Venous Thromboembolism Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases is Not Related to Increased Thrombophilia: A Case-Control Study.

GOAL: The aim was to assess whether thrombophilia significantly contributes to the risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). BACKGROUND: Patients with IBD have a high risk of VTE. The underlying mechanism has been only partially defined. METHODS: A case-control study in adults with IBD and an episode of VTE (IBD-VTE) were matched and compared with non-IBD patients with a VTE (non-IBD-VTE). The study population was comprised of patients seen in 2 tertiary medical centers in Israel between 2000 and 2013. Characteristics of IBD and risk factors for VTE were retrieved from medical charts, and a comprehensive thrombophilia panel was completed in all patients. RESULTS: Forty-four IBD-VTE cases (27 Crohn's disease) were matched with 127 non-IBD-VTE controls. The majority of VTE had a clear etiology and were considered provoked events. Provoked and unprovoked VTE rates were not different between the 2 groups. Likewise, thrombophilia rates were similar among patients with IBD-VTE and controls (40.9% vs. 53.5%, respectively, P=0.14). However, among patients with unprovoked VTE, thrombophilia rates were significantly lower in the IBD-VTE group compared with controls (42.1% vs. 70.7%, respectively, P=0.03). Among patients with IBD-VTE, an unprovoked event, and negative thrombophilia, 77% had active inflammation at the time of VTE. CONCLUSION: Thrombophilia rates are similar among patients with IBD-VTE and controls but are less common among patients with unprovoked IBD-VTE. This finding suggests that either inflammation or other novel pathways drive VTE in patients with IBD.

G-EYE colonoscopy is superior to standard colonoscopy for increasing adenoma detection rate: an international randomized controlled trial (with videos).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely preventable with routine screening and surveillance colonoscopy; however, interval cancers arising from precancerous lesions missed by standard colonoscopy still occur. An increased adenoma detection rate (ADR) has been found to be inversely associated with interval cancers. The G-EYE device includes a reusable balloon integrated at the distal tip of a standard colonoscope, which flattens haustral folds, centralizes the colonoscope's optics, and reduces bowel slippage. The insufflated balloon also aims to enhance visualization of the colon during withdrawal, thereby increasing the ADR. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled, international, multicenter study (11 centers), patients (aged ≥50 years) referred to colonoscopy for screening, surveillance, or changes in bowel habits were randomized to undergo either balloon-assisted colonoscopy by using an insufflated balloon during withdrawal or standard high-definition colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the ADR. RESULTS: One thousand patients were enrolled between May 2014 and September 2016 to undergo colonoscopy by experienced endoscopists; 803 were finally analyzed (standard colonoscopy n = 396; balloon-assisted colonoscopy n = 407). Baseline parameters were similar in both groups. Balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided a 48.0% ADR compared with 37.5% in the standard colonoscopy group (28% increase; P = .0027). Additionally, balloon-assisted colonoscopy provided for a significant increase in detection of advanced (P = .0033) flat adenomas (P < .0001) and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (P = .0026). CONCLUSION: Balloon-assisted colonoscopy yielded a higher ADR and increased the detection of advanced, flat, and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps when compared with standard colonoscopy. Improved detection by the G-EYE device could impact the quality of CRC screening by reducing miss rates and consequently reducing interval cancer incidence. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT01917513.).

Comparative Study of Two Cohorts of Newly Diagnosed Crohn's Disease Demonstrates Change in Therapeutic Strategies.

BACKGROUND: There has been a paradigm shift in the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) involving the rapid introduction of biologics and/or immunomodulators after diagnosis. We wished to assess whether this was applied to patients with newly diagnosed CD in a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease referral centre in Israel. METHODS: Newly diagnosed CD patients were stratified into 2 groups: the early group was diagnosed between 2005 and 2007 and the late group was diagnosed between 2010 and 2012. Baseline demographics, medical and surgical treatments, disease course and complications during those 2 periods were analyzed. RESULTS: Each group included 60 patients. Significantly higher rates of immunomodulators and biologics were administered to patients in the late group compared to the early group (81.7 and 36.7% compared to 56.7 and 18.3%, p = 0.004 and p = 0.021, respectively). On the other hand, steroid therapy was less prevalent in the late (36.7%) group compared to that of the early group (56.7%), p = 0.059. Medical and surgical CD outcomes, including exacerbations/hospitalizations and surgeries, were comparable for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was a change in treatment strategy between 2005-2007 and 2010-2012, as reflected in higher proportions of biologics/immunomodulators for patients with newly diagnosed CD. This was associated with a steroid-sparing effect.