Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Oral Dis ; 26(2): 270-284, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739380

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether sex hormone replacement therapy (HRT) improves periodontal parameters and dental implants osseointegration in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic databases and hand searches were performed from June to August 2018 in SciELO, LILACS and PubMed/MEDLINE. Human observational and interventional studies that evaluated the following parameters were included: clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), radiographic bone loss (RBL) or osseointegration. RESULTS: Initial search retrieved 1,282 non-duplicated articles. Fifteen studies were selected after inclusion criteria were applied. All studies were performed in postmenopausal women. Mean differences for PPD reduction ranged from 0.02 to 0.2 mm in HRT-positive patients; mean CAL gain -0.18 to 0.54 mm; mean RBL reduction -0.87 to 0.15 mm; and mean BOP reduction 9%-30.3%. Failure rate of dental implants increased -5.5% to 11.21% when HRT was used. CONCLUSIONS: Very low but consistent evidence suggests a reduction in BOP and no impact on RBL in postmenopausal women receiving HRT. There are inconsistent reports that suggest that HRT in postmenopausal women: (a) improves or does not impact PPD reduction and CAL gain; and (b) does not impact or increase implant loss. In summary, there is no evidence to support HRT prescription for either men or women for periodontal/implant placement purposes.


Assuntos
Implantes Dentários , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/uso terapêutico , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Osseointegração , Perda do Osso Alveolar/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/fisiologia , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Perda da Inserção Periodontal/epidemiologia , Índice Periodontal , Pós-Menopausa
2.
Rev Bras Med Trab ; 20(4): 685-690, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37101453

RESUMO

Advances in Brazilian science made the country reach the 13th position in the world scientific production, and, in 2020, o Brazil was responsible for 2.39% of the world scientific production, reaching the 11th position among the countries that most published about COVID-19. The aim of this study was to contribute to and reflect on the issue of health researchers and graduate students in the scenario of COVID-19 pandemic. This pandemic highlighted the importance of science in the outcome of public policies and the fragility of the research system in Brazil, where the workforce is mainly composed of graduate students, who often do not have ideal working conditions and are not included in the response plans to global public health emergencies. This text brings a reflection and a questioning on the role of health researchers and graduate students and reinforces the importance of discussing the work of researchers/scientists in a period of great uncertainty in society.


Os avanços na ciência brasileira alcançaram a 13ª posição na produção científica mundial, e, em 2020, o Brasil foi responsável por 2,39% da produção científica mundial, alcançando a 11a posição entre os países que mais publicaram sobre a COVID-19. O objetivo deste trabalho foi contribuir e refletir sobre o debate dos pesquisadores e pós-graduandos da área de saúde no cenário pandêmico da COVID-19. A pandemia da COVID-19 evidenciou a importância da ciência no desfecho de políticas públicas e a fragilidade do sistema de pesquisa no Brasil, em que a maior força de trabalho se concentra em pós-graduandos, que muitas vezes não possuem condições ideais de trabalho e não estão inseridos nos planos de resposta às emergências globais de saúde pública. Este texto traz uma reflexão e problematização sobre o papel dos pesquisadores e pós-graduandos em saúde e reforça a importância de discutir a atuação de pesquisadores/cientistas em um período de grandes incertezas na sociedade.

3.
Arch Oral Biol ; 122: 105000, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33307323

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the impact of testosterone and estrogen replacement therapy on mandibular bone density and bone-related markers. DESIGN: Forty male adult rats were randomly allocated to 4 experimental groups (n = 10/group): Sham (Control); Orchiectomy; Orchiectomy plus testosterone replacement; and orchiectomy plus estradiol replacement. Twenty-four days after orchiectomy, the hemi-mandibles were collected and processed for analysis of microhardness in cortical and trabecular bone, radiographic bone density and histomorphometric evaluation. Serum was collected for the analysis of calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and magnesium. RESULTS: The orchiectomy group had the lowest mandibular bone density (p < 0.01) and also their serum levels of alkaline phosphatase were higher than all other experimental groups (p < 0.001). Estradiol replacement significantly reduced microhardness when compared to orchiectomy in cortical bone (p < 0.05). Both testosterone and estrogen replacement reverted orchiectomy impact on this parameter (p < 0.01); and decreased alkaline phosphatase to levels comparable to the Sham-Control group. The effect of estrogen was more pronounced than testosterone, and a statistically significant difference was observed between Sham-Control and testosterone replacement (p < 0.05) but not between Sham-Control and estradiol replacement groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated that both estradiol and testosterone replacement therapies play a role in mandibular bone metabolism, but suggest different pathways.


Assuntos
Densidade Óssea , Estradiol/administração & dosagem , Hormônios Esteroides Gonadais/administração & dosagem , Mandíbula/metabolismo , Testosterona/administração & dosagem , Animais , Masculino , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem , Orquiectomia , Ratos
4.
J Periodontol ; 89(4): 486-495, 2018 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29683499

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Testosterone replacement enhances cognitive function and musculoskeletal health in postmenopausal women. However, the biological role of testosterone on inflammation and bone metabolism in females is not well understood. Our objective was to measure the impact of androgens and their receptors on periodontal tissues during periodontal repair in female rats. METHODS: Seventy female Holtzman rats were divided into seven groups (n = 10/group): negative control; repair control; androgen receptor antagonist (flutamide, 50 mg/kg, every other day); estrogen receptor antagonist (fulvestrant, 1.5 mg/kg/day); testosterone supplementation (durateston, 250 mg/kg, weekly); aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole, 0.2 mg /kg/day); testosterone plus anastrozole. Cotton ligatures were kept for 13 days, when pharmacological treatment was initiated. On day 14, the ligatures were removed. The rats were euthanized on the 17th or the 28th day (n = 5/group/period) for the evaluation of markers related to inflammation and bone. The tissue and serum samples were evaluated using a multiplexed immunoassay for the inflammatory targets. Radiographic and histologic analyses were performed to assess changes in tissues. RESULTS: Blockage of androgen receptors had little effect on inflammatory cell count, although it tended to increase interleukin (IL)-4, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) as well as decrease IL-1ß, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and IL-6. Flutamide also significantly impaired bone repair (P < 0.05) and had greater osteoclast count, although this last difference was not statistically significant. Testosterone supplementation significantly increased the inflammatory cell count, decreased the levels of IL-4, IL-10, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α; and increased VEGF and EGF. CONCLUSION: The blockage of androgen receptors significantly impair bone repair in females through mechanisms that are different from those related to estrogen receptors.


Assuntos
Androgênios , Fator A de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Animais , Feminino , Flutamida , Humanos , Ratos , Receptores Androgênicos , Testosterona
5.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 22: e238998, Jan.-Dec. 2023. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1509519

RESUMO

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a treatment for many diseases; however, it can induce complications such as Oral Mucositis (OM) and Graft-versus- Host Disease (GVHD). The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a peripheral biomarker of systemic inflammation and an independent prognostic factor for several inflammatory diseases. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the association of NLR with OM and GVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Methods: Patients who underwent allogeneic HSCT at the Bone Marrow Transplant Service of the Hospital de Clínicas Complex of the Federal University of Paraná were included in the study. Socio-demographic data and blood counts were collected from patients' medical records. The NLR was calculated and associated with OM and GVHD. Results: 45 patients were included in the study. Although NLR was higher in patients with OM and oral GVHD, no statistical difference was observed, and no relationship between OM and GVHD with NLR could be stated. Conclusion: Although both OM and GVHD are associated with an inflammatory response as well as the immune system, it was not associated with NLR. Further investigation considering other variables related to HSCT might find possible associations, as it could favor patient management and prevention


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estomatite , Linfócitos , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Neutrófilos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA