Rapid affinity optimization of an anti-TREM2 clinical lead antibody by cross-lineage immune repertoire mining.

We describe a process for rapid antibody affinity optimization by repertoire mining to identify clones across B cell clonal lineages based on convergent immune responses where antigen-specific clones with the same heavy (VH) and light chain germline segment pairs, or parallel lineages, bind a single epitope on the antigen. We use this convergence framework to mine unique and distinct VH lineages from rat anti-triggering receptor on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) antibody repertoire datasets with high diversity in the third complementarity-determining loop region (CDR H3) to further affinity-optimize a high-affinity agonistic anti-TREM2 antibody while retaining critical functional properties. Structural analyses confirm a nearly identical binding mode of anti-TREM2 variants with subtle but significant structural differences in the binding interface. Parallel lineage repertoire mining is uniquely tailored to rationally explore the large CDR H3 sequence space in antibody repertoires and can be easily and generally applied to antibodies discovered in vivo.

Discovery of Potent, Selective, and Orally Available IRE1α Inhibitors Demonstrating Comparable PD Modulation to IRE1 Knockdown in a Multiple Myeloma Model.

The lack of selective and safe in vivo IRE1α tool molecules has limited the evaluation of IRE1α as a viable target to treat multiple myeloma. Focus on improving the physicochemical properties of a literature compound by decreasing lipophilicity, molecular weight, and basicity allowed the discovery of a novel series with a favorable in vitro safety profile and good oral exposure. These efforts culminated in the identification of a potent and selective in vivo tool compound, G-5758, that was well tolerated following multiday oral administration of doses up to 500 mg/kg. G-5758 demonstrated comparable pharmacodynamic effects to induced IRE1 knockdown as measured by XBP1s levels in a multiple myeloma model (KMS-11).

Structure-Based Design of Potent, Selective, and Orally Bioavailable VPS34 Kinase Inhibitors.

VPS34 is a class III phosphoinositide 3-kinase involved in endosomal trafficking and autophagosome formation. Inhibitors of VPS34 were believed to have value as anticancer agents, but genetic and pharmacological data suggest that sustained inhibition of VPS34 kinase activity may not be well tolerated. Here we disclose the identification of a novel series of dihydropyrazolopyrazinone compounds represented by compound 5 as potent, selective, and orally bioavailable VPS34 inhibitors through a structure-based design strategy. A water-interacting hydrogen bond acceptor within an appropriate distance to a hinge-binding element was found to afford significant VPS34 potency across chemical scaffolds. The selectivity of compound 5 over PIK family kinases arises from interactions between the hinge-binding element and the pseudo-gatekeeper residue Met682. As recent in vivo pharmacology data suggests that sustained inhibition of VPS34 kinase activity may not be tolerated, structure-activity relationships leading to VPS34 inhibition may be helpful for avoiding this target in other ATP-competitive kinase programs.

A BCMA/CD16A bispecific innate cell engager for the treatment of multiple myeloma.

Despite the recent progress, multiple myeloma (MM) is still essentially incurable and there is a need for additional effective treatments with good tolerability. RO7297089 is a novel bispecific BCMA/CD16A-directed innate cell engager (ICE®) designed to induce BCMA+ MM cell lysis through high affinity binding of CD16A and retargeting of NK cell cytotoxicity and macrophage phagocytosis. Unlike conventional antibodies approved in MM, RO7297089 selectively targets CD16A with no binding of other Fcγ receptors, including CD16B on neutrophils, and irrespective of 158V/F polymorphism, and its activity is less affected by competing IgG suggesting activity in the presence of M-protein. Structural analysis revealed this is due to selective interaction with a single residue (Y140) uniquely present in CD16A opposite the Fc binding site. RO7297089 induced tumor cell killing more potently than conventional antibodies (wild-type and Fc-enhanced) and induced lysis of BCMA+ cells at very low effector-to-target ratios. Preclinical toxicology data suggested a favorable safety profile as in vitro cytokine release was minimal and no RO7297089-related mortalities or adverse events were observed in cynomolgus monkeys. These data suggest good tolerability and the potential of RO7297089 to be a novel effective treatment of MM patients.

Activation of the IRE1 RNase through remodeling of the kinase front pocket by ATP-competitive ligands.

Inositol-Requiring Enzyme 1 (IRE1) is an essential component of the Unfolded Protein Response. IRE1 spans the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, comprising a sensory lumenal domain, and tandem kinase and endoribonuclease (RNase) cytoplasmic domains. Excess unfolded proteins in the ER lumen induce dimerization and oligomerization of IRE1, triggering kinase trans-autophosphorylation and RNase activation. Known ATP-competitive small-molecule IRE1 kinase inhibitors either allosterically disrupt or stabilize the active dimeric unit, accordingly inhibiting or stimulating RNase activity. Previous allosteric RNase activators display poor selectivity and/or weak cellular activity. In this study, we describe a class of ATP-competitive RNase activators possessing high selectivity and strong cellular activity. This class of activators binds IRE1 in the kinase front pocket, leading to a distinct conformation of the activation loop. Our findings reveal exquisitely precise interdomain regulation within IRE1, advancing the mechanistic understanding of this important enzyme and its investigation as a potential small-molecule therapeutic target.

Identification of BRaf-Sparing Amino-Thienopyrimidines with Potent IRE1α Inhibitory Activity.

Amino-quinazoline BRaf kinase inhibitor 2 was identified from a library screen as a modest inhibitor of the unfolded protein response (UPR) regulating potential anticancer target IRE1α. A combination of crystallographic and conformational considerations were used to guide structure-based attenuation of BRaf activity and optimization of IRE1α potency. Quinazoline 6-position modifications were found to provide up to 100-fold improvement in IRE1α cellular potency but were ineffective at reducing BRaf activity. A salt bridge contact with Glu651 in IRE1α was then targeted to build in selectivity over BRaf which instead possesses a histidine in this position (His539). Torsional angle analysis revealed that the quinazoline hinge binder core was ill-suited to accommodate the required conformation to effectively reach Glu651, prompting a change to the thienopyrimidine hinge binder. Resulting analogues such as 25 demonstrated good IRE1α cellular potency and imparted more than 1000-fold decrease in BRaf activity.

Evaluation of assay technologies for the identification of protein-Peptide interaction antagonists.

An increasing number of assay detection technologies are routinely used in small molecule drug discovery and lead optimization. These assays range from solid-phase heterogeneous assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluorescent immunoassay (DELFIA, PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA) to solution phase, bead-based assays such as electrochemiluminescence assay (BioVeris [Gaithersburg, MD] technology) and amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay (AlphaScreen, PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences) to completely solution-based homogeneous assays such as time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer and fluorescence polarization. The aim of this study is to compare these assay technologies and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each in the context of our efforts to develop small molecule antagonists to the melanoma inhibitor of apoptosis protein. In this study, seven peptides have been evaluated for their potencies in each assay format. Our results indicate that these assay technologies produce similar relative potencies; however, some methods may be more susceptible to interference than others. Consequently, the choice of the method used frequently depends on a number of factors in addition to assay reproducibility and performance, such as throughput of the assay, cost, compound interference, and ease of use.