Self-paced polling increases medical student engagement in recorded lectures and improves examination performance.

Engaging preclinical medical students in the curriculum is challenging. To address this challenge, the investigators developed and implemented self-paced polling with recorded lectures, in which students answered audience response questions at their own pace. In 2021, we retrospectively assigned second-year medical students (N = 165) as Active or Inactive based on their answered polling questions. We subdivided the Active group into two groups, a Live group who predominantly responded to polling in live classes and a Self-paced group who predominantly used polling with recorded lectures. Outcomes were academic performance on customized National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) examinations and engagement. Compared with the Inactive group, the Self-paced group performed better on the customized NBME examination after extensive self-paced polling. Students answered a significantly larger proportion of questions correctly in self-paced polling compared with live polling. Students who used self-paced polling reported a positive experience and indicated they had emotional, behavioral, or cognitive engagement with the curriculum. This study introduces self-paced polling with recorded lectures, which medical educators can potentially use to enhance student engagement and academic performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY More medical students utilize recorded lectures than live lectures. Self-paced polling questions allow students to participate while watching recorded lectures. Second-year medical students performed significantly better on examination after actively using the self-paced polling compared with inactive students. They also reported emotional, behavioral, and cognitive engagement with the course material while using the self-paced polling.

Interactive retrieval practice in renal physiology improves performance on customized National Board of Medical Examiners examination of medical students.

Retrieval practice improves long-term retention. Use of interactive retrieval practice in large group, in-person and online live classes, in combination with outside resources, is unreported for medical physiology classes. The primary study purpose was to compare student cohorts' performance with or without retrieval practice in renal physiology classes, relative to the national average on customized national examinations in renal physiology, nonphysiology, and all questions. The secondary purpose was to examine the students' educational experience. For the primary purpose, we used a nonequivalent group, posttest-only design. For the secondary purpose, we used cross-sectional and qualitative designs. We analyzed examination results of 684 students in four academic years. For renal physiology questions, students performed significantly better in years with retrieval practice compared with years without it (P < 0.001). There was no change in nonphysiology scores over the four years. Performance in all questions, too, significantly improved (P < 0.001). A large majority (86%) of students indicated retrieval practice helped them learn renal physiology. Student ratings of quality in online classes, which featured interactive retrieval practice, were higher than that of in-person classes (P < 0.001). Qualitative analysis revealed students found interactive retrieval practice, scaffolding, outside resources, and the instructor's teaching style helpful. Educators in medical physiology classes can use our findings to implement interactive retrieval practice.

Twelve tips for getting started using mixed methods in medical education research.

BACKGROUND: Mixed methods research, which is gaining popularity in medical education, provides a new and comprehensive approach for addressing teaching, learning, and evaluation issues in the field. AIM: The aim of this article is to provide medical education researchers with 12 tips, based on consideration of current literature in the health professions and in educational research, for conducting and disseminating mixed methods research. CONCLUSION: Engaging in mixed methods research requires consideration of several major components: the mixed methods paradigm, types of problems, mixed method designs, collaboration, and developing or extending theory. Mixed methods is an ideal tool for addressing a full range of problems in medical education to include development of theory and improving practice.

Microlearning activities improve student comprehension of difficult concepts and performance in a biochemistry course.

INTRODUCTION: Students must rapidly learn and retain fundamental basic science knowledge in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum. Active learning stimulates engagement, reinforces concept understanding, and promotes retention of knowledge. The purpose this study was to determine if introducing game-based active recall and critical thinking microlearning activities improved student comprehension of challenging concepts, exam performance, and successful completion of a biochemistry course. METHODS: Microlearning activities were generated using Articulate Storyline software. Questions and problems were embedded in gamification-type activities to reinforce challenging biochemistry concepts and improve critical thinking. Activities were published on Blackboard and student performance was recorded. Students were divided into performance groups using their first exam scores. Student's exam scores were related to results from corresponding microlearning. Statistical analysis of results was performed to compare exam results with outcomes of microlearning activities. RESULTS: Student performance on exams and final scores positively correlated with successful completion of microlearning activities. Students who successfully completed more microlearning activities performed significantly better on all exams in comparison with students who completed few microlearning activities. Students who initially struggled with the material but completed more microlearning improved their performance on exams and passed the course with a higher score. In contrast, students who struggled and completed fewer activities failed to improve their exam and course performance. CONCLUSIONS: Active recall and critical thinking microlearning activities enhanced knowledge retention and comprehension of challenging biochemical concepts. Microlearning scores positively correlated with student exam performance in a biochemistry course, especially amongst students struggling with the material.

Educational Videos Versus Question Banks: Maximizing Medical Student Performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Exam.

Objective The aim of this research was to determine if medical students' use of the active study strategy of working practice questions is associated with improved performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 exam when compared to students who used the passive study strategy of watching educational videos. Methods The study used a correlational design. Participants were students from two cohorts in a United States medical school (N=164 and N=163) who completed their first two years and took the USMLE Step 1 exam. Data collected retrospectively included the number of practice questions completed, educational videos watched, Step 1 exam scores, average scores on in-class exams, and scores on the Medical College Admission Test (MCAT). Results The number of videos watched was negatively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r= -0.294, α=0.01) and cohort 2023 (r= -0.175, α=0.05). The number of practice questions worked was positively and significantly correlated with the Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (r=0.176, α=0.05) and cohort 2023 (r=0.143 though not significant). The number of practice questions was a significant positive predictor of Step 1 score for cohort 2022 (ß=0.141, p=0.017) and cohort 2023 (ß=0.133, p=0.015). Videos were significant negative predictors for cohort 2023 (ß= -0.118, p=0.034). Conclusions Answering practice questions appears to be a more effective study method than passively watching videos. Though other studies have supported the use of active learning methods, this study is unique in finding a negative correlation between test scores and the number of educational videos watched. Medical students should be urged to make the most effective use of study time by incorporating working practice questions and limiting watching educational videos.

A Better Learning Community: Mixed-Methods Reveal Medical Student Preferences with Implications for Learning Community Design and Implementation.

BACKGROUND: Medical school learning communities benefit students. The College of Medicine (COM) at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) provides medical students with academic, professional, and personal support through a learning community (LC) made of 7 academic houses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of the academic house model at UAMS utilizing a mixed-methods survey. The aims were to: (1) assess student experience and satisfaction with academic houses, (2) describe the realms of advising and guidance, and (3) identify areas for improvement. METHOD: An online survey was assigned to 723 COM students (all students enrolled, first through fourth years) at UAMS in March 2019. The survey was comprised of 25 items (10 multiple-choice, 8 on the Likert scale, and 7 open-ended questions). Data was depicted using frequency and percentages and/or thematic review of free-form responses. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 31% (227 students). The majority of students responding (132, 58.1%) attended 2 or more face-to-face meetings with the faculty advisor within the preceding year. However, 27 (11.9%) students did not have any meetings. Approximately two-thirds of the respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with the guidance and direction provided by their advisors [very satisfied (n = 83; 36.6%); satisfied (n = 77; 33.9%)]. Themes that emerged from student generated areas for improvement include time constraints, advisor/advisee interest mismatch, and perceived inadequacy of advising content/connections. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the effectiveness of the LC model for advising and mentoring in the COM at UAMS. Uniquely, this study identifies not only learners' satisfaction with their LC but also highlights areas for improvement which are widely generalizable and important to consider for institutions with or planning to start an LC.

Study Habits of Medical Students: An Analysis of which Study Habits Most Contribute to Success in the Preclinical Years.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Academic performance during the first two years of medical school is an important predictor of success on the United States Medical Licensing Exam Step 1. Research is lacking into what study methods successful students use, with success being defined as achieving a grade point average of above 90% in all or in most of the courses in the preclinical years.This study sought to identify specific study habits that successful students use and to demonstrate an association between preclinical grades and Step 1 scores. In this study, an anonymous survey was sent to first, second, and third year medical students that included various questions about their study habits, as well as their course grades (A, B, C, or fail) and, if applicable, their Step 1 score. Results demonstrated statistically significant differences existed between Step 1 scores and grades in the second year of medical school, with A students earning higher scores. A students tended to attend class, limit use of online lectures, study for 6-8 hours a day, and review lectures the same day they were given significantly more than B and C students did. This study demonstrates that certain study habits are employed consistently by successful students. These study habits should be shared with medical students early in the preclinical years to help students reach maximum potential both in class and on Step 1, which in turn will allow students to match into their choice of residency.

Impact of simulation training on self-efficacy of outpatient health care providers to use electronic health records.

OBJECTIVES: To examine whether simulation training enhanced self-efficacy of physicians and nurses who work in the outpatient setting to use electronic medical records, and whether the training changed their perceptions about the importance of electronic medical records (EMRs) in helping patients and improving patients' safety. METHODS: Two-hundred and ninety-three physicians and 94 nurses participated in the study. Participants first attended two computer classroom training sessions on how to use EMRs. Subsequently, the participants attended simulation training and practiced application of EMRs while encountering standardized patients. They answered questionnaires on a seven-point Likert-type scale prior to and immediately after simulation training. The questionnaires assessed their perceptions about the importance of EMRs in helping patients and improving patients' safety and their confidence and preparedness level to use EMRs. RESULTS: The overall self-efficacy of physicians and nurses to use EMRs increased after simulation training as compared to before simulation training. The physicians' and nurses' ratings about importance of EMRs to help patients' and improve patients' safety after simulation training were relatively unchanged compared to the ratings before simulation training. Additionally, participants described simulation training as exceptional, because it was an interactive learning opportunity to use EMRs within a simulated clinical setting with a simulated patient. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training in the current study enhanced physicians' and nurses' level of self-confidence and preparedness to use EMRs. To train health care providers how to use EMRs, simulation training should be considered as an interactive and effective method of teaching prior to implementation of EMRs in medical institutions.

Dental hygiene students' perceptions of distance learning: do they change over time?

PURPOSE: The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences dental hygiene program established a distant site where the didactic curriculum was broadcast via interactive video from the main campus to the distant site, supplemented with on-line learning via Blackboard. This study compared the perceptions of students towards distance learning as they progressed through the 21 month curriculum. Specifically, the study sought to answer the following questions: Is there a difference in the initial perceptions of students on the main campus and at the distant site toward distance learning? Do students' perceptions change over time with exposure to synchronous distance learning over the course of the curriculum? METHODS: All 39 subjects were women between the ages of 20 and 35 years. Of the 39 subjects, 37 were Caucasian and 2 were African-American. A 15-question Likert scale survey was administered at 4 different periods during the 21 month program to compare changes in perceptions toward distance learning as students progressed through the program. An independent sample t-test and ANOVA were utilized for statistical analysis. RESULTS: At the beginning of the program, independent samples t-test revealed that students at the main campus (n=34) perceived statistically significantly higher effectiveness of distance learning than students at the distant site (n=5). Repeated measures of ANOVA revealed that perceptions of students at the main campus on effectiveness and advantages of distance learning statistically significantly decreased whereas perceptions of students at distant site statistically significantly increased over time. Distance learning in the dental hygiene program was discussed, and replication of the study with larger samples of students was recommended.

Pharmacy students' ability to think about thinking.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate students' metacognitive skills to distinguish what they know from what they do not know, to assess students' prediction of performance on a summative examination, and to compare student-identified incorrect questions with actual examination performance in order to improve exam quality. METHODS: Students completed a test-taking questionnaire identifying items perceived to be incorrect and rating their test-taking ability. RESULTS: Higher performing students evidenced better metacognitive skills by more accurately identifying incorrect items on the exam. Most students (86%) underpredicted their performance on the summative examination (actual = 73.6 ± 7.1 versus predicted = 63.7 ± 10.5, p < 0.05). Student responses helped refine items and resulted in examination changes. CONCLUSION: Metacognition is important to the development of life-long learning in pharmacy students. Students able to monitor what they know and what they do not know can improve their performance.