RESUMO
BACKGROUND. Distal pancreatitis is an atypical imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis involving only the pancreatic body and tail, the head being spared. If no cause is identified, suspicion of a small imaging-occult cancer may be warranted. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of subsequently diagnosed pancreatic cancer in patients with unexplained acute distal pancreatitis and to compare this frequency to that found in patients with unexplained nondistal pancreatitis. METHODS. This retrospective study included patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020, that showed acute pancreatitis without identifiable explanation. Studies were classified as showing distal or nondistal acute pancreatitis on the basis of consensus. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the frequency of subsequent histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer between groups. Negative classification required 6 or more months of imaging follow-up and/or 12 or more months of clinical follow-up. Interreader agreement among seven readers of varying experience was assessed by Fleiss kappa. RESULTS. Among 215 patients with acute pancreatitis, 116 (54%) had no identifiable explanation and formed the study sample. A total of 100 of 116 (86%) patients (59 men, 41 women; mean age, 57 ± 18 [SD] years) had nondistal acute pancreatitis; 16 of 116 (14%) patients (10 men, six women; mean age, 66 ± 14 years) had distal acute pancreatitis. Among patients with nondistal pancreatitis, none were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer; 62 had sufficient follow-up (median, 2.5 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. Among patients with distal pancreatitis, nine were subsequently diagnosed with pancreatic cancer (median interval to suspected cancer on subsequent CT, 174 days); five had sufficient follow-up (median, 3.1 years) to be classified as having negative follow-up for pancreatic cancer. The frequency of pancreatic cancer was higher (p < .001) in patients with distal pancreatitis (9/14 [64%; 95% CI, 35-87%]) than in with those with nondistal pancreatitis (0/62 [0%; 95% CI, 0-6%]). Interreader agreement on classification of distal versus nondistal pancreatitis was almost perfect (κ = 0.81). CONCLUSION. Distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause on CT is an uncommon but unique imaging subtype of acute pancreatitis that is associated with a high frequency of pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL IMPACT. In patients with acute distal pancreatitis without identifiable cause, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy should be considered to evaluate for an underlying small cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Pancreatite , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pancreatite/diagnóstico por imagem , Pancreatite/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Doença Aguda , Pâncreas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
Mucin-producing neoplasms in the abdomen and pelvis are a distinct entity, separate from simple fluid-containing neoplasms and loculated fluid collections. Mucin is a thick gelatinous substance and-owing to its high water content-has imaging features that can be mistaken for those of simple fluid-containing neoplasms with multiple imaging modalities. However, mucin-producing neoplasms arise from specific organs in the abdomen and pelvis, with unique imaging appearances, knowledge of which is important to guide accurate diagnosis and management. With its large field of view and high soft-tissue resolution, MRI has advantages over other imaging modalities in characterizing these neoplasms. The authors focus on the spectrum of MRI features of such mucin-producing neoplasms and illustrate how-despite a varied organ origin-some of these neoplasms share similar MRI and histopathologic features, thereby helping narrow the differential diagnosis. One common finding in these tumors is that the presence of internal complexity and solid enhancing components increases as the degree of malignant transformation increases. Lack of internal complexity generally indicates benignity. These tumors have a varied range of prognosis; for example, a low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasm is indicative of a good prognosis, while a mucinous tumor of the rectum is known to manifest at an early age with aggressive behavior and poorer prognosis compared with its nonmucinous counterpart. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Assuntos
Cavidade Abdominal , Neoplasias do Apêndice , Cavidade Abdominal/patologia , Neoplasias do Apêndice/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias do Apêndice/patologia , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Mucinas , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Pelve/patologiaRESUMO
We report a patient who presented with a 4-month history of intermittent epigastric pain. Computed tomography (CT) angiography of the abdomen demonstrated a stenotic celiac trunk but also encasement of the common proper hepatic artery, gastroduodenal artery, and proper hepatic artery by an ill-defined hypoattenuating mass of the pancreatic head. Biopsy confirmed metastatic prostate cancer to the pancreas that occurred 4 years after radiation and androgen deprivation therapy. A follow-up staging study demonstrated an osseous metastasis at the T4 spinous process. This case demonstrates an unusual case of prostate metastasis to the pancreas with the involvement of a main abdominal vessel. With treatment improvements leading to longer survival rates from prostate cancer, radiologists should be aware of atypical metastases that may arise in the long term.
RESUMO
Incidental splenic focal findings are commonly encountered in clinical practice and frequently represent a diagnostic dilemma due to nonspecific imaging features. Most are benign, particularly in patients without a history of malignancy and without symptoms of fever, weight loss, or left upper quadrant or epigastric pain. Incidental malignant splenic processes are exceedingly rare. This article reviews imaging characteristics of incidental focal splenic findings, and proposes a practical approach for management of such findings, which can prevent unnecessary workup and its related drawbacks in clinical practice.