Psychosocial benefits of insulin pump therapy in children with diabetes type 1 and their families: The pumpkin multicenter randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is on the rise among pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Metabolic effects alone cannot explain this rising popularity. From the patient's perspective, the main benefits of CSII may be found in subjective psychosocial health outcomes (patient-reported outcomes [PRO]). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a multicenter open randomized controlled trial, children and adolescents aged 6 to16 years currently treated with multiple daily injections (MDI) were randomized 1:1, stratified by center, to either starting with CSII immediately after the baseline interview or to continuing MDI while waiting 6 months for transmission to CSII. The primary outcomes were patient-reported diabetes-specific health-related quality of life (DHRQOL) and diabetes burden of the main caregiver. Secondary outcomes were caregiver stress, fear of hypoglycemia, satisfaction with treatment, and HbA1c. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eleven patients were randomized between February 2011 and October 2014, and 186 caregivers and 170 patients were analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle for primary outcomes. Children 8 to 11 years in the CSII group reported improved DHRQOL at follow-up compared to MDI (median difference [MD] 9.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6-16.7, P = 0.004). There were no treatment differences in the adolescent age-group 12 to 16 years (MD 2.7; 95% CI -3.2-9.5; P = 0.353). The main caregivers of the CSII group reported a significant decline of overall diabetes burden at follow-up compared to the MDI group (MD 0; 95% CI -1-0; P = 0.029). Secondary PROs also were in favor of CSII. CONCLUSIONS: CSII has substantial psychosocial benefits. PROs demonstrate these benefits. Registered as NCT01338922 at clinicaltrials.gov.

Glycated hemoglobin A1c as a risk factor for severe hypoglycemia in pediatric type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of severe hypoglycemia related to glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels in a population-based cohort of pediatric type 1 diabetes patients during two time periods since 1995. METHODS: The association between HbA1c levels and severe hypoglycemia (defined as requiring assistance from another person) or hypoglycemic coma (loss of consciousness or seizures) was analyzed by multivariable regression analysis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the DPV Diabetes Prospective Follow-up in Germany and Austria in 1995-2003 (n = 15 221 patients) and 2004-2012 (n = 22 318 patients). RESULTS: Mean adjusted rates of severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma decreased from 19.18 [95% confidence interval (CI), 17.95-20.48] and 4.36 (3.93-4.83) per 100 patient-years in 1995-2003 to 15.01 (14.18-15.88) and 2.15 (1.94-2.39) in 2004-2012, respectively (p < 0.001). From the first to the second period, the relative risk (RR) for severe hypoglycemia and hypoglycemic coma per 1% lower HbA1c decreased from 1.22 (1.15-1.30) to 1.06 (1.01-1.12) and from 1.27 (1.15-1.40) to 1.04 (0.94-1.16), respectively. Risk of severe hypoglycemia and coma declined most in patients with HbA1c levels of 6-6.9% (RR 0.70 and 0.43, respectively) and with HbA1c of 7-7.9% (RR 0.63 and 0.38, respectively). Mean HbA1c levels fell from 8.4% in 1995-2003 to 8.2% in 2004-2012, while the use of insulin pumps, short- and long-acting insulin analogs, and glucose monitoring increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to 1995-2003, low HbA1c has become a minor risk factor for severe hypoglycemia and coma in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes in the 2004-2012 period.

Hemoglobin A1c Levels and risk of severe hypoglycemia in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes from Germany and Austria: a trend analysis in a cohort of 37,539 patients between 1995 and 2012.

BACKGROUND: Severe hypoglycemia is a major complication of insulin treatment in patients with type 1 diabetes, limiting full realization of glycemic control. It has been shown in the past that low levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), a marker of average plasma glucose, predict a high risk of severe hypoglycemia, but it is uncertain whether this association still exists. Based on advances in diabetes technology and pharmacotherapy, we hypothesized that the inverse association between severe hypoglycemia and HbA1c has decreased in recent years. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We analyzed data of 37,539 patients with type 1 diabetes (mean age ± standard deviation 14.4 ± 3.8 y, range 1-20 y) from the DPV (Diabetes Patienten Verlaufsdokumentation) Initiative diabetes cohort prospectively documented between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 2012. The DPV cohort covers an estimated proportion of >80% of all pediatric diabetes patients in Germany and Austria. Associations of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemic coma, and HbA1c levels were assessed by multivariable regression analysis. From 1995 to 2012, the relative risk (RR) for severe hypoglycemia and coma per 1% HbA1c decrease declined from 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.37) to 1.05 (1.00-1.09) and from 1.39 (1.23-1.56) to 1.01 (0.93-1.10), respectively, corresponding to a risk reduction of 1.2% (95% CI 0.6-1.7, p<0.001) and 1.9% (0.8-2.9, p<0.001) each year, respectively. Risk reduction of severe hypoglycemia and coma was strongest in patients with HbA1c levels of 6.0%-6.9% (RR 0.96 and 0.90 each year) and 7.0%-7.9% (RR 0.96 and 0.89 each year). From 1995 to 2012, glucose monitoring frequency and the use of insulin analogs and insulin pumps increased (p<0.001). Our study was not designed to investigate the effects of different treatment modalities on hypoglycemia risk. Limitations are that associations between diabetes education and physical activity and severe hypoglycemia were not addressed in this study. CONCLUSIONS: The previously strong association of low HbA1c with severe hypoglycemia and coma in young individuals with type 1 diabetes has substantially decreased in the last decade, allowing achievement of near-normal glycemic control in these patients. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Transition from insulin to sulfonylurea in a child with diabetes due to a mutation in KCNJ11 encoding Kir6.2--initial and long-term response to sulfonylurea therapy.

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KCNJ11 gene encoding the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-sensitive potassium channel (K(ATP)) subunit Kir6.2 are the most frequent cause of diabetes in infancy. Sulfonylurea (SU) treatment restores insulin secretion in patients with KCNJ11 mutations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report a 9-year-old boy who presented at the age of three months with diabetic ketoacidosis. Results Sequencing of the KCNJ11 gene revealed an R201H mutation. Therefore, he was transferred from insulin to oral SU therapy. He required a high-threshold dose before insulin could be discontinued. After transition, a subsequent dose reduction was necessary to avoid hypoglycemia. Improved sustained metabolic control without complications was achieved on a low SU maintenance dose twice daily over 36 months. CONCLUSION: SU therapy is safe for patients with diabetes due to KCNJ11 mutations. The mechanism of a threshold dose and the twice-daily requirement needs further attention.

Severe hypoglycaemia, metabolic control and diabetes management in children with type 1 diabetes in the decade after the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial -- a large-scale multicentre study.

UNLABELLED: Hypoglycaemia is frequently the limiting factor in achieving optimal glycaemic control. Therefore, insulin therapy, the incidence of hypoglycaemia, and glycaemic control were investigated in 6309 unselected children with type 1 diabetes in a large-scale multicentre study. Using standardised computer-based documentation, the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia, HbA1( c) levels, insulin regimen, diabetes duration, and the number of patients attending a treatment centre were investigated for the age groups 0-<5 years ( n =782), 5-<7 years ( n =1053), and 7-<9 years ( n =4474). The average HbA1( c) level was 7.6% (no significant difference between age groups). Young children had more severe hypoglycaemic events (31.2/100 patient years) as compared to older children (19.7; 21.7/100 patient years, P <0.05) independent of the treatment regimen. Our data suggest that diabetes centres treating less than 50 patients per year have a higher incidence of hypoglycaemia in 0-<5-year-old children (43.0/100 patient years) as compared to larger centres (24.1/100 patient years; P <0.0001). Significant predictors of hypoglycaemia were younger age ( P <0.0001), longer diabetes duration ( P <0.0001), higher insulin dose/kg per day ( P <0.0001), injection regimen ( P <0.0005), and centre experience ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite modern treatment, young children have an elevated risk for developing severe hypoglycaemia compared to older children, especially when treated at smaller diabetes centres. The therapeutic goal of carefully regulating metabolic control without developing hypoglycaemia has still not been achieved. Further advances in diabetic treatment may result from giving more attention to hypoglycaemia in young children.

Age, metabolic control and type of insulin regime influences health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

UNLABELLED: The effects of illness and treatment of diabetes mellitus extend beyond medical outcomes. We therefore evaluated health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children (aged 8-12 years) and adolescents (aged 13-16 years) with type 1 diabetes to compare their results with healthy peers and to identify HRQOL determinants. A total of 68 children and adolescents from a tertiary care clinic which specialises in the management of diabetes, completed the generic KINDL-R questionnaire. This instrument for children and adolescents has six dimensions and an additional module assessing condition-related HRQOL. Overall, the HRQOL was not different between patients with type 1 diabetes and healthy controls. In some areas, children and adolescents with diabetes reported a better HRQOL compared to healthy peers: adolescents reported better psychological well-being (P < 0.05) and children higher levels of well-being in the school domain (P < 0.05). In general, children reported a better HRQOL (P < 0.05) than adolescents with type 1 diabetes confirming age-related differences in HRQOL in the general population. Lower HbA1c (<8%) and intensified insulin therapy (>3 injections/day) were associated with a better HRQOL in different domains (P < 0.05). The subscale "chronic illness" showed a better HRQOL (P < 0.001) in children and adolescents with diabetes compared to age-matched controls with other chronic conditions. CONCLUSION: Children and adolescents from a paediatric department specialising in diabetes management report good health-related quality of life. Younger age, good metabolic control and intensified insulin therapy are associated with a better health-related quality of life. Dimensions of health-related quality of life appear to play different roles at different ages, emphasising the importance of the multidimensional health-related quality of life concept and the value of age-appropriate self-reports.