Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Allergol Int ; 66(1): 123-131, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27475625

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Environmental exposure chambers have been used to expose subjects to aeroallergens to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with symptomatic agents in Japan. We first examined the therapeutic effect of bilastine (BIL), a novel non-sedative second-generation H1-antihistamine, in subjects with Japanese cedar pollinosis using an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo- and active-controlled phase II study (trial registration number JapicCTI-132213). Subjects were exposed to cedar pollen (8000 grains/m3) for 2 h on Day -1 and 4 h each on Day 1 and 2. BIL 10 or 20 mg, placebo, or fexofenadine hydrochloride (FEX) 60 mg was administered orally 1 h after the start of pollen exposure on Day 1. Placebo or FEX was administered 12 h after the first dosing. The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 0 to 3 h after the Day 1 dosing. RESULTS: We enrolled 136 subjects and the sum of TNSS on Day 1 of the three active treatments was significantly lower than that of placebo and was maintained up to 26 h after the first dosing (Day 2). The sum of TNSS or sneezing score on Day 1 after BIL 20 mg was more significantly decreased than after FEX. Moreover, BIL showed a faster onset of action than FEX. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the efficacy, rapid onset, and long duration of action of BIL in subjects with Japanese cedar pollinosis exposed to cedar pollen using the OHIO Chamber.


Assuntos
Benzimidazóis/administração & dosagem , Cryptomeria , Piperidinas/administração & dosagem , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Benzimidazóis/efeitos adversos , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Piperidinas/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/imunologia
2.
Sleep Med ; 101: 543-549, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36577225

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a risk factor for recurrent adverse events in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the prognosis of continuous positive alveolar pressure (CPAP) treatment for SDB with CAD remains unknown. METHODS: A total of 281 consecutive patients with stable CAD requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were included and classified into three groups according to the concomitance of SDB and CPAP treatment (untreated SDB group, n = 61; CPAP-SDB group, n = 24; and non-SDB group, n = 138). The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) within a year after PCI was compared between the three groups. The characteristics of the culprit plaques, including macrophage accumulation, were further assessed using optical coherence tomography. RESULTS: The incidence of MACCEs was significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.037), with the highest incidence in the untreated-SDB group (22.9%) and 8.3% and 10.1% in the CPAP-SDB and non-SDB groups, respectively. The incidence of MACCEs at 1 year was significantly lower in patients with appropriate CPAP use than that in inadequately treated patients with SDB (0.0 vs. 22.5%, p = 0.048). Macrophage accumulation differed significantly among the three groups, with the highest accumulation in the untreated SDB group. CONCLUSIONS: CPAP treatment for SDB may be associated with a lower incidence of MACCEs following PCI and a lower prevalence of macrophages in the culprit plaques.


Assuntos
Doença da Artéria Coronariana , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono , Humanos , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/complicações , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/terapia , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/efeitos adversos , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/complicações , Síndromes da Apneia do Sono/terapia , Prognóstico
3.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 33(1): 102-9, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22370535

RESUMO

Pranlukast (PLK) is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that has been approved for treatment of asthma in patients of all ages and allergic rhinitis (AR) in adults but not for AR in children in Japan. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study used an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber) to investigate the efficacy and safety of PLK in children from 10 to 15 years old with seasonal AR (SAR) due to Japanese cedar (JC) pollen. Eighty-four subjects were enrolled and randomized to the treatment arm and 74 were included in the per protocol set. Subjects received either PLK dry syrup (DS) or placebo for 1 week. They were challenged with JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber for 3 hours. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) were recorded every 30 minutes during the exposure. PLK DS treatment suppressed the TNSS changes from baseline significantly when compared with placebo. The difference in the least square means in TNSS between the PLK DS-treated group and placebo group was -0.37 (95% CI, -0.54, -0.20) with a value of p < 0.0001, showing that PLK DS significantly suppressed the nasal symptoms. Regarding specific nasal symptoms, PLK DS significantly suppressed sneezing, nasal discharge, and nasal obstruction. The effect of PLK DS on nasal obstruction was most prominent, with significant improvement relative to placebo beginning 60 minutes after the start of exposure. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. In this study, PLK DS is effective and safe for treatment in children with SAR.


Assuntos
Câmaras de Exposição Atmosférica/estatística & dados numéricos , Cromonas/administração & dosagem , Cryptomeria/imunologia , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/administração & dosagem , Obstrução Nasal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Alérgenos/imunologia , Criança , Cromonas/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunização , Antagonistas de Leucotrienos/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Obstrução Nasal/etiologia , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/complicações
4.
Allergy Asthma Proc ; 33(6): 459-66, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23394502

RESUMO

Pranlukast (PLK) is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist approved for the treatment of bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis in Japan. We previously reported that PLK dry syrup (DS) improved the total nasal symptom score, as well as sneezing, nasal discharge, and nasal obstruction scores over placebo. We investigated the efficacy of PLK DS with a noninvasive method in 10- to 15-year-old children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis challenged with pollen allergen using an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). Levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal secretions, nasal obstruction score, and the relationship with nasal obstruction scores were analyzed. The estimated difference of means in ECP levels (PLK DS--placebo) was -22.9 micrograms (95% CI, -45.2 to -0.5), suggesting PLK DS reduced ECP significantly when compared with placebo (p = 0.0454). The difference in the least square means for nasal obstruction between the PLK DS and placebo was -0.25 (95% CI, -0.36 to -0.14) with a value of p < 0.0001. In addition, a statistically significant, although weak, positive correlation between the nasal obstruction score and nasal ECP levels was observed with placebo treatment (correlation coefficient = 0.2394; p = 0.0428). Moreover, the inhibition rate of nasal ECP with PLK DS relative to placebo was statistically significant, although weak, positively correlated with the inhibition rate of nasal obstruction (correlation coefficient = 0.3373; p = 0.0219). PLK DS significantly decreases nasal ECP levels and nasal obstruction score compared with placebo in children with JC pollinosis challenged with pollen allergen. Suppression of mucosal eosinophilic inflammation is one of the pathways by which PLK DS improves pollinosis-induced nasal obstruction.


Assuntos
Cromonas/administração & dosagem , Cryptomeria/efeitos adversos , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/etiologia , Adolescente , Antiasmáticos/administração & dosagem , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Cromonas/efeitos adversos , Cromonas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Cross-Over , Cryptomeria/efeitos dos fármacos , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Pólen/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Neurochem Res ; 36(7): 1261-9, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21287267

RESUMO

The development of the inner ear is an orchestrated process of morphogenesis with spatiotemporally controlled generations of individual cell types. Recent studies have revealed that the Sox gene family, a family of evolutionarily conserved HMG-type transcriptional factors, is differentially expressed in each cell type of the mammalian inner ear and plays critical roles in cell-fate determination during development. In this study, we examined the expression pattern of Sox21 in the developing and adult murine cochlea. Sox21 was expressed throughout the sensory epithelium in the early otocyst stage but became restricted to supporting cells during adulthood. Interestingly, the expression in adults was restricted to the inner phalangeal, inner border, and Deiters' cells: all of these cells are in direct contact with hair cells. Evaluations of the auditory brainstem-response revealed that Sox21(-/-) mice suffered mild hearing impairments, with an increase in hair cells that miss their appropriate planar cell polarity. Taken together with the previously reported critical roles of SoxB1 families in the morphogenesis of inner ear sensory and neuronal cells, our results suggest that Sox21, a counteracting partner of the SoxB1 family, controls fine-tuned cell fate decisions. Also, the characteristic expression pattern may be useful for labelling a particular subset of supporting cells.


Assuntos
Cóclea/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Fatores de Transcrição SOXB2/biossíntese , Fatores de Transcrição SOXB2/fisiologia , Animais , Células Ciliadas Auditivas Internas/fisiologia , Camundongos , Fatores de Transcrição SOXB2/deficiência
6.
J Drug Assess ; 5(1): 15-23, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27785375

RESUMO

Objective: To determine the efficacy of the antihistamine bepotastine on treating nasal symptoms in patients with Japanese cedar and cypress pollinosis, based on two previous studies that looked at bepotastine OD's inhibitory effect on symptom onset after exposure. Design and methods: Randomized double-blind placebo controlled, parallel study. Twenty-eight volunteers with Japanese cedar and cypress pollinosis were randomly assigned into two experimental groups: a bepotastine-treated or a placebo control group. Subjects received either 10 mg bepotastine tablets or placebo tablets 1 day before entering an artificial exposure pollen chamber (OHIO Chamber) and also for three or more consecutive days. They were exposed to Japanese cedar and cypress pollen for 3 h per day for 2 days. Nasal and ocular symptoms were self-rated by each patient at regular intervals in addition to being objectively measured. Possible cognitive impairment was assessed by using the digit cancellation test (D-CAT). Results: In Study 1, under controlled conditions, there were no significant differences (p > .05) between subjects exposed to Japanese cedar pollen and those exposed to cypress pollen in terms of total nasal symptom score (TNSS). In Study 2, in the placebo group, the amount of nasal discharge and the number of sneezes did not diminish before cypress pollen exposure on the second day (p < .05). This suggests that an antihistamine can suppress the symptoms of hang over. No deterioration of work performance was observed in the bepotastine group after pollen exposure for 2 days, as measured by D-CAT (p > .05). Conclusion: We conclude that bepotastine can suppress allergy-related symptoms without impairing work performance in subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis caused by Japanese cedar pollen or cypress pollen.

7.
J Drug Assess ; 2(1): 94-105, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536443

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the clinical efficacy of a combination therapy of levocetirizine (LCTZ) and fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS), compared with LCTZ monotherapy, for the suppression of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms induced in an artificial exposure chamber. METHODS: This study was a single-center, placebo-controlled, randomized, 3-way cross-over comparative study performed in 42 Japanese cedar pollinosis patients. These subjects received (1) LCTZ plus FFNS (combination group), (2) LCTZ plus FFNS placebo (monotherapy group), or (3) LCTZ placebo plus FFNS placebo (placebo group) once on the night prior to exposure, with a 1-week washout period between exposures. Nasal (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, and itchy nose) and ocular (eye itching and tearing) symptoms were recorded every 15 min, and the number of sneezes, nose blowing events, and the amount of nasal secretions were measured during exposure. The primary end-point was the cumulative incidence of SAR symptoms during exposure and the 'ime to occurrence of symptoms'. The secondary end-points were the total nasal symptom score, the ocular symptom score, the amount of nasal discharge, and the number of sneezes and nose blowing events. RESULTS: At all the measurement points, the lowest cumulative incidences for the nasal symptoms were observed in the combination group, followed by the monotherapy and placebo groups. All the subjects in the placebo group developed nasal symptoms within 2 h after pollen exposure, while three and eight subjects in the monotherapy and combination groups, respectively, did not develop any nasal symptoms during exposure. In addition, combination therapy delayed the onset of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that combination therapy with FFNS and LCTZ significantly suppressed the induced SAR symptoms and delayed the onset of symptoms compared with LCTZ monotherapy and placebo. Although the conditions of the allergen challenge study using an exposure chamber are different from those in real life, combination therapy with FF and LCTZ was confirmed to be an effective treatment for SAR.

8.
J Drug Assess ; 1(1): 40-7, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536427

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to investigate the prophylactic efficacy of montelukast (MLK) 10 mg in suppressing seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) symptoms induced by Japanese cedar (JC) pollen and to determine how many days before exposure to JC in the artificial exposure chamber (OHIO chamber) would be optimal to start administration. METHODS: This was a single-institution, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled four-group parallel inter-group comparison study. Adult volunteers with JC pollinosis were divided into four groups: an MLK 7-day administration group (n = 27), an MLK 3-day administration group (n = 27), an MLK 1-day administration group (n = 26), and a placebo group (n = 26). The mean change in total nasal symptom scores (nasal obstruction, nasal discharge and sneezing) (TNSS) and each of the nasal symptom scores during exposure of JC pollen in the OHIO chamber were investigated. RESULTS: The mean change in TNSS was significantly lower in the MLK treatment group, regardless of the number of days of administration, than in the placebo group (p = 0.0192). The results for the individual nasal symptoms showed that nasal obstruction was significantly suppressed in the 1-day administration group as compared with placebo (p = 0.0076), but no differences were found in sneezing score between any of the groups. For nasal discharge, we found a trend towards the effect clearing up after 3 days of administration. No serious adverse events were observed during the study. CONCLUSION: Although this study was acute and this artificial exposure model was conducted out of the pollen season, nasal symptoms that developed in the pollen exposure chamber, especially nasal obstruction, were significantly suppressed by starting oral administration of MLK 10 mg at least 1 day before exposure. These results suggest that prophylactic administration of MLK is effective and safe in the treatment of SAR.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA