Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 187: 192-197, 2024 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38795507

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following radical surgery for vulvar carcinoma remains poorly characterized, and recommendations for postoperative chemoprophylaxis are varied. Our objective was to assess the incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing surgery for vulvar carcinoma and to determine if VTE incidence differs by radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients with a diagnosis of vulvar cancer undergoing radical vulvectomy with or without lymph node assessment from 2012 to 2020. Clinical characteristics and 30-day incidence of VTE as well as other postoperative outcomes were abstracted. Variables were compared using Chi-square test and Fischer's exact test, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum tests where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 1672 patients underwent radical vulvectomy for vulvar carcinoma. 11 patients (0.7%) experienced postoperative VTE within 30 days of surgery. The incidence of VTE was similar when radical vulvectomy was performed alone or with lymph node dissection by any method (p = 0.116). Longer operative times (p = 0.033) and greater postoperative length of stay (p = 0.001) were associated with increased risk of postoperative VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE is low in patients undergoing radical vulvar surgery in this national cohort. Inguinofemoral lymph node dissection by any method does not appear to be a risk factor for VTE when compared to radical vulvectomy alone. Further research is needed to determine if extended VTE prophylaxis is beneficial in this population.

2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(2): 91-97, 2024 02 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38364368

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Distress among gynecologic oncology patients correlates with poor clinical outcomes and decreased quality of life. The purpose of this study was to determine risk factors for elevated NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT) results among postoperative gynecologic oncology patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all postoperative visits over a 5-year period. NCCN DT results were analyzed as both discretized values (DT ≤3 = low distress; DT 4-8 = moderate distress; DT ≥9 = high distress) and continuous variables. Patients with a DT score ≥4 were referred to social work. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to compare NCCN DT results with clinical and sociodemographic variables. Statistical significance was P<.05. RESULTS: In total, 1,795 NCCN DT results were included, with uterine (37.72%) being the most common disease site. Benign pathology was known prior to completion of the NCCN DT in 13.15% of patients. Most patients (71.75%) endorsed low levels of distress. Moderate/High levels of distress were reported by 28.25% of patients. Increasing levels of distress were significantly associated with younger age (P=.006), history of depression (P≤.001), status as a current smoker (P=.028), and history of asthma (P=.041). Knowledge of benign pathology was associated with low levels of distress (P=.002). Procedure type and disease site were not associated with distress. CONCLUSIONS: More than one-fourth of postoperative patients in a gynecologic oncology practice reported moderate or high distress. Distress was highest among those with malignancy regardless of disease site or surgical intervention. Benign pathology correlated with decreased distress. Identified associations with distress provide opportunities for prevention, early intervention, and tailored counseling.


Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Neoplasias , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Estresse Psicológico/epidemiologia , Estresse Psicológico/etiologia , Estresse Psicológico/psicologia , Neoplasias/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
Radiology ; 307(5): e223281, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37158725

RESUMO

Currently, imaging is part of the standard of care for patients with adnexal lesions prior to definitive management. Imaging can identify a physiologic finding or classic benign lesion that can be followed up conservatively. When one of these entities is not present, imaging is used to determine the probability of ovarian cancer prior to surgical consultation. Since the inclusion of imaging in the evaluation of adnexal lesions in the 1970s, the rate of surgery for benign lesions has decreased. More recently, data-driven Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) scoring systems for US and MRI with standardized lexicons have been developed to allow for assignment of a cancer risk score, with the goal of further decreasing unnecessary interventions while expediting the care of patients with ovarian cancer. US is used as the initial modality for the assessment of adnexal lesions, while MRI is used when there is a clinical need for increased specificity and positive predictive value for the diagnosis of cancer. This article will review how the treatment of adnexal lesions has changed due to imaging over the decades; the current data supporting the use of US, CT, and MRI to determine the likelihood of cancer; and future directions of adnexal imaging for the early detection of ovarian cancer.


Assuntos
Doenças dos Anexos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças dos Anexos/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças dos Anexos/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Ultrassonografia/métodos
4.
Eur Radiol ; 32(5): 3220-3235, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34846566

