Evidence that epidermal alloantigen Epa-1 is an immunogen for murine heart as well as skin allograft rejection.

Epa-1 is a non-H-2 mouse alloantigen defined by MHC-restricted, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. In vitro it is a strong determinant for the lysis of epidermal cells, fibroblasts, and macrophages but not lymphocytes, and in vivo it functions as a target for skin allograft rejection and cutaneous graft-versus-host reactions. Genetically, Epa-1 appears to be the nonpolymorphic manifestation of a loss mutation. The establishment of C3H.Epa-1 (Epa), an Epa-1+ congenic strain on the Epa-1- C3H/HeJ (C3H) inbred strain background, facilitated the investigation of the role of Epa-1 in skin and heart allograft rejection. C3H females and males rejected first-set Epa skin grafts with median survival times (MSTs) of 20 and 30 days, respectively. However, there was a strong factor of immunization, because all second-set skin allografts were rejected by hosts of both sexes within 10 days. In contrast, all Epa hosts of both sexes permanently accepted C3H skin allografts, consistent with Epa-1 arising from a loss mutation. C3H hosts of both sexes rejected primarily vascularized first-set Epa heart allografts in similar tempo to first-set Epa skin allografts, with MSTs of about 30 days. However, in contrast to the accelerated rejection of skin allografts, sensitized C3H hosts rejected Epa heart allografts in chronic fashion, with some transplants showing very prolonged survival. Thus, Epa-1 is a relatively strong determinant of skin allograft rejection but a weaker determinant of heart allograft rejection.

Elimination of acute GVHD and prolongation of rat pancreas allograft survival with DST cyclosporine, and spleen transplantation.

Allogeneic spleen transplantation has been shown to have a tolerizing effect on pancreas allograft survival in rats. In this study we examined the effect of blood transfusions and cyclosporine administration on both rat pancreas allograft survival and acute graft-versus-host disease in BN recipients of Lewis pancreas-spleen allografts. We found that in this strain combination significant pancreas allograft prolongation occurred when the spleen was included en bloc with the pancreas graft. However, 50% of these recipients developed GVHD and died. A single donor-specific transfusion delivered to BN recipients of Lewis pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts did not extend graft survival, but precluded the development of GVHD. A short, 6-day, and long, 26-day, course of CsA to recipients of pancreas and pancreas-spleen allografts extended graft and animal survival times, although not indefinitely. All pancreas-spleen recipients of both CsA protocols died following acute GVHD. Combined DST and CsA (short and long-course) administration in pancreas-only allograft recipients was deleterious to graft survival, compared with CsA administration alone. However, in pancreas-spleen recipients, combined DST and CsA had an additive effect. Moreover, in DST and long-course CsA-treated pancreas-spleen recipients, indefinite graft survival occurred with no signs of acute GVHD. The beneficial effect of the spleen allograft on pancreas graft survival was not dependent upon GVHD, since splenic-induced prolongation of pancreas graft survival was observed in the F1-donor to parent-recipient combination.

Alloreactive delayed-type hypersensitivity in graft recipients: complexity of responses and divergence from acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Immunocompetent allograft recipients typically exhibit evidence of sensitization to graft antigens through alloantibody production and allograft rejection, as well as delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactivity to donor antigens. Most previous studies have relied on whole donor splenocytes, which primarily elicit allorestricted allogeneic responses, to test specific DTH responses and overlook the independent element of self-restricted responses in host-allograft interactions. METHODS: We tested expression of self-MHC-restricted versus allo-MHC-restricted allogeneic DTH responses in both nonimmunosuppressed and tolerized C57BL/6 mice. Mice were sensitized for allogeneic DTH either by rejection of skin or cardiac allografts, or by subcutaneous injection of intact allogeneic splenocytes. Patterns of alloreactive DTH were compared in allosensitized, tolerant, and naive hosts. RESULTS: All three methods of allosensitization resulted in equivalent self-restricted and allorestricted allogeneic DTH responses in nonimmunosuppressed mice. Gallium nitrate blocked acute rejection of cardiac allografts, and also blocked allosensitization of both self-restricted and allorestricted DTH responses, but did not influence the expression of DTH responses in presensitized mice. Gallium nitrate treatment could not block acute rejection of skin allografts, but interfered with sensitization for self-restricted, but not allorestricted, DTH responses in these recipients. This divergence of self- versus allo-MHC-restricted allosensitization for DTH was observed in two additional situations: the rates of allosensitization for self-restricted versus allorestricted DTH, and the acquisition of allorestricted, but not self-restricted, alloreactive DTH responses in cardiac allograft tolerant mice subsequently challenged with a skin allograft. CONCLUSIONS: These studies demonstrate that acute rejection correlates generally with allogeneic DTH, whereas tolerance is associated with a lack of alloreactive DTH. However, self-restricted and allorestricted allosensitization can operate independently in allograft recipients. Thus, the relationships between alloreactive DTH and graft-induced allosensitization, acute rejection, or tolerance are more complicated than previously appreciated.

Transforming growth factor-beta and interleukin-10 subvert alloreactive delayed type hypersensitivity in cardiac allograft acceptor mice.

We have previously reported that temporary treatment of cardiac allograft recipients with gallium nitrate (GN) results in indefinite graft survival, and the inability to mount donor-reactive delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. We report that antibodies to either transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) or interleukin-10 (IL10) can uncover DTH responses to donor alloantigens in cardiac allograft acceptor mice. The DTH responses uncovered with TGFbeta-reactive antibodies can be blocked by exogenous IL10, and those uncovered with IL10-reactive antibodies can be blocked by exogenous TGFbeta. These data demonstrate that allograft acceptor mice are fully allosensitized, and poised to make donor-reactive cell-mediated immune responses. However, such responses are subverted by a donor alloantigen-dependent mechanism that involves TGFbeta and IL10, which in turn interfere with local cell-mediated immune responses.

Cardiac allograft tolerance: failure to develop in interleukin-4-deficient mice correlates with unusual allosensitization patterns.

BACKGROUND: The development of long-term allograft survival and understanding the mechanism(s) by which it is induced are major goals of experimental transplantation. Studies by several different investigators have provided conflicting evidence for the role of interleukin (IL)-4 in the process of allograft rejection or long-term allograft survival. These studies examine the role of IL-4 in experimental cardiac allograft rejection and in inducing long-term allograft survival. A possible mechanism for long-term allograft maintenance via alternative allosensitization is discussed. METHODS: Adult IL-4-intact or IL-4-deficient (knockout, KO) C57BL/6 (B6) mice were transplanted with heterotopic DBA/2 cardiac allografts and immunosuppressed either with gallium nitrate (GN), or the anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody, GK1.5. Cellular allosensitization was assessed by testing the allograft recipients for donor-reactive delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses. The presence of antigen-driven suppressive mechanisms was assessed using a linked unresponsiveness (bystander suppression) DTH assay. RESULTS: In general, the results were the same with either GN or GK1.5. We observed that (1) IL-4 is not required for acute allograft rejection or allogeneic DTH responses in nonsuppressed mice, (2) IL-4 is required for long-term allograft survival in immunosuppressed mice, (3) immunosuppression creates a requirement for IL-4 in major histocompatibility complex self-restricted, but not allorestricted, DTH responses, and (4) the development of alloantigen-dependent linked DTH unresponsiveness (bystander suppression) in allograft recipients requires IL-4. CONCLUSION: In summary, these studies demonstrate a common requirement for IL-4 during the development of long-term allograft survival and the concurrent development of alloantigen-dependent DTH down-regulation in cardiac allograft recipients after immunosuppression.

Prolonged murine cardiac allograft acceptance: characteristics of persistent active alloimmunity after treatment with gallium nitrate versus anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

We have treated DBA/2-->C57BL/6 murine cardiac allograft recipients with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or with gallium nitrate to promote long-term (>60 days) allograft survival. Within this period, all grafts developed histologic evidence of ongoing vascular and parenchymal tissue remodeling, including interstitial fibrosis and neointimal hyperplasia, which are characteristic of chronic allograft rejection. To evaluate residual alloimmunity associated with the pharmacologic avoidance of acute graft rejection and the development of chronic tissue remodeling, we subjected these graft recipients to a battery of histologic and immunologic tests. Similar test results were obtained for graft recipients treated with either of the two immunosuppressive agents. All long-surviving allografts displayed histologic evidence of ongoing microvascular endothelial activation and interstitial leukocytic infiltration. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analyses demonstrated intragraft expression of mRNAs for interleukin (IL)-1, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, tumor necrosis factor, interferon-gamma, and transforming growth factor-beta. All recipients had limiting dilution analysis-detectable, graft-reactive cytolytic T lymphocytes and helper T lymphocytes in their spleens and grafts, and all produced high titers of graft-reactive alloantibodies. In general, these observations indicate that (1) a similar immune status is achieved in long-surviving allografts and their recipients when either anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody or gallium nitrate was used for antirejection therapy, (2) this immune status is characterized by continuous, long-term inflammatory and immune processes that are qualitatively similar to those observed during acute allograft rejection, and (3) no specific immune responses developed selectively in long-term graft recipients to account for the avoidance of acute graft rejection or the development of chronic tissue remodeling in the graft.

Prevention of murine cardiac allograft rejection with gallium nitrate. Comparison with anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody.

Gallium nitrate (GN) was evaluated for its ability to interfere with a cute rejection of DBA/2-->C57BL/6 heterotopic cardiac allografts, in comparison with the depleting anti-CD4 mAb, GK1.5. The administration of GN for 30 days (s.c. 30 mg/kg elemental gallium on days 0 and 3, 10 mg/kg every third day) resulted in >60-day graft survival in 78% (25 of 32) of the graft recipients, whereas 2 perioperative injections of anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) resulted in >60-day graft survival in 58% (24 of 41) of the graft recipients. Serum gallium levels peaked at about 2000 ng/ml after 2-3 weeks of treatment and decreased to about 300 ng/ml by day 60, a level that was maintained for at least 30 more days. During the early posttransplant period, 25% of GN-treated grafts, but not anti-CD4 mAb-treated grafts, exhibited an unusual, transient reduction in graft impulse strength, suggesting a transient rejection response. Macroscopically, the long-surviving (>60 days) grafts from either treatment group exhibited none of the features of rejecting allografts. Histologically, they exhibited minor edema and rare epicardial inflammation but no tissue necrosis. However, there were vascular changes in allografts from GN-treated mice, including altered endothelial morphology, associated with moderate intimal hyperplasia and mild perivascular leukocytic infiltration. Allografts from anti-CD4 mAb-treated mice exhibited prominent neointimal hyperplasia associated with endothelial morphologic changes and prominent vascular and perivascular leukocytic infiltration. In general, both GN and anti-CD4 mAb promoted long-term allograft survival, but these allografts displayed the histopathologic signs of ongoing inflammation and chronic allograft rejection.

Suppressor cell induction in donor-specific transfused mouse heart recipients.

Administration of donor-specific blood presenting major or minor foreign histocompatibility antigens to the mouse recipient improved heart allograft survival when a single transfusion of 0.25 ml was given to the recipient prior to transplantation. Multiple transfusions did not prolong allograft survival, which suggested a presensitization effect. In addition, when the single transfusion volume was reduced to 0.025 ml, no significant effect in prolongation of graft survival was observed. Thus the amount of blood transfused seemed to be a critical factor in achieving the transfusion effect. Splenic suppressor cells after transfusion and transplantation (as determined by adoptive transfer) were present during the stable maintenance phase of graft survival in transfused recipients with long-term surviving heart allografts. Also, an intact spleen was required to achieve improved allograft survival in mice transfused with donor-specific blood. Thus a mechanism for the favorable effect of blood transfusion may be the generation of splenic suppressor cells in response to transfusion followed by transplantation.

Cell-mediated hyperacute rejection. VI. Prolonged survival of heterotopic mouse heart transplants.

The survival of heterotopically transplanted mouse hearts was enhanced in recipients who were sensitized intraperitoneally to give rise to cell-mediated hyperacute rejection, a T-cell-mediated response characterized by very rapid sensitization and rejection of allogeneic skin grafts.