Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Epileptic Disord ; 23(3): 466-475, 2021 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34080983

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of cutaneous adverse reactions and cross-sensitivity induced by antiseizure medications and compare the pattern of use of antiseizure medications in patients with epilepsy according to skin rash history. METHODS: We analysed patients with a history of skin rash presenting for up to 12 weeks after initiating antiseizure medication. The history of skin rash was verified by medical charts, interviews, and identification of skin lesions by patients based on illustrative images. The minimum follow-up period was eight months. The control group comprised epilepsy patients with regular antiseizure medication use for at least 12 weeks without skin rash. We included 109 cases and 99 controls. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) period from the index rash was six years (2-11). Carbamazepine was the trigger medication in 48% of cases and induced skin rashes in all patients with cross-sensitivity and carbamazepine exposure. Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, or drug reactions with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms affected 36% of cases. Carbamazepine- or oxcarbazepine-induced maculopapular exanthema occurred earlier (median: one week) than that induced by other antiseizure medications (median: three weeks) (p=0.006). Cross-sensitivity was more common in patients with at least one episode of Stevens-Johnson syndrome (29%) and Stevens-Johnson/toxic epidermal necrolysis overlap (50%) than in patients with maculopapular exanthema (8%) (p=0.01). Although most cases were mild, the pattern of antiseizure medication use differed from that of controls, with a lower proportion of antiseizure medication typically associated with severe cutaneous adverse reactions (carbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, primidone, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine) (p<0.001). Most cases exposed to high-risk medication, however, did not develop cross-sensitivity. SIGNIFICANCE: Cutaneous adverse reaction history may influence antiseizure medication use. Cross-sensitivity is more common in severe cases and most patients are affected by mild, self-limited skin rashes. Further research should consider the relevance of mild skin rashes in lifelong epilepsy treatment.


Assuntos
Epilepsia , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson , Anticonvulsivantes/efeitos adversos , Carbamazepina/efeitos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Exantema/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Oxcarbazepina , Síndrome de Stevens-Johnson/etiologia
2.
Transpl Immunol ; 49: 33-38, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596992

RESUMO

Detection of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has improved the risk classification and post-transplant evaluation of kidney recipients. Moreover, assessment of DSA C1q-binding ability has been shown to improve the individual risk classification of transplant patients for allograft loss, especially when detected after transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional clinical impact of C1q-binding DSA detection in a population that was extensively monitored for DSA and MFI alterations. Forty-two kidney allograft recipients were followed-up at multiple time points for up to 5 years after transplantation for the presence of anti-HLA DSA-IgG total. The samples that were positive for these antibodies were retrospectively tested for the presence of complement-binding antibodies. Overall, 24 patients presented DSA, 29% (7) of which also produced complement-binding DSA. Compared to patients with non-C1q-binding DSA and non-sensitized patients, patients with C1q-binding DSA after transplantation had the lowest allograft survival rate at 5 years (p = 0.042) and showed a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (based on the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) during the post-transplant follow-up period (p = 0.01). Thus, post-transplant monitoring for complement-binding DSA is a useful tool for predicting individuals most at risk for allograft failure, and might also be beneficial for evaluation of immunosuppression regimens.


Assuntos
Ativação do Complemento , Complemento C1q/metabolismo , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Isoanticorpos/metabolismo , Transplante de Rim , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/diagnóstico , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Ligação Proteica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Doadores de Tecidos , Transplante Homólogo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA