Revie ⊕: Impact of a resource-based life review intervention on patients with advanced cancer: A waitlist controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Life review interventions aim to support individuals facing an incurable disease accompanied by existential concerns and health-related challenges. Based on encouraging feasibility results, this study assessed the effects of Revie ⊕ life review intervention on the self-esteem of patients with advanced cancer, and the effects on well-being, post-traumatic growth, life satisfaction, symptom burden and interaction with nurses. METHOD: The study consisted of a two-arm parallel-group, waitlist-controlled trial (WCT) in the oncology division of a Swiss-French University Hospital. Revie ⊕ was composed of nurse-led meeting with the patient to address and document significant life events using a strengths-focused approach and targeting the life project. RESULTS: Due to Covid-19 pandemic, adjustments were made regarding study duration and participant's allocation: Fifty-eight patients received Revie ⊕, 39 completed all the measurements. Self-esteem was high at baseline and maintained stability over time. The social well-being decreased in the intervention group before-after Revie ⊕ (-1.7 (3.9), p = 0.044) while emotional and functional well-being showed stability. The intensity of symptoms decreased in the intervention group before-after Revie ⊕: 4.9 (9.4), p = 0.020. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that patients living with an advanced cancer and who received Revie ⊕ intervention may have maintained their self-esteem high over time. Observed results are promising, particularly considering the influence of the pandemic. Nevertheless, these findings do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of the intervention on self-esteem. WCT seems not to be the appropriate design to highlight the added value of Revie ⊕ for this particularly vulnerable population. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04254926.

Magmaris Resorbable Magnesium Scaffold Versus Conventional Drug-Eluting Stent in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: 1-Year Results of a Propensity-Score-Matching Comparison.

Magmaris® (Biotronik AG, Switzerland) is the first RMS and early experience has shown promising results in stable coronary artery disease. Acute coronary syndromes have been hypothesized as a potential target group for bioresorbable scaffolds, but the efficacy and safety of RMS has not been extensively studied in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BEST-MAG is a prospective multicenter trial designed to evaluate optical coherence tomography (OCT-)guided implantation of resorbable magnesium scaffold (RMS) in STEMI. Consecutive STEMI patients fulfilling inclusion/exclusion criteria were treated with RMS following a standardized OCT-based implantation technique including systematic pre- and post-dilatation, and baseline plus final OCT imaging. The primary endpoint was a device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) including cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 12 months. Clinical outcomes were compared after propensity score matching (PSM) to the results of the randomized controlled BIOSTEMI trial comparing biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting (BP-SES) and durable polymer everolimus eluting stents (DP-EES) in STEMI. Between 15th February 2019 and 25th May 2020, 30 patients were included in 5 centers. Procedural success was achieved in all cases based on OCT control with final scaffold expansion of 82 ± 11%. At twelve-months, DOCE rate was 13.3% (n = 4), including 4 cases of TLR (13.3%) and one case of TV-MI (3.3%). No cardiac death occurred, and no scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was observed. Using PSM, DOCE rates in BP-SES and DP-EES groups were 10% and 6% respectively and TLR rates were 3.3% and 0.0%. In this study, OCT-guided RMS implantation in selected STEMI patients appeared feasible but was associated with numerically higher rates of TLR as compared with conventional drug-eluting stents, although the limited number of patients included in this analysis does not allow drawing statistically significant conclusions.

Midluteal serum progesterone levels and pregnancy following ovulation induction with human follicle-stimulating hormone: results of a combined-data analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective analysis of combined data (one Phase II and three Phase III clinical trials) of patients with oligo- or anovulatory infertility aimed to evaluate the association between pregnancy and midluteal serum progesterone (P4) level following ovulation induction and hence the indicative value of P4 for ovulation and pregnancy achievement. STUDY DESIGN: All patients (n = 913) were treated with human follicle-stimulating hormone. Cycles (n = 1,554) with one or two serum P4 levels in the luteal phase (days 5-12) following human chorionic gonadotropin administration and complete data on cycle outcome were included. RESULTS: Clinical pregnancy was achieved in 295/1,554 (19.0%) cycles; 87.5% of these led to live births (16.6%/cycle). Including and excluding multiple pregnancy data, 88% and 86% of all live births had P4 values >10 ng/mL, respectively. Overall clinical pregnancy rate plateaued at midluteal P4 levels >25 ng/mL but, when multiple pregnancies were excluded, plateaued at 20-25 ng/mL and then decreased. Mean midluteal P4 levels were twice as high in multiple versus singleton pregnancies. CONCLUSION: A midluteal P4 level >10 ng/mL may represent an appropriate threshold for indication of ovulation resulting in live birth. Multiple pregnancies were associated with higher mean midluteal P4 levels.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in men with isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (rhFSH; follitropin alpha) in increasing sperm concentration in 26 men with severe isolated hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH). DESIGN: Clinical and endocrine studies using an open design. SETTING: Six university clinical sites in three European countries. PATIENT(S): Azoospermatic patients aged 16 to 48 years with IHH. INTERVENTION(S): Patients received hCG for up to 6 months before 18 months of treatment with rhFSH. Sperm count, motility, and morphology were assessed every 3 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Achievement of a sperm concentration of 1.5 x 10(6)/mL. RESULT(S): Spermatogenesis was achieved in 15 of 19 patients who could be evaluated, 12 achieving a sperm concentration of > or =1.5 x 10(6)/mL. CONCLUSION(S): With hCG, rhFSH is effective in initiating spermatogenesis in patients with IHH, and is well tolerated.

A comparison of 3-day and daily follicle-stimulating hormone injections on stimulation days 1-6 in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ovarian hyperstimulation by intermittent doses of 450 IU of recombinant human (h)FSH compared with daily 150-IU doses of recombinant hFSH. DESIGN: A pilot, open, randomized, parallel-group study. SETTING: Center for Reproductive Medicine, Düsseldorf, Germany. PATIENT(S): Infertile women with indication for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection after at least 1 year of unprotected intercourse. INTERVENTION(S): Recombinant hFSH was administered daily or intermittently (3-day intervals) from days 1 to 6 of stimulation and thereafter by daily injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Number of preovulatory follicles, retrieved oocytes, two-pronuclei (2PN) zygotes, implantation, and pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): The number of oocytes in the daily-dose group was significantly greater. There were no significant differences in mean values for number of follicles > or =11 mm (except for day 7) and > or =14 mm, 2PN zygotes, and number of transferred embryos. Implantation and pregnancy rates per cycle were in favor of the intermittent 450-IU dose regimen; implantation rates were 17.0% and 9.8% in the 3-day-dose and daily-dose groups, respectively, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates were 33.3% and 15.7% and 25.5% and 13.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): Intermittent administration of recombinant hFSH significantly reduces the total number of recombinant hFSH injections, compared with a conventional FSH regimen, without detrimental effects on implantation rate or pregnancy rate.

A combined analysis of data to identify predictive factors for spermatogenesis in men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism treated with recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH) and hCG treatment for male hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) in different populations and to identify characteristics predictive of spermatogenesis. DESIGN: A combined analysis of data from four clinical trials. SETTING: Phase III, open-label, noncomparative studies with similar designs conducted in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the United States. PATIENT(S): One hundred men with complete idiopathic or acquired HH. INTERVENTION(S): Pretreatment with hCG for 3-6 months, followed by combination therapy with hCG and r-hFSH (150 IU three times weekly) for up to 18 months. Doses of r-hFSH were adjusted according to spermatozoa count until the maximum dose was reached. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary efficacy endpoint was a spermatozoa concentration of >or=1.5 x 10(6)/mL. RESULT(S): A total of 81 men remained azoospermic but achieved normal serum T concentrations after hCG pretreatment. Of these, 68 (84.0%) achieved spermatogenesis and 56 (69.1%) achieved spermatozoa concentrations >or=1.5 x 10(6)/mL. Large baseline mean testicular volume, low body mass index, and advanced sexual maturity were predictors of good response to therapy. Similar treatment responses were observed across different study populations. CONCLUSION(S): R-hFSH (combined with hCG) is effective for the restoration of fertility in the majority of men with HH.