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Imaging evaluation is an essential part of treatment planning for patients with ovarian cancer. Variation in the terminology used for describing ovarian cancer on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in clinical radiology reports. The aim of this collaborative project between Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Uterine and Ovarian Cancer (UOC) Disease-focused Panel (DFP) and the European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR) Female Pelvic Imaging (FPI) Working Group was to develop an ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging. METHODS: Twenty-one members of the SAR UOC DFP and ESUR FPI working group, one radiology clinical fellow, and two gynecologic oncology surgeons formed the Ovarian Cancer Reporting Lexicon Committee. Two attending radiologist members of the committee prepared a preliminary list of imaging terms that was sent as an online survey to 173 radiologists and gynecologic oncologic physicians, of whom 67 responded to the survey. The committee reviewed these responses to create a final consensus list of lexicon terms. RESULTS: An ovarian cancer reporting lexicon was created for CT and MR Imaging. This consensus-based lexicon has 6 major categories of terms: general, adnexal lesion-specific, peritoneal carcinomatosis-specific, lymph node-specific, metastatic disease -specific, and fluid-specific. CONCLUSIONS: This lexicon for CT and MR imaging evaluation of ovarian cancer patients has the capacity to improve the clarity and consistency of reporting disease sites seen on imaging. KEY POINTS: • This reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging provides a list of consensus-based, standardized terms and definitions for reporting sites of ovarian cancer on imaging at initial diagnosis or follow-up. • Use of standardized terms and morphologic imaging descriptors can help improve interdisciplinary communication of disease extent and facilitate optimal patient management. • The radiologists should identify and communicate areas of disease, including difficult to resect or potentially unresectable disease that may limit the ability to achieve optimal resection.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Espectroscopia de Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
5.
Gynecol Oncol ; 162(3): 751-755, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34148718

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is increasingly utilized for gynecologic cancers. While incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after MIS is low, some guidelines recommend extended chemoprophylaxis for these patients undergoing MIS. Our objectives were to determine incidence of postoperative VTE in patients undergoing MIS, evaluate differences in the incidence by MIS modality and assess the need for extended chemoprophylaxis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients undergoing MIS (robot-assisted, multi-port laparoscopy, single-port laparoscopy) for gynecologic cancers between January 2014 and December 2018 at our institution. Demographic and perioperative variables were collected. Patients <18 years, with benign pathology, or on preoperative anticoagulation were excluded. Chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and one-way ANOVA were performed to determine risk factors related to VTE occurrence. RESULTS: We identified 806 patients who underwent MIS with median age 61. Most had Stage I disease (81.5%) and uterine cancer (81.5%). Five VTE events occurred within 90 days following surgery (0.6%). Incidence of 90-day VTE did not differ between MIS modalities (p = 0.6). Patients with longer OR times (p = 0.004) were more likely to experience VTE. Age, smoking status, BMI, type of cancer and stage were not significant risk factors for VTE. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative VTE in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing MIS is low and does not appear to differ by MIS modality. Given the very low incidence of postoperative VTE, extended chemoprophylaxis is unlikely to benefit patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing MIS procedures.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia
6.
Gynecol Oncol ; 147(3): 503-508, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28964622

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between intraperitoneal (IP) disease dissemination patterns, residual disease (RD), surgical complexity, and molecular subtypes in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). METHODS: 741 patients with operable stage III-IV HGSOC undergoing primary debulking surgery at Mayo Clinic from 1994 to 2011 were categorized into four mutually exclusive IP disease dissemination patterns: upper abdominal (60%), miliary (16%), lower abdominal (15%), and pelvic (9%). Surgical complexity was classified as high, intermediate, or low; RD status was defined as 0, 0.1-0.5, 0.6-1.0, or >1cm; molecular subtype assignments were derived from expression profiling of tumors from 334 patients. RESULTS: Patients with either miliary or upper abdominal dissemination patterns were less likely to achieve RD0 compared to patients with pelvic and lower abdominal dissemination patterns (25% vs. 9% and 62%, each P<0.001) despite higher surgical complexity (39% vs. 6% and 20%, each P<0.001). Among the subset with molecular subtype data, patients with mesenchymal subtype of tumors were more likely to have upper abdominal or miliary dissemination patterns compared to patients with differentiated, proliferative, or immunoreactive subtypes (90% vs. 77%, 70%, 69%, respectively, P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: IP disease dissemination patterns are associated with RD, surgical complexity, and tumor molecular subtypes. Patients with upper abdominal or miliary dissemination patterns are more likely to have mesenchymal HGSOC and in turn achieve lower rates of complete resection. This provides a plausible model for how the biologic behavior of molecular subtypes is manifest in disease and oncologic outcomes.


Assuntos
Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/patologia , Cistadenocarcinoma Seroso/cirurgia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasia Residual , Cavidade Peritoneal/patologia
7.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 14(5): 539-50, 2016 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27160232

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with refusal of recommended chemotherapy and its impact on patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: We identified patients in the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed with EOC from January 1998 to December 2011. Patients who refused chemotherapy were identified and compared with those who received recommended, multiagent chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using chi-square test with Bonferroni correction, binary logistic regression, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards modeling. The threshold for statistical significance was set at a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: From a cohort of 147,713 eligible patients, 2,707 refused chemotherapy. These patients were compared with 92,212 patients who received recommended multiagent chemotherapy. Older age, more medical comorbidities, not having insurance, and later year of diagnosis were directly and significantly associated with chemotherapy refusal when analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. In addition, lower-than-expected facility adherence to NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Ovarian Cancer, treatment at low-volume center, lower grade, and higher stage were all significantly and independently associated with chemotherapy refusal. Median overall survival of patients who received multiagent chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of those who refused chemotherapy (43 vs 4.8 months; P<.0005). After controlling for known patient, facility, and disease prognostic factors, chemotherapy refusal is significantly associated with increased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Refusal of recommended chemotherapy carries significant risk of early death from ovarian cancer. Our data demonstrate that the decision to refuse chemotherapy is multifactorial and, in addition to unalterable factors (eg, stage/grade, age), involves factors that can be changed, including facility type and payor. Efforts at addressing these discrepancies in care can improve compliance with chemotherapy recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer and outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Epiteliais e Glandulares/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 131(5): 891-898, 2018 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29630007

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine blood transfusion practices and develop a standardized bundle of interventions to address the high rate of perioperative red blood cell transfusion among patients with ovarian and endometrial cancer. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Our primary aim was to determine whether an implemented bundled intervention was associated with a reduction in perioperative red blood cell transfusions among cases of laparotomy for cancer. Secondary aims included comparing perioperative demographic, surgical, complication, and cost data. Interventions included blood transfusion practice standardization using American Society of Anesthesiologists guidelines, an intraoperative hemostasis checklist, standardized intraoperative fluid status communication, and evidence-based use of tranexamic acid. Prospective data from women undergoing laparotomy for ovarian or endometrial cancer from September 28, 2015, to May 31, 2016, defined the study cohort and were compared with historical controls (September 1, 2014, to September 25, 2015). Outcomes were compared in the full unadjusted cohorts and in propensity-matched cohorts. RESULTS: In the intervention and historical cohorts, respectively, 89 and 184 women underwent laparotomy for ovarian cancer (n=74 and 152) or advanced endometrial cancer (n=15 and 32). Tranexamic acid was administered in 54 (60.7%) patients. The perioperative transfusion rate was lower for the intervention group compared with historical controls (18.0% [16/89] vs 41.3% [76/184], P<.001), a 56.4% reduction. This improvement in the intervention group remained significant after propensity matching (16.2% [13/80] vs 36.2% [29/80], P=.004). The hospital readmission rate was also lower for the intervention group compared with historical controls (1.1% [1/89] vs 12.5% [23/184], P=.002); however, this improvement did not attain statistical significance after propensity matching (1.2% [1/80] vs 7.5% [6/80], P=.12). Cost analysis demonstrated that this intervention was cost-neutral during index hospitalization plus 30-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: Application of a standardized bundle of evidence-based interventions was associated with reduced blood use in our gynecologic oncology practice.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Sangue , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Laparotomia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Idoso , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Transfusão de Sangue/métodos , Transfusão de Sangue/normas , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
Obstet Gynecol ; 128(3): 467-475, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27500339

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare complications and outcomes after hysterectomy for benign compared with malignant indications in the United States. METHODS: Women who underwent hysterectomy in the United States for either benign or malignant indications from January 2008 to December 2012 were retrospectively identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients were excluded if the procedure was not performed for primary gynecologic indications. Appropriate procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology and International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision codes. Univariate and multivariable models for complication risk were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 59,525 eligible patients, with 49,331 (82.9%) hysterectomies performed for benign and 10,194 (17.1%) for malignant indications. All complications, including wound complications (2.5% benign compared with 5.5% malignant, P<.001), venous thromboembolism (0.33% compared with 1.7%, P<.001), urinary tract infection (2.7% compared with 3.2%, P=.009), sepsis (0.53% compared with 1.9%, P<.001), blood transfusion (2.6% compared with 11.5%, P<.001), death (0.02% compared with 0.10%, P<.001), unplanned readmission (1.8% compared with 4.5%, P<.001), and returns to the operating room (0.91% compared with 1.4%, P<.001), were significantly more common for malignant hysterectomies. The overall rate of complications for benign cases was 7.9% compared with a rate of 19.4% for malignant hysterectomy. The median operating time for laparoscopy in benign cases was significantly longer than for open or vaginal hysterectomy procedures (127 minutes compared with 105 or 94 minutes, respectively; P<.001). The median operating time in malignant cases was significantly longer than for benign cases (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Hysterectomies performed for gynecologic malignancies are associated with a more than twofold higher complication rate compared with those performed for benign conditions. Minimally invasive surgery is associated with a decreased complication rate compared with open surgery. These data can be used for patient counseling and surgical planning, determining physician and hospital costs of care, and considered when assigning value-based reimbursement.


Assuntos
Histerectomia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Doenças Uterinas , Neoplasias Uterinas , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Histerectomia/efeitos adversos , Histerectomia/métodos , Histerectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/classificação , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Doenças Uterinas/classificação , Doenças Uterinas/epidemiologia , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/classificação , Neoplasias Uterinas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA