Procedural adverse events in pediatric patients with sickle cell disease undergoing chronic automated red cell exchange.

BACKGROUND: Chronic automated red cell exchange (RCE) is increasingly employed for sickle cell disease (SCD). There is a paucity of data on the incidence of RCE adverse events (AEs) and potential patient and procedural risk factors for AEs. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric SCD patients receiving chronic RCE over 3 years was performed to determine the frequency of AEs and identify procedural and patient AE risk factors. AE incidence, AE rate, incidence rate ratios (IRRs), and relative risks (RRs) were calculated based on various procedural and patient characteristics by univariable (UV) and multivariable (MV) analyses. RESULTS: In 38 patients receiving 760 procedures, there were 150 (19.7%) AEs, 36 (4.7%) were symptomatic AEs. AE rates were 20.2 [95% CI 17.2, 23.6] and 4.8 [95% CI 3.49, 6.70] per 100 person months for AEs and symptomatic AEs, respectively. AE incidences were: hypocalcemia (117; 15.4%), dizziness (22; 3.0%), hypotension (15; 2.0%), and nausea (14; 1.8%). Patients with baseline Hct ≥30% experienced more total AEs and symptomatic AEs. Patients with pre-procedure systolic BP <50th percentile, severe CNS vasculopathy, and non-SCA genotype (HbSC or Sß+ thalassemia) exhibited more total AEs. IHD depletion was not associated with an increased incidence of AEs or symptomatic AEs. CONCLUSION: SCD patients with Hct ≥30%, systolic BP <50th percentile, severe CNS vasculopathy, and possibly non-SCA genotype may be at higher risk for RCE-related AEs. The effect of IHD on AE risk is likely minimal. Individualized AE risk assessment should be performed in all SCD patients undergoing chronic automated RCE.

Comparison of Antibody Class-Specific SARS-CoV-2 Serologies for the Diagnosis of Acute COVID-19.

Accurate diagnosis of acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is critical for appropriate management of patients with this disease. We examined the possible complementary role of laboratory-developed class-specific clinical serology in assessing SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospitalized patients. Serological tests for immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, and IgM antibodies against the receptor binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 were evaluated using samples from real-time reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR)-confirmed inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. We analyzed the influence of timing and clinical severity on the diagnostic value of class-specific COVID-19 serology testing. Cross-sectional analysis revealed higher sensitivity and specificity at lower optical density cutoffs for IgA in hospitalized patients than for IgG and IgM serology (IgG area under the curve [AUC] of 0.91 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.89 to 0.93] versus IgA AUC of 0.97 [95% CI, 0.96 to 0.98] versus IgM AUC of 0.95 [95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97]). The enhanced performance of IgA serology was apparent in the first 2 weeks after symptom onset and the first week after PCR testing. In patients requiring intubation, all three tests exhibit enhanced sensitivity. Among PCR-negative patients under investigation for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 2 out of 61 showed clear evidence of seroconversion IgG, IgA, and IgM. Suspected false-positive results in the latter population were most frequently observed in IgG and IgM serology tests. Our findings suggest the potential utility of IgA serology in the acute setting and explore the benefits and limitations of class-specific serology as a complementary diagnostic tool to PCR for COVID-19 in the acute setting.

How do I implement diagnostic management teams in transfusion medicine?

Diagnostic management teams (DMTs) were conceptualized approximately twenty years ago in response to increasing subspecialization in medicine. DMTs are a collaboration between diagnostic experts and clinicians that aim to improve accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment of disease. Diagnostic experts provide their expertise in the increasingly complex realm of laboratory testing and interpretation of those test results to guide appropriate test utilization for individual patients. Not only can this approach improve patient care and safety, but DMTs also decrease healthcare costs by reducing unnecessary testing and potential diagnostic errors. Following the DMT construct and principles along with the 2015 National Academy of Medicine recommendations, our transfusion medicine (TM) service streamlined the workup and management of platelet refractory (PR) patients by developing and implementing a formal PR laboratory consult. The goals of this DMT and consult are to improve diagnostic management of PR patients and to decrease delays in providing these patients with appropriate and compatible platelet units. A comprehensive interpretation of test results is directly uploaded to the patient's electronic medical record (EMR), which is associated with a CPT code allowing for compensation for the PR evaluation. Herein we describe the development of and experience with the DMT since its implementation.

Transfusion-Transmitted Infections: an Update on Product Screening, Diagnostic Techniques, and the Path Ahead.

The mandated testing of blood components for infectious diseases, to prevent transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs), began in the 1950s. Since then, changes in predonation questionnaires and advances in testing techniques have afforded more sensitive and specific tests for pathogens, in addition to allowing earlier detection. Given that these approaches have very low but detectable failure rates, the recent development and implementation of proactive pathogen reduction approaches is the new forefront of TTI prevention strategies. With globalization and the ability of pathogens to evolve rapidly, continuous redefining of testing standards and laboratory techniques is paramount for maintaining a safe blood supply.

Implementing virtual crossmatch based diagnostic management teams in human leukocyte antigen laboratories and transplant programs.

Histocompatibility testing has continuously evolved since its inception. One such advancement is the implementation of the virtual crossmatch (VXM). Recent changes to allograft allocation schemes have resulted in increased organ sharing over greater distances, resulting in expanded utilization of the VXM to assess donor: recipient compatibility. In fact, the VXM has become a major arbitrator of pre-transplant compatibility assessment prior to both deceased and living donor organ allocation. This shift in pre-transplant practice is concurrent with the US healthcare systems' move towards more inclusive and coordinated team-based management approach to disease diagnosis. Diagnostic Management Teams (DMTs) exemplify this shift in patient care. Our institution seized the opportunity to build and implement a VXM DMT to improve and streamline pre-transplant assessment. This VXM DMT is compliant with US regulatory standards and provides a consultative report containing relevant pre-transplant information, test interpretation as well as recommendations for HLA additional (if any) testing. Herein we describe the development of and experience with the VXM DMT a year after its launch.