systems for care coordination were areas for further improvement in providing postpartum cardio-obstetric care following preterm preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study identified patients' struggles with a confusing postpartum healthcare system and captured providers' concerns about maintaining consistent care and improving access to long-term healthcare services to improve outcomes for patients at risk of cardiovascular disease.

Multicenter registry and test bed for extended outpatient hemodynamic monitoring: the hemodynamic frontiers in heart failure (HF2) initiative.

Background: Hemodynamic Frontiers in Heart Failure (HF2) is a multicenter academic research consortium comprised of 14 US institutions with mature remote monitoring programs for ambulatory patients with heart failure (HF). The consortium developed a retrospective and prospective registry of patients implanted with a wireless pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) sensor. Goals/aims: HF2 registry collects demographic, clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic (ECHO), and hemodynamic data from patients with PAP sensors. The aims of HF2 are to advance understanding of HF and to accelerate development of novel diagnostic and therapeutic innovations. Methods: HF2 includes adult patients implanted with a PAP sensor as per FDA indications (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III HF functional class with a prior hospitalization, or patients with NYHA Class II or brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) elevation without hospitalization) at a HF2 member site between 1/1/19 to present. HF2 registry is maintained at University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC). The registry was approved by the institutional review board (IRB) at all participating institutions with required data use agreements. Institutions report data into the electronic registry database using REDCap, housed at KUMC. Results: This initial data set includes 254 patients implanted from the start of 2019 until May 2023. At time of device implant, the cohort average age is 73 years old, 59.8% are male, 72% have NYHA Class III HF, 40% have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40%, 35% have LVEF > 50%, mean BNP is 560 pg/ml, mean N-Terminal pro-BNP (NTproBNP) is 5,490 pg/ml, mean creatinine is 1.65 mg/dl. Average baseline hemodynamics at device implant are right atrial pressure (RAP) of 11 mmHg, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) of 47 mmHg, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP) 21 mmHg, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of 20 mmHg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) of 19 mmHg, cardiac output (CO) of 5.3 L/min, and cardiac index (CI) of 2.5 L/min/m2. Conclusion: A real-world registry of patients implanted with a PAP sensor enables long-term evaluation of hemodynamic and clinic outcomes in highly-phenotyped ambulatory HF patients, and creates a unique opportunity to validate and test novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to HF.

Evolution of the coronary care unit: clinical characteristics and temporal trends in healthcare delivery and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe long-term temporal trends in patient characteristics, processes of care, and in-hospital outcomes among unselected admissions within the contemporary coronary care unit. DESIGN: Hospital administrative database that records both payment and operation data. SETTING: Coronary care unit of a large, academic, tertiary-care medical institution. PATIENTS: A total of 29,275 patients admitted from January 1, 1989 through December 31, 2006. INTERVENTIONS: Unadjusted time-trend plots were created for all variables of interest, and multivariable modeling of coronary care unit death was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Temporal trends in Coronary Care Unit and in-hospital mortality, length-of-stay, demographic characteristics, discharge diagnoses, Coronary Care Unit procedures, and Charlson comorbidity scores were evaluated. Admission severity increased significantly over time (p < .001), but hospital length-of-stay decreased (p < .001). The proportion of coronary care unit admissions with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction increased (p < .001), whereas ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction decreased (p < .001). The prevalence of non-cardiovascular diagnoses increased, with the rate greatest for comorbid critical illnesses, including sepsis, acute kidney injury, and respiratory failure (all p < .001). The use of non-cardiac procedures, such as mechanical ventilation and central venous catheterization, also increased over time (p < .001). Unadjusted coronary care unit and in-hospital mortality did not change during the study period, although death did decrease in the adjusted setting. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial changes have occurred over time in patient characteristics, diagnoses, and procedures within the coronary care unit of a large, academic medical center. In particular, there have been significant increases in noncardiovascular critical illness, the results of which may be influencing patient outcomes. These findings underscore an existing need to clarify the role of the coronary care unit in contemporary cardiovascular care and to develop strategies for optimal training, staffing, and clinical investigation.

How to use diuretics in heart failure.

Systemic and pulmonary congestion is a central aspect of both acute and chronic heart failure and directly leads to many of the clinical manifestations of these syndromes. Therefore, diuretic therapy to treat congestion plays a fundamental role in heart failure management. However, although diuretics are the most common drugs prescribed for heart failure, there is limited quality evidence to guide their use. Unlike other components of the heart failure armamentarium, such as beta-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, diuretics (with the exception of aldosterone antagonists) have not been shown to decrease heart failure progression or improve mortality. Additionally, some observational data suggest that diuretics may actually be harmful in heart failure, contributing to neurohormonal activation, renal dysfunction, and potentially mortality. Despite these concerns, diuretics remain ubiquitous in heart failure management because of the need to address symptoms of congestion and the lack of alternative strategies. Recently, the development of a variety of potential adjuncts or alternatives to diuretic therapy has suggested the need for an active reappraisal of diuretic therapy for heart failure. The main classes of diuretics are the loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics, and thiazides. Loop diuretics, the mainstay of acute and chronic therapy for heart failure, are "threshold drugs"; therefore, an adequate dose to achieve a pharmacodynamic effect (ie, to increase urine output) must be prescribed for effective therapy. The minimum dose to achieve diuresis and manage congestion should be used to minimize adverse effects. For patients refractory to initial dosing of intravenous diuretics, options include dose escalation, use of continuous infusion rather than intermittent boluses, or combination therapy with the addition of a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic (eg, metolazone). Management of chronic heart failure often includes patient-directed titration of diuretics based on changes in symptoms or body weight in an attempt to decrease hospitalizations, although the efficacy of this strategy has not been tested in well-designed trials. Aldosterone antagonists, which are used primarily as neurohormonal agents rather than for their diuretic effects, are indicated for patients with systolic failure and moderate to severe symptoms, as long as renal function and serum potassium are stable and monitored closely. All diuretic therapy requires careful monitoring of electrolytes and renal function. Whether newer modalities for managing congestion (vasopressin antagonists, adenosine A(1) antagonists, and ultrafiltration therapy) will be an improvement over diuretic therapy will be determined by the results of multiple ongoing clinical trials.