Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 139
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Microbiol ; 16: 104, 2016 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27283157

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rumen microbes metabolize 22:6n-3. However, pathways of 22:6n-3 biohydrogenation and ruminal microbes involved in this process are not known. In this study, we examine the ability of the well-known rumen biohydrogenating bacteria, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens D1 and Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus P18, to hydrogenate 22:6n-3. RESULTS: Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens D1 failed to hydrogenate 22:6n-3 (0.5 to 32 µg/mL) in growth medium containing autoclaved ruminal fluid that either had or had not been centrifuged. Growth of B. fibrisolvens was delayed at the higher 22:6n-3 concentrations; however, total volatile fatty acid production was not affected. Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus P18 hydrogenated 22:6n-3 in growth medium containing autoclaved ruminal fluid that either had or had not been centrifuged. Biohydrogenation only started when volatile fatty acid production or growth of B. proteoclasticus P18 had been initiated, which might suggest that growth or metabolic activity is a prerequisite for the metabolism of 22:6n-3. The amount of 22:6n-3 hydrogenated was quantitatively recovered in several intermediate products eluting on the gas chromatogram between 22:6n-3 and 22:0. Formation of neither 22:0 nor 22:6 conjugated fatty acids was observed during 22:6n-3 metabolism. Extensive metabolism was observed at lower initial concentrations of 22:6n-3 (5, 10 and 20 µg/mL) whereas increasing concentrations of 22:6n-3 (40 and 80 µg/mL) inhibited its metabolism. Stearic acid formation (18:0) from 18:2n-6 by B. proteoclasticus P18 was retarded, but not completely inhibited, in the presence of 22:6n-3 and this effect was dependent on 22:6n-3 concentration. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, our study identified ruminal bacteria with the ability to hydrogenate 22:6n-3. The gradual appearance of intermediates indicates that biohydrogenation of 22:6n-3 by B. proteoclasticus P18 occurs by pathways of isomerization and hydrogenation resulting in a variety of unsaturated 22 carbon fatty acids. During the simultaneous presence of 18:2n-6 and 22:6n-3, B. proteoclasticus P18 initiated 22:6n-3 metabolism before converting 18:1 isomers into 18:0.


Assuntos
Butyrivibrio/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Ácidos Docosa-Hexaenoicos/química , Rúmen/microbiologia , Animais , Butyrivibrio/química , Meios de Cultura/química , Hidrogenação , Ácidos Esteáricos/metabolismo
2.
EFSA J ; 18(2): e06013, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32874223

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-tryptophan produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of Escherichia coli CGMCC 7.267 when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. The production strain E. coli CGMCC 7.267 is safe for the production of l-tryptophan. No viable cells or DNA of the production strain were detected in the additive under assessment. The use of l-tryptophan produced using E. coli CGMCC 7.267 in supplementing feed to compensate for tryptophan deficiency in feedingstuffs is safe for non-ruminant target species. However, excess doses would create amino acid imbalances with negative consequences on animal performance. The use of unprotected l-tryptophan in feed poses safety concerns for ruminants. The use of l-tryptophan produced by fermentation with E. coli CGMCC 7.267 in animal nutrition is considered safe for the consumers and for the environment. The endotoxin activity in the product and its dusting potential indicate an inhalation risk for the user. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the potential of the additive to be irritant to skin and eyes or to be a skin sensitiser. The additive l-tryptophan produced using E. coli CGMCC 7.267 is regarded as an effective source of the amino acid l-tryptophan. In order to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminants, it should be protected from ruminal degradation.

3.
EFSA J ; 18(2): e06019, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32874228

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-lysine monohydrochloride and l-lysine sulfate produced using Corynebacterium glutamicum CGMCC 7.266 when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The active substance is l-lysine and it is produced in two different forms (monohydrochloride or sulfate salts). None of those forms pose any safety concern associated with the genetic modification of the production strain. l-Lysine HCl and l-lysine sulfate produced by C. glutamicum CGMCC 7.266 are considered safe for the target species, for the consumer and for the environment. For both products, the FEEDAP Panel has concerns regarding the safety for the target species when the additives are administered via feed and water for drinking, simultaneously. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of both forms of the additive for the user. The products under assessment are considered efficacious sources of the amino acid l-lysine for all animal species. For these products to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, they require protection against degradation in the rumen.

4.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05524, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626070

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-1 when used in feed for dogs at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32203. This species is considered by the European Food Safety Authority to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns from other components of the additive, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-1 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-1 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-1 for dogs.

5.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05526, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626072

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-2 when used in feed for cats at a minimum dose of 6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per animal and day. The additive is a preparation of viable cells of L. reuteri DSM 32264. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach establishing safety for the target species and the environment. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the QPS approach to the assessment of safety. Consequently, in the absence of concerns form other components of the additives, Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-2 is presumed safe for the target animals and the environment. Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-2 should be considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of the additive to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. The FEEDAP the Panel is not in the position to conclude on the efficacy of Lactobacillus reuteri NBF-2 for cats.

6.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05536, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626081

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of B-Act® when used in feed for turkeys for fattening, reared for breeding and minor poultry species for fattening or raised for laying. B-Act® is a preparation containing viable spores of a Bacillus licheniformis strain. This species is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment, which requires the identity of the strain to be established and evidence that it is not toxigenic and does not show acquired resistance to relevant antibiotics. In a previous opinion, the strain was found to meet the criteria for the QPS approach. Since no concerns are expected from other components of the additive, B-Act® is presumed safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. In the same opinion, no conclusions could be drawn on the skin/eye irritation or skin sensitisation potential of the additive, but B-Act® was considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. Since the use of B-Act® with the target species is considered unlikely to introduce hazards for users of the product not already considered, the conclusions previously reached apply to the current application. B-Act® at the recommended dose of 1.6 × 109 colony forming units (CFU)/kg feed has the potential to be efficacious in turkeys for fattening. Since the same dose is proposed for the minor poultry species for fattening or raised for laying, the conclusions can be extended/extrapolated to these species. The conclusions on the compatibility of B-Act® with coccidiostats previously drawn apply to the current application provided that the maximum authorised concentrations of the coccidiostats for the target species are equal/lower than those for chickens.

7.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05538, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626083

RESUMO

The product subject of this assessment is l-valine produced by fermentation using a non-genetically modified strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum (KCCM 11201P). It is intended to be used in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. Species identity of the production organism was confirmed and the strain was sensitive to antibiotics at concentrations below thresholds specified by EFSA, thus C. glutamicum KCCM 11201P may be considered safe by the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach. No viable cells of C. glutamicum were detected in the final product. The amount of identified material exceeded ■■■■■% on 'as is' basis, and no impurities of concern were detected. The use of l-valine produced by C. glutamicum KCCM 11201P is safe for target species when supplemented to diets in appropriate amounts, for the consumer and the environment. The product l-valine produced by C. glutamicum (KCCM 11201P) is considered not to be an irritant or a dermal sensitiser, and does not cause acute inhalation toxicity. The additive is an effective source of valine for all species. For the supplemental l-valine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against microbial degradation in the rumen.

8.
EFSA J ; 17(2): e05602, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626227

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■ when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. The product under assessment is l-threonine produced by fermentation with a ■■■■■ strain of C. glutamicum (■■■■■). l-Threonine produced by C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is considered safe for the target species when supplemented in appropriate amounts to the diet. The FEEDAP Panel has concerns on the safety of the simultaneous oral administration of l-threonine via water for drinking and feed. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the consumer. The additive is not a skin or eye irritant and is not a skin sensitiser. Although the workers can be exposed by inhalation, the results of an acute inhalation study showed that risk of adverse effects by inhalation is low. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the environment. The product under assessment is considered an efficacious source of the amino acid l-threonine for all animal species. For l-threonine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen.

9.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05600, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626238

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Actisaf® Sc47 for dairy cows, cattle for fattening, weaned piglets and sows when used as a zootechnical additive. Actisaf® Sc47 consists of viable cells of a strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae and is marketed in three formulations. The FEEDAP Panel considers that the three available formulations are equivalent when used to deliver the same dose of the microorganism in feed. The active agent fulfils the requirements of the qualified presumption of safety approach to the assessment of safety. Since the additive is composed of the active agent only, Actisaf® Sc47 is also presumed safe for the target animals, consumers of products derived from treated animals and the environment. Actisaf® Sc47 is not a skin irritant. In the absence of data, no conclusions can be drawn on the eye irritancy and dermal sensitisation potential of the additive. Inhalation exposure is unlikely. The additive has the potential to be efficacious in weaned piglets and sows to have benefits in piglets at the recommended dose of 5 × 109 CFU/kg feed. Insufficient evidence was provided to conclude on the efficacy of the additive in dairy cows and cattle for fattening.

10.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05614, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626245

RESUMO

A mixture of methylated conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers (t10,c12 and c9,t11) in equal proportions is the subject of this assessment. The active substance is considered to be CLA (t10,c12) methyl ester (ME). The Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) of EFSA previously issued an opinion on the safety and efficacy of the product, in which it could not conclude on the efficacy of this additive for sows for reproduction and for cows for reproduction. The European Commission asked EFSA to deliver an opinion on the efficacy of this additive for sows and cows for reproduction, based on additional data submitted by the applicant. The FEEDAP Panel has performed the assessment of the new data following an approach in line with the principles laid down in Regulation (EC) No 429/2008 and the relevant guidance documents. In relation to the data on efficacy in sows for reproduction, owing to methodological shortcomings of the study submitted, including the duration of the study and the limited biological relevance of the effect observed, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the efficacy of CLA (t10,c12)-ME for sows for reproduction. The data related to dairy cows indicate that dietary CLA (t10,c12)-ME supplementation in the late dry period and/or lactation period showed an increase of the probability of pregnancy and a reduction of time to conception in the same reproductive cycle. However, considering that the minimum duration of efficacy studies for reproductive parameters is of at least two reproductive cycles, the FEEDAP Panel is not in a position to conclude on the efficacy of the additive for cows for reproduction.

11.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05643, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626264

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-lysine monohydrochloride and l-lysine sulfate produced using Corynebacterium glutamicum CCTCC M 2015595 when used as nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The active substance is l-lysine and it is produced in two different forms (monohydrochloride or sulfate). Owing to the uncertainties regarding the possible genetic modification of the strain used to obtain the production strain C. glutamicum CCTCC M 2015595 and on the possible presence of viable cells and DNA of the production strain in the final product, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of the additives l-lysine HCl and l-lysine sulfate produced with C. glutamicum CCTCC M 2015595 for the target species, the consumers, the users and the environment. For both products, the FEEDAP Panel has concerns regarding the safety for the target species when the additives are administered via water for drinking. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety of the additive for the user. The products under assessment are considered efficacious sources of the amino acid l-lysine for all animal species. For these products to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, they require protection against degradation in the rumen.

12.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05650, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626270

RESUMO

Bonvital® is the trade name for a feed additive based on Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 currently authorised for use in piglets, pigs for fattening, sows, chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying and minor poultry species. This opinion concerns the renewal of the authorisation of Bonvital® as a zootechnical additive for weaned piglets and pigs for fattening. The applicant is proposing to increase the minimum and maximum inclusion level of the additive in feed for weaned piglets and the maximum for pigs for fattening. The applicant has provided data demonstrating that the additive currently in the market complies with the conditions of authorisation. E. faecium DSM 7134 does not belong to the hospital-associated clade and does not express resistance to the antibiotics tested; therefore, its use in animal nutrition is considered safe for the target animals and consumers of animal products. Bonvital® is also considered safe for the target animals and consumers. In previous opinions, Bonvital® was found to be non-irritant to skin and eyes, but a potential skin/respiratory sensitiser and safe for the environment. No new evidence has been identified that would make the Panel reconsider the previous conclusions on the safety of the additive. The conclusions reached before are considered to cover the higher maximum application rates proposed by the applicant. Therefore, the Panel concludes that Bonvital® used under the proposed conditions of use is safe for weaned piglets and pigs for fattening, consumers of products derived from animals fed Bonvital® and the environment. Bonvital® is considered a potential skin/respiratory sensitiser. The additional studies provided confirm that Bonvital® has the potential to be efficacious in weaned piglets at 1 × 109 colony forming unit (CFU)/kg feed and in pigs for fattening at 2 × 108 CFU/kg feed.

13.
EFSA J ; 17(5): e05697, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626320

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-lysine monohydrochloride and concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced using Corynebacterium glutamicum KCCM 10227 when used as nutritional additives in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The active substance is l-lysine. l-lysine HCl and concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced by the strain C. glutamicum KCCM 10227 do not represent a risk for the target species, the consumer and the environment. l-lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum KCCM 10227 is hazardous by inhalation, it is not irritant to skin but mildly irritant to eyes and it is not a skin sensitiser. Concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced by C. glutamicum KCCM 10227 is hazardous by inhalation, not irritant to skin and eyes and it is not a skin sensitiser. l-lysine HCl and concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) are considered as efficacious sources of the essential amino acid l-lysine for non-ruminant animal species. For the supplemental l-lysine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it would require protection against degradation in the rumen.

14.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05532, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626077

RESUMO

The EFSA FEEDAP Panel previously (2016) could not conclude on the safety of certain concentrated liquid l-lysine (base), l-lysine monohydrochloride (HCl) and l-lysine sulfate products manufactured using different strains of Corynebacterium glutamicum. New information on the safety of these products was provided by the applicant. The recipient strain C. glutamicum KCTC 12307BP qualifies for qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach for safety assessment, the genetic modification does not introduce any safety concern and no introduced antibiotic resistance genes remain in its genome. Even if uncertainty remains concerning the absence/presence of the production strain and/or its recombinant DNA in the final products, these would not raise safety concerns. The liquid l-lysine (base) and l-lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum KCTC 12307BP or C. glutamicum KCCM 11117P; and l-lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50547 are considered safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. Regarding the safety for the user, concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) and l-lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum KCTC 12307BP, C. glutamicum NRRL B-50547 or C. glutamicum KCCM 11117P are not irritant to skin or eyes and they are not skin sensitisers. l-Lysine HCl is not hazardous by inhalation. The use of C. glutamicum DSM 24990 in the production of l-lysine sulfate is considered safe for the target species, consumers, users or the environment. No negative effects are to be expected for the target species within the proposed inclusion levels of 0.5-30 g lysine sulfate/kg complete feed provided that the total S intake complies with the recommendations of established scientific bodies. The use of C. glutamicum KCCM 10227 in the production of l-lysine sulfate is considered safe for the target species, consumers, users and the environment with regard to antimicrobial resistance. No negative effects are to be expected for the target species within common inclusion levels provided that the total S intake complies with the recommendations of established scientific bodies.

15.
EFSA J ; 17(1): e05537, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626082

RESUMO

The European Commission asked EFSA for an opinion on the safety for the target animals, consumer, user and the environment and on the efficacy of a l-lysine monohydrochloride (HCl, minimum 98.5%) and of a concentrated liquid l-lysine (base, minimum 50%) produced by a genetically modified strain of Corynebacterium glutamicum (NRRL B-50775). They are intended to be used in feed or water for drinking for all animal species and categories. Neither the production strain C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775 nor its recombinant DNA was detected in the final product. Therefore, the product does not pose any safety concern associated with the genetic modification of the production strain. l-Lysine HCl and concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775 are considered safe for the target species, for the consumer and for the environment. l-Lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775 is considered not irritant to skin or eyes and not a skin sensitiser. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the potential toxicity by inhalation of l-lysine HCl produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775. Concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775, due to its high pH (11) it is anticipated to be corrosive to skin and eyes and poses a risk by inhalation. l-Lysine HCl and concentrated liquid l-lysine (base) produced by C. glutamicum NRRL B-50775 are considered as efficacious sources of the essential amino acid l-lysine for non-ruminant animal species. For the supplemental l-lysine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it would require protection against degradation in the rumen.

16.
EFSA J ; 17(2): e05601, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626226

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-tryptophan produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of Escherichia coli CGMCC 7.248 when used as a nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. The production strain E. coli CGMCC 7.248 and its recombinant DNA were not detected in the final product. The product l-tryptophan, manufactured by fermentation with E. coli CGMCC 7.248, does not give rise to any safety concern with regard to the genetic modification of the production strain. l-Tryptophan produced by E. coli CGMCC 7.248 is safe for non-ruminant target species. The use of unprotected l-tryptophan in ruminant feed should be avoided. l-Tryptophan produced by fermentation by E. coli CGMCC 7.248 is safe for the consumer. The level of endotoxins present in the product and its dusting potential indicate an inhalation risk for the user. l-Tryptophan produced by E. coli CGMCC 7.248 is not a skin or eye irritant but it is a dermal sensitiser. The use of l-tryptophan produced by E. coli CGMCC 7.248 in animal nutrition does not pose a risk to the environment. The product under assessment is regarded as an effective source of the amino acid l-tryptophan for all non-ruminant species. For the supplemental l-tryptophan to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen.

17.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05603, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626239

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-threonine produced by fermentation with Corynebacterium glutamicum ■■■■■ when used as nutritional additive in feed and water for drinking for all animal species and categories. The product under assessment is l-threonine produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of C. glutamicum (■■■■■). The production strain and its recombinant DNA were not detected in the additive. The product l-threonine, manufactured by fermentation with C. glutamicum, ■■■■■ does not give rise to any safety concern with regard to the production strain. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is considered safe for the target species. The FEEDAP Panel has concerns regarding the safety of the simultaneous oral administration of l-threonine via water for drinking and feed. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the consumer. The additive is not a skin or eye irritant and is not a skin sensitiser. Although the workers can be exposed by inhalation, the results of an acute inhalation study showed that risk of adverse effects by inhalation is low. l-Threonine produced using C. glutamicum ■■■■■ is safe for the environment. The product under assessment is considered an efficacious source of the amino acid l-threonine for all animal species. For l-threonine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen.

18.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05646, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626267

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of Probiotic Lactina® for chickens for fattening and rabbits. The additive is a preparation containing viable cells of six strains of lactic acid bacteria intended for use in feed at the proposed dose of 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg complete feedingstuffs. The identity of all of the component strains of Probiotic Lactina® was established in a previous opinion, five of which qualify for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment. As no antibiotic resistance of concern was detected in these strains, following the QPS approach, the use of these five strains in feedingstuffs is presumed safe for target species; consumers of products from animals fed the additive and the environment. The identity and safety of the sixth strain, Enterococcus faecium NBIMCC 8270, was also established in the previous and current opinions. The FEEDAP Panel concludes that Probiotic Lactina® is safe for rabbits (suckling and weaned) at the recommended inclusion level of 2.5 × 109 CFU/kg feed and reiterates its former conclusion that the product is safe for chickens for fattening at 1 × 1010 CFU/kg feed. The FEEDAP Panel considers Probiotic Lactina® to be safe for consumers of products derived from treated animals when used at the conditions proposed. In the absence of data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the irritancy of Probiotic Lactina® to skin and eyes or on its dermal sensitisation. Owing to the proteinaceous nature of the active agents, the additive is considered to be a potential respiratory sensitiser. No conclusions can be drawn on the efficacy of Probiotic Lactina® for chickens for fattening and rabbits (suckling/weaned).

19.
EFSA J ; 17(3): e05647, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626268

RESUMO

The additive contains viable spores of two strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and a single strain of Bacillus subtilis and is intended to be used with pigs for fattening and minor porcine species at a minimum inclusion level of 1.5 × 108 colony forming units (CFU)/kg complete feedingstuffs. The two bacterial species are considered suitable for the qualified presumption of safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment, which requires the identity of the strains to be established and evidence that they lack toxigenic potential and acquired antimicrobial resistance determinants for antibiotics of human and veterinary importance. The identity of the three active agents is established and the lack of toxigenic potential confirmed. The two B. amyloliquefaciens strains do not show resistance to relevant antibiotics, and are presumed safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. The B. subtilis strain showed a low level of resistance to streptomycin, for which acquired resistance genes were not identified. Therefore, it also complies with the QPS qualifications and is presumed safe for the target species, consumer and the environment. Since no other component give rise to concerns, Cinergy® Life B3 HiCon is also considered safe for the target species, consumers and the environment. In the absence of data, no conclusions can be made on the skin or eye irritancy or the potential for dermal sensitisation of the additive. Owing to the proteinaceous nature of the active agents, the additive is considered a potential respiratory sensitiser. However, the low dusting potential makes it unlikely that additive poses a risk for the respiratory system. Cinergy® Life B3 HiCon showed a potential to improve the feed to gain ratio in pigs for fattening given the additive at a minimum inclusion level of 1.5 × 108 CFU/kg complete feed. This conclusion is extrapolated to minor porcine species at the same application rate and for an equivalent growth phase.

20.
EFSA J ; 17(5): e05689, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32626314

RESUMO

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on l-leucine produced by fermentation with Escherichia coli NITE BP-02351 when used as nutritional additive or as feed flavouring compound in feed and water for drinking for all animal species. The product under assessment is l-leucine produced by fermentation with a genetically modified strain of E. coli (NITE BP-02351). The production strain and its recombinant DNA were not detected in the final products. l-Leucine, manufactured by fermentation with E. coli NITE BP-02351, does not give rise to any safety concern to the production strain. The use of l-leucine produced with E. coli NITE BP-02351 is safe for the target species when used to supplement the diet in appropriate amounts. It is safe at the proposed use level of 25 mg/kg when used as flavouring compound for all animal species. The use of l-leucine produced by fermentation with E. coli NITE BP-02351 in animal nutrition raises no safety concerns for consumers of animal products. The additive is not irritating to the skin or eyes and is not a skin sensitiser. There is a risk for persons handling the additive from the exposure to endotoxins by inhalation. The use of l-leucine produced by E. coli NITE BP-02351 as feed additive does not represent a risk to the environment. The additive l-leucine produced by E. coli NITE BP-02351 is regarded as an effective source of the amino acid l-leucine when used as nutritional additive. For the supplemental l-leucine to be as efficacious in ruminants as in non-ruminant species, it requires protection against degradation in the rumen. It is also considered efficacious as feed flavouring compound under the proposed conditions of use.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA