Hemodynamic comparison of bioprostheses for complete supra-annular position in patients with small aortic annulus.

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluates complete supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter. BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus using stented bioprostheses is often associated with unsatisfactory hemodynamic results and high incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. METHODS: Between February 2000 and January 2004, 156 patients with aortic valve disease and an aortic annulus of 18 to 23 mm in diameter received the stented bovine Soprano (Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy) (n = 18), Perimount (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (n = 52), Perimount Magna (Edwards Lifesciences) (n = 42), or the stented porcine Mosaic (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) (n = 44) bioprostheses. Intraoperatively, the surgeon measured the aortic annulus diameter by inserting a hegar dilator. Thus, postoperative hemodynamic results could be referred to the patient's aortic annulus diameter instead of referring the results to the labeled valve size. This allows for objective comparisons between different valve types. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in hemodynamic results between the different valve types in patients with an aortic annulus 18 to 20 mm. In patients with an annulus 21 to 23 mm, the Magna was significantly superior to the other investigated devices in mean pressure gradient, effective orifice area, and incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch. There was no significant difference between the complete supra-annular bioprostheses Mosaic and Soprano and the intra-supra-annular Perimount valve. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with an aortic annulus of 18 to 20 mm in diameter, hemodynamic performance is independent of the implanted stented valve type and the annular position. Root enlargement or stentless valves may be beneficial alternatives. Patients with annulus diameter 21 to 23 mm benefit from the Magna in complete supra-annular position leading to superior hemodynamic results.

Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.

OBJECTIVE: Aortic valve replacement in patients with a small aortic annulus is often associated with increased pressure gradients. For this reason, prostheses for completely supra-annular placement have been developed. To evaluate the potential benefit of this design, the present study compared the effectiveness of 1 intra-supra-annular bioprosthesis and 3 completely supra-annular bioprostheses in patients with an aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less. METHODS: Between August 2000 and December 2004, each of 192 patients requiring aortic valve replacement with an intraoperatively measured aortic annulus diameter of 23 mm or less received one of the following bioprostheses: the stented bovine Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis (n = 28) (Sorin Group, Saluggia, Italy), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis (n = 50) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, Calif), the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis (n = 70) (Edwards Lifesciences), or the stented porcine Medtronic Mosaic (n = 44) (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn) bioprosthesis. After 6 months, hemodynamic data at rest and during exercise were obtained by echocardiography in 142 patients. RESULTS: The pericardial valves showed lower mean systolic pressure gradients, larger effective orifice areas and indices, and superior effective orifice fractions than did the porcine valve (P < .05) (Carpentier-Edwards Perimount: 10.9 +/- 3.6 mm Hg, 1.59 +/- 0.41 cm2, 0.9 +/- 0.25 cm2/m2, 41.9% +/- 9.6%; Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna 10.1 +/- 3.8 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.38 cm2, 0.93 +/- 0.22 cm2/m2, 45.1% +/- 10.2%; Sorin Soprano 13.5 +/- 5.0 mm Hg, 1.64 +/- 0.32 cm2, 0.92 +/- 0.15 cm2/m2, 45.8% +/- 9.0%; vs Medtronic Mosaic 15.5 +/- 5.2 mm Hg, 1.31 +/- 0.42 cm2, 0.75 +/- 0.24 cm2/m2, 35.2% +/- 10.0%, respectively). The lowest mean systolic pressure gradients were found after the implantation of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna. Effective orifice areas, indices, and fractions of the pericardial valves did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with small aortic roots, transvalvular gradients and effective orifice area showed a tendency to superior results in pericardial valves compared with the porcine bioprosthesis. However, the completely supra-annular design does not necessarily lead to superior hemodynamic results compared with the intra-supra-annular position.

Occasional single beat regurgitation observed with the medtronic advantage bileaflet heart valve.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this clinical study was to obtain further evidence of the underlying mechanism causing the echocardiographically detected phenomenon of single beat regurgitation in a new bileaflet heart valve. As part of a prospective multicenter trial at our institution, 63 patients received the Advantage bileaflet mechanical heart valve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) in aortic position. During routine follow-up performed at discharge and annually after the operation, intermittent moderate transvalvular regurgitation was detected by echocardiography in 5 patients. METHODS: Fluoroscopy of leaflet motion (n = 4), invasive blood pressure measurements in the ascending aorta (n = 3) and digital phonocardiography (n = 5) was obtained in the patients showing an intermittent regurgitation during echocardiography. RESULTS: Valve thrombosis, sutures, or pannus ingrowth impairing valve closure was not detected. Fluoroscopy of leaflet motion showed intermittent incomplete closure of either one of the two leaflets in the same prosthesis. This could be correlated with a distinct diastolic blood pressure drop in the same cardiac cycle. Digital phonocardiography showed pathologic closure sounds in those cycles in which echocardiographically the intermittent regurgitation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Some patients with the Medtronic Advantage prosthesis in the aortic position show an intermittent inability of complete valve closure that leads to a single beat transvalvular regurgitation. As thrombotic or other material that might cause a disturbance of leaflet motion could not be detected, and the patients seem not to be exposed to any risk except for some chronic regurgitant volume, we decided not to replace the prostheses.